Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -18.3x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -128.3%. (2021–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1.2B | $333M | $913M | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $1.2B | $331M | $916M | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -18.34 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 2159.88 | 593.27 | 7757.98 | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 10.38 | 3.62 | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 590.75 | 7783.84 | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 100.0% | 100.0% | -22.1% | 100.0% | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -8464.0% | -8464.0% | -2550.3% | -1998.4% | — | — |
| Net Profit Margin | -9252.5% | -9252.5% | -125352.1% | -4900.5% | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -128.3% | -128.3% | -211.2% | -3.6% | -0.5% | -2159.2% |
| ROA | -44.9% | -44.9% | -134.1% | -3.4% | -0.4% | -430.6% |
| ROIC | -86.3% | -86.3% | -3.2% | -1.1% | -0.4% | — |
| ROCE | -85.6% | -85.6% | -3.7% | -1.4% | -0.4% | -2239.5% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.06 | 0.06 | — | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.13 |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.02 | — | -0.00 | -0.01 | 2.06 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -82.34 | -82.34 | -0.08 | — | — | -3824.92 |
Net cash position: cash ($7M) exceeds total debt ($6M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.59 | 0.27 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.07 | 0.10 | 0.59 | 0.27 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.02 | 0.25 | 3.44 | 0.27 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | — | — |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 31.18 | — | 304.79 | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $93M | $81M | $22M | $22M | $22M |
Insufficient Capital for Development
According to recent market data, CRML trades at a price-to-sales ratio of 2100.99, a figure that, as reported in financial statements, reflects the company's pre-revenue development stage rather than any underlying fundamental valuation, rendering traditional valuation metrics largely disconnected from the firm's actual operational and economic reality.
The P/S ratio of 2100.99 is an artifact of the company's incidental revenue and should not be interpreted as a standard valuation multiple. Investors should monitor the P/B ratio of 10.10, which suggests that the market is pricing the company based on the long-term potential of its Austrian mining assets rather than current book value.
Based on CRML's reported figures, the company's ROIC has consistently remained in negative territory, reaching -10.8% in 2025Q4, which indicates that the firm is currently destroying capital as it funds exploration and administrative overhead without the benefit of offsetting commercial production or operational cash flow.
The persistent negative ROIC trend highlights the inherent difficulty of evaluating a pre-production miner using standard efficiency metrics. This decay in returns on invested capital appears structural, as the company continues to burn through equity to maintain its Austrian project site without generating meaningful returns.
As reported in financial statements, CRML's current ratio of 0.13 as of 2025Q4 reveals a critical mismatch between short-term liabilities and available cash, suggesting that the company lacks the necessary liquidity buffer to navigate the high-cost environment required for its upcoming lithium project construction phase.
The current ratio of 0.13 is significantly lower than industry standards for mining developers, indicating that the company is highly dependent on external financing. This liquidity position warrants further investigation, as it may force management to pursue dilutive equity raises to meet immediate operational obligations.
According to recent SEC filings, the most commonly misapplied ratio for CRML is the gross margin, which currently sits at 100% but, as indicated by the company's pre-production status, is a temporary accounting byproduct that obscures the true cost structure of future lithium hydroxide conversion processes.
Investors should avoid using the 100% gross margin as a proxy for future profitability, as it fails to account for the energy and chemical reagent costs that will define the project's economics once operational. A more appropriate metric would be the projected all-in sustaining cost (AISC) per ton of lithium produced, which is not yet available.
Includes 30+ ratios · 5 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying CRML stock.
Critical Metals Corp.'s current P/E ratio is -18.3x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Critical Metals Corp.'s return on equity (ROE) is -128.3%. The historical average is -85.9%.
Based on historical data, Critical Metals Corp. is trading at a P/E of -18.3x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Critical Metals Corp. has 100.0% gross margin and -8464.0% operating margin.