Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -743.8x · EV/EBITDA 661.3x · ROE -12.8%. (2014–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $81.1B | $20.9B | $5.0B | $3.1B | $3.6B | $3.8B | $4.0B | $860M | $532M | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $81.6B | $21.4B | $5.8B | $3.9B | $4.2B | $4.5B | $4.6B | $1.8B | $1.4B | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -743.76 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 40.05 | 10.32 | 3.43 | 2.36 | 2.96 | 3.91 | 5.01 | 1.10 | 0.72 | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 83.43 | 26.34 | 8.63 | 6.05 | 9.38 | — | 28.12 | — | 5.86 | — | — |
| P/FCF | 1417.22 | 365.25 | 152.35 | — | — | — | — | 7.63 | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | 711.29 | 183.31 | 54.89 | — | — | — | — | 5.25 | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 10.59 | 3.92 | 2.95 | 3.52 | 4.66 | 5.84 | 2.23 | 1.95 | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 661.34 | 173.68 | 76.05 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | 1120.69 | — | 159.23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 374.65 | 174.28 | — | — | — | — | 15.54 | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 29.0% | 29.0% | 27.5% | 14.8% | 12.4% | 20.1% | 20.3% | 12.1% | 13.5% | -5.7% | -48.6% |
| Operating Margin | 3.6% | 3.6% | 1.6% | -15.7% | -21.8% | -12.0% | -10.7% | -30.0% | -23.0% | -42.7% | -117.1% |
| Net Profit Margin | -4.4% | -4.4% | -2.0% | -22.7% | -25.1% | -16.9% | -19.8% | -38.8% | -36.9% | -69.8% | -134.1% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -12.8% | -12.8% | -5.3% | -67.2% | -159.8% | -235.1% | -111.4% | — | -301.6% | — | — |
| ROA | -2.5% | -2.5% | -1.2% | -13.9% | -16.4% | -10.3% | -11.3% | -22.4% | -21.0% | -21.7% | -26.0% |
| ROIC | 4.1% | 4.1% | 1.3% | -13.3% | -22.0% | -11.4% | -8.3% | -20.4% | -12.7% | — | — |
| ROCE | 2.5% | 2.5% | 1.2% | -12.5% | -18.7% | -9.8% | -9.6% | -25.3% | -16.6% | -17.0% | -29.3% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 3.77 | 3.77 | 2.61 | 2.79 | 2.69 | — | 6.46 | — | 12.51 | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | 24.25 | 24.25 | 20.14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.68 | 1.24 | 1.52 | 1.77 | — | 4.71 | — | 10.08 | — | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 4.36 | 4.36 | 9.57 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | 9.40 | 21.93 | — | — | — | — | 7.91 | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -0.57 | -0.57 | 0.58 | -1.83 | -4.87 | -1.79 | -1.27 | -2.43 | -1.74 | -1.38 | -3.13 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 5.98 | 5.98 | 3.21 | 3.60 | 1.95 | 2.35 | 1.42 | 0.82 | 2.37 | 1.55 | 1.50 |
| Quick Ratio | 4.95 | 4.95 | 2.35 | 2.53 | 1.45 | 1.94 | 1.09 | 0.63 | 1.90 | 1.22 | 1.18 |
| Cash Ratio | 3.93 | 3.93 | 1.26 | 1.41 | 0.64 | 1.16 | 0.57 | 0.35 | 1.16 | 0.48 | 0.60 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.46 | 0.55 | 0.55 | 0.62 | 0.56 | 0.55 | 0.59 | 0.53 | 0.31 | 0.17 |
| Inventory Turnover | 2.23 | 2.23 | 1.96 | 2.26 | 3.92 | 5.42 | 4.45 | 6.30 | 4.02 | 4.40 | 3.73 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 99.32 | 119.12 | 104.59 | 90.62 | 44.59 | 48.23 | 19.96 | 46.42 | 34.49 | 70.02 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 0.1% | 0.3% | 0.7% | — | — | — | — | 13.1% | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $240M | $227M | $213M | $186M | $173M | $139M | $115M | $53M | $59M | $58M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 12 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying BE stock.
Bloom Energy Corporation's current P/E ratio is -743.8x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Bloom Energy Corporation's current EV/EBITDA is 661.3x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 76.1x.
Bloom Energy Corporation's return on equity (ROE) is -12.8%. The historical average is -126.2%.
Based on historical data, Bloom Energy Corporation is trading at a P/E of -743.8x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Bloom Energy Corporation's current dividend yield is 0.00%.
Bloom Energy Corporation has 29.0% gross margin and 3.6% operating margin.
Bloom Energy Corporation's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 24.3x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
High leverage and dilution
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Inflection Points to Operating Leverage
Bloom Energy's gross margin expanded to 33.4% in 2026Q2 from 27.2% a year earlier, while operating margin jumped to 17.1%, according to recent SEC filings, signaling a potential inflection in operating leverage.
The sequential improvement in operating margin from 1.5% in 2025Q3 to 17.1% in 2026Q2 suggests that the high fixed-cost base is finally being absorbed by rapid revenue growth. However, the 2026Q2 net margin of 18.4% includes a significant non-operating gain, as operating income was $182.2M versus net income of $196.3M, implying that core profitability is slightly lower than headline figures suggest. Investors should monitor whether this margin expansion is sustainable as the company scales, given historical volatility and the need to replace fuel cell stacks over time.
Return on Capital Inflects Sharply
ROIC surged to 9.1% in 2026Q2 from 0.4% in 2025Q3, as reported in financial statements, while ROE reached 15.2%, indicating a potential turning point after years of negative returns.
The dramatic improvement in ROIC and ROE is driven by both margin expansion and improved asset turnover, which rose to 0.21 from 0.12 a year earlier. However, the 2026Q2 ROE of 15.2% is inflated by a one-time gain and the recent $2.1B equity raise, which temporarily boosts equity while the full impact of dilution on per-share metrics remains to be seen. The sustainability of these returns hinges on whether the company can maintain its current margin trajectory and convert its growing backlog into profitable revenue without further dilutive capital raises.
Working Capital Cycle Compresses Rapidly
Bloom Energy's cash conversion cycle improved to 114 days in 2026Q2 from 304 days in 2025Q2, according to reported figures, driven by faster collections and lower inventory days, signaling improved working capital management.
The sharp reduction in DSO from 125 days to 53 days and DIO from 231 days to 96 days over the past year suggests that the company is collecting payments faster and managing inventory more efficiently, likely due to the shift toward large data center customers with stronger credit profiles. However, the CCC remains elevated compared to traditional industrials, reflecting the project-based nature of the business and the need to hold specialized inventory. The improvement in working capital efficiency is a positive sign, but investors should watch for potential reversals as the product mix evolves.
Leverage Eases After Dilutive Raise
Debt-to-equity fell to 1.71 in 2026Q2 from a peak of 3.77 in 2025Q4, as per balance sheet data, while interest coverage improved to 23.49, indicating reduced financial strain after a $2.1B equity raise.
The equity raise significantly de-risked the balance sheet, but it came at the cost of shareholder dilution, as evidenced by the jump in shares outstanding. The improvement in interest coverage from 1.22 in 2025Q4 to 23.49 in 2026Q2 suggests that operating income is now more than sufficient to cover interest expense, a stark contrast to the negative coverage ratios seen in 2025. However, the company's retained earnings remain deeply negative at -$3.7B, and the high historical leverage suggests that management is willing to take on significant risk to fund growth, which warrants monitoring if interest rates remain elevated.
Liquidity Buffer Strengthens Substantially
Bloom Energy's current ratio improved to 4.09 in 2026Q2 from 3.21 in 2024Q4, with cash representing 48% of total assets, according to recent SEC filings, providing a robust cushion against near-term obligations.
The $2.7B cash position, bolstered by the recent equity raise, gives the company ample liquidity to fund its growth initiatives and weather potential project delays. The quick ratio of 3.41 indicates that even without selling inventory, the company can cover its current liabilities nearly 3.5 times over, which is a fortress-like position for an industrial company. However, this liquidity comes at a cost: the dilutive raise and the low return on cash (given the company's negative retained earnings) suggest that the capital is not yet being deployed at returns that justify the dilution.
EV/EBITDA Misleads in High-Growth Phase
Bloom Energy's EV/EBITDA of 495.71 appears extreme, but this ratio is distorted by the company's transition from losses to profitability, as reported in financial statements, making it an unreliable valuation metric at this stage.
The EV/EBITDA multiple is nearly meaningless for a company that has only recently turned EBITDA positive, as the denominator is still small and volatile. A more appropriate metric is EV/Sales, which at 29.95 reflects the market's pricing of future growth, but even this must be compared to the company's own historical range and the potential for margin expansion. Investors should focus on forward-looking metrics like EV/forward EBITDA, if available, and the sustainability of the growth rate, rather than trailing multiples that are distorted by the earnings inflection.