Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio N/A · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -16.7%. (2021–2024 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $9M | — | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $-2830612 | — | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.02 | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 0.18 | 0.05 | 0.06 | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 4.6% | 4.6% | 4.2% | 5.3% | 4.7% |
| Operating Margin | -1.9% | -1.9% | -5.1% | -4.3% | -9.0% |
| Net Profit Margin | -1.8% | -1.8% | -4.8% | -3.4% | -8.4% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -16.7% | -16.7% | -42.2% | — | — |
| ROA | -5.6% | -5.6% | -19.9% | -11.5% | -16.9% |
| ROIC | -22.8% | -22.8% | -76.7% | — | — |
| ROCE | -16.6% | -16.6% | -44.1% | -26.1% | -29.9% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.08 | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.23 | -0.57 | — | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -79.41 | -79.41 | -116.03 | -35.11 | -23.87 |
Net cash position: cash ($117M) exceeds total debt ($35M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.34 | 1.34 | 1.56 | 1.75 | 2.16 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.34 | 1.34 | 1.56 | 1.75 | 2.16 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.17 | 0.17 | 0.53 | 0.44 | 1.23 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 2.70 | 3.69 | 3.76 | 2.00 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 105.60 | 55.94 | 59.39 | 65.59 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Regulatory commission fee compression
Based on current market data, CCGWW trades at a P/S ratio of 0.02, which appears to reflect deep investor skepticism regarding the firm's ability to convert its high-volume transaction revenue into sustainable earnings, especially when compared to the broader fintech peer group's valuation multiples.
The extremely low P/S ratio suggests that the market is heavily discounting the company's revenue due to its razor-thin margins and persistent operating losses. Investors should monitor whether this valuation reflects a permanent impairment of the business model or a temporary mispricing of its potential data-driven ecosystem expansion.
As reported in recent financial statements, the company's gross margin of 4.57% underscores the inherent difficulty of maintaining profitability within a high-volume brokerage model, where intense competition and regulatory pressure on intermediary fees severely constrain the firm's ability to generate meaningful bottom-line returns.
The negative operating margin of -1.92% indicates that the current scale of operations is insufficient to absorb fixed technology and overhead costs. This suggests that without a significant shift toward higher-margin SaaS revenue, the company may struggle to achieve consistent profitability in the near term.
According to 2022Q4 filings, the company's asset turnover of 1.09 and a DSO of 206 days reveal significant inefficiencies in converting insurance transactions into cash, highlighting the structural challenges of managing liquidity within a complex, multi-party intermediary ecosystem in the Chinese market.
The extended DSO suggests that CCGWW faces substantial delays in collecting commissions from insurance carriers, which places additional pressure on its already limited cash reserves. This working capital inefficiency warrants further investigation into the company's bargaining power relative to its upstream insurance partners.
Based on the 2022Q4 balance sheet, the company's negative equity position of $1.3 billion, contrasted against total assets of $712.5 million, indicates a precarious financial foundation that suggests the firm is highly vulnerable to any further deterioration in its core operating cash flow.
While the current ratio of 1.75 provides a superficial appearance of liquidity, the underlying insolvency risk is significant given the company's reliance on intangible goodwill and its inability to generate positive free cash flow. Investors should monitor the company's cash burn rate closely to assess the likelihood of future dilutive financing.
As indicated by the company's financial profile, the market's tendency to apply standard software-as-a-service valuation multiples to CCGWW's $3.47 billion in gross revenue obscures the reality that the vast majority of this figure represents low-margin pass-through transaction volume rather than high-margin, recurring software subscription income.
Analysts should prioritize net commission income over gross revenue to avoid overestimating the company's economic value. Treating this business as a pure-play SaaS entity ignores the structural reality of its brokerage-heavy cost base and the regulatory risks inherent in its primary revenue stream.
Includes 30+ ratios · 4 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying CCGWW stock.
Cheche Group Inc. Warrant's return on equity (ROE) is -16.7%. The historical average is -29.4%.
Based on historical data, Cheche Group Inc. Warrant is trading at valuation metrics that vary. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Cheche Group Inc. Warrant has 4.6% gross margin and -1.9% operating margin.