Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 30.5x · EV/EBITDA 22.6x · ROE 22.4%. (1997–2026 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $12.3B | $12.8B | $9.0B | $7.6B | $5.7B | $3.8B | $3.6B | $2.4B | $2.4B | $2.8B | $2.3B |
| Enterprise Value | $12.5B | $12.9B | $9.2B | $7.9B | $6.0B | $4.4B | $4.2B | $3.1B | $3.3B | $3.7B | $2.5B |
| P/E Ratio → | 30.45 | 30.88 | 22.97 | 19.74 | 16.38 | 14.62 | 24.74 | 100.63 | 16.72 | 19.43 | 17.37 |
| P/S Ratio | 2.48 | 2.58 | 1.98 | 1.70 | 1.29 | 0.99 | 1.11 | 0.75 | 0.69 | 0.90 | 0.90 |
| P/B Ratio | 6.78 | 6.88 | 4.89 | 4.51 | 3.89 | 3.27 | 3.84 | 2.88 | 2.69 | 3.38 | 3.12 |
| P/FCF | 26.76 | 27.80 | 19.40 | 21.98 | 17.89 | 22.19 | 15.84 | 8.80 | 14.91 | 22.21 | 15.77 |
| P/OCF | 25.46 | 26.44 | 18.32 | 20.51 | 16.51 | 20.05 | 14.80 | 8.20 | 13.34 | 18.71 | 14.13 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 2.60 | 2.02 | 1.76 | 1.35 | 1.15 | 1.31 | 0.95 | 0.94 | 1.19 | 0.97 |
| EV / EBITDA | 22.56 | 23.43 | 16.47 | 14.39 | 11.32 | 10.64 | 16.27 | 20.42 | 11.01 | 13.29 | 11.73 |
| EV / EBIT | 22.68 | 23.43 | 17.73 | 15.21 | 12.55 | 12.27 | 20.40 | 14.08 | 13.85 | 16.01 | 14.30 |
| EV / FCF | — | 28.09 | 19.79 | 22.77 | 18.77 | 25.83 | 18.78 | 11.20 | 20.16 | 29.54 | 17.03 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 30.3% | 30.3% | 30.3% | 29.8% | 29.2% | 29.0% | 28.9% | 28.9% | 29.0% | 28.8% | 28.4% |
| Operating Margin | 11.1% | 11.1% | 10.9% | 11.1% | 10.7% | 9.4% | 6.3% | 2.7% | 6.7% | 7.3% | 6.7% |
| Net Profit Margin | 8.3% | 8.3% | 8.6% | 8.6% | 7.9% | 6.8% | 4.5% | 0.7% | 4.1% | 4.6% | 5.2% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 22.4% | 22.4% | 22.2% | 24.5% | 26.6% | 24.7% | 16.3% | 2.8% | 16.8% | 18.2% | 19.1% |
| ROA | 13.4% | 13.4% | 12.8% | 13.5% | 13.3% | 10.9% | 6.4% | 1.0% | 6.2% | 7.7% | 9.9% |
| ROIC | 20.5% | 20.5% | 18.7% | 20.1% | 20.3% | 16.0% | 9.9% | 4.1% | 10.1% | 12.8% | 14.1% |
| ROCE | 21.8% | 21.8% | 19.5% | 21.3% | 22.8% | 18.8% | 11.1% | 4.7% | 12.4% | 15.4% | 16.5% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.14 | 0.14 | 0.31 | 0.44 | 0.43 | 0.70 | 0.99 | 1.11 | 1.07 | 1.18 | 0.39 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 0.47 | 0.47 | 1.02 | 1.34 | 1.18 | 1.95 | 3.53 | 6.15 | 3.24 | 3.50 | 1.36 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.07 | 0.10 | 0.16 | 0.19 | 0.54 | 0.71 | 0.79 | 0.95 | 1.12 | 0.25 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.24 | 0.24 | 0.33 | 0.50 | 0.53 | 1.50 | 2.54 | 4.38 | 2.87 | 3.30 | 0.87 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 0.29 | 0.40 | 0.79 | 0.88 | 3.63 | 2.93 | 2.41 | 5.26 | 7.33 | 1.26 |
| Interest Coverage | 69.57 | 69.57 | 15.12 | 25.25 | 19.14 | 13.31 | 6.75 | 5.91 | 5.77 | 9.48 | 19.91 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.58 | 2.58 | 3.32 | 3.53 | 3.05 | 2.72 | 2.80 | 2.72 | 2.71 | 2.45 | 2.85 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.75 | 1.75 | 2.36 | 2.56 | 2.12 | 1.82 | 1.95 | 1.81 | 1.65 | 1.47 | 1.73 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.21 | 0.21 | 0.74 | 0.92 | 0.64 | 0.37 | 0.60 | 0.63 | 0.26 | 0.13 | 0.34 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.65 | 1.44 | 1.52 | 1.61 | 1.55 | 1.42 | 1.42 | 1.49 | 1.34 | 1.87 |
| Inventory Turnover | 6.80 | 6.80 | 6.29 | 6.44 | 6.24 | 6.01 | 6.35 | 5.93 | 5.51 | 5.19 | 5.38 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 61.09 | 61.56 | 60.10 | 58.59 | 62.88 | 58.24 | 50.61 | 56.85 | 65.18 | 55.01 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.6% | 0.6% | 0.7% | 0.7% | 0.9% | 1.4% | 1.4% | 2.0% | 2.0% | 1.7% | 1.9% |
| Payout Ratio | 17.5% | 17.5% | 16.2% | 14.5% | 15.4% | 20.1% | 35.0% | 203.3% | 32.8% | 32.4% | 33.3% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 3.3% | 3.2% | 4.4% | 5.1% | 6.1% | 6.8% | 4.0% | 1.0% | 6.0% | 5.1% | 5.8% |
| FCF Yield | 3.7% | 3.6% | 5.2% | 4.6% | 5.6% | 4.5% | 6.3% | 11.4% | 6.7% | 4.5% | 6.3% |
| Buyback Yield | 2.6% | 2.5% | 1.7% | 1.0% | 0.0% | 0.4% | 1.1% | 0.1% | 0.5% | 0.8% | 0.4% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 3.1% | 3.0% | 2.4% | 1.7% | 1.0% | 1.7% | 2.5% | 2.1% | 2.4% | 2.5% | 2.3% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $38M | $39M | $39M | $39M | $39M | $39M | $39M | $39M | $39M | $39M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying AIT stock.
Applied Industrial Technologies, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 30.5x. The historical average is 26.8x. This places it at the 87th percentile of its historical range.
Applied Industrial Technologies, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 22.6x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 10.7x.
Applied Industrial Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 22.4%. This is above the typical threshold of 15-20% considered good for most companies. The historical average is 14.7%.
Based on historical data, Applied Industrial Technologies, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 30.5x. This is at the 87th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Applied Industrial Technologies, Inc.'s current dividend yield is 0.58% with a payout ratio of 17.5%.
Applied Industrial Technologies, Inc. has 30.3% gross margin and 11.1% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
Applied Industrial Technologies, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 0.5x, indicating low leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Valuation premium vulnerable to macro softening
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Premium Valuation Reflects Technical Pivot
Applied Industrial's forward P/E of 30.26 and EV/EBITDA of 20.70 represent a significant premium to its historical median, suggesting the market is pricing in a successful transition from a commodity distributor to a higher-margin technical solutions provider.
The current valuation multiples, particularly the P/E of 29.59, are elevated compared to the broader industrial distribution sector, indicating investors are paying for expected margin expansion and growth from the Fluid Power segment. This premium appears contingent on the company sustaining its recent gross margin expansion to 31.6% and demonstrating that the technical integration model can drive durable, above-peer returns on capital. Any deceleration in industrial activity or failure to execute the mix shift could lead to a sharp multiple compression.
Margin Expansion Driven by Technical Mix
Gross margin expanded to a ten-quarter high of 31.6% in Q4 2026, suggesting that AIT's shift toward engineered fluid power systems is successfully insulating it from pure commodity cost pressures and enhancing its pricing power.
The consistent operating margin above 10% and net margin near 9% indicate strong underlying profitability, supported by disciplined SG&A management. The recent gross margin improvement is the most critical trend, as it validates the strategic pivot toward higher-value technical services. This margin structure appears more resilient than that of pure-play logistics-focused distributors, though it remains sensitive to input cost inflation and the timing of price pass-throughs.
Stable Returns Mask Underlying Efficiency Gains
ROIC has remained stable in the 4.7%-5.5% range over the past ten quarters, but the recent improvement in asset turnover to 0.45 suggests the company is generating more revenue per dollar of assets, a positive signal for future capital efficiency.
The stable ROE and ROIC figures, while not exceptional, are being achieved with minimal financial leverage, which is a sign of high-quality, internally generated returns. The recent uptick in asset turnover is a key development to monitor, as it indicates the business is becoming more efficient at utilizing its asset base, potentially driven by better inventory management or a shift toward less capital-intensive technical services. This trend, if sustained, could provide a pathway to higher returns without requiring increased leverage.
Working Capital Management Shows Cyclical Flexibility
The cash conversion cycle improved to 75 days in Q4 2026 from 88 days in Q2 2026, indicating that management is actively optimizing working capital, likely by accelerating collections or extending payables amid shifting demand patterns.
The reduction in days inventory outstanding from 63 to 51 days over the same period is particularly noteworthy, suggesting improved inventory turnover and potentially better alignment of stock with customer orders. This operational flexibility is crucial for a distributor navigating cyclical industrial demand. The stable days sales outstanding around 56-59 days indicates consistent customer payment terms, while the modest increase in days payable outstanding provides a modest source of operational cash flow.
Minimal Leverage Provides Cyclical Insulation
With a debt-to-equity ratio of just 0.26 and interest coverage exceeding 1,150x in Q4 2026, Applied Industrial's balance sheet is exceptionally conservative, virtually eliminating direct financial risk from rising interest rates.
The company's negligible leverage is a significant structural advantage, particularly in a higher-rate environment where many industrial peers face increased interest burdens. This financial strength provides substantial flexibility to pursue opportunistic acquisitions without straining the balance sheet. However, the extreme conservatism also raises questions about capital efficiency; the substantial cash pile of $388 million may represent an opportunity cost if not deployed effectively for growth or shareholder returns.
The Misapplied P/E Multiple
The P/E ratio is the most commonly misapplied metric for AIT, as it fails to account for the company's low capital intensity and high cash conversion, which make its earnings stream more valuable than those of asset-heavy industrial peers.
Investors often compare AIT's P/E to other industrial companies without adjusting for its minimal capital expenditure requirements (consistently below 1% of revenue) and strong free cash flow generation. This leads to an underappreciation of the quality of its earnings. A more appropriate metric would be the Price/Free Cash Flow ratio, which at 26.00 better reflects the cash-generative nature of the business model. Alternatively, using an EV/EBITDA multiple that accounts for the company's net cash position would provide a more accurate valuation framework for this low-leverage, high-working-capital business.