AGRI no longer trades under this symbol. Its last trade on record was Mar 13, 2026. The price and figures on this page are from its last trading day and final filings, and are no longer updated.
Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio N/A · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE N/A. (2018–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | — | $25M | $9M | $5M | $184M | $284M | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | — | $3M | $10M | $5M | $187M | $276M | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | — | — | 127.98 | 301.45 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | — | 0.13 | 1.42 | 0.57 | 17.44 | 35.51 | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | — | 142.63 | 316.89 | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | — | — | -31.3% | 16.6% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | — | -15322.6% | -68502.6% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Profit Margin | — | — | -23973.4% | -72066.9% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | — | -34.4% | -221.8% | -122.8% | -138.8% | -141.3% | -146.5% | -346.5% | — |
| ROA | — | -32.3% | -115.7% | -59.8% | -76.6% | -87.8% | -83.3% | -222.8% | -1224.8% |
| ROIC | — | -27.9% | -98.0% | -74.0% | -145.8% | -986.4% | -310.3% | -1071.4% | — |
| ROCE | — | -33.1% | -117.1% | -80.2% | -105.2% | -127.0% | -151.0% | -346.5% | — |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | — | — | 0.24 | 0.48 | 0.52 | 0.01 | 0.02 | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.12 | 0.16 | 0.03 | 0.31 | -0.97 | -0.44 | -0.72 | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | — | — | -4.46 | -0.47 | -2.79 | -12.74 | — | — | — |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | — | 4.19 | 0.30 | 0.70 | 0.54 | 3.55 | 0.45 | 1.68 | 0.74 |
| Quick Ratio | — | 4.19 | 0.24 | 0.69 | 0.44 | 3.44 | 0.37 | 1.68 | 0.52 |
| Cash Ratio | — | 2.77 | 0.11 | 0.64 | 0.42 | 3.40 | 0.34 | 1.57 | 0.30 |
| Asset Turnover | — | — | 0.01 | 0.00 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | 0.33 | 0.35 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | 1018.16 | 691.82 | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | — | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | — | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $17M | $407311 | $11605 | $3616 | $3035 | $2904 | $2904 | $323 |
Includes 30+ ratios · 8 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying AGRI stock.
Based on historical data, AgriFORCE Growing Systems Ltd. is trading at valuation metrics that vary. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Total capital depletion risk
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Distressed Pricing Reflects Operational Stagnation
According to recent market data, AGRI trades at a P/S multiple of 4.59, which appears highly speculative given the company's reported -100% revenue growth and the total absence of any meaningful commercial activity to justify such a premium over its distressed book value.
The current valuation suggests that the market is pricing the company as a distressed shell rather than an operational ag-tech entity. Investors should monitor whether the P/B ratio of 0.05 indicates a genuine asset-backed floor or merely reflects the market's expectation of further impairment to intangible assets.
Persistent Destruction of Invested Capital
Based on reported financial statements, the company's ROIC has remained consistently negative, reaching -23.9% in 2026Q1, which underscores a structural inability to generate returns on the capital deployed into its proprietary facility engineering and ingredient processing technology initiatives.
The trend of decaying returns suggests that management's capital allocation strategy has failed to achieve commercial scale. This persistent negative return profile warrants further investigation into whether the company's intellectual property holds any latent economic value or if it is merely a sink for ongoing R&D expenditures.
Operational Inefficiency and Working Capital
As indicated by the quarterly data, the company's asset turnover ratio has stagnated near zero, reflecting a complete lack of operational throughput and an inability to convert its specialized agricultural infrastructure into a functional, revenue-generating business model.
The erratic nature of the cash conversion cycle, when data is available, highlights a lack of disciplined working capital management. This inefficiency appears to be a symptom of a business model that has yet to transition from a theoretical R&D phase to a repeatable commercial process.
Misapplication of Book Value Metrics
Based on the provided financial data, the Price-to-Book ratio is the most commonly misapplied metric for this business model, as it obscures the reality that the company's assets are primarily intangible and subject to significant impairment risk in the absence of commercial revenue.
Investors should instead focus on the cash burn rate and the remaining liquidity runway, as the book value likely overstates the firm's true worth. Relying on P/B ratios in this context may lead to a false sense of security regarding the company's underlying asset base.