Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 20.2x · EV/EBITDA 7.5x · ROE 12.4%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $156.1B | $117.3B | $117.1B | $139.9B | $150.8B | $95.9B | $43.1B | $73.1B | $73.3B | $67.0B | $62.4B |
| Enterprise Value | $173.0B | $134.3B | $136.8B | $153.9B | $161.6B | $110.8B | $55.5B | $83.7B | $82.3B | $80.4B | $86.1B |
| P/E Ratio → | 20.17 | 14.74 | 12.70 | 12.81 | 8.10 | 11.87 | — | 10.16 | 11.72 | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 2.66 | 2.00 | 2.14 | 2.50 | 1.92 | 2.08 | 2.30 | 2.25 | 2.02 | 2.31 | 2.61 |
| P/B Ratio | 2.49 | 1.82 | 1.81 | 2.84 | 3.14 | 2.11 | 1.44 | 2.08 | 2.29 | 2.18 | 1.77 |
| P/FCF | 9.30 | 7.00 | 14.63 | 16.05 | 8.31 | 8.21 | 495.52 | 16.35 | 11.85 | 26.96 | — |
| P/OCF | 7.88 | 5.93 | 5.82 | 7.01 | 5.33 | 5.64 | 8.98 | 6.58 | 5.67 | 9.47 | 14.18 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 2.29 | 2.51 | 2.75 | 2.06 | 2.41 | 2.96 | 2.58 | 2.26 | 2.77 | 3.60 |
| EV / EBITDA | 7.46 | 5.79 | 6.10 | 6.56 | 4.82 | 5.64 | 11.62 | 6.18 | 5.42 | 8.16 | 14.65 |
| EV / EBIT | 15.05 | 9.67 | 9.26 | 8.87 | 5.52 | 8.00 | — | 7.88 | 7.44 | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 8.01 | 17.09 | 17.66 | 8.90 | 9.49 | 637.80 | 18.74 | 13.32 | 32.34 | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 24.6% | 24.6% | 29.3% | 31.8% | 37.7% | 32.0% | -3.4% | 26.4% | 29.1% | 12.7% | -12.2% |
| Operating Margin | 19.6% | 19.6% | 23.4% | 26.8% | 32.6% | 26.9% | -9.8% | 21.7% | 25.1% | 8.4% | -18.3% |
| Net Profit Margin | 13.6% | 13.6% | 16.9% | 19.5% | 23.7% | 17.5% | -14.4% | 22.2% | 17.2% | -2.9% | -15.1% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 12.4% | 12.4% | 16.2% | 22.5% | 39.9% | 21.5% | -8.3% | 21.4% | 19.9% | -2.6% | -9.6% |
| ROA | 6.5% | 6.5% | 8.4% | 11.5% | 20.2% | 10.5% | -4.1% | 10.2% | 8.7% | -1.0% | -3.9% |
| ROIC | 10.4% | 10.4% | 13.0% | 18.5% | 32.3% | 18.1% | -3.1% | 12.2% | 16.1% | 3.5% | -5.4% |
| ROCE | 10.4% | 10.4% | 13.0% | 18.0% | 32.1% | 18.2% | -3.0% | 11.2% | 14.4% | 3.3% | -5.1% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.36 | 0.36 | 0.39 | 0.40 | 0.36 | 0.44 | 0.51 | 0.45 | 0.47 | 0.64 | 0.77 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 1.01 | 1.01 | 1.13 | 0.84 | 0.51 | 1.02 | 3.22 | 1.17 | 0.99 | 2.00 | 4.64 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.26 | 0.30 | 0.28 | 0.22 | 0.33 | 0.41 | 0.30 | 0.28 | 0.43 | 0.67 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.88 | 0.60 | 0.32 | 0.76 | 2.59 | 0.79 | 0.60 | 1.36 | 4.03 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 1.01 | 2.47 | 1.61 | 0.59 | 1.28 | 142.28 | 2.38 | 1.46 | 5.38 | — |
| Interest Coverage | 11.26 | 11.26 | 13.34 | 16.32 | 27.76 | 12.29 | -1.97 | 9.63 | 10.17 | -0.79 | -2.31 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.30 | 1.30 | 1.29 | 1.43 | 1.46 | 1.34 | 2.25 | 2.40 | 1.79 | 1.76 | 1.25 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.14 | 1.14 | 1.14 | 1.29 | 1.36 | 1.23 | 2.06 | 2.26 | 1.66 | 1.64 | 1.10 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.58 | 0.58 | 0.50 | 0.66 | 0.72 | 0.55 | 1.46 | 1.17 | 0.83 | 0.87 | 0.57 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.48 | 0.44 | 0.58 | 0.84 | 0.51 | 0.30 | 0.46 | 0.52 | 0.40 | 0.27 |
| Inventory Turnover | 23.63 | 23.63 | 21.33 | 27.36 | 40.16 | 25.93 | 19.37 | 23.27 | 25.61 | 23.92 | 26.33 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 36.14 | 44.75 | 35.64 | 32.92 | 52.86 | 53.57 | 38.28 | 40.81 | 54.32 | 52.16 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 2.5% | 3.4% | 3.1% | 4.0% | 3.8% | 2.5% | 4.2% | 2.1% | 1.9% | 1.9% | 2.0% |
| Payout Ratio | 50.0% | 50.0% | 39.6% | 51.1% | 30.8% | 29.2% | — | 20.9% | 21.8% | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 5.0% | 6.8% | 7.9% | 7.8% | 12.3% | 8.4% | — | 9.8% | 8.5% | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 10.7% | 14.3% | 6.8% | 6.2% | 12.0% | 12.2% | 0.2% | 6.1% | 8.4% | 3.7% | — |
| Buyback Yield | 3.2% | 4.3% | 4.7% | 3.9% | 6.1% | 3.8% | 2.1% | 4.8% | 4.1% | 4.6% | 0.2% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 5.7% | 7.7% | 7.8% | 7.8% | 9.9% | 6.2% | 6.3% | 6.8% | 6.0% | 6.5% | 2.2% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $1.3B | $1.2B | $1.2B | $1.3B | $1.3B | $1.1B | $1.1B | $1.2B | $1.2B | $1.2B |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying COP stock.
ConocoPhillips's current P/E ratio is 20.2x. The historical average is 10.6x. This places it at the 96th percentile of its historical range.
ConocoPhillips's current EV/EBITDA is 7.5x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 5.4x.
ConocoPhillips's return on equity (ROE) is 12.4%. The historical average is 13.8%.
Based on historical data, ConocoPhillips is trading at a P/E of 20.2x. This is at the 96th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
ConocoPhillips's current dividend yield is 2.49% with a payout ratio of 50.0%.
ConocoPhillips has 24.6% gross margin and 19.6% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
ConocoPhillips's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 1.0x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Commodity price volatility and lack of guidance
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Rebound Masks Underlying Volatility
Q2 2026 gross margin spiked to 100% due to a data artifact, but excluding that, operating margins averaged 22% over the past year, reflecting commodity price swings. According to the latest financial statements, profitability remains highly sensitive to oil prices.
The reported gross margin of 100% in Q2 2026 is clearly anomalous, as COGS was reported as zero, and prior quarters ranged from 19.6% to 46.7%. Normalizing for this, operating margins have fluctuated between 15.1% and 33.6% over the last ten quarters, with the Q2 2026 figure of 33.6% representing a cyclical peak. This suggests that COP's profitability is driven more by price realizations than by structural cost improvements, and investors should expect mean reversion if commodity prices soften. The absence of forward guidance further complicates the sustainability of these margins.
Return on Capital Cyclical but Improving
ROIC improved to 5.6% in Q2 2026 from 1.8% in Q4 2025, but remains below the cost of capital, reflecting the capital-intensive nature of E&P. Based on reported figures, returns are highly cyclical and have not yet reached the levels seen in 2024.
ROIC has ranged from 1.8% to 5.6% over the past ten quarters, with the Q2 2026 figure representing a significant sequential improvement. However, even at 5.6%, ROIC is likely below COP's weighted average cost of capital, which is typical for a commodity producer in a mid-cycle price environment. The improvement is driven by higher margins rather than asset efficiency, as asset turnover has remained stable at 0.11-0.15. This suggests that COP is not yet compounding returns at a level that would justify a premium valuation, and investors should monitor whether the Willow project and Permian integration can drive structural improvements.
Working Capital Efficiency Shows Mixed Signals
Cash conversion cycle turned negative at -14 days in Q1 2026, indicating COP is using supplier financing effectively, but DSO has risen to 40 days in Q4 2025. According to the quarterly data, working capital management appears to be a minor source of cash.
The negative CCC in Q1 2026 is driven by a DPO of 70 days, which suggests COP is stretching payables, possibly due to timing of payments to oilfield service providers. However, DSO has been volatile, ranging from 35 to 40 days, with no clear trend. The inventory days have remained low, reflecting the nature of the business, but the lack of DIO data in Q2 2026 limits analysis. Overall, working capital is not a major driver of cash flow, as changes have been minor relative to operating cash flow, but the negative CCC in Q1 2026 indicates some supplier leverage that may not be sustainable.
Leverage Remains a Pillar of Strength
Debt-to-equity has held steady at 0.36 for the past year, with interest coverage improving to 34.4x in Q2 2026 from 8.7x in Q4 2025. As reported in the balance sheet, COP's leverage is among the lowest in its peer group.
COP's debt-to-equity ratio of 0.36 is significantly lower than peers like OXY (0.65) and APA (0.69), and interest coverage has improved dramatically to 34.4x in Q2 2026, reflecting both higher EBITDA and stable debt levels. This fortress-like balance sheet provides substantial flexibility for capital returns and potential M&A, even in a downturn. However, the D/EBITDA ratio of 2.57 in Q2 2026 is slightly elevated compared to the 2024 average of around 3.3, but still manageable. The stability of leverage despite the Shell Permian acquisition suggests disciplined financing, and investors should view this as a key differentiator.
Liquidity Buffer Strengthens with Cash Build
Current ratio improved to 1.54 in Q2 2026 from 1.27 a year earlier, with cash rising to $6.6B. According to the balance sheet data, COP's liquidity position is robust and provides a cushion against commodity price shocks.
The current ratio of 1.54 is the highest in the series, and the quick ratio of 1.39 indicates that inventory is not a significant component of current assets. Cash has increased from $4.3B in 2024Q2 to $6.6B in 2026Q2, providing a solid buffer. This liquidity, combined with low leverage, suggests COP could withstand a prolonged period of low oil prices without cutting its capital return program. However, the reliance on uninterrupted operations is a risk, as any disruption could pressure cash flows, but the current position appears adequate for near-term obligations.
Misapplied Metric: P/E on Cyclical Earnings
The trailing P/E of 19.97 is misleading for a commodity producer, as it reflects peak-cycle earnings. Based on reported figures, forward P/E of 13.20 is more relevant, but EV/EBITDA of 7.40 better captures the capital structure.
Investors often apply a simple P/E to E&P companies, but this fails to account for the cyclicality of earnings and the significant non-cash DD&A charges. COP's trailing P/E of 19.97 is elevated due to depressed earnings in 2025, while the forward P/E of 13.20 suggests the market expects a rebound. However, EV/EBITDA of 7.40 is a more appropriate metric as it normalizes for capital structure and is less distorted by depreciation. Additionally, P/FCF of 9.21 is a useful check, as it reflects the company's ability to generate cash after capex. Investors should focus on EV/EBITDA and P/FCF rather than P/E when valuing COP.