Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -0.0x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -33.2%. (2021–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $25127 | $4M | $6M | $37M | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $1M | $5M | $7M | $40M | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -0.01 | — | — | 2536.59 | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.02 | 2.99 | 13.13 | 0.97 | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 0.00 | 0.41 | 0.47 | 5.40 | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | 6.64 | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | 24.70 | 6.64 | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 3.75 | 14.93 | 1.03 | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | 25.87 | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | 27.93 | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | 7.05 | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 12.9% | 12.9% | 39.2% | 11.1% | 8.1% | 7.7% |
| Operating Margin | -298.4% | -298.4% | -818.7% | 3.6% | 6.4% | 5.5% |
| Net Profit Margin | -283.2% | -283.2% | -1138.4% | 0.3% | 1.5% | 3.0% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -33.2% | -33.2% | -53.2% | 3.1% | 97.6% | — |
| ROA | -26.8% | -26.8% | -40.8% | 1.1% | 5.0% | 6.4% |
| ROIC | -24.3% | -24.3% | -24.7% | 9.0% | 18.9% | 11.4% |
| ROCE | -30.7% | -30.7% | -33.6% | 27.2% | 246.1% | 623.0% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.20 | 0.39 | 6.60 | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | 1.77 | 3.29 | 6.62 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.10 | 0.07 | 0.33 | 6.56 | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | 1.49 | 3.28 | 6.40 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | 0.41 | 5.53 | — |
| Interest Coverage | -98.04 | -98.04 | -76.49 | 1.16 | 1.40 | 2.26 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 6.74 | 6.74 | 12.50 | 4.16 | 1.19 | 0.99 |
| Quick Ratio | 6.74 | 6.74 | 12.50 | 3.52 | 0.70 | 0.09 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.17 | 0.17 | 1.87 | 0.18 | 0.00 | 0.03 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.11 | 0.03 | 3.81 | 3.75 | 2.15 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | 22.48 | 8.50 | 2.26 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 2405.37 | 38.42 | 70.43 | 49.93 | 7.08 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | 0.0% | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | 15.1% | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $16317 | $9776 | $8958 | $8958 | $8958 |
Liquidity and insolvency risk
As reported in financial statements, CTNT's operating margin of -298.38% in the most recent period highlights a severe inability to cover fixed costs, suggesting that the current business model fails to generate sufficient gross profit to sustain its administrative and compliance overhead in the competitive luxury export market.
The gross margin volatility, which has swung from over 50% to 21.4% in 2026Q1, indicates that the company lacks the pricing power necessary to offset the high variable costs of international vehicle logistics. This persistent negative profitability suggests that the company is effectively subsidizing its trade volume, which is unsustainable without a fundamental shift in its cost structure or revenue model.
Based on recent SEC filings, the company's Days Sales Outstanding (DSO) of 4,123 days in 2026Q1 reflects an extreme delay in cash collection, which, when compared to industry norms, suggests significant friction in the company's ability to convert its luxury vehicle sales into actual cash inflows.
The erratic nature of the cash conversion cycle, compounded by the lack of consistent inventory turnover, implies that the company is struggling to manage its working capital effectively. This inefficiency forces the firm to rely on external liquidity to bridge the gap between vehicle acquisition and final payment, increasing the risk of insolvency during periods of market volatility.
According to the provided balance sheet data, the company's cash position of $233,217 is critically low relative to the capital-intensive nature of its luxury vehicle inventory, indicating that the firm may face an imminent liquidity crisis if it cannot secure additional financing to support its ongoing operations.
While the current ratio appears high at 43.21, this figure is likely distorted by the composition of current assets that may not be readily convertible to cash in a distressed scenario. Investors should monitor the company's ability to maintain operations, as the current cash burn rate suggests that the existing liquidity buffer is inadequate for a business model reliant on high-value asset procurement.
The market's tendency to apply standard dealership valuation multiples to CTNT obscures the reality that the company functions as a high-risk regulatory arbitrage play rather than a traditional retail business, leading to a potential mispricing of its long-term viability and operational risks.
Analysts should avoid using P/S or P/E ratios, as these metrics fail to account for the company's lack of recurring service revenue and its extreme sensitivity to geopolitical and regulatory shifts. Instead, a focus on gross profit per unit and cash burn rate provides a more accurate assessment of the company's ability to survive as a niche logistics facilitator.
Includes 30+ ratios · 5 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying CTNT stock.
Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -0.0x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -33.2%. The historical average is 3.6%.
Based on historical data, Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service Inc. is trading at a P/E of -0.0x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service Inc. has 12.9% gross margin and -298.4% operating margin.