Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -10.9x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -6.4%. (2008–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $14M | $11M | $684M | $4.0B | $1.2B | $3.6B | $1.7B | $878M | $1.9B | $3.9B | $2.1B |
| Enterprise Value | $21M | $18M | $688M | $4.0B | $1.2B | $3.6B | $1.7B | $884M | $1.9B | $3.9B | $2.1B |
| P/E Ratio → | -10.91 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 11.58 | 9.57 | 23.63 | 840.27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 0.56 | 0.49 | 50.79 | 305.02 | 23.95 | 52.97 | 77.13 | 26.32 | 45.97 | 74.18 | 58.99 |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 15.37 | 23.78 | 841.80 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 36.2% | 36.2% | 68.0% | 23.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -871.8% | -871.8% | -70.5% | -1035.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Profit Margin | -99.6% | -99.6% | -31.9% | -1262.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -6.4% | -6.4% | -69.1% | -189.2% | -42.0% | -60.0% | -108.4% | -68.1% | -48.8% | -55.4% | -38.3% |
| ROA | -3.0% | -3.0% | -17.9% | -86.4% | -31.6% | -42.0% | -59.5% | -46.3% | -39.2% | -48.8% | -35.1% |
| ROIC | -32.2% | -32.2% | -79.3% | -101.9% | -38.9% | -51.2% | -66.9% | -49.5% | -40.6% | -46.8% | -32.8% |
| ROCE | -39.7% | -39.7% | -91.4% | -114.4% | -42.4% | -45.7% | -58.6% | -61.7% | -49.4% | -56.4% | -39.6% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.43 | 0.43 | 1.12 | 0.88 | 0.24 | 0.07 | 0.35 | 0.31 | 0.21 | 0.00 | 0.01 |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.30 | 0.34 | 0.55 | 0.03 | -0.12 | -0.42 | 0.15 | 0.13 | -0.09 | -0.06 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -8.04 | -8.04 | -0.02 | -26.96 | -13.51 | -25.18 | -19.41 | -12.90 | -1070.90 | -1201.90 | -1179.50 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.95 | 1.95 | 1.76 | 1.10 | 4.87 | 5.91 | 2.15 | 2.36 | 4.74 | 7.49 | 9.86 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.78 | 1.78 | 1.56 | 1.06 | 4.85 | 5.89 | 2.15 | 2.35 | 4.74 | 7.49 | 9.86 |
| Cash Ratio | 1.72 | 1.72 | 1.27 | 1.00 | 4.78 | 5.88 | 2.12 | 2.30 | 4.47 | 7.36 | 9.73 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.03 | 0.74 | 0.08 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Inventory Turnover | 0.35 | 0.35 | 2.95 | 1.89 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 139.94 | 48.72 | 53.84 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $4M | $80M | $64M | $52M | $44M | $17M | $10M | $7M | $6M | $4M |
Imminent liquidity and dilution
Based on reported figures, BLRX trades at a P/S multiple of 11.58, which appears significantly detached from the company's current revenue trajectory and the severe liquidity constraints highlighted in recent SEC filings, suggesting the market may be pricing in speculative pipeline potential rather than near-term commercial execution.
The elevated P/S ratio relative to the company's limited revenue generation suggests that investors are assigning a premium to the intellectual property rather than the current sales of APHEXDA. This valuation appears precarious, as the lack of a positive P/E or meaningful EBITDA makes it difficult to justify the current market capitalization without assuming a rapid and unlikely inflection in commercial adoption.
As reported in financial statements, the company's operating margin of -871.78% underscores a profound mismatch between the high fixed-cost base required for commercialization and the current revenue scale, indicating that the firm is currently unable to achieve the operating leverage necessary for long-term financial sustainability.
The gross margin of 36.19% is notably low for a specialized pharmaceutical product, which may imply high third-party manufacturing costs or significant royalty obligations that erode the value of each unit sold. Investors should monitor whether these margins can improve through scale or if they remain permanently suppressed by the competitive necessity of discounting in the transplant center market.
According to recent quarterly data, the company's cash conversion cycle remains highly erratic, with DSO figures reaching 221 days in 2026Q1, which suggests significant friction in collecting payments from hospital systems and partners compared to the more efficient operations of established biotechnology peers.
The extremely high DIO and DPO metrics indicate that the company is struggling to manage its inventory and supplier relationships effectively during this early commercial phase. This inefficiency in working capital management further exacerbates the cash burn, as capital remains tied up in inventory that is not yet moving through the supply chain at a sufficient velocity.
Based on reported figures, the company's interest coverage ratio of -9.35 in 2026Q1 highlights a complete inability to service debt through operational earnings, leaving the firm entirely dependent on external equity financing to maintain its ongoing research and commercial operations.
While the D/E ratio of 0.44 might appear manageable in isolation, the lack of positive EBITDA means that any debt burden is effectively a liability that cannot be serviced by the business model. This reliance on equity markets for survival creates a persistent risk of shareholder dilution, which appears to be the primary mechanism for funding the company's ongoing cash requirements.
The P/S ratio is frequently misapplied to BioLineRx, as it obscures the lumpy, milestone-dependent nature of the company's revenue and fails to account for the high cost-to-serve that currently renders the top-line growth largely irrelevant to the firm's actual cash-generating capacity.
Analysts should instead focus on the cash burn rate relative to the remaining cash runway, as the P/S multiple provides a false sense of security regarding the company's ability to sustain operations. A more appropriate metric would be the 'cash-to-burn' ratio, which better reflects the immediate existential risk posed by the current financial structure.
Includes 30+ ratios · 18 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying BLRX stock.
BioLineRx Ltd.'s current P/E ratio is -10.9x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
BioLineRx Ltd.'s return on equity (ROE) is -6.4%. The historical average is -70.2%.
Based on historical data, BioLineRx Ltd. is trading at a P/E of -10.9x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
BioLineRx Ltd. has 36.2% gross margin and -871.8% operating margin.