Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio N/A · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE N/A. (2022–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | — | $241M | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | — | $241M | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | — | 11260.00 | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | — | 1.00 | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | 5604.92 | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | 5604.92 | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 5613.58 | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | — | — | — | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Profit Margin | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | — | 0.0% | — | -77.6% | -101.2% |
| ROA | — | 0.0% | -129.4% | -77.6% | -101.2% |
| ROIC | — | -1.2% | -721.3% | -58.2% | — |
| ROCE | — | -1.5% | -591.1% | -77.6% | — |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | — | 0.00 | — | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.00 | — | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | 8.66 | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | — | — | — | — | — |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | — | 0.10 | — | — | — |
| Quick Ratio | — | 0.10 | — | — | — |
| Cash Ratio | — | 0.02 | — | — | — |
| Asset Turnover | — | — | — | — | — |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | 0.0% | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | 0.0% | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | — | 0.0% | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | — | 0.0% | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $21M | $26M | $26M | $26M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 4 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying CEPT stock.
Based on historical data, Cantor Equity Partners II, Inc. is trading at valuation metrics that vary. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Sponsor deal execution failure
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Shell Status Distorts Valuation Multiples
According to recent market data, CEPT trades at a P/FCF of 7726.10, a figure that appears largely meaningless given the company's lack of operational revenue and its status as a pre-combination shell entity awaiting a target acquisition to establish any fundamental valuation basis.
The extreme P/FCF multiple reflects the absence of meaningful cash flow rather than investor optimism regarding future growth. Investors should monitor the P/B ratio of 0.97, which suggests the market is pricing the entity near its liquidation value, highlighting the speculative nature of the current share price.
Severe Liquidity Constraints Impede Operations
Based on reported financial statements, the current ratio of 0.07 in 2026Q1 indicates a precarious liquidity position, suggesting that the company lacks the necessary working capital to sustain its administrative and regulatory obligations without continued reliance on external sponsor support or additional capital injections.
The sharp decline in the current ratio from 3.08 in 2025Q2 to 0.07 in 2026Q1 underscores a rapid depletion of liquid assets relative to mounting liabilities. This trend warrants further investigation into the sponsor's commitment to funding the entity's ongoing overhead until a merger is successfully finalized.
Capital Efficiency Remains Structurally Negative
As reported in recent filings, CEPT's ROIC has fluctuated into negative territory, reaching -0.5% in 2026Q1, which reflects the company's inability to generate returns on invested capital while it remains in a dormant state prior to identifying a viable business combination target.
The negative ROIC trend is consistent with a shell company that incurs fixed costs without any offsetting operational income. This performance suggests that capital is being eroded by administrative expenses rather than being deployed effectively, which is typical for SPACs but highlights the risk of value destruction over time.
Misapplication of Traditional Profitability Metrics
Based on an analysis of the company's financial structure, the use of P/E ratios is fundamentally misapplied to CEPT, as non-operating income items frequently create artificial net income figures that obscure the underlying cash burn and lack of operational earning power inherent in a shell vehicle.
Investors should instead focus on the sponsor's track record and the cash burn rate, as traditional profitability metrics like net margin are distorted by accounting adjustments related to warrant liabilities. Relying on P/E ratios for a pre-revenue SPAC may lead to a significant misinterpretation of the company's actual financial health.