VCP Scanner
Stock Screener
Filter stocks with fundamental & technical criteria
Technical Scanner
RSI, Moving averages & volume momentum signals
Market Themes
Curated industry baskets & thematic leaders
Earnings Hub
Calendar, EPS surprise stats & earnings transcripts
Market News
Real-time market intelligence & AI overviews
Insider Buying
SEC Form 4 corporate insider purchases
Minervini — VCPContraction bases in Stage 2 uptrends
Minervini — Trend TemplateFull 8-rule Stage 2 screen
O'Neil — Cup with HandleBase breakouts with RS leadership
O'Neil — CANSLIM LeadersGrowth leaders with RS ≥ 85
Qullamaggie — High Tight FlagsPower plays after a large advance
Qullamaggie — Momentum Leaders1/3/6-month strength leaders
Livermore — Pivotal PointsMulti-touch resistance breakouts
View All Playbooks...
Breakouts
FAANG & Tech
AAPL vs MSFTNVDA vs AMDGOOGL vs META
Cloud & Cyber
CRM vs NOWCRWD vs PANWSNOW vs DDOG
Consumer & Auto
TSLA vs FAMZN vs WMTNFLX vs DIS
Finance & Crypto
JPM vs BACV vs MACOIN vs MSTR
Index & ETFs
SPY vs QQQVTI vs VOOSPY vs IWM
Compare Any Stocks...
DCF ValuationCalculate intrinsic value of US stocks
Market ValuationBuffett indicator, CAPE & macro gauges
Total ReturnSee dividends + price return history
DCA CalculatorSimulate recurring buys & compounding
VisualizeInteractive multi-year financial charts
Watchlist
Breakouts
WatchlistPricing
Ctrl K
Pricing
CQP
← Back to Screener
VCP ScannerFree US Stock Screener & Financial Analysis

Find stocks. Analyze deeply. Research with clarity.

Data updated daily

Product

  • Screener
  • Themes
  • Valuation
  • Total Return
  • DCA Calculator
  • Pricing
  • News
  • Earnings

Resources

  • Market Valuation
  • Compare
  • Insider Activity
  • Methodology
  • How It Works
  • Glossary
  • Learn

Get Ideas

Get weekly market insights — free

© 2026 VCP Scanner
AboutPrivacyTermsRefund Policy
Not financial advice. Do your own research.
ScreenerBreakoutsCompareWatchlist
CQPCheniere Energy Partners, L.P.
$63.64$30.8B
Overview & Tools
OverviewChart Terminal ↗Visualize
Valuation & Forecasts
Valuation ModelsEstimatesDCF Model
Price & Analyst Data
Analyst TargetsPrice History
Financial Statements
Income StatementBalance SheetCash FlowRatios & Margins
Performance
P/E HistoryRevenue HistoryEarnings HistoryDividend HistoryTotal Return
Discovery & Screens
Live BreakoutsStock ScreenerOwnership
  1. Home
  2. Financial Ratios

  1. Home
  2. Stocks
  3. CQP
  4. Financial Ratios

Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. (CQP) Financial Ratios

Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 10.3x · EV/EBITDA 10.6x · ROE 721.5%. (2005–2025 historical series)

Income StatementBalance SheetCash FlowRatios
AnnualQuarterly

CQP Valuation Multiples

Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018FY 2017FY 2016
Market Cap$30.8B$25.9B$25.7B$24.1B$27.5B$20.4B$14.1B$19.3B$17.5B$14.3B$9.7B
Enterprise Value$45.3B$40.4B$40.6B$39.5B$42.9B$36.7B$30.5B$35.2B$32.0B$28.8B$23.6B
P/E Ratio →10.318.6712.507.1617.3914.0815.1917.6914.3824.70—
P/S Ratio2.862.412.952.491.602.172.282.822.723.338.85
P/B Ratio74.4062.52———28.4726.1126.9521.8422.4521.98
P/FCF11.9910.089.148.347.4412.4418.0789.2016.33——
P/OCF11.139.358.667.756.638.928.0412.469.3214.68—

P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart

CQP EV Ratios

Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018FY 2017FY 2016
EV / Revenue—3.754.664.092.493.894.955.144.986.6921.42
EV / EBITDA10.609.4510.256.9210.6911.8011.4113.7013.3219.2758.03
EV / EBIT12.6310.7912.267.7812.7514.9314.6017.0715.9426.09126.68
EV / FCF—15.7114.4313.6811.6122.3639.21162.7729.90——

CQP Profitability

Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency

Margins

Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018FY 2017FY 2016
Gross Margin34.3%34.3%51.1%64.7%26.0%37.0%49.2%42.8%98.2%97.7%48.4%
Operating Margin33.3%33.3%37.7%52.1%19.6%27.1%34.5%29.8%30.8%26.9%22.8%
Net Profit Margin27.8%27.8%28.8%44.0%14.5%17.3%19.2%17.2%19.8%11.4%-15.5%

Return on Capital

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018FY 2017FY 2016
ROE721.5%721.5%———259.3%188.7%155.1%177.1%90.6%-29.6%
ROA17.1%17.1%14.1%22.5%12.8%8.5%6.1%6.3%7.2%3.0%-1.2%
ROIC18.4%18.4%17.0%27.1%16.7%11.3%9.5%9.6%9.8%5.9%1.4%
ROCE22.8%22.8%20.3%29.8%19.2%14.1%11.6%11.6%11.8%7.4%2.0%

CQP Leverage & Debt

Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018FY 2017FY 2016
Debt / Equity35.4735.47———24.0632.8024.7220.0825.1132.58
Debt / EBITDA3.443.443.852.804.065.556.616.886.6910.7335.54
Net Debt / Equity—34.99———22.7030.5522.2318.1622.6231.21
Net Debt / EBITDA3.393.393.762.703.845.236.156.196.049.6734.05
Debt / FCF—5.645.295.344.169.9221.1473.5713.57——
Interest Coverage4.974.974.146.173.872.962.302.332.741.800.52

CQP Liquidity & Efficiency

Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018FY 2017FY 2016
Current Ratio0.780.780.771.011.081.642.422.802.212.581.12
Quick Ratio0.680.680.690.921.021.512.302.682.112.471.01
Cash Ratio0.120.120.220.370.370.721.371.841.441.920.71
Asset Turnover—0.620.500.530.880.490.320.350.360.250.07
Inventory Turnover39.2439.2428.1724.0579.5933.8029.2833.6939.691.055.83
Days Sales Outstanding—30.3327.0924.5924.9936.9129.7121.4626.2430.0262.70

CQP Shareholder Yields

Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders

Dividends

Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018FY 2017FY 2016
Dividend Yield6.7%8.0%8.7%12.1%9.6%7.1%9.7%6.5%6.4%2.0%1.0%
Payout Ratio69.1%69.1%89.0%68.3%105.5%89.0%114.9%107.2%87.4%60.0%—

Total Shareholder Return Metrics

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018FY 2017FY 2016
Earnings Yield9.7%11.5%8.0%14.0%5.7%7.1%6.6%5.7%7.0%4.0%—
FCF Yield8.3%9.9%10.9%12.0%13.4%8.0%5.5%1.1%6.1%——
Buyback Yield0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Total Shareholder Yield6.7%8.0%8.7%12.1%9.6%7.1%9.7%6.5%6.4%2.0%1.0%
Shares Outstanding—$484M$484M$484M$484M$484M$399M$484M$484M$484M$338M

Key Metrics

Growth RegimeMixed
ProfitabilityStable
Balance SheetStrained
Cash FlowStable
Top Statement Risk

High leverage and thin equity

Verified Source

Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.

SEC 10-K (2026Q2)

Margin Volatility Masks Underlying Stability

CQP's gross margin swung from 70.4% in 2026Q2 to 9.9% in 2026Q1, per reported financials, yet operating margin averaged 33.3% over the period, suggesting commodity pass-through and derivative effects distort quarterly profitability.

The extreme quarterly margin swings are largely attributable to the pass-through nature of natural gas feedstock costs and mark-to-market derivative adjustments, which obscure the stable fee-based earnings from take-or-pay contracts. When smoothing through the noise, the operating margin trend appears resilient, with 2026Q2's 51.9% operating margin reflecting a favorable contract mix and high utilization. Investors should focus on cash-based metrics like EBITDA and distributable cash flow rather than GAAP net income, as the latter is heavily influenced by non-cash items.

Thin Equity Distorts Return Metrics

ROIC ranged from 1.7% in 2026Q1 to 7.5% in 2025Q4, per financial statements, while ROE spiked to 721.5% in 2026Q1 due to a minimal equity base, indicating that return on capital is more meaningful than ROE for this partnership.

The partnership's equity base is exceptionally thin relative to its asset size, causing ROE to be highly volatile and not representative of underlying economic returns. ROIC, though also volatile, provides a clearer picture of operational efficiency, with recent quarters showing improvement to 7.0% in 2026Q2. This suggests that the massive sunk-cost infrastructure is generating adequate returns on invested capital, but the capital structure amplifies equity-based metrics, warranting caution when comparing to traditional corporations.

Working Capital Efficiency Reflects Cargo Timing

Cash conversion cycle lengthened to 38 days in 2026Q2 from 22 days in 2024Q4, per reported data, driven by higher DSO and DIO, while DPO remained low, indicating CQP extends less to suppliers but faces timing swings from LNG cargo loadings.

The CCC expansion is primarily due to an increase in days sales outstanding to 27 days and days inventory outstanding to 19 days, which may reflect the timing of cargo deliveries and billing cycles. The low DPO of 8 days suggests CQP pays suppliers promptly, likely due to the nature of feedstock purchases, but this also means limited supplier financing. Asset turnover remains low at 0.15, consistent with a capital-intensive midstream model, and the efficiency metrics are less critical than utilization rates and contract terms.

Leverage Elevated but Deleveraging Trend Emerges

Debt-to-equity fell to 19.16 in 2026Q2 from 35.47 in 2025Q4, per balance sheet data, while interest coverage improved to 7.34 from 7.92, indicating a gradual reduction in leverage despite a still-thin equity base.

Total debt declined to $14.4B while equity grew to $3.7B, reflecting retained earnings and reduced borrowings, which is a positive trend. However, the absolute debt level remains high, and the D/EBITDA ratio of 9.54 in 2026Q2 is elevated compared to investment-grade midstream peers, suggesting limited headroom for additional debt. Interest coverage of 7.34x is adequate but could deteriorate if EBITDA normalizes to lower levels seen in 2026Q1, making the partnership sensitive to interest rate movements and refinancing conditions.

Liquidity Buffer Strengthens but Remains Modest

Current ratio improved to 1.22 in 2026Q2 from 0.78 in 2025Q4, per financial statements, with cash rising to $443M, yet the quick ratio of 1.09 indicates limited inventory dependence, though the buffer remains thin relative to debt obligations.

The improvement in liquidity is encouraging, but the absolute cash balance is small compared to the $14.4B debt load, and the current ratio is only marginally above 1.0. In a stress scenario, such as a prolonged downturn in LNG prices or a disruption in operations, the partnership would likely rely on credit facilities or asset sales, given the limited cash cushion. The low inventory levels (quick ratio close to current ratio) suggest that liquidity is not inventory-dependent, but the overall position remains vulnerable to sudden cash flow shocks.

ROE Misleads in Thin-Equity MLP

ROE of 721.5% in 2026Q1, as reported, is often misapplied to CQP, but it is distorted by a minimal equity base and derivative gains, obscuring the true return on invested capital and leverage risk.

The extreme ROE figure is a mathematical artifact of a very small equity denominator, not a sign of exceptional profitability. Analysts should instead use ROIC or cash-on-cash returns, which better reflect the economics of the underlying infrastructure assets. Additionally, the partnership's distribution yield of 6.2% is a more relevant metric for unitholders, but it must be evaluated against the sustainability of distributable cash flow, which is subject to commodity price and interest rate risks. Relying on ROE alone would overstate the partnership's earning power and understate its financial risk.

Download Financial Ratios Data

Includes 30+ ratios · 21 years · Updated daily

Consensus & Technical Research Suite
Open CQP Terminal

CQP Chart Terminal

WASM

Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.

Launch Terminal

Live Breakouts Feed

LIVE

High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.

Explore Setups

Intrinsic Valuation

DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.

Check Valuation

Historical Returns

10-year return with dividends reinvested.

Calculate

Peer Comparison

Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.

Compare

CQP — Frequently Asked Questions

Quick answers to the most common questions about buying CQP stock.

What is Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P.'s P/E ratio?

Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P.'s current P/E ratio is 10.3x. The historical average is 20.3x. This places it at the 18th percentile of its historical range.

What is Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P.'s EV/EBITDA?

Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P.'s current EV/EBITDA is 10.6x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 20.5x.

What is Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P.'s ROE?

Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P.'s return on equity (ROE) is 721.5%. This is above the typical threshold of 15-20% considered good for most companies. The historical average is 65.9%.

Is CQP stock overvalued?

Based on historical data, Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. is trading at a P/E of 10.3x. This is at the 18th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.

What is Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P.'s dividend yield?

Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P.'s current dividend yield is 6.70% with a payout ratio of 69.1%.

What are Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P.'s profit margins?

Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. has 34.3% gross margin and 33.3% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.

How much debt does Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. have?

Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 3.4x, indicating high leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.