VCP ScannerFree US Stock Screener & Financial AnalysisFree US Stock Screener
ScreenerThemes
DCF ValuationCalculate intrinsic value of US stocks
Market ValuationBuffett indicator, CAPE & macro gauges
Total ReturnSee dividends + price return history
DCA CalculatorSimulate recurring buys & compounding
Earnings
FAANG & Tech
AAPL vs MSFTNVDA vs AMDGOOGL vs META
Cloud & Cyber
CRM vs NOWCRWD vs PANWSNOW vs DDOG
Consumer & Auto
TSLA vs FAMZN vs WMTNFLX vs DIS
Finance & Crypto
JPM vs BACV vs MACOIN vs MSTR
Pharma & Energy
LLY vs NVOJNJ vs PFEXOM vs CVX
Compare Any Stocks...
WatchlistInsider
ScreenerThemes
Earnings
WatchlistInsider
AKAa.k.a. Brands Holding Corp.
$10.48$113M
Overview & Verdict
Overview
Valuation & Forecasts
Valuation ModelsEstimatesDCF Model
Price & Analyst Data
Analyst TargetsPrice HistoryTechnical Analysis
Financial Statements
Income StatementBalance SheetCash FlowRatios & Margins
Performance
P/E HistoryRevenue HistoryEarnings HistoryDividend HistoryTotal Return
Ownership
Holders
← Back to Screener
VCP ScannerFree US Stock Screener & Financial Analysis

Find stocks. Verify deeply. Act with conviction.

Data updated daily

Product

  • Screener
  • Themes
  • Valuation
  • Total Return
  • DCA Calculator
  • News
  • Earnings

Resources

  • Market Valuation
  • Compare
  • Insider Activity
  • Methodology
  • How It Works
  • Glossary
  • Learn

Get Ideas

Get weekly stock ideas — free

© 2026 VCP Scanner
AboutPrivacyTerms
Not financial advice. Do your own research.
ScreenerNewsCompareWatchlist
  1. Home
  2. Financial Ratios

  1. Home
  2. Stocks
  3. AKA
  4. Financial Ratios

a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. (AKA) Financial Ratios

Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -3.6x · EV/EBITDA 27.8x · ROE -29.2%. (2019–2025 historical series)

Income StatementBalance SheetCash FlowRatios
AnnualQuarterly

AKA Valuation Multiples

Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019
Market Cap$113M$115M$198M$86M$163M$1.2B——
Enterprise Value$305M$306M$357M$201M$302M$1.3B——
P/E Ratio →-3.58———————
P/S Ratio0.190.190.340.160.272.12——
P/B Ratio1.151.171.680.580.662.64——
P/FCF———3.15—77.31——
P/OCF6.906.98295.712.58—49.65——

P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart

AKA EV Ratios

Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019
EV / Revenue—0.510.620.370.492.29——
EV / EBITDA27.7527.8749.10——38.89——
EV / EBIT—————303.12——
EV / FCF———7.32—83.61——

AKA Profitability

Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency

Margins

Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019
Gross Margin54.4%54.4%57.0%55.0%55.1%54.7%58.5%54.5%
Operating Margin-1.1%-1.1%-1.8%-15.3%-28.1%2.9%10.3%2.5%
Net Profit Margin-5.2%-5.2%-4.5%-18.1%-28.9%-1.1%6.6%1.4%

Return on Capital

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019
ROE-29.2%-29.2%-19.5%-50.0%-50.6%-2.0%11.4%1.2%
ROA-8.0%-8.0%-7.0%-22.7%-29.5%-1.4%8.5%1.0%
ROIC-1.8%-1.8%-2.9%-19.3%-27.6%3.7%14.1%1.7%
ROCE-2.3%-2.3%-3.7%-23.9%-34.4%4.5%16.1%2.0%

AKA Leverage & Debt

Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019
Debt / Equity2.172.171.560.920.750.300.080.06
Debt / EBITDA19.2719.2725.23——4.110.380.82
Net Debt / Equity—1.961.360.770.560.22-0.120.01
Net Debt / EBITDA17.4317.4321.91——2.93-0.560.16
Debt / FCF———4.18—6.30-0.82—
Interest Coverage-0.68-0.68-1.10-7.68-24.640.4566.8210.02

AKA Liquidity & Efficiency

Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019
Current Ratio1.231.231.491.582.241.711.591.59
Quick Ratio0.410.410.510.520.800.630.690.34
Cash Ratio0.190.190.250.250.520.360.660.30
Asset Turnover—1.511.491.511.200.821.140.70
Inventory Turnover3.183.182.582.702.172.202.431.96
Days Sales Outstanding—6.485.153.201.931.732.001.42

AKA Shareholder Yields

Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders

Dividends

Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019
Dividend Yield————————
Payout Ratio————————

Total Shareholder Return Metrics

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019
Earnings Yield————————
FCF Yield———31.8%—1.3%——
Buyback Yield1.7%1.7%0.8%2.4%0.0%0.0%——
Total Shareholder Yield1.7%1.7%0.8%2.4%0.0%0.0%——
Shares Outstanding—$11M$11M$11M$11M$11M$11M$11M

Key Metrics

Growth RegimeMixed
ProfitabilityNegative
Balance SheetVulnerable
Cash FlowBurning
Top Statement Risk

Liquidity and solvency pressure

Verified Source

Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.

SEC 10-K (2026Q1)

Distressed Pricing Reflects Operational Uncertainty

According to current market data, AKA trades at a P/S multiple of 0.19, which, when paired with a negative TTM P/E of -3.58, suggests that investors are pricing the company as a distressed asset rather than a growth-oriented digital platform relative to peers like Revolve Group.

The low P/S ratio indicates that the market assigns minimal value to the company's revenue stream, likely due to the persistent inability to convert top-line sales into positive net income. This valuation gap warrants further investigation into whether the market is discounting the brand portfolio's long-term viability or simply reacting to the company's precarious liquidity position.

Capital Efficiency Decay Remains Persistent

Based on reported financial figures, AKA's ROIC has remained consistently negative, bottoming at -2.7% in 2025Q4, which indicates that the company is currently destroying shareholder value rather than compounding returns on the capital deployed into its brand incubation and physical retail expansion strategies.

The inability to achieve a positive return on invested capital suggests that the costs associated with scaling the brand portfolio and maintaining physical shrines are currently outpacing the economic benefits generated by these assets. Investors should monitor whether management can pivot toward a more capital-efficient model, as the current trend appears to be one of structural value erosion.

Working Capital Cycles Indicate Inefficiency

As reported in recent financial statements, AKA's cash conversion cycle has fluctuated significantly, reaching 92 days in 2026Q1, which highlights a persistent struggle to optimize inventory turnover and manage supplier payment terms effectively within its highly discretionary and trend-sensitive apparel business model.

The high days inventory outstanding, which peaked at 162 days in 2024Q1, suggests that the company may be carrying excessive or obsolete stock, tying up critical liquidity. This inefficiency in working capital management appears to be a primary driver of the company's ongoing cash burn, as the business fails to convert its inventory into cash at a pace sufficient to fund operations.

Rising Debt Burden Constrains Flexibility

According to the company's latest filings, the debt-to-equity ratio has climbed to 2.28 in 2026Q1, a significant increase from 0.92 in 2023Q4, signaling that the firm is increasingly reliant on debt to bridge the gap between its operational cash outflows and its limited internal funding sources.

The negative interest coverage ratio of -1.88 in the most recent quarter suggests that the company is currently unable to service its debt obligations from operating earnings alone. This leverage profile appears increasingly unsustainable, and investors should monitor the risk of potential covenant breaches or the need for dilutive equity financing to maintain solvency.

Misapplication of Adjusted EBITDA Metrics

Based on an analysis of the company's financial reporting, the most commonly misapplied metric is Adjusted EBITDA, which frequently excludes significant restructuring and brand integration costs that are, in reality, recurring operational expenses necessary to maintain the company's multi-brand platform structure.

By focusing on Adjusted EBITDA, analysts may overlook the true cash-consuming nature of the business, as these adjustments mask the ongoing costs of maintaining the company's infrastructure. A more accurate assessment of the company's health would prioritize free cash flow and operating cash flow, which better reflect the actual cash burn associated with the current business model.

Download Financial Ratios Data

Includes 30+ ratios · 7 years · Updated daily

Consensus-Based Analysis Tools

Intrinsic Valuation

DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.

Check Valuation

Historical Returns

10-year return with dividends reinvested.

Calculate

DCA Calculator

See how regular investing compounds over time.

Run Numbers

Peer Comparison

Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.

Compare

AKA — Frequently Asked Questions

Quick answers to the most common questions about buying AKA stock.

What is a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp.'s P/E ratio?

a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp.'s current P/E ratio is -3.6x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.

What is a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp.'s EV/EBITDA?

a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp.'s current EV/EBITDA is 27.8x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 38.6x.

What is a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp.'s ROE?

a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp.'s return on equity (ROE) is -29.2%. The historical average is -19.8%.

Is AKA stock overvalued?

Based on historical data, a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. is trading at a P/E of -3.6x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.

What are a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp.'s profit margins?

a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. has 54.4% gross margin and -1.1% operating margin.

How much debt does a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. have?

a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 19.3x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.