Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 14.1x · EV/EBITDA 6.4x · ROE 12.4%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $166.0B | $117.3B | $117.1B | $139.9B | $150.8B | $95.9B | $43.1B | $73.1B | $73.3B | $67.0B | $62.4B |
| Enterprise Value | $183.0B | $134.3B | $136.8B | $153.9B | $161.6B | $110.8B | $55.5B | $83.7B | $82.3B | $80.4B | $86.1B |
| P/E Ratio → | 14.10 | 14.74 | 12.70 | 12.81 | 8.10 | 11.87 | — | 10.16 | 11.72 | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 2.45 | 1.99 | 2.14 | 2.49 | 1.92 | 2.09 | 2.30 | 2.24 | 2.01 | 2.30 | 2.64 |
| P/B Ratio | 2.65 | 1.82 | 1.81 | 2.84 | 3.14 | 2.11 | 1.44 | 2.08 | 2.29 | 2.18 | 1.77 |
| P/FCF | 14.94 | 16.20 | 14.63 | 16.05 | 8.31 | 8.21 | 495.52 | 16.35 | 11.85 | 26.96 | — |
| P/OCF | 8.39 | 5.93 | 5.82 | 7.01 | 5.33 | 5.64 | 8.98 | 6.58 | 5.67 | 9.47 | 14.18 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 2.28 | 2.50 | 2.74 | 2.06 | 2.42 | 2.95 | 2.57 | 2.26 | 2.76 | 3.63 |
| EV / EBITDA | 6.41 | 5.88 | 6.11 | 6.61 | 4.90 | 5.75 | 11.55 | 6.37 | 5.46 | 8.65 | 14.08 |
| EV / EBIT | 16.13 | 9.67 | 9.26 | 8.87 | 5.52 | 8.00 | — | 7.88 | 7.44 | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 18.54 | 17.09 | 17.66 | 8.90 | 9.49 | 637.80 | 18.74 | 13.32 | 32.34 | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 25.1% | 25.1% | 29.9% | 32.4% | 38.2% | 32.2% | 4.5% | 28.6% | 30.1% | 15.9% | -4.2% |
| Operating Margin | 19.2% | 19.2% | 23.4% | 26.8% | 32.4% | 26.3% | -9.6% | 21.7% | 25.1% | 8.4% | -17.4% |
| Net Profit Margin | 13.6% | 13.6% | 16.9% | 19.5% | 23.8% | 17.6% | -14.4% | 22.1% | 17.2% | -2.9% | -15.3% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 12.4% | 12.4% | 16.2% | 22.5% | 40.0% | 21.5% | -8.3% | 21.4% | 19.9% | -2.6% | -9.6% |
| ROA | 6.5% | 6.5% | 8.5% | 11.5% | 20.3% | 10.5% | -4.1% | 10.2% | 8.7% | -1.0% | -3.9% |
| ROIC | 10.3% | 10.3% | 13.0% | 18.5% | 32.1% | 17.7% | -3.1% | 12.2% | 16.1% | 3.6% | -5.1% |
| ROCE | 10.3% | 10.3% | 13.0% | 18.0% | 31.9% | 17.8% | -3.0% | 11.2% | 14.4% | 3.3% | -4.8% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.36 | 0.36 | 0.39 | 0.40 | 0.36 | 0.44 | 0.51 | 0.45 | 0.47 | 0.64 | 0.77 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 1.03 | 1.03 | 1.13 | 0.84 | 0.52 | 1.03 | 3.20 | 1.20 | 0.99 | 2.12 | 4.46 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.26 | 0.30 | 0.28 | 0.22 | 0.33 | 0.41 | 0.30 | 0.28 | 0.43 | 0.67 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.88 | 0.60 | 0.33 | 0.77 | 2.58 | 0.81 | 0.60 | 1.44 | 3.87 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 2.34 | 2.47 | 1.61 | 0.59 | 1.28 | 142.28 | 2.38 | 1.46 | 5.38 | — |
| Interest Coverage | 11.26 | 11.26 | 13.34 | 16.32 | 27.76 | 12.29 | -1.97 | 9.63 | 10.17 | -0.79 | -2.31 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.30 | 1.30 | 1.29 | 1.43 | 1.46 | 1.34 | 2.25 | 2.40 | 1.79 | 1.76 | 1.25 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.14 | 1.14 | 1.14 | 1.29 | 1.36 | 1.23 | 2.06 | 2.26 | 1.66 | 1.64 | 1.10 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.58 | 0.58 | 0.50 | 0.66 | 0.72 | 0.55 | 1.46 | 1.17 | 0.83 | 0.87 | 0.57 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.48 | 0.45 | 0.59 | 0.84 | 0.51 | 0.30 | 0.46 | 0.52 | 0.40 | 0.26 |
| Inventory Turnover | 23.58 | 23.58 | 21.21 | 27.14 | 39.77 | 25.71 | 17.91 | 22.66 | 25.29 | 23.10 | 24.26 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 36.00 | 44.64 | 35.59 | 32.96 | 53.12 | 53.51 | 38.12 | 40.76 | 54.17 | 52.59 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 2.3% | 3.4% | 3.1% | 4.0% | 3.8% | 2.5% | 4.2% | 2.1% | 1.9% | 1.9% | 2.0% |
| Payout Ratio | 50.0% | 50.0% | 39.4% | 51.0% | 30.7% | 29.2% | — | 20.9% | 21.8% | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 7.1% | 6.8% | 7.9% | 7.8% | 12.3% | 8.4% | — | 9.8% | 8.5% | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 6.7% | 6.2% | 6.8% | 6.2% | 12.0% | 12.2% | 0.2% | 6.1% | 8.4% | 3.7% | — |
| Buyback Yield | 3.1% | 4.4% | 4.7% | 3.9% | 6.1% | 3.8% | 2.1% | 4.8% | 4.1% | 4.6% | 0.2% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 5.4% | 7.8% | 7.8% | 7.8% | 9.9% | 6.2% | 6.3% | 6.8% | 6.0% | 6.5% | 2.2% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $1.3B | $1.2B | $1.2B | $1.3B | $1.3B | $1.1B | $1.1B | $1.2B | $1.2B | $1.2B |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
Bull/bear thesis, analyst target revisions, and earnings execution.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying COP stock.
ConocoPhillips's current P/E ratio is 14.1x. The historical average is 10.6x. This places it at the 88th percentile of its historical range.
ConocoPhillips's current EV/EBITDA is 6.4x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 5.4x.
ConocoPhillips's return on equity (ROE) is 12.4%. The historical average is 13.8%.
Based on historical data, ConocoPhillips is trading at a P/E of 14.1x. This is at the 88th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
ConocoPhillips's current dividend yield is 2.34% with a payout ratio of 50.0%.
ConocoPhillips has 25.1% gross margin and 19.2% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
ConocoPhillips's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 1.0x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Commodity price volatility and margin compression
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Multiples Discount Peer Average Despite Strength
Based on reported figures, COP trades at a trailing P/E of 14.10 and EV/EBITDA of 6.41, which sits below the broader peer average and suggests the market is pricing in a cyclical rather than structural earnings base for the company.
The forward P/E of 11.86 implies that consensus expects earnings to rise, yet the multiple remains modest against EOG's 9.38 and the sector's wide dispersion. The price-to-book of 2.65 is reasonable for an asset-heavy producer with ROE near 6 percent, which suggests investors are unwilling to pay for returns that have only recently recovered. Investors should monitor whether the earnings rebound proves durable, since the current discount may reflect skepticism about sustainability rather than a mispricing.
Margin Recovery Outpaces Earlier Trough
As reported in the quarterly figures, COP's operating margin expanded from 13.1 percent in 2025Q4 to 28.4 percent in 2026Q3, a recovery that appears driven primarily by realized commodity prices rather than cost reduction.
The gross margin swing from 19.2 percent to 49.3 percent over the same window is far larger than any change in the cost base would plausibly explain, which suggests the margin structure is highly sensitive to price realizations. Net margin of 20.6 percent in the latest quarter compares with roughly 10.8 percent a year earlier, indicating a meaningful improvement in earnings power. The peak-cycle nature of the current margin warrants caution, as the same company operated near the lower end of this range only recently.
Returns Recovering but Below Peer Leaders
According to reported quarterly data, COP's ROIC climbed from 1.6 percent to 5.5 percent over the last several quarters, yet remains well below EOG's 15.4 percent and APA's 17.8 percent, suggesting capital efficiency still lags the strongest shale peers.
The ROE of 12.4 percent in the trailing view sits above the quarterly reading of 6.1 percent, which indicates the annualized figure may be flattering given the recent recovery trajectory. The gap versus peers appears structural to some degree, reflecting COP's large legacy asset base and global diversification rather than purely execution issues. Investors should evaluate whether returns can compound toward peer levels or remain capped by the company's broader asset mix.
Conservative Debt Load With Thin Coverage
Based on reported figures, COP's debt-to-equity held near 0.36 while interest coverage moved from 43.13 times in the latest quarter down to 12.40 times earlier, suggesting debt service comfort has varied meaningfully with earnings.
Total debt steady near $23.3 billion against equity that grew to $66.0 billion indicates a conservative capital structure that is largely insensitive to earnings swings. Debt-to-EBITDA of 2.73 in the latest quarter is manageable, though it was materially higher in prior quarters, which may indicate that coverage depends heavily on the commodity cycle. Headline leverage may understate obligations such as asset retirement liabilities, which warrant further investigation.
Headline Leverage Ignores Lease and ARO Claims
As reported in the balance sheet data, COP's 0.36 debt-to-equity ratio captures only funded debt, while total liabilities of $60.1 billion may provide a more complete picture of claims on the business.
Asset retirement obligations and lease commitments are not captured in the headline ratio, and their inclusion would materially raise the effective leverage profile. The peak-quarter margins and cash generation may not persist, so applying a trough-to-peak normalized view could overstate sustainable coverage. Investors should adjust for these items before concluding that the balance sheet offers unconstrained flexibility.