Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 0.3x · EV/EBITDA 7.4x · ROE 5.1%. (1998–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $20M | $556M | $358M | $380M | $329M | $169M | — | — | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $892M | $1.21T | $788.0B | $917.2B | $250.1B | $159.7B | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | 0.29 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.03 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | 0.50 | 0.01 | — | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.01 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | 0.28 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.01 | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.33 | 1.11 | 1.30 | 0.33 | 1.07 | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 7.43 | 7.26 | — | — | 0.70 | 4.20 | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | 8.23 | 3.45 | 8.47 | 8.84 | 19.07 | 1.78 | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 21.30 | — | 13.89 | 1.77 | 6.66 | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 37.0% | 37.0% | 41.0% | 38.1% | 44.3% | 18.8% | 42.6% | 50.5% | 35.8% | 37.1% | 43.9% |
| Operating Margin | 16.5% | 16.5% | -19.2% | -10.7% | 45.1% | 23.4% | 131.3% | -87.8% | 34.2% | 6.1% | 125.5% |
| Net Profit Margin | 10.5% | 10.5% | 11.0% | 23.0% | 38.7% | -29.6% | 11.8% | -84.7% | 6.5% | -0.9% | 33.1% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 5.1% | 5.1% | 4.7% | 14.6% | 95.9% | -24.9% | 6.2% | -32.1% | 7.1% | -1.4% | 20.0% |
| ROA | 2.2% | 2.2% | 2.1% | 6.4% | 35.0% | -5.6% | 1.1% | -6.3% | 1.5% | -0.3% | 4.5% |
| ROIC | 3.9% | 3.9% | -4.0% | -3.3% | 50.5% | 5.1% | 13.4% | -6.8% | 8.5% | 2.1% | 18.1% |
| ROCE | 4.4% | 4.4% | -4.5% | -3.7% | 54.8% | 5.8% | 15.8% | -7.8% | 9.7% | 2.4% | 21.6% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.66 | 0.66 | 0.58 | 0.59 | 0.73 | 1.18 | 3.60 | 3.76 | 2.77 | 2.75 | 3.15 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 8.76 | 8.76 | — | — | 0.91 | 5.38 | 5.86 | — | 8.21 | 11.29 | 5.55 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.55 | 0.50 | 0.51 | 0.56 | 0.92 | 2.77 | 3.05 | 2.28 | 2.24 | 2.77 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 7.26 | 7.26 | — | — | 0.70 | 4.20 | 4.51 | — | 6.77 | 9.17 | 4.88 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 21.29 | — | 13.88 | 1.76 | 6.66 | 6.03 | 10.99 | 17.67 | 10.51 | 29.16 |
| Interest Coverage | 1.81 | 1.81 | -2.24 | -0.91 | 3.07 | 0.72 | 4.59 | -4.31 | 1.64 | 0.30 | 7.29 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.24 | 1.24 | 1.07 | 1.10 | 0.77 | 0.99 | 1.34 | 1.71 | 1.79 | 1.34 | 0.99 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.93 | 0.93 | 0.81 | 0.86 | 0.61 | 0.74 | 1.27 | 1.63 | 1.74 | 1.23 | 0.89 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.48 | 0.48 | 0.40 | 0.42 | 0.37 | 0.41 | 0.71 | 1.18 | 1.20 | 0.77 | 0.52 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.18 | 0.20 | 0.18 | 0.67 | 0.27 | 0.08 | 0.07 | 0.17 | 0.28 | 0.08 |
| Inventory Turnover | 1.81 | 1.81 | 2.40 | 2.50 | 8.76 | 4.24 | 2.66 | 2.31 | 11.76 | 7.63 | 1.97 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 176.82 | 135.44 | 151.37 | 34.21 | 91.37 | 293.45 | 299.59 | 107.23 | 100.38 | 289.00 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | 90.9% | 90.9% | 157.5% | 100.0% | 22.4% | — | 26.4% | — | 15.4% | — | 4.6% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 100.0% | 17288.1% | 21921.6% | 43261.8% | 91141.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 100.0% | 10239.5% | — | 17357.8% | 43000.4% | 14211.9% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 58.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $662M | $702M | $692M | $686M | $544M | $531M | $531M | $533M | $528M | $555M |
Hyperinflationary currency volatility
According to recent financial data, CRESW trades at a P/S of 0.03 and a P/B of 0.01, figures that appear to reflect extreme market skepticism regarding the realizable value of its land bank rather than a genuine assessment of the company's underlying economic earning power.
The exceptionally low valuation multiples are likely a byproduct of the conglomerate discount and the difficulty in reconciling IAS 29-adjusted book values with market-clearing prices for Argentine assets. Investors should monitor whether these depressed ratios represent a deep-value opportunity or a permanent impairment of capital due to the persistent sovereign risk premium.
As reported in quarterly filings, ROIC has oscillated between a high of 14.5% in 2024Q1 and a low of -20.9% in 2024Q3, suggesting that the company struggles to consistently compound capital across its disparate agricultural and urban property segments in a volatile macroeconomic environment.
The erratic nature of these returns indicates that capital allocation is heavily influenced by lumpy land divestitures and non-recurring fair value adjustments. The inability to maintain a stable positive spread over the cost of capital warrants further investigation into the efficiency of the company's land transformation model.
Based on the provided quarterly figures, the cash conversion cycle remains highly unstable, with DSO reaching as high as 1,340 days in 2023Q4, which highlights the significant friction in converting agricultural production and real estate assets into liquid cash flows within the Argentine economy.
The extreme variability in days inventory outstanding and days sales outstanding suggests that the company is frequently forced to hold assets for extended periods due to market illiquidity or currency controls. This lack of operational velocity limits the company's ability to pivot quickly in response to changing commodity prices or domestic demand shifts.
As indicated by the reported financial statements, the interest coverage ratio has swung from a peak of 60.84 in 2024Q1 to negative territory in 2025Q1, illustrating that the company's ability to service its debt is highly sensitive to quarterly operational volatility and currency fluctuations.
While the debt-to-equity ratio of 0.66 appears manageable in isolation, the reliance on USD-denominated debt to fund local-currency operations creates a structural mismatch that exposes the balance sheet to significant refinancing risk. Investors should monitor the company's ability to maintain positive interest coverage during periods of local currency devaluation.
Data from recent filings suggests that the P/E ratio is a fundamentally flawed metric for CRESW, as it fails to account for the massive non-cash fair value adjustments and hyperinflationary accounting impacts that frequently distort the company's reported net income figures.
Using P/E to value this business obscures the underlying cash-generating capacity of the urban property portfolio and the lumpy nature of land sales. A more appropriate approach would involve a Sum-of-the-Parts (SOTP) analysis that values the land bank and rental properties independently of the volatile, accounting-heavy net income line.
Includes 30+ ratios · 28 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying CRESW stock.
Cresud S.A. Warrant 2021-08.03.26 on Cresud's current P/E ratio is 0.3x. The historical average is 0.0x. This places it at the 100th percentile of its historical range.
Cresud S.A. Warrant 2021-08.03.26 on Cresud's current EV/EBITDA is 7.4x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 4.1x.
Cresud S.A. Warrant 2021-08.03.26 on Cresud's return on equity (ROE) is 5.1%. The historical average is 5.6%.
Based on historical data, Cresud S.A. Warrant 2021-08.03.26 on Cresud is trading at a P/E of 0.3x. This is at the 100th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Cresud S.A. Warrant 2021-08.03.26 on Cresud's current dividend yield is 100.00% with a payout ratio of 90.9%.
Cresud S.A. Warrant 2021-08.03.26 on Cresud has 37.0% gross margin and 16.5% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
Cresud S.A. Warrant 2021-08.03.26 on Cresud's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 8.8x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.