Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio N/A · EV/EBITDA 4.5x · ROE 17.7%. (2023–2024 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $8M | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $11M | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.95 | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 4.51 | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | 8.47 | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 27.0% | 27.0% | 22.6% |
| Operating Margin | 15.0% | 15.0% | 7.8% |
| Net Profit Margin | 10.2% | 10.2% | 3.8% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 17.7% | 17.7% | 8.9% |
| ROA | 8.5% | 8.5% | 3.6% |
| ROIC | 12.1% | 12.1% | 7.7% |
| ROCE | 17.4% | 17.4% | 11.0% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.55 | 0.55 | 1.07 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 1.36 | 1.36 | 2.18 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.46 | 0.81 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.14 | 1.14 | 1.64 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | 10.14 | 10.14 | 6.47 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.94 | 1.94 | 1.23 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.83 | 1.83 | 1.13 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.32 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.80 | 0.94 |
| Inventory Turnover | 20.90 | 20.90 | 22.84 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 156.06 | 79.81 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $0 | $19M |
Structural revenue contraction
Based on current market data, CCHH trades at an EV/EBITDA multiple of 4.41x, which appears to reflect significant investor skepticism regarding the company's ability to reverse its recent 8.79% year-over-year revenue decline and restore long-term growth in a highly competitive Taiwanese food service market.
The 4.41x EV/EBITDA multiple suggests that the market is pricing the company as a value-trap rather than a growth-oriented restaurant operator. This valuation implies that investors are discounting the potential for future margin expansion, likely due to the lack of clear catalysts to revitalize legacy brands like Sanshang Qiaofu.
As reported in financial statements, CCHH maintains an operating margin of 14.98%, which suggests that the company's shared services platform effectively mitigates the impact of its 8.79% revenue contraction by centralizing procurement and logistics costs across its diverse portfolio of quick-service dining brands.
While the 14.98% operating margin appears robust for the industry, it warrants further investigation to determine if these levels are sustainable or if they are being propped up by aggressive cost-cutting that may erode long-term brand equity. The 26.99% gross margin indicates that the company remains vulnerable to commodity price volatility, which could compress profitability if inflationary pressures persist.
According to recent financial disclosures, CCHH operates with a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.55%, indicating a fortress-like balance sheet that provides the company with significant financial flexibility to navigate the current period of top-line contraction without the immediate pressure of high interest service obligations.
This minimal leverage profile is a structural advantage compared to more debt-laden peers, effectively insulating the bottom line from rising interest rates. However, the lack of debt utilization may also suggest a lack of aggressive expansion plans, which investors should monitor as a potential indicator of management's cautious outlook on the domestic market.
Based on an analysis of the business model, the P/E ratio is frequently misapplied to CCHH, as it fails to account for the company's role as a logistics-heavy food distribution platform that benefits from the scale of the Mercuries & Associates conglomerate ecosystem.
Using standard restaurant P/E multiples obscures the value of the company's shared services infrastructure and its defensive, staple-like revenue streams. Analysts should instead focus on EV/EBITDA or cash-flow-based metrics to better capture the underlying operational efficiency and the value of the company's underutilized cash reserves.
Includes 30+ ratios · 2 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying CCHH stock.
CCH Holdings Ltd Ordinary Shares's current EV/EBITDA is 4.5x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA.
CCH Holdings Ltd Ordinary Shares's return on equity (ROE) is 17.7%. The historical average is 13.3%.
Based on historical data, CCH Holdings Ltd Ordinary Shares is trading at valuation metrics that vary. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
CCH Holdings Ltd Ordinary Shares has 27.0% gross margin and 15.0% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
CCH Holdings Ltd Ordinary Shares's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 1.4x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.