Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 48.8x · EV/EBITDA 32.5x · ROE 41.2%. (1997–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $40.9B | $34.3B | $11.0B | $3.5B | $1.4B | $1.4B | $1.0B | $1.1B | $1.2B | $1.5B | $1.7B |
| Enterprise Value | $41.3B | $34.7B | $11.3B | $3.9B | $1.8B | $1.8B | $1.2B | $1.3B | $1.6B | $1.2B | $1.4B |
| P/E Ratio → | 48.85 | 40.55 | 25.57 | 14.42 | 7.72 | 13.57 | 17.17 | 15.60 | 12.53 | 14.56 | 12.47 |
| P/S Ratio | 3.25 | 2.72 | 1.14 | 0.44 | 0.19 | 0.25 | 0.18 | 0.19 | 0.19 | 0.25 | 0.28 |
| P/B Ratio | 18.70 | 15.53 | 5.78 | 1.99 | 0.83 | 0.96 | 0.74 | 0.80 | 0.93 | 1.11 | 1.36 |
| P/FCF | 87.80 | 73.66 | 36.16 | 17.52 | 13.64 | 8.08 | 5.58 | 4.12 | — | 62.36 | 15.62 |
| P/OCF | 61.02 | 51.19 | 23.12 | 10.80 | 6.60 | 6.22 | 4.35 | 3.16 | 37.25 | 11.98 | 9.84 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 2.75 | 1.17 | 0.49 | 0.25 | 0.32 | 0.21 | 0.22 | 0.24 | 0.20 | 0.23 |
| EV / EBITDA | 32.54 | 27.34 | 15.08 | 8.39 | 4.45 | 6.18 | 4.67 | 4.64 | 8.05 | 5.51 | 5.94 |
| EV / EBIT | 37.89 | 32.90 | 19.39 | 10.23 | 6.21 | 10.86 | 9.23 | 8.85 | 14.80 | 8.46 | 8.05 |
| EV / FCF | — | 74.35 | 37.39 | 19.57 | 17.67 | 10.41 | 6.32 | 5.00 | — | 49.63 | 12.75 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 11.7% | 11.7% | 10.7% | 9.5% | 9.0% | 8.6% | 7.6% | 6.5% | 6.5% | 6.8% | 7.1% |
| Operating Margin | 8.6% | 8.6% | 6.2% | 4.2% | 4.0% | 3.0% | 2.2% | 2.5% | 1.6% | 2.3% | 2.6% |
| Net Profit Margin | 6.7% | 6.7% | 4.4% | 3.1% | 2.5% | 1.8% | 1.1% | 1.2% | 1.5% | 1.7% | 2.3% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 41.2% | 41.2% | 23.3% | 14.2% | 11.5% | 7.2% | 4.4% | 5.2% | 7.3% | 8.0% | 11.8% |
| ROA | 12.8% | 12.8% | 7.2% | 4.2% | 3.5% | 2.5% | 1.7% | 1.9% | 3.0% | 3.6% | 5.1% |
| ROIC | 34.0% | 34.0% | 20.2% | 11.9% | 11.0% | 7.4% | 6.1% | 6.9% | 5.8% | 10.7% | 13.4% |
| ROCE | 34.9% | 34.9% | 21.3% | 12.9% | 11.6% | 7.5% | 6.1% | 7.1% | 5.6% | 8.7% | 10.3% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.41 | 0.41 | 0.42 | 0.44 | 0.47 | 0.55 | 0.43 | 0.52 | 0.57 | 0.15 | 0.19 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 0.72 | 0.72 | 1.06 | 1.67 | 1.94 | 2.73 | 2.38 | 2.50 | 3.90 | 0.93 | 1.04 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.14 | 0.20 | 0.23 | 0.25 | 0.28 | 0.10 | 0.17 | 0.26 | -0.23 | -0.25 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.50 | 0.88 | 1.02 | 1.39 | 0.55 | 0.81 | 1.74 | -1.41 | -1.33 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 0.69 | 1.23 | 2.06 | 4.03 | 2.34 | 0.74 | 0.87 | — | -12.74 | -2.86 |
| Interest Coverage | 19.69 | 19.69 | 11.21 | 4.88 | 5.62 | 5.33 | 3.39 | 2.95 | 4.36 | 14.18 | 17.30 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.44 | 1.44 | 1.49 | 1.40 | 1.42 | 1.52 | 1.73 | 1.75 | 1.74 | 1.96 | 1.90 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.88 | 0.88 | 0.91 | 0.75 | 0.65 | 0.77 | 1.04 | 1.08 | 1.07 | 1.30 | 1.35 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.14 | 0.12 | 0.12 | 0.17 | 0.29 | 0.32 | 0.26 | 0.41 | 0.45 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.75 | 1.61 | 1.35 | 1.29 | 1.21 | 1.57 | 1.65 | 1.77 | 2.07 | 2.13 |
| Inventory Turnover | 5.10 | 5.10 | 4.89 | 3.42 | 2.81 | 3.03 | 4.87 | 5.55 | 5.69 | 6.95 | 8.21 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 76.23 | 78.61 | 82.33 | 70.16 | 81.64 | 69.43 | 65.25 | 66.39 | 60.83 | 61.41 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 2.0% | 2.5% | 3.9% | 6.9% | 13.0% | 7.4% | 5.8% | 6.4% | 8.0% | 6.9% | 8.0% |
| FCF Yield | 1.1% | 1.4% | 2.8% | 5.7% | 7.3% | 12.4% | 17.9% | 24.3% | — | 1.6% | 6.4% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.9% | 1.1% | 1.4% | 1.0% | 2.5% | 2.5% | 0.0% | 6.2% | 7.9% | 2.4% | 3.1% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.9% | 1.1% | 1.4% | 1.0% | 2.5% | 2.5% | 0.0% | 6.2% | 7.9% | 2.4% | 3.1% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $116M | $119M | $120M | $124M | $127M | $129M | $132M | $141M | $145M | $144M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 29 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying CLS stock.
Celestica Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 48.8x. The historical average is 27.3x. This places it at the 89th percentile of its historical range.
Celestica Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 32.5x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 12.3x.
Celestica Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 41.2%. This is above the typical threshold of 15-20% considered good for most companies. The historical average is 3.3%.
Based on historical data, Celestica Inc. is trading at a P/E of 48.8x. This is at the 89th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Celestica Inc. has 11.7% gross margin and 8.6% operating margin.
Celestica Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 0.7x, indicating low leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Hyperscaler concentration and margin ceiling
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Expansion at EMS High End
Gross margin reached 12.3% in 2026Q2, up from 10.6% a year earlier, per recent financial statements, positioning Celestica above peers like Jabil and Flex, indicating a favorable mix shift toward high-complexity work.
The sequential decline from 12.8% in 2025Q2 to 12.3% in 2026Q2, despite record operating margin of 9.8%, suggests that while the company is capturing value from JDM initiatives, the pace of gross margin expansion may be moderating. Operating leverage is evident as operating margin expanded from 5.6% in 2024Q2 to 9.8% in 2026Q2, driven by SG&A efficiency, but the sustainability of this depends on continued CCS growth. Investors should monitor whether the 8.2% adjusted operating margin cited in recent guidance represents a ceiling, given the EPS miss versus consensus despite the beat-and-raise narrative.
ROIC Inflection Signals Compounding
ROIC surged to 13.1% in 2026Q2 from 4.4% in 2024Q2, as reported in financial statements, indicating a structural shift in capital efficiency, though the 2025Q3 dip to 6.4% highlights volatility.
The improvement in ROIC is driven by both margin expansion and asset turnover, with asset turnover rising from 0.38 in 2024Q1 to 0.52 in 2026Q2, reflecting better utilization of the expanded asset base. However, the 2025Q3 ROIC of 6.4% versus 8.8% in 2025Q2 suggests that returns are sensitive to working capital swings and capacity ramp costs. The recent capex surge to 5.6% of revenue may pressure near-term ROIC, but if the AI infrastructure demand persists, the investment could drive further compounding. The trend from 4.3% in 2024Q1 to 13.1% in 2026Q2 indicates a potential inflection point, but investors should verify that this is not a peak driven by temporary demand.
Working Capital Cycle Compresses Sharply
Cash conversion cycle improved to 54 days in 2026Q2 from 106 days in 2024Q1, per balance sheet data, driven by faster inventory turnover and extended payables, signaling enhanced working capital management.
The CCC compression is notable, with DIO falling from 93 days to 67 days and DPO rising from 62 to 76 days over the same period, indicating that Celestica is managing inventory more efficiently and leveraging supplier terms. However, the quick ratio of 0.68 in 2026Q2, down from 0.78 in 2024Q1, suggests that liquidity is increasingly dependent on inventory, which could be a risk if demand softens. The improvement in DSO from 74 to 63 days reflects better receivables collection, but the 2026Q1 DPO drop to 62 days shows volatility in supplier leverage. This efficiency gain is a positive signal, but the reliance on inventory and the potential for customer concentration to disrupt payment terms warrant monitoring.
Low Leverage Masks Rising Capex Needs
Debt-to-equity fell to 0.33 in 2026Q2 from 0.50 a year earlier, per balance sheet data, but interest coverage of 21.8x remains comfortable, though capex intensity tripled to 5.6% of revenue.
The balance sheet appears conservative with D/E of 0.33 and D/EBITDA of 1.75, down from 5.16 in 2024Q1, indicating reduced leverage relative to earnings. However, the 7x increase in capex to $263.8M in 2026Q2 suggests that the company may need to increase debt to fund capacity ahead of demand, which could raise leverage from its current low base. Interest coverage of 21.8x is robust, but the 2025Q1 coverage of 9.3x shows that it can compress quickly if EBITDA dips. The low D/E is a strength, but investors should monitor whether the company shifts toward higher debt utilization to finance growth, which could strain the balance sheet if the AI cycle turns.
Liquidity Buffer Thins Amid Rapid Growth
Current ratio dipped to 1.23 in 2026Q2 from 1.44 a year earlier, per balance sheet data, while quick ratio fell to 0.68, indicating tighter short-term liquidity despite rising cash reserves.
The current ratio decline is driven by a 43% sequential jump in PPE, which is not a current asset, and a rise in current liabilities to fund working capital. The quick ratio of 0.68 suggests that the company relies heavily on inventory to meet short-term obligations, which could be problematic if inventory becomes obsolete or demand slows. Cash rose to $535.7M, but the cash conversion cycle improvement to 54 days may not fully offset the liquidity strain from rapid expansion. Under a severe stress scenario, such as a sudden drop in hyperscaler orders, the thin quick ratio could force the company to draw on credit lines or delay payables, though the low leverage provides a cushion.
P/E Misleads on AI Growth Potential
The trailing P/E of 40.68 appears expensive, but the PEG of 0.56, based on reported growth, suggests the market may be underpricing Celestica's earnings acceleration relative to its AI-driven growth.
The most commonly misapplied ratio for Celestica is the P/E multiple, which fails to capture the company's transition from a cyclical EMS provider to a specialized AI infrastructure enabler. The trailing P/E of 40.68 is distorted by the recent EPS miss versus consensus, but the forward P/E of 26.56 and PEG of 0.56 indicate that the market is pricing in significant growth, which may be justified given the 30.7% revenue growth. However, the EV/EBITDA of 27.14 is at a premium to peers like Jabil (18.77) and Flex (20.47), suggesting that the market is already paying for the AI narrative. Investors should use EV/EBITDA or a normalized earnings power that adjusts for the cyclicality of hyperscaler capex, rather than relying on P/E, which can be skewed by one-time charges and the timing of consensus estimates.