Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -0.7x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -101.1%. (2017–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $8M | $15M | $41M | $17M | $355M | — | — | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $9M | $16M | $53M | $26M | $368M | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -0.66 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.31 | 0.55 | 1.35 | 0.30 | 7.62 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 0.58 | 0.99 | 36.11 | 1.05 | 4.64 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.59 | 1.72 | 0.46 | 7.90 | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | 13.92 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 25.6% | 25.6% | 14.7% | 10.6% | 5.9% | 11.9% | 39.7% | 50.9% | 82.1% | 75.8% |
| Operating Margin | -33.0% | -33.0% | -47.4% | -136.3% | -71.2% | -262.7% | -47.1% | -70.4% | 50.4% | 59.2% |
| Net Profit Margin | -30.3% | -30.3% | -78.8% | -140.6% | -72.6% | -258.5% | -47.1% | -71.0% | 50.4% | 59.2% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -101.1% | -101.1% | -280.5% | -173.3% | -66.4% | -237.0% | -58.5% | -68.5% | 419.7% | 302.6% |
| ROA | -31.2% | -31.2% | -61.9% | -102.8% | -48.1% | -161.6% | -39.8% | -57.0% | 159.8% | 240.4% |
| ROIC | -46.6% | -46.6% | -57.3% | -101.3% | -41.7% | -163.7% | -58.4% | -87.3% | 208.1% | — |
| ROCE | -92.5% | -92.5% | -123.7% | -150.8% | -59.2% | -201.7% | -53.6% | -64.6% | 182.6% | 302.6% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.18 | 0.18 | 10.72 | 0.61 | 0.19 | 0.29 | 0.52 | 0.03 | 5.54 | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.07 | 9.86 | 0.59 | 0.17 | 0.18 | -0.15 | -0.45 | 3.32 | -0.35 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.49 | -0.15 |
| Interest Coverage | 0.12 | 0.12 | -4.55 | -27.00 | -48.60 | -126.36 | -198.01 | -113.26 | — | — |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.42 | 0.42 | 0.14 | 0.88 | 0.62 | 1.80 | 1.64 | 4.28 | 12.88 | 4.82 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.42 | 0.42 | 0.14 | 0.88 | 0.62 | 1.66 | 1.64 | 4.17 | 12.88 | 4.82 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.22 | 0.22 | 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.08 | 0.53 | 1.35 | 3.24 | 4.02 | 1.35 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.06 | 1.15 | 1.10 | 0.45 | 0.42 | 0.57 | 0.42 | 2.51 | 4.06 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | 233.04 | 3712.98 | 18.32 | — | 14.51 | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 17.74 | 23.94 | 19.18 | 64.25 | 116.68 | 50.75 | 101.77 | 100.12 | 64.29 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 71.0% | 69.2% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $31M | $12M | $11M | $9M | $126M | $113M | $108M | $108M | $7M |
Liquidity and insolvency risk
Based on reported figures, CISO trades at a price-to-sales multiple of 0.30, a valuation level that suggests the market is heavily discounting the firm's future growth prospects and questioning the long-term viability of its current service-heavy, acquisition-led business model compared to higher-multiple cybersecurity peers.
The low P/S ratio indicates that investors are pricing the company as a distressed asset rather than a growth-oriented technology firm. This valuation gap appears to stem from the persistent revenue contraction and the lack of a clear path to profitability, which makes traditional earnings-based multiples like P/E largely irrelevant for assessing the company's current market standing.
As reported in financial statements, CISO's ROIC has remained consistently negative over the last ten quarters, bottoming out at -22.7% in 2023Q4, which highlights a fundamental inability to generate returns on capital that exceed the cost of funding its aggressive acquisition strategy.
The negative ROIC trend suggests that the capital deployed for acquisitions has failed to create value, likely due to the high integration costs and the inability to achieve operational synergies. This persistent decay in returns warrants further investigation into whether the company's core service offerings are fundamentally capable of achieving positive economic profit.
According to recent SEC filings, CISO's asset turnover ratio has stagnated at approximately 0.25, a figure that underscores the company's struggle to extract meaningful revenue from its asset base and points to significant inefficiencies in managing its service-delivery infrastructure compared to more scalable software-centric competitors.
The low asset turnover ratio reflects a business model that is heavily reliant on human capital rather than proprietary technology, which limits the ability to scale revenue without a proportional increase in costs. Investors should monitor whether management can improve these turnover metrics, as current levels suggest a lack of operational leverage.
Based on the most recent quarterly data, CISO's current ratio has deteriorated to 0.29, a level that indicates severe liquidity pressure and suggests the company may face significant challenges in meeting its short-term obligations without relying on external financing or further dilutive capital raises.
The rapid decline in the current ratio from previous periods highlights a precarious financial position that leaves little room for operational error. This liquidity profile appears to be a direct consequence of sustained cash burn and the lack of a self-sustaining cash flow engine, which increases the risk of a near-term liquidity event.
Analysts frequently misapply traditional software growth metrics to CISO, failing to recognize that the company's revenue contraction is a symptom of a distressed roll-up model rather than a standard cyclical downturn, which obscures the underlying reality of its high-cost, service-dependent cost structure.
Using standard SaaS metrics like ARR growth or CAC/LTV ratios is misleading for CISO because the company lacks the proprietary software moat that these metrics are designed to measure. Instead, analysts should focus on consultant utilization rates and cash-burn-to-liquidity ratios to better understand the company's true operational health and survival risk.
Includes 30+ ratios · 9 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying CISO stock.
CISO Global Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -0.7x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
CISO Global Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -101.1%. The historical average is -29.2%.
Based on historical data, CISO Global Inc. is trading at a P/E of -0.7x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
CISO Global Inc. has 25.6% gross margin and -33.0% operating margin.