Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -3.9x · EV/EBITDA 8.9x · ROE -4.0%. (2017–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1.5B | $2.2B | $3.5B | $6.2B | $5.7B | $15.1B | $12.7B | $4.6B | $2.9B | — |
| Enterprise Value | $5.6B | $6.4B | $7.8B | $10.7B | $10.4B | $20.1B | $16.1B | $6.2B | $4.9B | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -3.87 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.66 | 0.92 | 1.38 | 2.37 | 2.13 | 8.03 | 10.15 | 4.72 | 3.01 | — |
| P/B Ratio | 0.33 | 0.46 | 0.69 | 1.04 | 0.83 | 1.26 | 1.41 | 3.69 | 2.77 | — |
| P/FCF | 4.64 | 6.16 | 9.86 | 12.40 | 18.47 | 73.41 | 81.73 | 96.37 | — | — |
| P/OCF | 2.38 | 3.58 | 5.45 | 8.36 | 11.11 | 46.54 | 48.33 | 39.13 | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 2.61 | 3.06 | 4.05 | 3.90 | 10.71 | 12.84 | 6.41 | 5.04 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 8.93 | 7.72 | 17.33 | — | — | 44.58 | 60.33 | 52.93 | 37.11 | — |
| EV / EBIT | 78.98 | 37.18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 17.52 | 21.88 | 21.24 | 33.89 | 97.89 | 103.35 | 130.89 | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 66.0% | 66.0% | 66.0% | 65.5% | 64.1% | 66.6% | 65.0% | 63.9% | 59.1% | 57.0% |
| Operating Margin | 2.9% | 2.9% | -10.8% | -27.9% | -147.6% | -4.6% | -2.9% | -8.5% | -10.9% | -16.0% |
| Net Profit Margin | -8.2% | -8.2% | -24.9% | -34.7% | -148.9% | -14.4% | -28.0% | -26.5% | -25.0% | -28.8% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -4.0% | -4.0% | -11.4% | -14.2% | -42.3% | -2.6% | -6.8% | -22.5% | -20.7% | -20.5% |
| ROA | -1.8% | -1.8% | -5.3% | -6.8% | -23.2% | -1.5% | -3.8% | -6.9% | -6.3% | -6.6% |
| ROIC | 0.6% | 0.6% | -2.1% | -5.0% | -20.7% | -0.4% | -0.4% | -2.1% | -2.5% | -3.4% |
| ROCE | 0.7% | 0.7% | -2.6% | -6.3% | -25.6% | -0.5% | -0.4% | -2.7% | -3.3% | -4.4% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.92 | 0.92 | 0.89 | 0.80 | 0.74 | 0.47 | 0.40 | 1.38 | 1.89 | 1.57 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 5.41 | 5.41 | 10.17 | — | — | 12.45 | 13.59 | 14.60 | 15.14 | 24.72 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.86 | 0.84 | 0.74 | 0.69 | 0.42 | 0.37 | 1.32 | 1.87 | 1.52 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 5.01 | 5.01 | 9.52 | — | — | 11.15 | 12.62 | 13.96 | 14.94 | 24.07 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 11.36 | 12.02 | 8.85 | 15.42 | 24.48 | 21.62 | 34.51 | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | 0.65 | 0.65 | -0.95 | -2.45 | -13.76 | -0.02 | -2.16 | -0.58 | -0.81 | -1.06 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.84 | 0.84 | 0.87 | 0.91 | 0.89 | 0.86 | 0.81 | 0.76 | 0.63 | 0.67 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.84 | 0.84 | 0.87 | 0.91 | 0.83 | 0.86 | 0.81 | 0.76 | 0.59 | 0.59 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.21 | 0.21 | 0.21 | 0.23 | 0.22 | 0.31 | 0.18 | 0.12 | 0.04 | 0.08 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.22 | 0.22 | 0.21 | 0.19 | 0.09 | 0.08 | 0.26 | 0.26 | 0.23 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | 9.79 | — | — | — | 12.78 | 7.47 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 122.16 | 113.97 | 126.11 | 119.68 | 176.27 | 214.71 | 125.07 | 124.86 | 126.41 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | 1.1% | 1.2% | 1.3% | 0.1% | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 21.5% | 16.2% | 10.1% | 8.1% | 5.4% | 1.4% | 1.2% | 1.0% | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 15.0% | 10.0% | 5.7% | 1.6% | 3.1% | 1.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 15.0% | 10.0% | 6.7% | 2.8% | 4.4% | 1.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $673M | $694M | $672M | $679M | $641M | $429M | $274M | $305M | $305M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 9 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying CLVT stock.
Clarivate Plc's current P/E ratio is -3.9x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Clarivate Plc's current EV/EBITDA is 8.9x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 36.7x.
Clarivate Plc's return on equity (ROE) is -4.0%. The historical average is -16.1%.
Based on historical data, Clarivate Plc is trading at a P/E of -3.9x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Clarivate Plc has 66.0% gross margin and 2.9% operating margin.
Clarivate Plc's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 5.4x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Leverage against shrinking equity
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Deep Discount Prices Structural Decline Risk
Based on the supplied multiples, CLVT trades at 0.61x sales, 0.33x book, and 6.81x trailing EV/EBITDA, well below peers such as SPGI at 19.64x and VRSK at 17.57x, a discount that markets appear to attach to shrinking revenue.
The trailing P/E is negative at -7.80, so earnings-based valuation offers no anchor, while the forward P/E of 3.19 and forward EV/EBITDA of 3.63 imply the market expects a sharp earnings recovery that the reported contraction does not yet confirm. The gap to peers is large enough that it likely reflects skepticism about franchise durability rather than a mispricing alone, and investors should monitor whether the discount narrows only if top-line declines stabilize.
Gross Margin Holds While Net Margin Erodes
Gross margin has held between 65% and 71% across the ten quarters, yet net margin remained negative in most periods, with 2026Q3 at -16.8% based on reported figures, indicating that costs below gross profit absorb the resilience at the top line.
The stable gross margin suggests the core data and subscription economics retain pricing power, but operating margin swung from -34.1% in 2026Q2 to 8.3% in 2026Q3, a volatility that does not yet establish durable earnings power. Relative to peers reporting net margins of 20% to 41%, Clarivate's negative net margin appears to reflect non-operating and impairment-related charges, which warrants further investigation before treating gross margin as a reliable proxy for earning power.
Returns Hover Near Zero Against Peers
ROIC has oscillated between roughly -1.8% and 0.4% over the period, and ROE between -5.8% and 0.1%, compared with peer ROIC of 9% to 35%, based on Clarivate's reported figures.
Near-zero returns on invested capital suggest the capital base built through prior acquisitions is not currently generating economic value above its cost, a pattern that may indicate impaired goodwill-heavy assets are diluting returns. The absence of a sustained upward trend in ROIC over ten quarters points toward decay rather than compounding, with margin recovery alone unlikely to lift returns meaningfully without improvement in asset efficiency.
Debt Steady as Equity Base Shrinks
Debt-to-equity has remained between 0.84 and 0.94 while total assets fell from $12.1B to $10.4B, according to reported quarterly figures, so leverage is elevated against a contracting equity cushion.
Total debt has held in a narrow band, but the denominator is shrinking, which mechanically pushes leverage higher even without new borrowing. Interest coverage has been erratic, including negative readings in 2024Q2 and 2026Q2, which suggests debt service depends heavily on operating cash generation remaining above $90M per quarter, a level that the declining operating cash flow trend may not sustain.
Misapplied Metric: Price-to-Book Understates Risk
The 0.33x price-to-book ratio is most often read as a signal of undervaluation, yet for a business whose equity is shrinking and carries substantial goodwill, it may obscure impairment risk embedded in the book value itself.
Book value for an acquisition-heavy information services firm rests heavily on goodwill, which fell roughly $0.6B from $1.7B to $1.1B in the reported data, so a low P/B may simply reflect a book base that is still being written down. A more informative substitute is free cash flow yield or tangible book value after excluding goodwill, which better isolates what shareholders would recover from the operating franchise.