Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 12.6x · EV/EBITDA 4.0x · ROE 10.1%. (2012–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $4.6B | $3.9B | $4.2B | $4.0B | $3.4B | $3.5B | $2.0B | $444M | $808M | $826M | $860M |
| Enterprise Value | $5.9B | $5.1B | $5.1B | $4.1B | $3.7B | $3.9B | $2.6B | $5.5B | $6.0B | $6.1B | $6.1B |
| P/E Ratio → | 12.55 | 10.77 | 11.23 | 7.03 | 6.45 | 5.80 | 1.04 | — | 2.52 | — | 3.15 |
| P/S Ratio | 1.28 | 1.08 | 1.43 | 1.41 | 1.04 | 1.38 | 1.22 | 0.16 | 0.26 | 0.39 | 0.49 |
| P/B Ratio | 1.24 | 1.06 | 1.19 | 1.79 | 1.81 | 2.10 | 1.66 | 0.88 | 1.59 | — | — |
| P/FCF | 8.52 | 7.20 | 12.07 | 8.62 | 10.86 | 7.61 | 33.31 | 2.01 | — | — | 15.64 |
| P/OCF | 5.35 | 4.52 | 6.98 | 6.15 | 4.89 | 5.37 | 18.54 | 0.66 | 1.75 | 3.33 | 6.62 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.42 | 1.72 | 1.45 | 1.15 | 1.51 | 1.60 | 2.03 | 1.97 | 2.92 | 3.49 |
| EV / EBITDA | 3.96 | 3.48 | 4.51 | 3.50 | 2.34 | 3.33 | 6.98 | 4.01 | 3.59 | 9.49 | 11.16 |
| EV / EBIT | 6.87 | 8.45 | 8.42 | 5.07 | 4.58 | 13.70 | 1.23 | 11.33 | 7.48 | 75.46 | 11.83 |
| EV / FCF | — | 9.46 | 14.50 | 8.87 | 12.00 | 8.32 | 43.67 | 24.75 | — | — | 111.20 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 39.6% | 39.6% | 40.6% | 47.1% | 53.3% | 48.6% | 25.0% | 46.9% | 51.8% | 30.0% | 21.2% |
| Operating Margin | 23.6% | 23.6% | 22.0% | 31.8% | 41.6% | 35.2% | 0.4% | 31.6% | 37.2% | 3.5% | -0.8% |
| Net Profit Margin | 10.1% | 10.1% | 12.7% | 20.0% | 16.1% | 23.9% | 117.0% | -1.0% | 10.7% | -12.7% | 15.9% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 10.1% | 10.1% | 13.1% | 27.6% | 29.5% | 42.6% | 223.0% | -5.5% | 64.4% | — | — |
| ROA | 5.0% | 5.0% | 6.8% | 14.2% | 13.4% | 17.7% | 37.5% | -0.4% | 4.9% | -4.2% | 4.2% |
| ROIC | 13.8% | 13.8% | 14.5% | 29.5% | 47.9% | 35.5% | 0.1% | 11.3% | 16.6% | 1.2% | -0.2% |
| ROCE | 13.6% | 13.6% | 13.7% | 27.7% | 44.6% | 32.3% | 0.2% | 13.3% | 19.0% | 1.3% | -0.2% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.37 | 0.37 | 0.35 | 0.27 | 0.36 | 0.38 | 0.54 | 9.97 | 10.32 | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | 0.92 | 0.92 | 1.09 | 0.52 | 0.42 | 0.55 | 1.73 | 3.69 | 3.12 | 8.24 | 9.61 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.33 | 0.24 | 0.05 | 0.19 | 0.20 | 0.52 | 9.93 | 10.28 | — | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.83 | 0.83 | 0.76 | 0.10 | 0.22 | 0.28 | 1.66 | 3.68 | 3.11 | 8.21 | 9.59 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 2.26 | 2.43 | 0.25 | 1.14 | 0.71 | 10.36 | 22.74 | — | — | 95.56 |
| Interest Coverage | 5.74 | 5.74 | 6.93 | 14.36 | 15.36 | 5.24 | 9.62 | 1.26 | 2.13 | 0.24 | 1.58 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.89 | 0.89 | 1.04 | 1.51 | 0.97 | 0.88 | 0.70 | 0.69 | 1.05 | 0.66 | 0.59 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.79 | 0.79 | 0.95 | 1.39 | 0.90 | 0.81 | 0.57 | 0.60 | 0.94 | 0.58 | 0.51 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.38 | 0.81 | 0.34 | 0.36 | 0.06 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.02 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.49 | 0.41 | 0.70 | 0.82 | 0.67 | 0.52 | 0.39 | 0.43 | 0.34 | 0.28 |
| Inventory Turnover | 20.53 | 20.53 | 19.50 | 20.65 | 25.33 | 21.97 | 19.77 | 21.36 | 21.38 | 26.20 | 23.83 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 46.08 | 57.64 | 36.07 | 45.71 | 41.55 | 49.68 | 47.03 | 43.73 | 61.47 | 57.47 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 3.0% | 3.5% | 2.7% | 2.0% | 1.7% | 0.4% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | 37.5% | 37.5% | 30.1% | 14.4% | 11.3% | 2.3% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 8.0% | 9.3% | 8.9% | 14.2% | 15.5% | 17.3% | 95.8% | — | 39.7% | — | 31.8% |
| FCF Yield | 11.7% | 13.9% | 8.3% | 11.6% | 9.2% | 13.1% | 3.0% | 49.7% | — | — | 6.4% |
| Buyback Yield | 8.1% | 9.6% | 4.5% | 3.6% | 9.3% | 4.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 11.1% | 13.1% | 7.2% | 5.7% | 11.0% | 4.6% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $87M | $81M | $73M | $78M | $83M | $83M | $49M | $47M | $43M | $40M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 14 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying CRC stock.
California Resources Corp's current P/E ratio is 12.6x. The historical average is 6.0x. This places it at the 100th percentile of its historical range.
California Resources Corp's current EV/EBITDA is 4.0x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 5.3x.
California Resources Corp's return on equity (ROE) is 10.1%. The historical average is -1.8%.
Based on historical data, California Resources Corp is trading at a P/E of 12.6x. This is at the 100th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
California Resources Corp's current dividend yield is 2.99% with a payout ratio of 37.5%.
California Resources Corp has 39.6% gross margin and 23.6% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
California Resources Corp's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 0.9x, indicating low leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Regulatory and permit constraints
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Resilience Amid Cost Pressures
CRC's operating margin reached 39.4% in 2026Q2, up from 22.2% in Q1, reflecting Brent-linked pricing and Aera integration, though net margin swung wildly from -73.5% to 39.6% due to non-cash items.
The gross margin has held between 35.5% and 44.0% over the past ten quarters, indicating that CRC's California premium and fee-simple acreage provide a structural cost advantage despite high compliance costs. However, the extreme volatility in net margin—from -73.5% in 2026Q1 to 39.6% in 2026Q2—suggests that reported profitability is heavily distorted by non-cash items such as asset retirement obligations and hedge settlements. Investors should focus on operating margin as the cleaner measure of underlying earning power, as it strips out these one-time distortions and better reflects the company's ability to convert revenue into profit.
ROIC Stability Masks Earnings Volatility
ROIC has remained remarkably stable between 2.6% and 8.8% over the last ten quarters, despite wide swings in ROE and net income, indicating that capital efficiency is driven by asset base rather than short-term earnings.
ROIC's narrow range suggests that CRC's returns on invested capital are relatively insensitive to commodity price swings, likely because the asset base is large and fixed. The 2026Q2 ROIC of 8.8% is the highest in the series, possibly reflecting the Aera acquisition's contribution, but it remains below the cost of capital for many E&P peers. ROE, in contrast, swung from -21.6% to 16.3% in consecutive quarters, highlighting that equity returns are heavily influenced by non-operating items. This divergence implies that ROIC is the more reliable metric for assessing management's capital allocation effectiveness, as it smooths out the noise from financing and tax effects.
Working Capital Efficiency Improves Post-Aera
CRC's cash conversion cycle turned negative to -7 days in 2026Q2, driven by DPO of 72 days versus DSO of 48 days, indicating the company is effectively using supplier credit to fund operations.
The negative CCC suggests that CRC is collecting receivables and selling inventory faster than it pays suppliers, which is a sign of operational efficiency and negotiating power. DPO has risen from 49 days in 2024Q3 to 72 days in 2026Q2, while DSO has remained relatively stable, indicating that the company is stretching payables without straining supplier relationships. However, the current ratio of 0.66 in 2026Q2 is below 1, implying that short-term obligations exceed current assets, but this is common in E&P where inventory is minimal and the negative CCC offsets liquidity needs. The efficiency gains appear to be a result of the Aera integration, which may have brought more favorable payment terms.
Conservative Leverage Provides Flexibility
CRC's debt-to-EBITDA stood at 2.0x in 2026Q2, down from 4.29x in 2025Q4, while interest coverage improved to 18.25x, indicating a comfortable debt service position despite the Aera acquisition.
The D/E ratio of 0.38 is conservative relative to peers like CIVI at 0.68 and CRGY at 1.11, suggesting that CRC has balance sheet capacity to fund its CCS pivot or weather regulatory setbacks. The sharp improvement in D/EBITDA from 4.29x to 2.0x in one quarter is largely due to the EBITDA boost from Aera, but it also reflects disciplined debt management. Interest coverage of 18.25x is robust, implying that even if EBITDA were to halve, CRC would still comfortably service its debt. However, the 2026Q1 negative interest coverage of -25.21x highlights the volatility in earnings, so investors should monitor whether the current coverage is sustainable given the regulatory overhang.
Liquidity Cushion Thins but Remains Manageable
CRC's current ratio fell to 0.66 in 2026Q2 from 0.89 in 2025Q4, while cash dropped to $263M, indicating a shrinking liquidity buffer that could strain operations under a severe downturn.
The quick ratio of 0.66 matches the current ratio, reflecting minimal inventory, which is typical for an E&P company. The decline in liquidity is partly due to the Aera acquisition and increased capital spending, but the negative CCC and strong operating cash flow provide some offset. Under a severe stress scenario—such as a prolonged drop in oil prices or a regulatory moratorium—CRC's ability to meet short-term obligations could be tested, given the thin current ratio. However, the company's low leverage and access to credit markets, as evidenced by its debt levels, may provide a backstop. Investors should monitor whether the current ratio stabilizes above 0.8 as integration synergies materialize.
Misapplied Metric: EV/EBITDA
EV/EBITDA of 4.06x appears cheap, but it is misleading for CRC because EBITDA excludes the significant cash costs of California's carbon compliance and asset retirement obligations, which are unique to its business model.
Standard E&P valuation often relies on EV/EBITDA, but for CRC, this metric understates the true economic burden of operating in California, where GHG allowance purchases and AROs are material cash outflows. The reported EBITDA likely does not fully capture these costs, making the multiple appear artificially low. A more appropriate metric would be EV/EBIT or EV/EBITDAX (excluding exploration costs), but even these may not adjust for the full regulatory drag. Investors should consider EV/Operating Cash Flow or EV/Pre-tax Operating Income, which better reflect the cash-generating ability of the business after accounting for the unique cost structure. The market's focus on EV/EBITDA may be one reason CRC trades at a discount to peers, but the discount may be justified by the hidden liabilities.