EIDP, Inc. (CTA-PA) P/E Ratio History
UndervaluedTrading at 33.3x vs 5Y avg 97.0x · 50th percentile · Below historical baseline · Data 2005–2026
Loading P/E history...
P/E Ratio Analysis
The current P/E is 66% below its 5-year average of 97.0x. Over the past five years, CTA-PA's P/E has ranged from a low of 10.9x to a high of 631.8x, placing the current valuation at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Compared to the Basic Materials sector median P/E of 21.3x, CTA-PA trades at a 56% premium to its sector peers. The sector includes 124 companies with P/E ratios ranging from 0.9x to 162.8x.
The PEG ratio of 0.24 (P/E divided by 23% EPS growth) suggests the stock may be undervalued relative to its earnings growth. Peter Lynch popularized the rule that a PEG below 1.0 indicates an attractive entry point.
Relative to the broader market, CTA-PA commands a significant premium over the S&P 500 median P/E of 24.7x. Investors should consider the company's growth prospects, competitive position, and earnings quality when evaluating whether the current valuation is justified.
For a comprehensive intrinsic value estimate using discounted cash flow analysis, see our CTA-PA DCF Valuation Calculator →
Note: P/E ratio is just one valuation metric. It does not account for balance sheet strength, cash flow quality, or growth sustainability. Always conduct comprehensive due diligence before making investment decisions.
CTA-PA Cross-Benchmark Valuation
How does the current P/E compare to sector peers and the broader market?
CTA-PA P/E vs Peers
Seeds and crop genetics peers sorted by market cap
| Company | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | PEG Ratio | EPS Growth (1Y) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $8B | 17.2Lowest | 5.34 | -47% | |
| $27B | 17.5 | 1.89 | +46%Best | |
| $82B | 32.4 | 4.69 | -3% | |
| $14B | 20.5 | 1.14Best | +17% |
Lower P/E can signal a discount or weaker growth expectations; PEG adds growth context.
CTA-PA Historical P/E Data (2005–2026)
Quarterly P/E ratios calculated from closing price and TTM EPS
| Quarter | Period End | Price | TTM EPS | P/E Ratio | vs Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY2026 Q1 | - | $54.45 | $2.51 | 21.7x | -72% |
| FY2025 Q4 | Dec 31 2025 | $54.03 | $2.39 | 22.6x | -71% |
| FY2025 Q3 | - | $55.75 | $2.34 | 23.8x | -69% |
| FY2025 Q2 | Jun 30 2025 | $55.04 | $2.21 | 24.9x | -68% |
| FY2025 Q1 | Mar 31 2025 | $57.25 | $1.51 | 37.8x | -51% |
| FY2024 Q4 | - | $55.33 | $1.16 | 47.6x | -38% |
| FY2024 Q3 | Sep 30 2024 | $65.89 | $1.21 | 54.5x | -29% |
| FY2024 Q2 | Jun 30 2024 | $54.97 | $1.81 | 30.4x | -61% |
| FY2024 Q1 | Mar 31 2024 | $57.79 | $0.60 | 96.3x | +25% |
| FY2020 Q4 | - | $88.45 | $0.14 | 631.8x | +719% |
| FY2020 Q3 | Sep 30 2020 | $85.28 | $0.14 | 609.1x | +690% |
| FY2018 Q2 | Jun 30 2018 | $86.50 | $1.14 | 75.9x | -2% |
| FY2018 Q1 | Mar 31 2018 | $86.05 | $1.32 | 65.2x | -15% |
| FY2017 Q4 | Dec 31 2017 | $92.40 | $2.84 | 32.5x | -58% |
| FY2017 Q3 | Sep 30 2017 | $91.00 | $2.55 | 35.7x | -54% |
| FY2017 Q2 | Jun 30 2017 | $88.73 | $2.55 | 34.8x | -55% |
| FY2017 Q1 | Mar 31 2017 | $88.30 | $2.96 | 29.8x | -61% |
| FY2016 Q4 | Dec 31 2016 | $87.50 | $2.82 | 31.0x | -60% |
| FY2016 Q3 | Sep 30 2016 | $92.93 | $4.06 | 22.9x | -70% |
| FY2016 Q1 | - | $83.50 | $7.64 | 10.9x | -86% |
| FY2015 Q1 | - | $86.50 | $7.82 | 11.1x | -86% |
| FY2014 Q1 | Mar 31 2014 | $75.28 | $7.98 | 9.4x | -88% |
| FY2013 Q1 | Mar 31 2013 | $87.81 | $7.96 | 11.0x | -86% |
| FY2012 Q1 | Mar 31 2012 | $87.98 | $5.62 | 15.7x | -80% |
| FY2011 Q2 | - | $75.80 | $4.05 | 18.7x | -76% |
| FY2011 Q1 | - | $71.50 | $2.76 | 25.9x | -66% |
| FY2010 Q1 | Mar 31 2010 | $70.15 | $1.24 | 56.6x | -27% |
| FY2008 Q1 | Mar 31 2008 | $64.00 | $0.88 | 72.7x | -6% |
| FY2005 Q1 | - | $73.00 | $0.96 | 76.0x | -1% |
Average P/E for displayed period: 77.1x
Full Stock Analysis
Deep dive into CTA-PA consensus models and risk factors.
Intrinsic Valuation
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
Historical Returns
21+ years return with dividends reinvested.
DCA Calculator
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Peer Comparison
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
CTA-PA — Frequently Asked Questions
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying CTA-PA stock.
What is CTA-PA's P/E ratio?
EIDP, Inc. (CTA-PA) trailing twelve-month P/E ratio is 33.3x, based on TTM diluted EPS of N/A. The 5-year average P/E is 97.0x and the historical range spans 10.9x to 631.8x.
Is CTA-PA stock overvalued or undervalued?
CTA-PA trades at 33.3x P/E, below its 5-year average of 97.0x. At the 50th percentile of its historical range (10.9x–631.8x), the stock is priced at a discount to its own history.
Is CTA-PA stock expensive?
No, CTA-PA is not expensive on a historical basis. The current P/E of 33.3x is below the 5-year average of 97.0x and sits at the 50th percentile of its valuation range.
What is CTA-PA's historical P/E range?
Over the past 5 years, CTA-PA's P/E ratio has ranged from 10.9x to 631.8x, with a median of 34.8x and an average of 97.0x. The current P/E of 33.3x places the stock at the 50th percentile of this range. Full historical data spans 2005–2026.
How does CTA-PA's P/E compare to the S&P 500?
CTA-PA trades at 33.3x P/E versus the S&P 500 median of 24.7x. The 35% premium to the market typically reflects higher expected earnings growth or quality.
How does CTA-PA's valuation compare to Basic Materials peers?
EIDP, Inc. P/E of 33.3x compares to the Basic Materials sector median of 21.3x. The premium reflects expected growth above peers or stronger fundamentals. See the peer comparison table on this page for ticker-by-ticker P/E and PEG.
What is CTA-PA's PEG ratio?
CTA-PA PEG ratio is 0.24, based on a P/E of 33.3x and EPS growth of 23.1%. A PEG below 1.0 indicates the valuation is supported by the earnings growth rate — typically considered attractive.
What is CTA-PA's earnings yield?
CTA-PA earnings yield is 3.01%, the inverse of its 33.3x P/E ratio. Earnings yield represents the percentage of each dollar invested that the company earns. It can be compared directly to bond yields to assess relative attractiveness of stocks versus fixed income.