Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -1.2x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -1031.1%. (2021–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $19M | $30M | $23M | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $30M | $41M | $38M | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -1.17 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.52 | 0.83 | 1.02 | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 11.86 | 18.82 | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.15 | 1.68 | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 29.5% | 29.5% | 26.3% | 25.2% | 26.1% | 20.6% |
| Operating Margin | -33.6% | -33.6% | -51.2% | -37.4% | -25.0% | -77.6% |
| Net Profit Margin | -45.3% | -45.3% | -99.6% | -45.8% | -22.9% | -79.3% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -1031.1% | -1031.1% | -173.4% | -13.5% | -8.3% | -67332.2% |
| ROA | -66.4% | -66.4% | -49.3% | -10.6% | -7.5% | -1028.3% |
| ROIC | -428.6% | -428.6% | -39.0% | -8.0% | -6.7% | -3152.2% |
| ROCE | -369.2% | -369.2% | -46.4% | -9.1% | -8.4% | -65831.5% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 8.84 | 8.84 | — | 0.07 | 0.00 | 15.65 |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 7.31 | — | 0.07 | 0.00 | 14.66 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -9.24 | -9.24 | -7.29 | -5.43 | -13.49 | -72.22 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.24 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.02 |
| Quick Ratio | -19.01 | -19.01 | 0.23 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.02 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.02 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.99 | 1.78 | 0.25 | 0.16 | 12.96 |
| Inventory Turnover | 0.04 | 0.04 | 30.34 | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 34.33 | 33.90 | 1.14 | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $2M | $596000 | $354617 | $363688 | $316250 |
Imminent liquidity and dilution
Based on reported figures, CNTM trades at a price-to-sales multiple of 0.57, which appears to reflect a market expectation of rapid scaling that remains disconnected from the company's persistent net losses and the absence of a clear path to positive earnings per share.
The current P/S ratio suggests investors are pricing the firm as a distressed growth asset rather than a mature software entity. Given the negative P/E of -1.29 and the lack of a forward earnings profile, the valuation appears to rely heavily on speculative terminal value rather than current cash-generating capability.
As reported in financial statements, the company's gross margin of 29.49% is significantly lower than typical software-as-a-service peers, suggesting that the business model remains tethered to hardware-intensive deployments rather than high-margin, scalable software licensing revenue.
The persistent operating margin of -33.59% indicates that the company's fixed cost structure is currently too heavy for its revenue base. Investors should monitor whether management can shift the revenue mix toward software, as the current profile suggests the firm is functioning more like a low-margin industrial integrator.
According to recent SEC filings, CNTM's ROIC has remained deeply negative, reaching -16.6% in 2026Q1, which indicates that the company is currently destroying shareholder value through its capital-intensive expansion strategy rather than compounding returns on invested capital.
The inability to generate positive returns on capital suggests that the firm's investments in electrification assets are not yet yielding the expected operational efficiencies. This trend warrants further investigation into whether the company's asset base is becoming obsolete or if the cost of deployment is structurally too high.
Based on the reported 2026Q1 current ratio of 0.24, the company's liquidity position appears highly vulnerable, indicating that current assets are insufficient to cover short-term liabilities without the potential for immediate, dilutive external financing to sustain ongoing operations.
The extremely low quick ratio confirms that the firm lacks the necessary cash buffer to navigate even minor operational disruptions or delays in project payments. This liquidity profile suggests that the company is operating in a state of financial distress that may limit its strategic flexibility.
The most commonly misapplied metric for CNTM is the price-to-sales ratio, which investors often use to compare the firm to high-margin SaaS peers, thereby obscuring the reality that the company's revenue is largely derived from low-margin hardware and installation services.
Using SaaS multiples for a company with a 29.49% gross margin leads to an overestimation of the firm's scalability and earnings potential. Analysts should instead focus on EV/Gross Profit or cash burn metrics to better understand the company's true economic viability and its reliance on external capital.
Includes 30+ ratios · 5 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying CNTM stock.
ConnectM Technology Solutions, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -1.2x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
ConnectM Technology Solutions, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -1031.1%. The historical average is -65.1%.
Based on historical data, ConnectM Technology Solutions, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -1.2x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
ConnectM Technology Solutions, Inc. has 29.5% gross margin and -33.6% operating margin.