Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 29.7x · EV/EBITDA 12.4x · ROE 0.8%. (1997–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $103.1B | $35.8B | $37.7B | $38.0B | $35.9B | $58.5B | $59.8B | — | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $399.5B | $332.2B | $257.4B | $260.5B | $235.6B | $221.7B | $206.5B | — | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | 29.74 | 30.26 | 76.73 | 39.24 | 18.77 | 15.42 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 1.35 | 0.47 | 0.44 | 0.40 | 0.39 | 0.77 | 0.95 | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 0.21 | 0.22 | 0.23 | 0.23 | 0.25 | 0.43 | 0.49 | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | 24.69 | 59.42 | 13.13 | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | 5.23 | 5.77 | 4.27 | 7.49 | 6.81 | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 4.36 | 2.99 | 2.72 | 2.54 | 2.93 | 3.29 | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 12.43 | 10.33 | 9.28 | 11.08 | 10.80 | 12.28 | 13.53 | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | 18.34 | 14.83 | 13.24 | 12.05 | 13.57 | 9.94 | 23.58 | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | 161.93 | 225.27 | 45.31 | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 38.8% | 38.8% | 21.0% | 15.1% | 15.4% | 15.5% | 24.5% | 22.3% | 19.8% | 20.6% | 27.4% |
| Operating Margin | 28.6% | 28.6% | 20.9% | 15.1% | 15.2% | 15.3% | 15.1% | 14.9% | 14.2% | 14.6% | 18.8% |
| Net Profit Margin | 1.7% | 1.7% | 0.7% | 1.2% | 2.2% | 5.2% | -0.2% | 4.1% | 6.3% | 3.6% | 6.8% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 0.8% | 0.8% | 0.4% | 0.7% | 1.5% | 3.1% | -0.1% | 2.6% | 4.0% | 2.0% | 2.6% |
| ROA | 0.3% | 0.3% | 0.1% | 0.2% | 0.5% | 1.1% | -0.0% | 1.0% | 1.6% | 0.8% | 1.1% |
| ROIC | 3.7% | 3.7% | 3.4% | 2.9% | 3.2% | 3.0% | 2.6% | 3.2% | 3.2% | 3.1% | 2.7% |
| ROCE | 5.1% | 5.1% | 4.5% | 3.8% | 4.1% | 3.7% | 3.3% | 3.9% | 4.0% | 3.8% | 3.5% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 1.88 | 1.88 | 1.42 | 1.39 | 1.51 | 1.31 | 1.28 | 1.27 | 1.22 | 0.98 | 0.93 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 9.72 | 9.72 | 8.47 | 9.94 | 9.81 | 9.75 | 10.26 | 9.92 | 10.60 | 9.44 | 9.83 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 1.78 | 1.33 | 1.32 | 1.41 | 1.21 | 1.20 | 1.22 | 1.13 | 0.92 | 0.87 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 9.22 | 9.22 | 7.92 | 9.46 | 9.15 | 9.04 | 9.61 | 9.47 | 9.85 | 8.82 | 9.18 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | 137.24 | 165.85 | 32.19 | 42.40 | 36.20 | 30.54 | 38.07 |
| Interest Coverage | 1.31 | 1.31 | 1.17 | 1.39 | 1.62 | 2.93 | 1.21 | 1.81 | 2.49 | 2.43 | 1.93 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.14 | 1.14 | 0.65 | 0.51 | 0.69 | 0.86 | 0.85 | 0.86 | 1.16 | 0.91 | 1.07 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.14 | 1.14 | 0.65 | 0.51 | 0.69 | 0.86 | 0.85 | 0.86 | 1.16 | 0.91 | 1.07 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.26 | 0.26 | 0.17 | 0.12 | 0.19 | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.17 | 0.32 | 0.22 | 0.26 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.15 | 0.18 | 0.20 | 0.21 | 0.19 | 0.18 | 0.21 | 0.22 | 0.21 | 0.15 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | 1.3% | 1.1% | 2.4% | 2.3% | 1.5% | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | 77.2% | 38.6% | 42.8% | 33.7% | — | 27.5% | 20.3% | 46.9% | 38.3% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 3.4% | 3.3% | 1.3% | 2.5% | 5.3% | 6.5% | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | 4.1% | 1.7% | 7.6% | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 2.5% | 1.7% | 1.8% | 0.6% | 0.7% | — | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 3.8% | 2.9% | 4.3% | 2.9% | 2.3% | — | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $2.4B | $2.4B | $2.4B | $2.4B | $2.4B | $2.3B | $2.2B | $2.2B | $2.2B | $2.2B |
High financial leverage sensitivity
According to recent market data, the firm trades at a P/B ratio of 0.21, which suggests that investors are applying a significant conglomerate discount compared to pure-play asset managers like BAM, potentially reflecting market skepticism regarding the complexity of the firm's capital-heavy, diversified organizational structure.
The P/E ratio of 29.74 appears elevated relative to the firm's thin net margins, implying that the market is pricing in future growth from asset recycling rather than current earnings power. This valuation gap warrants further investigation into whether the market is correctly discounting the volatility of the firm's carried interest and transactional revenue streams.
As reported in financial statements, the firm's ROIC has remained consistently low, hovering near 0.7% to 1.5% over the last ten quarters, which indicates that the massive capital base required for infrastructure and real estate projects is struggling to generate meaningful returns above the cost of capital.
The persistent gap between ROIC and the firm's cost of debt suggests that the company is not effectively compounding value at the asset level. Investors should monitor whether this trend is a structural byproduct of the firm's long-term, capital-intensive investment horizon or a sign of deteriorating efficiency in its recent project deployments.
Based on the provided quarterly data, the debt-to-equity ratio reached 1.88 in 2025Q4, signaling that the firm's reliance on external financing to fund its expansive portfolio has created a high-leverage environment that leaves little room for error in a volatile interest rate landscape.
The interest coverage ratio, which has fluctuated between 1.00 and 1.80, suggests that the firm's ability to service its debt is becoming increasingly sensitive to macro-economic shifts. This level of leverage appears to be a structural feature of the owner-operator model, yet it introduces significant risk if asset yields fail to outpace rising borrowing costs.
As indicated by the quarterly filings, the firm's asset turnover remains stagnant at 0.04, which highlights the extreme capital intensity of the business and the difficulty of converting massive physical asset holdings into rapid, recurring revenue streams compared to more agile, capital-light financial services peers.
The erratic nature of the firm's DSO, which has swung from 79 to 221 days, suggests that the timing of large-scale project settlements creates significant, unpredictable liquidity gaps. This inefficiency appears to be a direct consequence of the firm's reliance on complex, long-duration infrastructure contracts that are inherently difficult to manage from a working capital perspective.
Based on the firm's unique business model, the most commonly misapplied metric is GAAP net income, which obscures the true earning power of the company by including heavy non-cash depreciation charges that do not reflect the actual appreciation of the firm's long-term infrastructure and real estate assets.
Analysts should instead prioritize Distributable Earnings (DE) to assess the cash available for dividends and reinvestment, as GAAP figures fail to account for the economic reality of the firm's permanent capital base. Relying on traditional P/E multiples for this entity may lead to a fundamental misunderstanding of its cash-generating capacity and long-term value creation potential.
Includes 30+ ratios · 29 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying BNJ stock.
Brookfield Finance Inc. 4.50% P's current P/E ratio is 29.7x. The historical average is 36.1x. This places it at the 40th percentile of its historical range.
Brookfield Finance Inc. 4.50% P's current EV/EBITDA is 12.4x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 11.2x.
Brookfield Finance Inc. 4.50% P's return on equity (ROE) is 0.8%. The historical average is 6.1%.
Based on historical data, Brookfield Finance Inc. 4.50% P is trading at a P/E of 29.7x. This is at the 40th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Brookfield Finance Inc. 4.50% P has 38.8% gross margin and 28.6% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Brookfield Finance Inc. 4.50% P's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 9.7x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.