VCP ScannerFree US Stock Screener & Financial AnalysisFree US Stock Screener
ScreenerThemes
DCF ValuationCalculate intrinsic value of US stocks
Market ValuationBuffett indicator, CAPE & macro gauges
Total ReturnSee dividends + price return history
DCA CalculatorSimulate recurring buys & compounding
Earnings
FAANG & Tech
AAPL vs MSFTNVDA vs AMDGOOGL vs META
Cloud & Cyber
CRM vs NOWCRWD vs PANWSNOW vs DDOG
Consumer & Auto
TSLA vs FAMZN vs WMTNFLX vs DIS
Finance & Crypto
JPM vs BACV vs MACOIN vs MSTR
Pharma & Energy
LLY vs NVOJNJ vs PFEXOM vs CVX
Compare Any Stocks...
WatchlistInsider
ScreenerThemes
Earnings
WatchlistInsider
BLRXBioLineRx Ltd.
$3.17$14M
Overview & Verdict
Overview
Valuation & Forecasts
Valuation ModelsEstimatesDCF Model
Price & Analyst Data
Analyst TargetsPrice HistoryTechnical Analysis
Financial Statements
Income StatementBalance SheetCash FlowRatios & Margins
Performance
P/E HistoryRevenue HistoryEarnings HistoryDividend HistoryTotal Return
Ownership
Holders
← Back to Screener
VCP ScannerFree US Stock Screener & Financial Analysis

Find stocks. Verify deeply. Act with conviction.

Data updated daily

Product

  • Screener
  • Themes
  • Valuation
  • Total Return
  • DCA Calculator
  • News
  • Earnings

Resources

  • Market Valuation
  • Compare
  • Insider Activity
  • Methodology
  • How It Works
  • Glossary
  • Learn

Get Ideas

Get weekly stock ideas — free

© 2026 VCP Scanner
AboutPrivacyTerms
Not financial advice. Do your own research.
ScreenerNewsCompareWatchlist
  1. Home
  2. Financial Ratios

  1. Home
  2. Stocks
  3. BLRX
  4. Financial Ratios

BioLineRx Ltd. (BLRX) Financial Ratios

Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -10.9x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -6.4%. (2008–2025 historical series)

Income StatementBalance SheetCash FlowRatios
AnnualQuarterly

BLRX Valuation Multiples

Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018FY 2017FY 2016
Market Cap$14M$11M$684M$4.0B$1.2B$3.6B$1.7B$878M$1.9B$3.9B$2.1B
Enterprise Value$21M$18M$688M$4.0B$1.2B$3.6B$1.7B$884M$1.9B$3.9B$2.1B
P/E Ratio →-10.91——————————
P/S Ratio11.589.5723.63840.27———————
P/B Ratio0.560.4950.79305.0223.9552.9777.1326.3245.9774.1858.99
P/FCF———————————
P/OCF———————————

P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart

BLRX EV Ratios

Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018FY 2017FY 2016
EV / Revenue—15.3723.78841.80———————
EV / EBITDA———————————
EV / EBIT———————————
EV / FCF———————————

BLRX Profitability

Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency

Margins

Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018FY 2017FY 2016
Gross Margin36.2%36.2%68.0%23.1%———————
Operating Margin-871.8%-871.8%-70.5%-1035.3%———————
Net Profit Margin-99.6%-99.6%-31.9%-1262.8%———————

Return on Capital

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018FY 2017FY 2016
ROE-6.4%-6.4%-69.1%-189.2%-42.0%-60.0%-108.4%-68.1%-48.8%-55.4%-38.3%
ROA-3.0%-3.0%-17.9%-86.4%-31.6%-42.0%-59.5%-46.3%-39.2%-48.8%-35.1%
ROIC-32.2%-32.2%-79.3%-101.9%-38.9%-51.2%-66.9%-49.5%-40.6%-46.8%-32.8%
ROCE-39.7%-39.7%-91.4%-114.4%-42.4%-45.7%-58.6%-61.7%-49.4%-56.4%-39.6%

BLRX Leverage & Debt

Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018FY 2017FY 2016
Debt / Equity0.430.431.120.880.240.070.350.310.210.000.01
Debt / EBITDA———————————
Net Debt / Equity—0.300.340.550.03-0.12-0.420.150.13-0.09-0.06
Net Debt / EBITDA———————————
Debt / FCF———————————
Interest Coverage-8.04-8.04-0.02-26.96-13.51-25.18-19.41-12.90-1070.90-1201.90-1179.50

BLRX Liquidity & Efficiency

Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018FY 2017FY 2016
Current Ratio1.951.951.761.104.875.912.152.364.747.499.86
Quick Ratio1.781.781.561.064.855.892.152.354.747.499.86
Cash Ratio1.721.721.271.004.785.882.122.304.477.369.73
Asset Turnover—0.030.740.08———————
Inventory Turnover0.350.352.951.89———————
Days Sales Outstanding—139.9448.7253.84———————

BLRX Shareholder Yields

Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders

Dividends

Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018FY 2017FY 2016
Dividend Yield———————————
Payout Ratio———————————

Total Shareholder Return Metrics

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018FY 2017FY 2016
Earnings Yield———————————
FCF Yield———————————
Buyback Yield0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Total Shareholder Yield0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Shares Outstanding—$4M$80M$64M$52M$44M$17M$10M$7M$6M$4M

Key Metrics

Growth RegimeDecelerating
ProfitabilityNegative
Balance SheetVulnerable
Cash FlowBurning
Top Statement Risk

Imminent liquidity and dilution

Valuation Disconnected from Commercial Reality

Based on reported figures, BLRX trades at a P/S multiple of 11.58, which appears significantly detached from the company's current revenue trajectory and the severe liquidity constraints highlighted in recent SEC filings, suggesting the market may be pricing in speculative pipeline potential rather than near-term commercial execution.

The elevated P/S ratio relative to the company's limited revenue generation suggests that investors are assigning a premium to the intellectual property rather than the current sales of APHEXDA. This valuation appears precarious, as the lack of a positive P/E or meaningful EBITDA makes it difficult to justify the current market capitalization without assuming a rapid and unlikely inflection in commercial adoption.

Operating Margins Reflect Structural Inefficiency

As reported in financial statements, the company's operating margin of -871.78% underscores a profound mismatch between the high fixed-cost base required for commercialization and the current revenue scale, indicating that the firm is currently unable to achieve the operating leverage necessary for long-term financial sustainability.

The gross margin of 36.19% is notably low for a specialized pharmaceutical product, which may imply high third-party manufacturing costs or significant royalty obligations that erode the value of each unit sold. Investors should monitor whether these margins can improve through scale or if they remain permanently suppressed by the competitive necessity of discounting in the transplant center market.

Working Capital Cycles Indicate Friction

According to recent quarterly data, the company's cash conversion cycle remains highly erratic, with DSO figures reaching 221 days in 2026Q1, which suggests significant friction in collecting payments from hospital systems and partners compared to the more efficient operations of established biotechnology peers.

The extremely high DIO and DPO metrics indicate that the company is struggling to manage its inventory and supplier relationships effectively during this early commercial phase. This inefficiency in working capital management further exacerbates the cash burn, as capital remains tied up in inventory that is not yet moving through the supply chain at a sufficient velocity.

Debt Service Capacity Remains Negligible

Based on reported figures, the company's interest coverage ratio of -9.35 in 2026Q1 highlights a complete inability to service debt through operational earnings, leaving the firm entirely dependent on external equity financing to maintain its ongoing research and commercial operations.

While the D/E ratio of 0.44 might appear manageable in isolation, the lack of positive EBITDA means that any debt burden is effectively a liability that cannot be serviced by the business model. This reliance on equity markets for survival creates a persistent risk of shareholder dilution, which appears to be the primary mechanism for funding the company's ongoing cash requirements.

Misapplication of P/S Multiples

The P/S ratio is frequently misapplied to BioLineRx, as it obscures the lumpy, milestone-dependent nature of the company's revenue and fails to account for the high cost-to-serve that currently renders the top-line growth largely irrelevant to the firm's actual cash-generating capacity.

Analysts should instead focus on the cash burn rate relative to the remaining cash runway, as the P/S multiple provides a false sense of security regarding the company's ability to sustain operations. A more appropriate metric would be the 'cash-to-burn' ratio, which better reflects the immediate existential risk posed by the current financial structure.

Download Financial Ratios Data

Includes 30+ ratios · 18 years · Updated daily

Consensus-Based Analysis Tools

Intrinsic Valuation

DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.

Check Valuation

Historical Returns

10-year return with dividends reinvested.

Calculate

DCA Calculator

See how regular investing compounds over time.

Run Numbers

Peer Comparison

Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.

Compare

BLRX — Frequently Asked Questions

Quick answers to the most common questions about buying BLRX stock.

What is BioLineRx Ltd.'s P/E ratio?

BioLineRx Ltd.'s current P/E ratio is -10.9x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.

What is BioLineRx Ltd.'s ROE?

BioLineRx Ltd.'s return on equity (ROE) is -6.4%. The historical average is -70.2%.

Is BLRX stock overvalued?

Based on historical data, BioLineRx Ltd. is trading at a P/E of -10.9x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.

What are BioLineRx Ltd.'s profit margins?

BioLineRx Ltd. has 36.2% gross margin and -871.8% operating margin.