Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -0.1x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE N/A. (2021–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1M | $1M | $479485 | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $7M | $8M | $5M | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -0.10 | — | 0.12 | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 152.73 | 191.27 | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1058.09 | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | 1.11 | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | 1.11 | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 100.0% | 100.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -73468.6% | -73468.6% | — | — | — | — |
| Net Profit Margin | -112373.7% | -112373.7% | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | — | — | — | -0.4% | -0.0% | -0.0% |
| ROA | -637.0% | -637.0% | 449.8% | -0.4% | -0.0% | -0.0% |
| ROIC | — | — | — | -0.3% | -0.0% | — |
| ROCE | — | — | — | -0.3% | -0.0% | -0.0% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | 1.17 | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | — | — | — | -0.00 | -0.00 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | 1.00 | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -1.01 | -1.01 | 25.30 | -3.58 | — | — |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.23 | 0.11 | 0.60 | 5.15 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.23 | 0.11 | 0.60 | 5.15 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.19 | 2.58 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.01 | — | — | — | — |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 6980.41 | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | 858.8% | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $27M | $6M | $13M | $30M | $31M |
Imminent Liquidity Exhaustion
Based on reported figures, the company trades at a P/S ratio of 152.73, which appears disconnected from its negligible revenue base and suggests that market participants are pricing the equity as a binary option on future patent litigation rather than as a viable, ongoing commercial software enterprise.
The extreme valuation multiple reflects a total absence of earnings, rendering traditional P/E or EV/EBITDA metrics irrelevant for assessing the company's intrinsic value. Investors should monitor whether this premium is supported by any tangible progress in licensing agreements, as the current pricing appears to be driven entirely by speculative sentiment regarding the patent portfolio.
As reported in financial statements, the company's operating margin of -73,468.59% underscores a profound lack of scalability, as the firm continues to accrue significant administrative overhead while failing to generate the high-volume throughput necessary to offset the fixed costs associated with its intellectual property holding strategy.
While the 100% gross margin is a technical artifact of the licensing model, it masks the reality of a business that is unable to cover its basic operating expenses. This suggests that the current cost structure is fundamentally unsustainable and requires a radical shift toward commercialization to avoid further margin erosion.
According to recent SEC filings, the company's cash reserves have dwindled to a precarious $68,000 as of 2025Q4, while the current ratio remains severely depressed at 0.09, indicating an inability to meet short-term obligations without immediate and substantial external capital injections to sustain basic operations.
The persistent decline in liquidity ratios over the last ten quarters suggests that the company is rapidly consuming its remaining capital to fund patent maintenance. This trend warrants close investigation, as the lack of a buffer leaves the firm highly vulnerable to any unexpected regulatory or legal costs.
Based on reported figures, the most commonly misapplied metric for this business model is the P/S ratio, which obscures the fact that the company is not a revenue-generating software entity but rather a distressed intellectual property holder with no proven ability to monetize its 571-patent portfolio.
Analysts should instead focus on 'Cash Burn Runway' and 'Patent Maintenance Costs' to gauge the firm's survival probability. Relying on standard software valuation multiples is misleading, as it ignores the binary risk that the underlying technology may become obsolete before any meaningful licensing revenue is ever realized.
Includes 30+ ratios · 5 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying AMODW stock.
Alpha Modus Holdings, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -0.1x. The historical average is 0.1x.
Based on historical data, Alpha Modus Holdings, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -0.1x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Alpha Modus Holdings, Inc. has 100.0% gross margin and -73468.6% operating margin.