Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 39.1x · EV/EBITDA 26.5x · ROE 19.0%. (2012–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1.8B | $1.3B | $1.4B | $995M | $1.3B | $1.3B | $789M | $523M | $455M | $541M | $546M |
| Enterprise Value | $1.9B | $1.5B | $1.3B | $915M | $1.2B | $1.3B | $734M | $510M | $414M | $494M | $517M |
| P/E Ratio → | 39.10 | 31.04 | 27.46 | 24.85 | 27.72 | 13.93 | 44.82 | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 5.45 | 4.48 | 5.29 | 3.95 | 4.61 | 5.31 | 3.50 | 2.46 | 1.96 | 2.30 | 2.37 |
| P/B Ratio | 8.61 | 6.15 | 5.98 | 4.79 | 7.14 | 6.35 | 6.80 | 4.80 | 4.38 | 5.50 | 6.60 |
| P/FCF | 24.24 | 20.10 | 17.71 | 29.60 | 23.38 | 29.54 | 15.25 | — | — | 63.03 | 44.01 |
| P/OCF | 21.00 | 15.33 | 15.31 | 22.35 | 19.56 | 26.49 | 14.27 | — | — | 37.78 | 29.08 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 5.00 | 4.98 | 3.63 | 4.45 | 5.08 | 3.26 | 2.40 | 1.78 | 2.10 | 2.25 |
| EV / EBITDA | 26.45 | 23.44 | 23.57 | 19.06 | 20.62 | 30.06 | 25.29 | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | 41.03 | 27.72 | 19.89 | 20.88 | 22.92 | 37.62 | 38.37 | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 22.44 | 16.65 | 27.20 | 22.54 | 28.30 | 14.20 | — | — | 57.60 | 41.67 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 79.3% | 79.3% | 80.4% | 80.9% | 79.7% | 78.6% | 77.8% | 77.0% | 77.7% | 77.4% | 76.1% |
| Operating Margin | 16.2% | 16.2% | 16.8% | 15.4% | 18.9% | 13.4% | 7.9% | -8.0% | -11.9% | -4.4% | -8.3% |
| Net Profit Margin | 14.5% | 14.5% | 19.2% | 15.9% | 16.7% | 37.9% | 7.9% | -8.4% | -11.9% | -4.6% | -9.1% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 19.0% | 19.0% | 22.8% | 20.6% | 24.1% | 58.4% | 15.9% | -16.8% | -27.3% | -11.9% | -26.0% |
| ROA | 7.9% | 7.9% | 12.2% | 10.5% | 12.3% | 27.7% | 6.3% | -7.0% | -12.0% | -4.9% | -10.3% |
| ROIC | 13.8% | 13.8% | 23.9% | 22.1% | 27.7% | 23.3% | 16.9% | -16.1% | -36.1% | -14.7% | -84.7% |
| ROCE | 11.7% | 11.7% | 15.0% | 14.6% | 20.1% | 14.5% | 9.9% | -10.9% | -20.5% | -8.4% | -17.5% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 1.05 | 1.05 | 0.05 | 0.08 | 0.12 | 0.11 | 0.25 | 0.30 | — | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | 3.59 | 3.59 | 0.22 | 0.35 | 0.36 | 0.55 | 0.99 | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.72 | -0.36 | -0.39 | -0.26 | -0.27 | -0.47 | -0.12 | -0.39 | -0.47 | -0.35 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 2.44 | 2.44 | -1.51 | -1.68 | -0.77 | -1.32 | -1.88 | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | 2.34 | -1.06 | -2.39 | -0.84 | -1.24 | -1.05 | — | — | -5.43 | -2.34 |
| Interest Coverage | — | — | 8.87 | — | 32.62 | 15.68 | — | -68.25 | -204.70 | -57.92 | -50.02 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 3.56 | 3.56 | 2.49 | 2.45 | 2.17 | 2.45 | 2.25 | 2.26 | 2.21 | 2.20 | 1.94 |
| Quick Ratio | 3.43 | 3.43 | 2.31 | 2.24 | 2.01 | 2.25 | 2.06 | 2.03 | 2.02 | 2.01 | 1.78 |
| Cash Ratio | 2.83 | 2.83 | 1.58 | 1.43 | 1.28 | 1.59 | 1.47 | 1.33 | 1.32 | 1.41 | 1.13 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.46 | 0.60 | 0.65 | 0.76 | 0.64 | 0.78 | 0.78 | 0.98 | 1.05 | 1.06 |
| Inventory Turnover | 3.33 | 3.33 | 2.34 | 2.04 | 2.89 | 2.38 | 2.42 | 2.18 | 2.89 | 3.03 | 3.46 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 77.97 | 106.96 | 107.76 | 94.95 | 90.21 | 82.62 | 91.95 | 84.83 | 74.83 | 97.26 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 1.0% | 1.3% | 1.3% | 1.8% | 1.2% | 0.3% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | 41.2% | 41.2% | 35.5% | 44.6% | 33.9% | 4.1% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 2.6% | 3.2% | 3.6% | 4.0% | 3.6% | 7.2% | 2.2% | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 4.1% | 5.0% | 5.6% | 3.4% | 4.3% | 3.4% | 6.6% | — | — | 1.6% | 2.3% |
| Buyback Yield | 3.9% | 5.3% | 2.2% | 1.6% | 6.1% | 1.4% | 4.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.6% | 0.3% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 4.8% | 6.6% | 3.5% | 3.4% | 7.4% | 1.7% | 4.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.6% | 0.3% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $74M | $75M | $76M | $78M | $80M | $80M | $76M | $73M | $70M | $66M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 14 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying ATEN stock.
A10 Networks, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 39.1x. The historical average is 28.3x. This places it at the 83th percentile of its historical range.
A10 Networks, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 26.5x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 23.7x.
A10 Networks, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 19.0%. The historical average is -3.8%.
Based on historical data, A10 Networks, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 39.1x. This is at the 83th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
A10 Networks, Inc.'s current dividend yield is 0.95% with a payout ratio of 41.2%.
A10 Networks, Inc. has 79.3% gross margin and 16.2% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
A10 Networks, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 3.6x, indicating high leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Elevated leverage and lumpy demand
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Premium Multiple Demands Sustained Growth
According to the supplied market data, ATEN trades at 39.10x trailing earnings and 23.73x forward earnings, a compression that implies consensus expects roughly a doubling of earnings power over the coming year, well above its trailing growth pace.
The gap between trailing and forward P/E suggests the market is pricing in a meaningful earnings recovery rather than the current run-rate, and a PEG of 1.86 indicates investors are paying a premium for that growth. Relative to F5 at 24.82x and NetScout at 17.98x, ATEN carries a richer trailing multiple, which investors should weigh against its smaller scale and more volatile quarterly earnings base. The multiple appears defensible only if the recent Q3 2026 revenue acceleration proves durable rather than timing-driven.
Debt Build Outpaces Deleveraging Progress
As reported in the financial statements, ATEN's debt-to-equity ratio rose to 1.05 in the latest data, a substantial step up from near-zero leverage in 2024, while peers F5, NetScout and Radware remain below 0.05.
The sharp shift in leverage over a short window warrants investigation into the composition of the debt increase, since the reported figures alone do not reveal whether it funded acquisitions, buybacks or working capital. Interest coverage data is largely unavailable for recent quarters, which limits confidence in how comfortably debt service is being covered. Investors should monitor whether record profitability translates into debt reduction, as sustained leverage above 1.0 would leave less room for error if demand softens.
Returns Recovering From Compressed Base
Based on reported quarterly figures, ATEN's ROE climbed from 3.9% in 2026Q2 to 7.3% in 2026Q3, and ROIC moved from 1.7% to 3.5%, yet both remain far below F5's 19.2% ROE and 22.9% ROIC.
The recovery in returns appears driven primarily by the rebound in operating margin from 11.3% to 20.0%, rather than by any improvement in capital efficiency, since asset turnover has stayed roughly flat near 0.12 to 0.14. The ten-quarter history shows ROIC declining from above 9% in 2024 toward the low single digits, suggesting capital has been compounding poorly through the period. Returns would need to sustain the latest margin level to indicate genuine compounding rather than a cyclical bounce.
Ample Liquidity Masks Volatile Cash Position
As reported in financial statements, ATEN's current ratio of 3.46 and quick ratio of 3.19 in 2026Q3 indicate strong short-term coverage, though cash balances have swung materially, falling to $54.7M in 2026Q2 before recovering.
The high current ratio appears to reflect a large receivables and deferred revenue base rather than cash alone, which means liquidity quality depends on collection timing. The volatility in cash balances, combined with buybacks and dividends, suggests that short-term liquidity is being actively managed against capital return commitments. Under a severe demand shock, the position would likely hold for near-term obligations but could tighten if collections slow.
Gross Margin Stability Versus Earnings Volatility
The most commonly misapplied metric here is the trailing P/E, which Based on the reported EPS swings from negative 41.7% to positive 35.3% quarter over quarter, obscures the true earnings base for ATEN.
Applying a trailing P/E to a business with this quarterly volatility can make the stock appear either expensive or cheap depending on which quarter anchors the calculation, which is why the 39.10x figure should be read with caution. A normalized metric such as EV/EBITDA on a trailing-four-quarter basis, or free cash flow yield, would likely give a more stable picture of what owners are paying for. Investors should treat the forward multiple as conditional on the Q3 demand strength persisting.