Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -5.5x · EV/EBITDA 14.0x · ROE -34.6%. (2004–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $421M | $463M | $561M | $854M | $1.2B | $1.3B | $1.6B | $482M | $311M | $305M | $341M |
| Enterprise Value | $362M | $405M | $836M | $1.1B | $1.2B | $1.3B | $1.6B | $555M | $369M | $529M | $618M |
| P/E Ratio → | -5.54 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 23.40 | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.94 | 1.09 | 1.35 | 2.01 | 2.75 | 5.11 | 5.41 | 1.40 | 0.90 | 0.89 | 0.85 |
| P/B Ratio | 0.75 | 0.82 | 0.78 | 1.16 | 1.59 | 1.73 | 3.02 | 0.89 | 0.59 | 0.68 | 0.69 |
| P/FCF | 9.39 | 18.07 | — | — | 87.44 | 105.42 | 33.02 | — | 24.43 | — | 15.23 |
| P/OCF | 4.92 | 5.42 | 8.68 | 19.50 | 17.33 | 31.63 | 25.84 | 39.25 | 8.18 | — | 7.41 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.95 | 2.01 | 2.61 | 2.93 | 5.04 | 5.43 | 1.61 | 1.06 | 1.55 | 1.53 |
| EV / EBITDA | 14.01 | 85.45 | 99.74 | — | 415.36 | — | 41.86 | 9.31 | 6.62 | — | 14.84 |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 25.57 | 52.07 | — | 35.89 |
| EV / FCF | — | 15.77 | — | — | 93.17 | 104.03 | 33.16 | — | 28.99 | — | 27.55 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 4.2% | 4.2% | 20.1% | 8.4% | 13.7% | -2.0% | 20.1% | 23.9% | 23.6% | 8.5% | 21.8% |
| Operating Margin | -22.0% | -22.0% | -8.7% | -18.0% | -12.3% | -37.2% | -3.4% | 2.9% | 1.1% | -39.4% | -4.4% |
| Net Profit Margin | -52.1% | -52.1% | -20.0% | -23.4% | -14.0% | -36.4% | -3.4% | 5.9% | -1.1% | -23.2% | -3.0% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -34.6% | -34.6% | -11.4% | -13.6% | -7.9% | -14.6% | -1.9% | 3.8% | -0.8% | -16.8% | -3.0% |
| ROA | -19.3% | -19.3% | -6.6% | -8.5% | -5.8% | -11.1% | -1.3% | 2.8% | -0.5% | -9.4% | -1.3% |
| ROIC | -9.4% | -9.4% | -2.7% | -6.4% | -5.0% | -11.2% | -1.3% | 1.2% | 0.5% | -14.0% | -1.6% |
| ROCE | -9.4% | -9.4% | -3.3% | -7.5% | -5.9% | -13.0% | -1.6% | 1.6% | 0.6% | -19.3% | -2.3% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.18 | 0.18 | 0.51 | 0.49 | 0.28 | 0.11 | 0.22 | 0.22 | 0.17 | 0.58 | 0.63 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 20.89 | 20.89 | 43.55 | — | 68.00 | — | 3.05 | 2.04 | 1.59 | — | 7.50 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.10 | 0.38 | 0.35 | 0.10 | -0.02 | 0.01 | 0.13 | 0.11 | 0.50 | 0.56 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -12.43 | -12.43 | 32.87 | — | 25.55 | — | 0.17 | 1.22 | 1.04 | — | 6.64 |
| Debt / FCF | — | -2.29 | — | — | 5.73 | -1.38 | 0.14 | — | 4.56 | — | 12.32 |
| Interest Coverage | -3.28 | -3.28 | -1.52 | -3.38 | -8.41 | -20.23 | -0.53 | 2.86 | 0.44 | -3.69 | 0.58 |
Net cash position: cash ($158M) exceeds total debt ($99M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.32 | 2.32 | 2.67 | 2.87 | 3.18 | 3.26 | 3.29 | 1.81 | 2.81 | 1.50 | 2.93 |
| Quick Ratio | 2.03 | 2.03 | 2.39 | 2.59 | 2.93 | 3.01 | 2.94 | 1.62 | 2.38 | 1.33 | 2.60 |
| Cash Ratio | 1.05 | 1.05 | 1.41 | 1.61 | 1.79 | 1.82 | 1.73 | 0.65 | 1.20 | 0.87 | 1.23 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.40 | 0.33 | 0.34 | 0.39 | 0.27 | 0.41 | 0.44 | 0.50 | 0.43 | 0.45 |
| Inventory Turnover | 9.30 | 9.30 | 7.65 | 8.59 | 9.76 | 8.33 | 8.30 | 8.76 | 7.57 | 8.87 | 10.66 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 91.56 | 112.06 | 101.47 | 94.22 | 159.74 | 106.90 | 156.06 | 88.94 | 88.90 | 91.89 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 4.3% | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 10.7% | 5.5% | — | — | 1.1% | 0.9% | 3.0% | — | 4.1% | — | 6.6% |
| Buyback Yield | 1.9% | 1.7% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.9% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 1.9% | 1.7% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.9% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $221M | $223M | $223M | $222M | $213M | $201M | $206M | $181M | $150M | $119M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 22 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying CLNE stock.
Clean Energy Fuels Corp.'s current P/E ratio is -5.5x. The historical average is 23.4x.
Clean Energy Fuels Corp.'s current EV/EBITDA is 14.0x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 46.6x.
Clean Energy Fuels Corp.'s return on equity (ROE) is -34.6%. The historical average is -12.5%.
Based on historical data, Clean Energy Fuels Corp. is trading at a P/E of -5.5x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Clean Energy Fuels Corp. has 4.2% gross margin and -22.0% operating margin.
Clean Energy Fuels Corp.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 20.9x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Negative coverage on spiking debt
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Gross Whipsaw Masks Structural Operating Loss
CLNE's operating margin has never printed positive across the ten quarters observed, while gross margin swung roughly 60 points from -32.5% in 2025Q1 to 28.3% in 2026Q2, suggesting the recovery reflects input cost timing rather than durable pricing power, per the company's reported statements.
The cleanest read on underlying earning power is the operating margin rather than net margin, since the latter is distorted by large non-cash charges — including the goodwill write-down implied between 2024Q4 and 2025Q1. Even the improved 28.3% gross margin in 2026Q2 only translated to a -4.8% operating margin, confirming SG&A remains structurally oversized against the current revenue base of roughly $106M per quarter. Absent evidence that overhead has been permanently right-sized, the recent margin expansion appears to be a gross-line artifact rather than an earnings inflection, and investors should be cautious extrapolating the 2026Q2 print forward.
ROIC Never Crosses Into Positive Territory
CLNE's ROIC has remained negative in every quarter presented, ranging from -5.0% in 2025Q1 to a still-subdued -0.5% in 2026Q2, while asset turnover has been stuck near 0.10, indicating the roughly $1.0B asset base is generating minimal return against its cost of capital.
A capital-intensive fuel distribution business with asset turnover near 0.10 is effectively a slow-moving infrastructure play, and combined with persistently negative spreads this points to capital destruction rather than compounding, as disclosed in CLNE's filings. The modest sequential improvement in ROIC from -1.2% in 2025Q4 to -0.5% in 2026Q2 appears tied to gross margin normalization rather than any step-change in asset productivity, since asset turnover did not meaningfully lift. The gap between ROIC and any plausible cost of equity or debt remains wide enough that, absent a durable swing to positive operating income, further equity erosion should be expected on the current trajectory.
Long Collection Cycle Drags Working Capital
CLNE's DSO has hovered between 86 and 108 days over the ten quarters presented, pushing the cash conversion cycle to 119 days in 2026Q2 — a level that, per the company's reported working capital disclosures, leaves operating cash flow unusually exposed to quarter-to-quarter swings.
The DPO of just 26 days in 2026Q2, down from 52 days in 2024Q1, suggests CLNE has been paying suppliers faster than it is collecting from customers, compressing the natural supplier-financing benefit that utilities and larger peers typically enjoy. This asymmetry likely explains why working capital swung from a $27.4M drag in 2026Q1 to an $11.4M release in 2026Q2, a roughly $39M reversal that dominates quarterly FCF optics. Sustained improvement in DPO discipline, or faster customer collections, would be a meaningful leading indicator that the business is actually tightening its cash cycle rather than merely benefitting from timing effects.
Debt Spike Meets Negative Interest Coverage
Total debt surged to $320.7M in 2026Q2 from just $96.1M in 2026Q1, lifting the D/E ratio to 0.57, while interest coverage has remained negative in all ten quarters — reaching -1.71 in 2026Q2, per CLNE's quarterly balance sheet and income statement disclosures.
Negative interest coverage means CLNE is not generating enough operating income to service its debt costs, so debt service is presumably being met from cash on hand, asset sales, or new issuance rather than earnings — a dynamic that investors should monitor closely given cash reserves slipped to $59.2M in 2026Q2. The D/E jump from 0.17 to 0.57 in a single quarter, on a shrinking equity base of $553.3M, suggests the leverage ratios are moving against the company faster than operations can offset, and refinancing terms could tighten materially if losses persist. This combination — rising absolute debt, negative coverage, and no demonstrated path to positive EBIT — makes the leverage profile one of the more fragile elements of CLNE's financial structure.
Low P/B Confronts Eroding Book Value
CLNE trades at a P/B of 0.57 and P/S of 0.75, yet ROIC has been negative throughout, and total equity has fallen roughly 23% from $722.9M in 2024Q1 to $553.3M in 2026Q2, suggesting the apparent discount reflects anticipated further impairment rather than a mispriced asset.
The EV/EBITDA gap of 55x trailing versus 2.1x forward is particularly striking and implies the market is being asked to underwrite a step-change in EBITDA that has no precedent in the ten quarters reviewed; any forward multiple built on near-zero trailing EBITDA should be treated with caution. Meanwhile, P/FCF of 12.45 looks reasonable in isolation, but prior cash flow analysis has highlighted that FCF swings are dominated by working capital reversals rather than sustained operating generation. On a sum-of-parts basis, the combination of negative ROIC, shrinking equity, and impaired goodwill makes the low headline multiples look more like a recognition of structural economics than a classic value entry point, and further downside valuation support appears limited absent a fundamental inflection.
EV/EBITDA Is the Most Misapplied Ratio Here
The most commonly misapplied ratio for CLNE's capital-intensive, thin-margin fuel distribution model is EV/EBITDA, where the 55x trailing and 2.1x forward spread obscures the reality that EBITDA has hovered near break-even and depends heavily on non-cash addbacks such as depreciation and stock compensation.
EV/EBITDA is conventionally used for capital-intensive energy businesses to strip out financing and non-cash noise, but that logic breaks down when EBITDA itself is the swing factor rather than a stable base — CLNE's trailing figure is so small that the multiple becomes mathematically volatile rather than informative. Given that roughly $288M of the divergence between cumulative operating cash flow and cumulative net losses over the past two and a half years appears anchored in non-cash addbacks per reported statements, and that stock-based compensation has already collapsed from $20.5M to $2.3M quarter-over-quarter, the addback cushion supporting EBITDA optics may be structurally shrinking. A more informative lens would be ROIC paired with cash interest coverage, or EV per unit of throughput volume, since those metrics strip away the accounting noise that currently makes CLNE's headline multiples look deceptively actionable. Investors relying on the 2.1x forward EV/EBITDA as evidence of cheapness should recognize that no forward EBITDA estimate has yet been validated by reported quarterly results, and warrants further investigation before being treated as a reliable anchor.