Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 13.0x · EV/EBITDA 3.4x · ROE 23.7%. (2013–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $728M | $1.8B | $1.2B | $1.3B | $785M | $767M | $704M | $688M | $566M | $559M | $378M |
| Enterprise Value | $1.4B | $2.5B | $1.9B | $1.7B | $1.3B | $839M | $797M | $540M | $431M | $441M | $229M |
| P/E Ratio → | 12.98 | 26.76 | 15.40 | 23.86 | — | 10.04 | 26.36 | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.93 | 2.35 | 1.83 | 2.27 | 1.69 | 2.77 | 2.27 | 2.32 | 2.02 | 19.62 | 220.79 |
| P/B Ratio | 2.95 | 6.09 | 5.06 | 6.58 | 4.03 | 3.78 | 3.78 | 7.87 | 6.18 | 5.37 | 2.80 |
| P/FCF | 2.22 | 5.61 | 5.70 | 4.69 | 6.40 | 7.55 | — | 32.25 | 3.90 | — | — |
| P/OCF | 2.21 | 5.58 | 5.65 | 4.68 | 6.32 | 7.40 | 7.49 | 24.78 | 3.34 | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 3.24 | 3.08 | 3.04 | 2.85 | 3.03 | 2.57 | 1.82 | 1.54 | 15.50 | 133.66 |
| EV / EBITDA | 3.43 | 6.12 | 5.74 | 5.44 | 7.66 | 9.70 | 6.76 | — | 4.77 | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | 7.58 | 14.45 | 11.28 | 10.82 | 38.42 | 47.57 | 14.11 | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 7.72 | 9.58 | 6.28 | 10.77 | 8.26 | — | 25.30 | 2.97 | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 59.3% | 59.3% | 59.8% | 57.5% | 45.2% | 54.4% | 58.0% | 34.7% | 40.9% | 90.9% | 87.6% |
| Operating Margin | 24.0% | 24.0% | 26.9% | 29.5% | 7.2% | 6.4% | 18.1% | -8.0% | -7.4% | -264.9% | -5498.7% |
| Net Profit Margin | 8.1% | 8.1% | 11.0% | 8.5% | -5.4% | 25.8% | 8.6% | -7.7% | -14.0% | -262.9% | -5504.1% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 23.7% | 23.7% | 32.6% | 24.7% | -12.6% | 36.8% | 19.6% | -25.4% | -40.0% | -62.7% | -85.6% |
| ROA | 3.8% | 3.8% | 4.9% | 4.2% | -2.7% | 10.7% | 5.6% | -7.6% | -18.3% | -50.3% | -72.5% |
| ROIC | 14.0% | 14.0% | 15.5% | 18.4% | 5.0% | 4.8% | 38.8% | — | — | — | — |
| ROCE | 15.8% | 15.8% | 18.5% | 23.4% | 5.8% | 4.3% | 22.1% | -22.8% | -19.9% | -62.1% | -81.4% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 3.12 | 3.12 | 3.75 | 3.45 | 3.64 | 1.28 | 1.43 | 0.25 | 0.13 | 0.01 | 0.03 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 2.28 | 2.28 | 2.53 | 2.13 | 4.12 | 2.99 | 2.26 | — | 0.13 | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 2.29 | 3.45 | 2.23 | 2.75 | 0.36 | 0.50 | -1.70 | -1.48 | -1.13 | -1.11 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.67 | 1.67 | 2.33 | 1.38 | 3.11 | 0.84 | 0.79 | — | -1.50 | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | 2.10 | 3.88 | 1.59 | 4.37 | 0.71 | — | -6.95 | -0.93 | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | 2.13 | 2.13 | 2.33 | 1.91 | 0.54 | 0.84 | 1.95 | -24.00 | -0.94 | — | -1000.87 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.57 | 1.57 | 0.95 | 1.17 | 0.97 | 1.13 | 1.16 | 1.27 | 1.27 | 4.24 | 6.92 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.48 | 1.48 | 0.88 | 1.10 | 0.86 | 1.07 | 1.10 | 1.22 | 1.23 | 4.18 | 6.86 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.92 | 0.92 | 0.32 | 0.68 | 0.40 | 0.67 | 0.73 | 0.84 | 0.78 | 3.77 | 6.68 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.47 | 0.38 | 0.50 | 0.40 | 0.40 | 0.48 | 0.97 | 0.96 | 0.21 | 0.01 |
| Inventory Turnover | 7.76 | 7.76 | 7.15 | 7.44 | 5.47 | 7.26 | 8.34 | 20.08 | 21.19 | 1.43 | 0.16 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 98.82 | 132.10 | 115.61 | 144.07 | 139.54 | 98.10 | 89.75 | 101.46 | 127.78 | 454.17 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 6.5% |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 7.7% | 3.7% | 6.5% | 4.2% | — | 10.0% | 3.8% | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 45.0% | 17.8% | 17.6% | 21.3% | 15.6% | 13.3% | — | 3.1% | 25.6% | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 3.4% | 1.4% | 5.2% | 5.8% | 1.8% | 6.2% | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 3.4% | 1.4% | 5.2% | 5.8% | 1.8% | 6.2% | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.0% | 6.5% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $40M | $40M | $42M | $34M | $41M | $35M | $33M | $33M | $30M | $24M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 13 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying COLL stock.
Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 13.0x. The historical average is 20.5x. This places it at the 20th percentile of its historical range.
Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 3.4x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 6.6x.
Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 23.7%. This is above the typical threshold of 15-20% considered good for most companies. The historical average is -37.8%.
Based on historical data, Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 13.0x. This is at the 20th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. has 59.3% gross margin and 24.0% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 2.3x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
DEA quota constraints on opioids
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Compression from Mix Shift
Gross margin fell to 55.2% in 2026Q2 from 63.1% in 2024Q1, while operating margin swung to 1.9% from 34.1%, reflecting acquisition integration and higher SG&A, per quarterly filings.
The sharp decline in operating margin from 34.1% in 2024Q1 to 1.9% in 2026Q2 suggests that the AZSTARYS acquisition and expanded salesforce have yet to generate operating leverage. The gross margin erosion to 55.2% may indicate a higher mix of lower-margin products or increased royalty obligations, which could persist if the ADHD portfolio grows faster than the opioid franchise. Investors should monitor whether the 41% ADHD revenue growth can eventually absorb the elevated cost base, as the current margin trajectory appears unsustainable without further scale.
ROIC Decay Amidst Acquisition Spree
ROIC fell to 0.3% in 2026Q2 from 5.9% in 2024Q1, while ROE turned negative at -4.8%, as the $655.4M AZSTARYS acquisition expanded the capital base without immediate returns, per balance sheet data.
The decline in ROIC from 5.9% to 0.3% over ten quarters indicates that the company is not yet earning returns above its cost of capital on recent investments. The flat equity base near $312M despite rising debt suggests that the acquisition was largely debt-funded, which amplifies the drag on ROE when earnings are depressed. If the ADHD portfolio does not deliver the expected synergies, the goodwill and intangibles recorded may face impairment risk, further eroding returns.
Working Capital Cycle Lengthens
Cash conversion cycle extended to 188 days in 2026Q2 from 153 days in 2024Q1, driven by DSO rising to 117 days and DPO falling to 8 days, indicating deteriorating working capital efficiency, per quarterly data.
The 35-day increase in the cash conversion cycle suggests that Collegium is taking longer to collect receivables while paying suppliers more quickly, which may strain liquidity. The DSO of 117 days is notably high for a specialty pharma company, possibly reflecting payer mix or rebate accrual timing. The sharp drop in DPO to 8 days from 13 days in 2024Q1 could indicate a shift in payment terms or a deliberate strategy to maintain supplier relationships, but it reduces the company's ability to finance operations with trade credit.
Leverage Spikes with Debt-Funded M&A
Debt-to-equity rose to 2.75 in 2026Q2 from 2.58 in 2024Q2, while interest coverage collapsed to 0.31 from 2.87, as debt climbed to $857.8M and operating income fell, per balance sheet data.
The combination of rising debt and falling operating income has pushed interest coverage to a precarious 0.31, meaning operating income covers less than one-third of interest expense. This suggests that the company may need to rely on cash reserves or refinancing to meet debt obligations, especially if the current margin pressure persists. The D/EBITDA ratio of 12.53 in 2026Q2 is elevated relative to the 6.75 in 2024Q2, indicating a significant increase in leverage that could constrain future borrowing capacity.
Liquidity Buffer Thins After Acquisition
Current ratio fell to 1.03 in 2026Q2 from 1.71 in 2026Q1, and cash dropped to $129.5M from $268.6M, leaving a thin cushion against short-term obligations, per balance sheet data.
The near-unity current ratio suggests that Collegium's current assets barely cover its current liabilities, which could be problematic if revenue collections slow or if unexpected cash outflows arise. The quick ratio of 0.84 indicates that even after excluding inventory, the company may struggle to meet immediate obligations without relying on inventory liquidation. Given the high DSO of 117 days, the liquidity position appears vulnerable to any disruption in receivables collection, though the strong operating cash flow of $71.3M in 2026Q2 provides some offset.
Misapplied EV/EBITDA Multiple
The EV/EBITDA of 3.88 appears optically cheap, but it is distorted by the recent acquisition's non-cash charges and the company's high leverage, making it an unreliable standalone valuation metric, per current multiples.
The EV/EBITDA multiple of 3.88 is significantly below the peer average, but this is misleading because EBITDA does not account for the substantial amortization of intangibles from acquisitions, which is a recurring cash expense for Collegium. Additionally, the high debt load inflates EV, yet the low multiple may signal that the market is pricing in the risk of margin compression and regulatory overhang. A more appropriate metric would be EV/EBITDAR or EV/OCF, which better captures the company's cash-generating ability after adjusting for acquisition-related charges and lease obligations.