Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 16.8x · EV/EBITDA 9.3x · ROE 22.9%. (2000–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $5.4B | $4.5B | $4.0B | $2.4B | $1.4B | $1.1B | $1.3B | $1.4B | $820M | $731M | $911M |
| Enterprise Value | $7.8B | $7.0B | $6.2B | $4.0B | $2.9B | $2.7B | $3.0B | $3.2B | $2.3B | $2.1B | $2.3B |
| P/E Ratio → | 16.76 | 14.14 | 23.70 | 22.99 | 32.07 | 41.56 | — | 14.34 | 39.42 | 40.38 | — |
| P/S Ratio | 3.63 | 3.05 | 3.49 | 2.40 | 1.63 | 1.45 | 1.49 | 1.43 | 0.91 | 0.92 | 1.13 |
| P/B Ratio | 3.61 | 3.05 | 3.05 | 2.73 | 1.60 | 1.27 | 1.40 | 1.27 | 0.97 | 0.99 | 1.33 |
| P/FCF | 45.18 | 38.01 | 57.28 | 205.70 | — | 8.14 | 6.70 | — | — | — | 5.82 |
| P/OCF | 8.69 | 7.31 | 9.41 | 7.66 | 6.77 | 4.78 | 3.90 | 4.76 | 3.63 | 3.62 | 3.32 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 4.68 | 5.40 | 4.01 | 3.48 | 3.43 | 3.44 | 3.35 | 2.59 | 2.69 | 2.91 |
| EV / EBITDA | 9.35 | 8.32 | 8.30 | 6.72 | 6.21 | 5.42 | 5.14 | 5.58 | 4.56 | 4.70 | 4.52 |
| EV / EBIT | 13.59 | 11.83 | 17.03 | 15.37 | 20.32 | 19.65 | 15.09 | 15.91 | 14.33 | 27.48 | 22.66 |
| EV / FCF | — | 58.23 | 88.55 | 343.81 | — | 19.22 | 15.44 | — | — | — | 15.01 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 48.6% | 48.6% | 60.4% | 54.7% | 50.4% | 54.1% | 56.9% | 52.7% | 48.7% | 47.3% | 52.9% |
| Operating Margin | 38.7% | 38.7% | 48.4% | 42.9% | 36.5% | 40.4% | 44.9% | 40.6% | 37.4% | 33.5% | 38.6% |
| Net Profit Margin | 21.6% | 21.6% | 14.9% | 10.6% | 5.2% | 3.6% | -7.8% | 10.1% | 2.3% | 2.4% | -6.8% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 22.9% | 22.9% | 15.7% | 12.1% | 5.1% | 3.1% | -6.8% | 10.1% | 2.7% | 2.7% | -7.4% |
| ROA | 7.9% | 7.9% | 5.3% | 4.0% | 1.7% | 1.1% | -2.3% | 3.4% | 0.8% | 0.8% | -2.1% |
| ROIC | 11.6% | 11.6% | 14.0% | 13.0% | 9.5% | 9.3% | 10.6% | 11.1% | 11.3% | 9.4% | 10.4% |
| ROCE | 14.8% | 14.8% | 18.2% | 17.1% | 12.6% | 12.3% | 13.9% | 14.6% | 14.5% | 11.6% | 12.8% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 1.62 | 1.62 | 1.67 | 1.83 | 1.82 | 1.74 | 1.82 | 1.71 | 1.82 | 1.93 | 2.10 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 2.89 | 2.89 | 2.94 | 2.70 | 3.30 | 3.13 | 2.91 | 3.21 | 2.98 | 3.11 | 2.77 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 1.62 | 1.67 | 1.83 | 1.81 | 1.73 | 1.82 | 1.71 | 1.81 | 1.91 | 2.10 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 2.89 | 2.89 | 2.93 | 2.70 | 3.30 | 3.13 | 2.91 | 3.20 | 2.97 | 3.09 | 2.77 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 20.22 | 31.27 | 138.10 | — | 11.08 | 8.74 | — | — | — | 9.19 |
| Interest Coverage | 3.56 | 3.56 | 2.97 | 2.32 | 1.43 | 1.26 | 1.89 | 1.94 | 1.75 | 0.88 | 1.24 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.54 | 1.54 | 1.24 | 1.40 | 1.56 | 1.49 | 1.63 | 1.67 | 1.70 | 1.69 | 2.02 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.76 | 0.86 | 0.99 | 0.91 | 1.06 | 1.14 | 1.19 | 1.00 | 1.14 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.08 | 0.03 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.34 | 0.30 | 0.37 | 0.33 | 0.30 | 0.31 | 0.31 | 0.35 | 0.33 | 0.33 |
| Inventory Turnover | 6.98 | 6.98 | 5.11 | 5.49 | 4.96 | 4.93 | 5.92 | 6.13 | 6.08 | 4.62 | 4.05 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 45.03 | 41.77 | 45.73 | 59.37 | 49.01 | 43.56 | 54.77 | 65.88 | 52.09 | 50.54 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 2.6% | 3.1% | 2.7% | 4.0% | 6.6% | 7.9% | 6.8% | 5.7% | 7.1% | 4.7% | 3.8% |
| Payout Ratio | 43.9% | 43.9% | 64.1% | 91.2% | 203.9% | 316.6% | — | 80.7% | 276.7% | 179.7% | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 6.0% | 7.1% | 4.2% | 4.4% | 3.1% | 2.4% | — | 7.0% | 2.5% | 2.5% | — |
| FCF Yield | 2.2% | 2.6% | 1.7% | 0.5% | — | 12.3% | 14.9% | — | — | — | 17.2% |
| Buyback Yield | 1.3% | 1.5% | 0.3% | 0.4% | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.2% | 0.4% | 0.2% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 3.9% | 4.7% | 3.1% | 4.4% | 6.7% | 8.1% | 6.9% | 5.8% | 7.3% | 5.0% | 4.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $175M | $162M | $154M | $153M | $152M | $151M | $138M | $109M | $70M | $69M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 26 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying AROC stock.
Archrock, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 16.8x. The historical average is 25.9x. This places it at the 40th percentile of its historical range.
Archrock, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 9.3x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 6.5x.
Archrock, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 22.9%. This is above the typical threshold of 15-20% considered good for most companies. The historical average is -0.1%.
Based on historical data, Archrock, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 16.8x. This is at the 40th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Archrock, Inc.'s current dividend yield is 2.63% with a payout ratio of 43.9%.
Archrock, Inc. has 48.6% gross margin and 38.7% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Archrock, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 2.9x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
EPS miss and thin liquidity
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Volatility Masks Underlying Stability
Gross margin swung from 66.1% in 2025Q3 to 47.5% in 2026Q1, then recovered to 65.9% in 2026Q2, reflecting cost pass-through and mix shifts, per quarterly filings.
The extreme swings in gross margin—from 66.1% to 47.5% and back to 65.9% within three quarters—suggest that reported margins are heavily influenced by contract mix and cost recovery mechanisms rather than a fundamental deterioration in pricing power. Operating margin volatility is even more pronounced, collapsing from 52.4% in 2025Q2 to 4.7% in 2025Q3, which indicates that the high-fixed-cost fleet model amplifies any revenue or cost shock. Investors should focus on the trend in net margin, which has remained relatively stable in the mid-to-high teens, as it better captures the underlying earning power after absorbing non-operating items.
ROIC Stagnant Despite Fleet Expansion
ROIC has hovered between 0.3% and 3.9% over the past ten quarters, with 2026Q2 at 1.8%, indicating that the massive capital investment in new horsepower is not yet generating commensurate returns, per reported figures.
Despite a $1.3 billion increase in net PPE over the past two years, ROIC has remained stubbornly low, averaging around 3% and even dipping to 0.3% in 2025Q3. This suggests that the fleet high-grading strategy is still in its investment phase, with returns lagging the capital deployed. The recent EPS miss and lowered guidance further imply that the expected returns from new units may be taking longer to materialize, or that operating costs are absorbing the incremental revenue. Investors should monitor whether ROIC begins to inflect upward as utilization and pricing on the new fleet mature.
Working Capital Cycle Lengthens
The cash conversion cycle extended from 58 days in 2024Q4 to 81 days in 2026Q2, driven by a rise in DSO to 49 days and DIO to 80 days, per quarterly data.
The elongation of the cash conversion cycle by 23 days over six quarters indicates that Archrock is tying up more cash in receivables and inventory, which is particularly concerning given the thin cash balance of $1.55 million. The increase in DSO from 37 days in 2024Q2 to 49 days in 2026Q2 may reflect a shift in customer mix or slower collections, while the jump in DIO to 80 days suggests inventory buildup, possibly for aftermarket parts or new fleet components. This trend, if sustained, could pressure liquidity and increase reliance on credit facilities, especially as the company continues to invest heavily in growth capex.
Leverage Elevated but Coverage Thin
Debt-to-EBITDA spiked to 14.16 in 2026Q2 from 9.46 in 2024Q1, while interest coverage fell to 1.51, indicating a deteriorating ability to service debt from operating earnings, per reported figures.
The sharp increase in D/EBITDA to 14.16 in 2026Q2, up from a range of 9.5-11.7 in prior quarters, is alarming and suggests either a decline in EBITDA or a debt increase that is not fully captured in the balance sheet data. Interest coverage of 1.51 is barely above the minimum threshold for many covenants, implying that any further earnings pressure could strain debt service. The reported debt-to-equity of 1.52 is lower than the 1.79 seen in 2024Q1, but the coverage metrics indicate that the company's cash flow is increasingly committed to interest payments, leaving little room for error.
Thin Cash Buffer Despite Adequate Ratios
Current ratio improved to 1.39 in 2026Q2, but cash and equivalents stood at just $2.0 million, indicating that the company is operating with a razor-thin liquidity cushion, per balance sheet data.
While the current ratio of 1.39 suggests that current assets cover short-term obligations, the composition of those assets is critical: with cash of only $2.0 million, the company relies heavily on receivables and inventory to meet near-term liabilities. The quick ratio of 0.94 in 2026Q2, down from 1.30 in 2025Q2, indicates that excluding inventory, current assets barely cover current liabilities. This leaves Archrock vulnerable to any unexpected cash outflow, such as a spike in maintenance capex or a delay in customer payments, and suggests that the company may need to draw on its revolving credit facility to manage working capital swings.
Misapplied EV/EBITDA in Capital-Intensive Fleet
EV/EBITDA of 9.80 appears reasonable, but it understates the true cost of maintaining the fleet because maintenance capex is capitalized, inflating EBITDA and distorting the multiple, per financial statement analysis.
The most commonly misapplied ratio for Archrock is EV/EBITDA, as it is for many asset-heavy businesses. Because maintenance capex is capitalized rather than expensed, EBITDA overstates the cash-generating ability of the fleet, making the 9.80x multiple appear more attractive than it truly is. A more appropriate metric would be EV/EBITDAR (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization, and rental costs) or EV/OCF (operating cash flow) to capture the full cash cost of maintaining the compression units. Adjusting for maintenance capex, which has averaged over 30% of revenue, would likely push the effective multiple higher and reveal that the company is not as cheap as the headline EV/EBITDA suggests.