Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 61.7x · EV/EBITDA 30.7x · ROE 3.3%. (2006–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $59M | $64M | $73M | $32M | $8M | $19M | $26M | $5M | $6M | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $49M | $54M | $59M | $23M | $7M | $16M | $15M | $8M | $2M | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | 61.69 | 66.00 | 12.48 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 1.45 | 1.57 | 2.28 | 1.21 | 0.41 | 1.99 | 5.28 | 1.54 | 4.12 | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 1.86 | 1.99 | 2.75 | 2.44 | 0.56 | 0.80 | 1.59 | 1.82 | 1.63 | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | 8.25 | 6.88 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | 8.16 | 6.80 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.33 | 1.86 | 0.88 | 0.39 | 1.66 | 3.16 | 2.55 | 1.58 | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 30.66 | 33.75 | 7.36 | 6.47 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | 105.05 | 32.27 | 7.98 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | 6.71 | 4.98 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 58.5% | 58.5% | 75.1% | 70.9% | 54.7% | 49.8% | 48.9% | 42.5% | 46.0% | 46.8% | 39.3% |
| Operating Margin | 1.2% | 1.2% | 22.3% | 3.1% | -65.1% | -107.7% | -231.9% | -298.1% | -628.0% | -665.7% | -871.6% |
| Net Profit Margin | 2.4% | 2.4% | 18.2% | -20.8% | -70.9% | -136.0% | -160.6% | -395.8% | -801.7% | -484.8% | -1058.4% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 3.3% | 3.3% | 29.2% | -41.7% | -70.1% | -65.0% | -82.6% | -400.7% | -343.1% | -246.4% | -726.8% |
| ROA | 2.4% | 2.4% | 21.1% | -26.0% | -49.6% | -48.9% | -38.4% | -107.4% | -191.2% | -116.1% | -306.9% |
| ROIC | 2.0% | 2.0% | 62.1% | 7.2% | -53.3% | -58.2% | -142.1% | -241.1% | — | — | -752.9% |
| ROCE | 1.5% | 1.5% | 34.5% | 5.8% | -61.2% | -47.8% | -100.4% | -215.2% | -201.8% | -220.1% | -410.5% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.06 | 0.15 | 0.23 | 0.02 | 0.04 | 2.76 | — | — | 0.05 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 1.64 | 1.64 | 0.20 | 0.55 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.30 | -0.51 | -0.67 | -0.02 | -0.14 | -0.64 | 1.20 | -1.00 | -1.12 | -1.06 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -5.99 | -5.99 | -1.68 | -2.47 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | -1.53 | -1.90 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | 6.27 | 6.27 | 18.81 | -8.37 | -38.21 | -78.26 | -25.78 | -20.90 | -21.84 | -20.61 | -612.38 |
Net cash position: cash ($12M) exceeds total debt ($3M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.21 | 2.21 | 2.30 | 2.39 | 0.79 | 2.20 | 2.65 | 0.41 | 3.07 | 2.85 | 1.68 |
| Quick Ratio | 2.21 | 2.21 | 2.30 | 2.39 | 0.79 | 2.20 | 2.65 | 0.41 | 3.07 | 2.85 | 1.68 |
| Cash Ratio | 1.07 | 1.07 | 1.85 | 1.96 | 0.40 | 1.79 | 2.33 | 0.32 | 2.33 | 2.24 | 1.37 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.89 | 0.91 | 1.32 | 0.83 | 0.31 | 0.21 | 0.18 | 0.23 | 0.18 | 0.26 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 117.03 | 42.83 | 32.93 | 50.18 | 83.52 | 115.19 | 127.82 | 270.14 | 268.75 | 108.68 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 1.6% | 1.5% | 8.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | 12.1% | 14.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $7M | $7M | $4M | $3M | $3M | $2M | $167149 | $10169 | $2305 | $1440 |
ISP partnership dependency
Based on recent financial data, Alarum trades at an EV/EBITDA multiple of 30.84, which appears to price in significant future growth expectations that may be disconnected from the company's current thin operating margins and the inherent volatility of its usage-based revenue model compared to broader infrastructure peers.
The current P/S ratio of 1.45 suggests the market is still struggling to categorize Alarum as a high-growth data infrastructure provider rather than a legacy cybersecurity firm. Investors should monitor whether the valuation premium can be sustained if the company fails to demonstrate consistent operating leverage as it scales.
According to reported figures, ROIC has experienced a sharp decline from 90.7% in 2024Q2 to 1.0% in 2025Q4, indicating that the company's recent aggressive capital deployment into infrastructure has yet to generate the compounding returns necessary to justify its current expansionary strategy and asset-heavy pivot.
The dramatic drop in return metrics suggests that the cost of acquiring and maintaining network capacity is outpacing the incremental revenue generated by new enterprise clients. This trend warrants further investigation into whether the company's current capital allocation strategy is creating long-term value or merely subsidizing growth.
As reported in recent quarterly filings, the company's DSO has expanded to 84 days in 2025Q4 from 30 days in 2023Q4, signaling a potential deterioration in collection efficiency that may be placing unnecessary strain on the firm's cash conversion cycle and overall operational liquidity.
The lengthening of the collection cycle suggests that Alarum may be offering more lenient payment terms to secure enterprise contracts, which could be a sign of increased competitive pressure. Investors should watch for further degradation in these metrics as a potential indicator of weakening customer leverage.
Based on the 2025Q4 balance sheet, Alarum maintains a current ratio of 2.21, which provides an adequate liquidity cushion to navigate the volatility of its usage-based revenue model despite the recent decline in cash reserves from the peak levels observed in 2024Q3.
While the liquidity position appears healthy, the reliance on cash to fund ongoing operations and infrastructure investment suggests that the company's runway is finite. The absence of significant debt obligations provides a degree of safety, but the lack of consistent free cash flow remains a primary concern.
Investors frequently misapply standard SaaS valuation multiples to Alarum, failing to account for the infrastructure-heavy nature of its proxy business which inherently limits gross margins compared to pure-play software firms, as evidenced by the recent compression of margins toward the 53.8% level in 2025Q4.
By ignoring the bandwidth and ISP partnership costs that act as a structural floor on profitability, analysts may be overestimating the company's potential for margin expansion. A more appropriate approach would involve evaluating the company as a data infrastructure utility rather than a high-margin software entity.
Includes 30+ ratios · 20 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying ALAR stock.
Alarum Technologies Ltd.'s current P/E ratio is 61.7x. The historical average is 39.2x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Alarum Technologies Ltd.'s current EV/EBITDA is 30.7x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 15.9x.
Alarum Technologies Ltd.'s return on equity (ROE) is 3.3%. The historical average is -105.6%.
Based on historical data, Alarum Technologies Ltd. is trading at a P/E of 61.7x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Alarum Technologies Ltd. has 58.5% gross margin and 1.2% operating margin.
Alarum Technologies Ltd.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 1.6x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.