Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -1.6x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -3.9%. (2018–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $7M | $5M | $117M | $93M | $454M | $1.4B | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $13M | $11M | $124M | $97M | $459M | $1.4B | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -1.57 | — | 286.76 | 0.81 | 2.91 | 12.46 | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.37 | 0.29 | 4.91 | 3.14 | 15.18 | 55.70 | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 0.05 | 0.09 | 2.64 | 2.58 | 15.09 | 53.52 | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | 48.74 | 38.07 | — | — | — | 350.36 | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.61 | 5.22 | 3.28 | 15.33 | 55.75 | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | 39.47 | 13.63 | 66.37 | 249.92 | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | 122.02 | 16.70 | 57.64 | 243.06 | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 20.8% | 20.8% | 29.8% | 29.9% | 31.5% | 27.9% | 28.6% | 32.2% | 22.0% |
| Operating Margin | -8.7% | -8.7% | 7.9% | 20.0% | 21.9% | 21.2% | 19.0% | 19.4% | 5.6% |
| Net Profit Margin | -10.7% | -10.7% | 1.7% | 15.6% | 20.9% | 18.0% | 16.6% | 15.7% | 2.1% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -3.9% | -3.9% | 1.0% | 13.9% | 22.0% | 24.4% | 33.1% | 43.6% | 4.9% |
| ROA | -2.7% | -2.7% | 0.7% | 11.0% | 16.9% | 14.9% | 13.5% | 14.2% | 1.3% |
| ROIC | -2.1% | -2.1% | 3.1% | 11.9% | 15.7% | 18.2% | 17.5% | 20.4% | 4.4% |
| ROCE | -3.1% | -3.1% | 4.6% | 17.5% | 22.0% | 25.5% | 31.2% | 38.3% | 7.6% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.21 | 0.21 | 0.16 | 0.12 | 0.18 | 0.12 | 0.52 | 0.84 | 1.44 |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | 2.32 | 0.59 | 0.78 | 0.56 | 1.55 | 1.79 | 7.91 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.10 | 0.16 | 0.11 | 0.15 | 0.05 | 0.51 | 0.80 | 1.26 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | 2.29 | 0.58 | 0.66 | 0.23 | 1.53 | 1.71 | 6.91 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 193.78 | — |
| Interest Coverage | -3.67 | -3.67 | 3.36 | 24.32 | 17.80 | 14.01 | 10.54 | 9.97 | 2.42 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.74 | 1.74 | 2.42 | 2.52 | 2.21 | 2.20 | 0.93 | 0.79 | 1.54 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.01 | 1.01 | 2.32 | 1.54 | 1.95 | 1.44 | 0.84 | 0.55 | 0.46 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.24 | 0.24 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.13 | 0.48 | 0.00 | 0.03 | 0.09 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.22 | 0.39 | 0.63 | 0.80 | 0.70 | 0.72 | 0.84 | 0.65 |
| Inventory Turnover | 0.77 | 0.77 | 10.64 | 2.20 | 11.90 | 3.23 | 12.81 | 4.27 | 0.89 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 225.60 | 180.85 | 57.01 | 82.79 | 88.09 | 115.61 | 116.57 | 86.47 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | 0.3% | 124.1% | 34.4% | 8.0% | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $3M | $2M | $919811 | $839606 | $670624 | $521065 | $516667 | $516667 |
Operational viability and liquidity
According to current market data, BON trades at a price-to-sales multiple of 0.37, which, when combined with a negative trailing P/E ratio, suggests that investors are pricing the company as a distressed asset rather than a viable growth-oriented participant in the natural ingredients sector.
The lack of a meaningful forward P/E or EV/EBITDA multiple indicates that the market has largely abandoned traditional valuation frameworks for the company. This valuation compression appears to be a direct consequence of the persistent revenue contraction and the shift into negative net margins, which have effectively decoupled the stock price from its historical growth narrative.
Based on reported financial statements, the company's ROIC has deteriorated from a peak of 10.4% in 2021Q2 to a negative 2.4% in 2025Q4, signaling a fundamental failure to generate adequate returns on the capital deployed into its extraction and manufacturing infrastructure.
The consistent decline in ROIC over the last ten quarters suggests that the company is struggling to maintain its competitive moat, likely due to unabsorbed manufacturing overhead and a loss of pricing power. This trend warrants further investigation into whether the current asset base is becoming a liability rather than a driver of future compounding.
As indicated by the latest quarterly filings, the cash conversion cycle has expanded significantly to 233 days in 2025Q4, driven by a sharp increase in days inventory outstanding to 171 days, which highlights a growing inefficiency in managing the company's operational working capital.
The ballooning inventory levels relative to sales suggest that the company is failing to move its fragrance and bioactive products through the supply chain at historical speeds. This inefficiency ties up critical liquidity and increases the risk of inventory obsolescence, particularly given the perishable nature of botanical ingredients.
While the company maintains a conservative debt-to-equity ratio of 0.21 according to recent balance sheet data, this low leverage profile appears insufficient to offset the risks posed by negative interest coverage and the absence of consistent operating cash flow to service potential future obligations.
Investors should monitor the company's reliance on equity-based financing, as the current lack of debt service capacity limits the firm's ability to leverage its balance sheet for operational turnarounds. The absence of meaningful interest coverage suggests that any future debt-funded expansion would likely be prohibitively expensive or structurally impossible under current performance.
Market participants frequently misapply the 'Consumer Defensive' classification to BON, which obscures the reality that the company functions more like a volatile, low-margin agricultural processor highly sensitive to discretionary B2B demand cycles rather than a stable provider of essential consumer goods.
Using standard consumer defensive valuation metrics for this business model is misleading because it ignores the high cyclicality of the fragrance and cosmetic ingredient markets. Analysts should instead focus on gross margin stability and inventory turnover ratios to better assess the company's true operational health and competitive positioning.
Includes 30+ ratios · 8 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying BON stock.
Bon Natural Life Limited's current P/E ratio is -1.6x. The historical average is 5.4x.
Bon Natural Life Limited's return on equity (ROE) is -3.9%. The historical average is 17.4%.
Based on historical data, Bon Natural Life Limited is trading at a P/E of -1.6x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Bon Natural Life Limited has 20.8% gross margin and -8.7% operating margin.