Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -2.4x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -301.6%. (2020–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $356M | $118M | $113M | — | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $346M | $107M | $44M | — | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -2.42 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 186.35 | 61.50 | 41.81 | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | — | — | 1.80 | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 56.12 | 16.26 | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | -16.6% | -16.6% | 46.8% | 32.1% | 9.3% | 32.7% | 61.5% |
| Operating Margin | -4908.2% | -4908.2% | -2899.4% | -1760.3% | -972.1% | -289.2% | -243.0% |
| Net Profit Margin | -4921.3% | -4921.3% | -2822.5% | -1682.8% | -954.9% | -294.5% | -215.8% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -301.6% | -301.6% | -187.0% | -329.5% | -312.5% | -277.4% | -634.5% |
| ROA | -181.6% | -181.6% | -137.2% | -197.9% | -163.4% | -110.1% | -120.7% |
| ROIC | — | — | — | -45271.9% | — | -4070.3% | — |
| ROCE | -285.6% | -285.6% | -183.9% | -310.5% | -293.8% | -225.6% | -357.5% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | — | — | 0.02 | 0.08 | 0.11 | 0.39 | 1.57 |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | — | -1.10 | -1.03 | -0.92 | -1.08 | -0.24 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -1286.22 | -1286.22 | -955.76 | -696.04 | -46.11 | -15.60 | -48.67 |
Net cash position: cash ($13M) exceeds total debt ($2M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.73 | 0.73 | 4.51 | 2.56 | 2.02 | 1.84 | 1.03 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.73 | 0.73 | 4.48 | 2.51 | 1.97 | 1.78 | 0.94 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.59 | 0.59 | 4.25 | 2.22 | 1.54 | 1.52 | 0.56 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.08 | 0.03 | 0.09 | 0.20 | 0.27 | 0.56 |
| Inventory Turnover | 14.67 | 14.67 | 2.80 | 4.20 | 8.16 | 7.14 | 3.93 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 6.11 | 51.72 | 246.29 | 172.72 | 115.94 | 43.63 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $24M | $20M | $36M | $36M | $36M | $36M |
Imminent capital dilution risk
According to recent market data, Anteris Technologies trades at a price-to-sales multiple of 186.35, a figure that reflects extreme investor optimism regarding the DurAVR clinical pipeline rather than any tangible current revenue generation or established commercial footprint within the competitive structural heart medical device industry.
The elevated P/S ratio suggests that the market is pricing the company as a binary outcome play rather than a traditional operating entity. Investors should monitor whether this valuation can be sustained as the company transitions into more capital-intensive pivotal trials, which may necessitate further equity dilution.
As reported in financial statements, the company's gross margin collapsed to -9.9% in 2026Q1, indicating that the costs associated with early-stage manufacturing and quality control for the DurAVR system currently exceed the limited revenue generated from legacy tissue products, signaling a lack of operational scale.
The persistent negative operating margins underscore the heavy reliance on R&D spending to drive clinical milestones. Until the company achieves regulatory approval and transitions to high-volume automated manufacturing, profitability will likely remain elusive and highly sensitive to the timing of clinical trial expenditures.
Based on the reported figures, the company's cash conversion cycle remains deeply negative at -1187 days in 2026Q1, a metric that appears to be driven by erratic inventory management and significant delays in supplier payments rather than any inherent operational efficiency in the medical device manufacturing process.
The extreme volatility in the cash conversion cycle suggests that management is struggling to balance the procurement of specialized materials with the unpredictable timing of clinical trial requirements. This lack of operational rhythm warrants further investigation into the company's supply chain resilience and vendor relationships.
According to the latest quarterly filings, the current ratio of 20.93 in 2026Q1 appears artificially inflated by recent capital raises, masking the underlying reality that the company's liquidity position is entirely dependent on external funding to sustain its ongoing clinical development and regulatory activities.
While the current ratio suggests a strong short-term buffer, the rapid depletion of cash through high R&D burn rates implies that this liquidity is transient. Investors should monitor the cash-to-burn ratio closely, as the company's ability to fund operations without further dilution remains a critical risk.
The price-to-sales ratio is frequently misapplied to Anteris Technologies, as it obscures the fact that current revenue is derived from legacy products rather than the flagship DurAVR system, rendering traditional valuation benchmarks largely irrelevant for assessing the company's true long-term commercial potential and clinical success.
Instead of relying on P/S, analysts should focus on clinical milestones, such as EOA and PVL rates, and the company's cash runway relative to its pivotal trial timeline. Using revenue multiples for a pre-commercial firm risks ignoring the fundamental reality that the company's value is currently tied to IP and regulatory progress.
Includes 30+ ratios · 6 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying AVR stock.
Anteris Technologies Global Corp.'s current P/E ratio is -2.4x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Anteris Technologies Global Corp.'s return on equity (ROE) is -301.6%. The historical average is -281.6%.
Based on historical data, Anteris Technologies Global Corp. is trading at a P/E of -2.4x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Anteris Technologies Global Corp. has -16.6% gross margin and -4908.2% operating margin.