Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 10.3x · EV/EBITDA 10.6x · ROE 721.5%. (2005–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $30.8B | $25.9B | $25.7B | $24.1B | $27.5B | $20.4B | $14.1B | $19.3B | $17.5B | $14.3B | $9.7B |
| Enterprise Value | $45.3B | $40.4B | $40.6B | $39.5B | $42.9B | $36.7B | $30.5B | $35.2B | $32.0B | $28.8B | $23.6B |
| P/E Ratio → | 10.31 | 8.67 | 12.50 | 7.16 | 17.39 | 14.08 | 15.19 | 17.69 | 14.38 | 24.70 | — |
| P/S Ratio | 2.86 | 2.41 | 2.95 | 2.49 | 1.60 | 2.17 | 2.28 | 2.82 | 2.72 | 3.33 | 8.85 |
| P/B Ratio | 74.40 | 62.52 | — | — | — | 28.47 | 26.11 | 26.95 | 21.84 | 22.45 | 21.98 |
| P/FCF | 11.99 | 10.08 | 9.14 | 8.34 | 7.44 | 12.44 | 18.07 | 89.20 | 16.33 | — | — |
| P/OCF | 11.13 | 9.35 | 8.66 | 7.75 | 6.63 | 8.92 | 8.04 | 12.46 | 9.32 | 14.68 | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 3.75 | 4.66 | 4.09 | 2.49 | 3.89 | 4.95 | 5.14 | 4.98 | 6.69 | 21.42 |
| EV / EBITDA | 10.60 | 9.45 | 10.25 | 6.92 | 10.69 | 11.80 | 11.41 | 13.70 | 13.32 | 19.27 | 58.03 |
| EV / EBIT | 12.63 | 10.79 | 12.26 | 7.78 | 12.75 | 14.93 | 14.60 | 17.07 | 15.94 | 26.09 | 126.68 |
| EV / FCF | — | 15.71 | 14.43 | 13.68 | 11.61 | 22.36 | 39.21 | 162.77 | 29.90 | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 34.3% | 34.3% | 51.1% | 64.7% | 26.0% | 37.0% | 49.2% | 42.8% | 98.2% | 97.7% | 48.4% |
| Operating Margin | 33.3% | 33.3% | 37.7% | 52.1% | 19.6% | 27.1% | 34.5% | 29.8% | 30.8% | 26.9% | 22.8% |
| Net Profit Margin | 27.8% | 27.8% | 28.8% | 44.0% | 14.5% | 17.3% | 19.2% | 17.2% | 19.8% | 11.4% | -15.5% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 721.5% | 721.5% | — | — | — | 259.3% | 188.7% | 155.1% | 177.1% | 90.6% | -29.6% |
| ROA | 17.1% | 17.1% | 14.1% | 22.5% | 12.8% | 8.5% | 6.1% | 6.3% | 7.2% | 3.0% | -1.2% |
| ROIC | 18.4% | 18.4% | 17.0% | 27.1% | 16.7% | 11.3% | 9.5% | 9.6% | 9.8% | 5.9% | 1.4% |
| ROCE | 22.8% | 22.8% | 20.3% | 29.8% | 19.2% | 14.1% | 11.6% | 11.6% | 11.8% | 7.4% | 2.0% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 35.47 | 35.47 | — | — | — | 24.06 | 32.80 | 24.72 | 20.08 | 25.11 | 32.58 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 3.44 | 3.44 | 3.85 | 2.80 | 4.06 | 5.55 | 6.61 | 6.88 | 6.69 | 10.73 | 35.54 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 34.99 | — | — | — | 22.70 | 30.55 | 22.23 | 18.16 | 22.62 | 31.21 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 3.39 | 3.39 | 3.76 | 2.70 | 3.84 | 5.23 | 6.15 | 6.19 | 6.04 | 9.67 | 34.05 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 5.64 | 5.29 | 5.34 | 4.16 | 9.92 | 21.14 | 73.57 | 13.57 | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | 4.97 | 4.97 | 4.14 | 6.17 | 3.87 | 2.96 | 2.30 | 2.33 | 2.74 | 1.80 | 0.52 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.78 | 0.78 | 0.77 | 1.01 | 1.08 | 1.64 | 2.42 | 2.80 | 2.21 | 2.58 | 1.12 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.69 | 0.92 | 1.02 | 1.51 | 2.30 | 2.68 | 2.11 | 2.47 | 1.01 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.12 | 0.12 | 0.22 | 0.37 | 0.37 | 0.72 | 1.37 | 1.84 | 1.44 | 1.92 | 0.71 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.62 | 0.50 | 0.53 | 0.88 | 0.49 | 0.32 | 0.35 | 0.36 | 0.25 | 0.07 |
| Inventory Turnover | 39.24 | 39.24 | 28.17 | 24.05 | 79.59 | 33.80 | 29.28 | 33.69 | 39.69 | 1.05 | 5.83 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 30.33 | 27.09 | 24.59 | 24.99 | 36.91 | 29.71 | 21.46 | 26.24 | 30.02 | 62.70 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 6.7% | 8.0% | 8.7% | 12.1% | 9.6% | 7.1% | 9.7% | 6.5% | 6.4% | 2.0% | 1.0% |
| Payout Ratio | 69.1% | 69.1% | 89.0% | 68.3% | 105.5% | 89.0% | 114.9% | 107.2% | 87.4% | 60.0% | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 9.7% | 11.5% | 8.0% | 14.0% | 5.7% | 7.1% | 6.6% | 5.7% | 7.0% | 4.0% | — |
| FCF Yield | 8.3% | 9.9% | 10.9% | 12.0% | 13.4% | 8.0% | 5.5% | 1.1% | 6.1% | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 6.7% | 8.0% | 8.7% | 12.1% | 9.6% | 7.1% | 9.7% | 6.5% | 6.4% | 2.0% | 1.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $484M | $484M | $484M | $484M | $484M | $399M | $484M | $484M | $484M | $338M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 21 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying CQP stock.
Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P.'s current P/E ratio is 10.3x. The historical average is 20.3x. This places it at the 18th percentile of its historical range.
Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P.'s current EV/EBITDA is 10.6x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 20.5x.
Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P.'s return on equity (ROE) is 721.5%. This is above the typical threshold of 15-20% considered good for most companies. The historical average is 65.9%.
Based on historical data, Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. is trading at a P/E of 10.3x. This is at the 18th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P.'s current dividend yield is 6.70% with a payout ratio of 69.1%.
Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. has 34.3% gross margin and 33.3% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 3.4x, indicating high leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
High leverage and thin equity
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Volatility Masks Underlying Stability
CQP's gross margin swung from 70.4% in 2026Q2 to 9.9% in 2026Q1, per reported financials, yet operating margin averaged 33.3% over the period, suggesting commodity pass-through and derivative effects distort quarterly profitability.
The extreme quarterly margin swings are largely attributable to the pass-through nature of natural gas feedstock costs and mark-to-market derivative adjustments, which obscure the stable fee-based earnings from take-or-pay contracts. When smoothing through the noise, the operating margin trend appears resilient, with 2026Q2's 51.9% operating margin reflecting a favorable contract mix and high utilization. Investors should focus on cash-based metrics like EBITDA and distributable cash flow rather than GAAP net income, as the latter is heavily influenced by non-cash items.
Thin Equity Distorts Return Metrics
ROIC ranged from 1.7% in 2026Q1 to 7.5% in 2025Q4, per financial statements, while ROE spiked to 721.5% in 2026Q1 due to a minimal equity base, indicating that return on capital is more meaningful than ROE for this partnership.
The partnership's equity base is exceptionally thin relative to its asset size, causing ROE to be highly volatile and not representative of underlying economic returns. ROIC, though also volatile, provides a clearer picture of operational efficiency, with recent quarters showing improvement to 7.0% in 2026Q2. This suggests that the massive sunk-cost infrastructure is generating adequate returns on invested capital, but the capital structure amplifies equity-based metrics, warranting caution when comparing to traditional corporations.
Working Capital Efficiency Reflects Cargo Timing
Cash conversion cycle lengthened to 38 days in 2026Q2 from 22 days in 2024Q4, per reported data, driven by higher DSO and DIO, while DPO remained low, indicating CQP extends less to suppliers but faces timing swings from LNG cargo loadings.
The CCC expansion is primarily due to an increase in days sales outstanding to 27 days and days inventory outstanding to 19 days, which may reflect the timing of cargo deliveries and billing cycles. The low DPO of 8 days suggests CQP pays suppliers promptly, likely due to the nature of feedstock purchases, but this also means limited supplier financing. Asset turnover remains low at 0.15, consistent with a capital-intensive midstream model, and the efficiency metrics are less critical than utilization rates and contract terms.
Leverage Elevated but Deleveraging Trend Emerges
Debt-to-equity fell to 19.16 in 2026Q2 from 35.47 in 2025Q4, per balance sheet data, while interest coverage improved to 7.34 from 7.92, indicating a gradual reduction in leverage despite a still-thin equity base.
Total debt declined to $14.4B while equity grew to $3.7B, reflecting retained earnings and reduced borrowings, which is a positive trend. However, the absolute debt level remains high, and the D/EBITDA ratio of 9.54 in 2026Q2 is elevated compared to investment-grade midstream peers, suggesting limited headroom for additional debt. Interest coverage of 7.34x is adequate but could deteriorate if EBITDA normalizes to lower levels seen in 2026Q1, making the partnership sensitive to interest rate movements and refinancing conditions.
Liquidity Buffer Strengthens but Remains Modest
Current ratio improved to 1.22 in 2026Q2 from 0.78 in 2025Q4, per financial statements, with cash rising to $443M, yet the quick ratio of 1.09 indicates limited inventory dependence, though the buffer remains thin relative to debt obligations.
The improvement in liquidity is encouraging, but the absolute cash balance is small compared to the $14.4B debt load, and the current ratio is only marginally above 1.0. In a stress scenario, such as a prolonged downturn in LNG prices or a disruption in operations, the partnership would likely rely on credit facilities or asset sales, given the limited cash cushion. The low inventory levels (quick ratio close to current ratio) suggest that liquidity is not inventory-dependent, but the overall position remains vulnerable to sudden cash flow shocks.
ROE Misleads in Thin-Equity MLP
ROE of 721.5% in 2026Q1, as reported, is often misapplied to CQP, but it is distorted by a minimal equity base and derivative gains, obscuring the true return on invested capital and leverage risk.
The extreme ROE figure is a mathematical artifact of a very small equity denominator, not a sign of exceptional profitability. Analysts should instead use ROIC or cash-on-cash returns, which better reflect the economics of the underlying infrastructure assets. Additionally, the partnership's distribution yield of 6.2% is a more relevant metric for unitholders, but it must be evaluated against the sustainability of distributable cash flow, which is subject to commodity price and interest rate risks. Relying on ROE alone would overstate the partnership's earning power and understate its financial risk.