Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 10.2x · EV/EBITDA 53.9x · ROE 35.6%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1.5B | $1.5B | $684M | $403M | $137M | $207M | $453M | $115M | $267M | $110M | $95M |
| Enterprise Value | $1.4B | $1.3B | $608M | $315M | $116M | $170M | $389M | $94M | $189M | $76M | $69M |
| P/E Ratio → | 10.18 | 11.10 | 113.38 | — | — | — | — | — | 9.97 | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 5.03 | 4.97 | 3.07 | 2.77 | 1.29 | 1.91 | 5.20 | 1.81 | 4.74 | 2.28 | 1.26 |
| P/B Ratio | 2.45 | 2.68 | 3.47 | 2.79 | 1.67 | 1.89 | 3.88 | 1.60 | 3.28 | 2.11 | 1.57 |
| P/FCF | 82.41 | 81.38 | 26.45 | 334.66 | — | — | — | — | 6.38 | — | — |
| P/OCF | 65.01 | 64.20 | 24.19 | 188.46 | — | — | — | — | 6.24 | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 4.50 | 2.73 | 2.16 | 1.10 | 1.57 | 4.46 | 1.48 | 3.36 | 1.58 | 0.92 |
| EV / EBITDA | 53.90 | 53.17 | 111.39 | — | — | — | — | — | 4.89 | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | 80.93 | 80.36 | 108.49 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 73.70 | 23.51 | 261.73 | — | — | — | — | 4.53 | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 29.8% | 29.8% | 27.8% | 24.2% | 8.0% | 12.4% | 20.0% | 14.8% | 24.9% | 7.8% | 14.4% |
| Operating Margin | 5.6% | 5.6% | -0.5% | -7.8% | -31.1% | -19.4% | -26.6% | -36.2% | 60.5% | -66.4% | -36.6% |
| Net Profit Margin | 44.7% | 44.7% | 2.7% | -7.6% | -33.1% | -17.7% | -26.0% | -26.8% | 47.6% | -67.7% | -36.4% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 35.6% | 35.6% | 3.5% | -9.8% | -36.7% | -17.0% | -24.0% | -22.3% | 40.1% | -58.3% | -38.1% |
| ROA | 25.2% | 25.2% | 2.2% | -5.4% | -20.1% | -11.2% | -15.5% | -14.0% | 25.8% | -34.8% | -23.2% |
| ROIC | 4.7% | 4.7% | -0.9% | -14.4% | -36.9% | -25.3% | -33.5% | -63.5% | 233.5% | -90.9% | -49.7% |
| ROCE | 4.1% | 4.1% | -0.6% | -9.3% | -31.2% | -17.0% | -21.9% | -26.6% | 44.8% | -49.9% | -33.9% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.05 | — | — | 0.02 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 0.16 | 0.16 | 0.62 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.25 | -0.39 | -0.61 | -0.25 | -0.34 | -0.55 | -0.29 | -0.95 | -0.65 | -0.42 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -5.54 | -5.54 | -13.94 | — | — | — | — | — | -2.01 | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | -7.68 | -2.94 | -72.93 | — | — | — | — | -1.86 | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | -71.91 |
Net cash position: cash ($144M) exceeds total debt ($4M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.39 | 2.39 | 2.07 | 2.11 | 1.26 | 1.75 | 2.58 | 2.30 | 3.64 | 2.46 | 1.73 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.65 | 1.65 | 1.36 | 1.58 | 0.82 | 1.31 | 2.26 | 1.84 | 3.22 | 1.73 | 1.19 |
| Cash Ratio | 1.04 | 1.04 | 0.80 | 1.15 | 0.28 | 0.75 | 1.79 | 1.34 | 2.73 | 1.25 | 0.83 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.40 | 0.72 | 0.63 | 0.60 | 0.62 | 0.52 | 0.51 | 0.47 | 0.55 | 0.75 |
| Inventory Turnover | 2.03 | 2.03 | 2.26 | 2.64 | 2.64 | 4.01 | 5.24 | 2.87 | 3.48 | 2.26 | 3.69 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 84.65 | 75.66 | 65.98 | 105.61 | 68.26 | 55.58 | 97.12 | 69.76 | 78.16 | 38.62 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 9.8% | 9.0% | 0.9% | — | — | — | — | — | 10.0% | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 1.2% | 1.2% | 3.8% | 0.3% | — | — | — | — | 15.7% | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.5% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.5% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $44M | $38M | $30M | $28M | $27M | $24M | $21M | $21M | $19M | $14M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying AMSC stock.
American Superconductor Corporation's current P/E ratio is 10.2x. The historical average is 53.7x. This places it at the 25th percentile of its historical range.
American Superconductor Corporation's current EV/EBITDA is 53.9x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 27.8x.
American Superconductor Corporation's return on equity (ROE) is 35.6%. This is above the typical threshold of 15-20% considered good for most companies. The historical average is -27.8%.
Based on historical data, American Superconductor Corporation is trading at a P/E of 10.2x. This is at the 25th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
American Superconductor Corporation has 29.8% gross margin and 5.6% operating margin.
American Superconductor Corporation's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 0.2x, indicating low leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Cyclical end-market concentration
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Defense-Tech Multiple or Industrial Trap
AMSC trades at 10.3x trailing earnings but 32.3x forward earnings, per current multiples, implying the market expects a sharp earnings decline from one-time gains. EV/EBITDA of 54.8x suggests investors are pricing in sustained growth.
The trailing P/E of 10.33 is artificially depressed by the $117.8M non-operating gain in 2025Q3, which inflated net income. The forward P/E of 32.28 is more indicative of the market's view on normalized earnings power, but it still implies a high growth expectation relative to the 5.64% operating margin. Compared to peers like Powell Industries (not shown) and Vicor (P/E 86.8), AMSC's forward multiple is not excessive if the company can sustain 30% revenue growth, but the EV/EBITDA of 54.8x leaves little room for margin disappointment. Investors should monitor whether the market re-rates AMSC as a defense technology firm, which would justify a higher multiple, or as an industrial supplier, which would compress it.
Operating Leverage Emerges from Hardware Mix
Gross margin fell to 26.3% in 2026Q1 from 33.8% a year earlier, per quarterly data, yet operating margin improved to 10.5% from 7.8%, indicating SG&A discipline is driving profitability. Net margin of 10.1% is distorted by one-time items.
The decline in gross margin reflects a hardware-heavy mix in the Grid segment and competitive bidding, but the operating margin expansion shows that the company is finally achieving scale efficiencies. The 10.5% operating margin in 2026Q1 is the highest in the ten-quarter series, up from 4.2% in 2025Q4, suggesting that the fixed-cost base is being covered. However, the net margin of 10.1% is far below the 158.1% spike in 2025Q3, which included a non-operating gain, so investors should focus on operating margin as the true measure of earning power. The recent guidance for gross margin improvement in H2 warrants monitoring, as any expansion would further boost operating leverage.
ROIC Inflection Still Nascent
ROIC improved to 1.7% in 2026Q1 from negative levels in 2024, per quarterly data, but remains far below the cost of capital. The 26.8% ROE in 2025Q3 was a one-off due to a non-operating gain, masking underlying returns.
The ten-quarter trend shows ROIC oscillating between -4.5% and 3.4%, with the latest 1.7% still insufficient to justify the capital employed. The recent equity raise of $128.5M and increased PP&E investment have expanded the capital base, but returns have not yet scaled proportionally. The 2025Q3 ROE of 26.8% is misleading because it was driven by the $117.8M gain, not operational performance. As the company grows into its asset base, ROIC should improve, but the current level suggests that value creation is still in early stages. Investors should monitor whether the increased investment in capacity and acquisitions translates into higher returns over the next four quarters.
Working Capital Drag from Project Cycles
Cash conversion cycle widened to 185 days in 2026Q1 from 164 days in 2023Q4, per quarterly data, driven by DSO of 73 days and DIO of 132 days. DPO remains low at 20 days, indicating limited supplier leverage.
The CCC has been consistently above 180 days over the past ten quarters, reflecting the long-cycle nature of naval and grid projects. DSO of 73 days is elevated, suggesting that customers, primarily government and utility entities, take time to pay, while DIO of 132 days indicates significant inventory buildup, possibly for project-specific components. DPO of 20 days is very low, meaning AMSC pays suppliers quickly, which may be a strategic choice to secure critical components but also ties up cash. The improvement in FCF margin to 5.9% in 2026Q1 suggests that working capital management is improving, but the absolute levels remain a drag on cash conversion. Investors should watch for any reduction in DSO or DIO as a sign of operational maturity.
Minimal Debt Masks Strategic Flexibility
AMSC's debt-to-equity ratio is 0.01 with total debt of $3.9M, per the latest balance sheet, and interest coverage is not reported due to negligible debt. This fortress-like balance sheet provides ample room for M&A or organic investment.
The company operates with virtually no leverage, which is unusual for an industrial manufacturer and provides significant financial flexibility. The D/EBITDA ratio of 0.31 in 2026Q1 is negligible, and the absence of interest coverage data confirms that debt service is not a concern. This low leverage is a strategic asset, especially if the company pursues acquisitions to consolidate the grid resiliency market, as suggested by the $144M cash pile. However, the historical reliance on equity raises to fund operations indicates that the balance sheet strength is partly a result of dilution, which has weighed on per-share metrics. Investors should monitor whether management uses this leverage capacity to fund growth without further diluting shareholders.
Liquidity Buffer Supports Growth Ambitions
Current ratio improved to 2.43 in 2026Q1 from 2.11 in 2023Q4, per quarterly data, with quick ratio at 1.74, indicating a strong liquidity position. Cash of $143.7M provides a cushion against project delays.
The current ratio has remained above 2.0 for the entire ten-quarter period, and the quick ratio of 1.74 suggests that even without selling inventory, the company can cover short-term obligations. The increase in cash to $143.7M, up from $79.5M a year earlier, reflects both the equity raise and improved cash generation. This liquidity is critical given the lumpy cash flows from long-cycle contracts and the potential for working capital swings. Under a severe stress scenario, such as a delay in naval contracts or a downturn in the wind segment, the company could likely weather the storm without needing external financing. However, the low DPO of 20 days means that AMSC is not using supplier financing to preserve cash, which could be an area for improvement.
Valuation Gap vs. Defense and Industrial Peers
AMSC's forward P/E of 32.3x is below Vicor's 86.8x but above Energy Recovery's 18.6x, per peer data, reflecting its hybrid defense-industrial profile. ROE of 1.7% lags peers, but growth is accelerating.
The peer group shows a wide dispersion in multiples, with AMSC trading at a premium to traditional industrial names like Energy Recovery but a discount to high-growth power electronics firms like Vicor. The company's ROE of 1.7% is far below Ituran's 29.0% and Vicor's 20.2%, indicating that profitability is still catching up to growth. However, the 30% revenue growth and improving operating margin suggest that the gap may narrow. The market appears to be pricing AMSC as a growth story, but the low ROIC and high EV/EBITDA imply that expectations are high. Investors should compare AMSC to defense technology firms like L3Harris, which trade at higher multiples, to assess whether the current valuation is justified.
Misapplied P/E Distorts True Earnings
The trailing P/E of 10.3 is misleading due to a one-time $117.8M gain in 2025Q3, per financial statements, which inflated net income. Investors should use EV/EBITDA or P/FCF to assess value.
The most commonly misapplied ratio for AMSC is the P/E ratio, because the trailing earnings include a massive non-operating gain that is not indicative of ongoing profitability. The 44.73% net margin in 2025Q3 is a clear red flag, and the trailing P/E of 10.33 would suggest the stock is cheap, but that is an artifact of the one-time item. Instead, investors should focus on EV/EBITDA, which at 54.8x reflects the market's view of core operating earnings, or P/FCF, which at 83.6x shows that cash generation is still limited. The forward P/E of 32.28 is more useful but still relies on analyst estimates that may be optimistic. A better approach is to use EV/sales or EV/EBIT to normalize for the non-recurring items and assess the company's true earnings power.