Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 11.3x · EV/EBITDA 7.2x · ROE 15.2%. (1998–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $29.2B | $40.0B | $38.2B | $38.1B | $29.7B | $46.8B | $44.3B | $34.7B | $37.1B | $42.3B | $34.2B |
| Enterprise Value | $28.8B | $39.7B | $37.5B | $36.8B | $29.0B | $46.7B | $43.4B | $33.8B | $36.7B | $41.2B | $33.0B |
| P/E Ratio → | 11.32 | 18.24 | 17.05 | 17.94 | 12.97 | 21.91 | 31.89 | 18.85 | 17.63 | 28.07 | 21.97 |
| P/S Ratio | 1.33 | 1.90 | 1.94 | 1.97 | 1.53 | 2.53 | 2.66 | 2.07 | 2.30 | 2.85 | 2.53 |
| P/B Ratio | 2.08 | 2.66 | 2.65 | 2.88 | 2.41 | 3.91 | 4.09 | 3.15 | 3.25 | 3.96 | 3.19 |
| P/FCF | 12.34 | 15.42 | 20.92 | 18.95 | 13.27 | 21.14 | 15.28 | 16.48 | 16.74 | 19.90 | 25.87 |
| P/OCF | 10.11 | 13.88 | 17.99 | 16.37 | 11.56 | 18.78 | 13.44 | 13.90 | 14.30 | 17.56 | 21.08 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.88 | 1.90 | 1.90 | 1.49 | 2.52 | 2.61 | 2.01 | 2.27 | 2.78 | 2.45 |
| EV / EBITDA | 7.23 | 9.73 | 10.92 | 11.36 | 8.21 | 13.73 | 16.24 | 11.34 | 11.11 | 14.09 | 12.38 |
| EV / EBIT | 8.17 | 10.95 | 12.53 | 13.03 | 9.56 | 16.46 | 20.48 | 13.15 | 12.98 | 15.39 | 13.90 |
| EV / FCF | — | 15.29 | 20.52 | 18.30 | 12.98 | 21.07 | 14.96 | 16.03 | 16.55 | 19.41 | 25.00 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 33.7% | 33.7% | 34.3% | 34.6% | 35.9% | 37.3% | 35.9% | 36.6% | 39.0% | 38.2% | 39.9% |
| Operating Margin | 16.7% | 16.7% | 14.7% | 13.9% | 15.3% | 15.3% | 12.7% | 14.6% | 17.4% | 16.8% | 17.0% |
| Net Profit Margin | 10.6% | 10.6% | 11.3% | 11.0% | 11.8% | 11.5% | 8.4% | 11.0% | 13.0% | 10.2% | 11.5% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 15.2% | 15.2% | 16.2% | 16.7% | 18.8% | 18.7% | 12.7% | 16.4% | 19.0% | 14.1% | 15.5% |
| ROA | 11.0% | 11.0% | 11.7% | 11.7% | 12.8% | 12.3% | 8.4% | 11.5% | 13.5% | 10.2% | 11.4% |
| ROIC | 18.7% | 18.7% | 16.9% | 17.1% | 19.0% | 19.5% | 15.9% | 17.5% | 20.4% | 19.4% | 19.1% |
| ROCE | 21.1% | 21.1% | 18.3% | 18.1% | 20.6% | 20.4% | 15.9% | 18.6% | 22.0% | 20.5% | 20.6% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.12 | 0.14 | 0.16 | 0.15 | 0.07 | 0.08 | 0.08 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 0.39 | 0.39 | 0.44 | 0.41 | 0.43 | 0.48 | 0.66 | 0.57 | 0.23 | 0.30 | 0.33 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.02 | -0.05 | -0.10 | -0.05 | -0.01 | -0.09 | -0.09 | -0.04 | -0.10 | -0.11 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -0.08 | -0.08 | -0.21 | -0.40 | -0.19 | -0.04 | -0.34 | -0.32 | -0.13 | -0.36 | -0.43 |
| Debt / FCF | — | -0.13 | -0.40 | -0.65 | -0.29 | -0.07 | -0.32 | -0.46 | -0.19 | -0.50 | -0.88 |
| Interest Coverage | 97.92 | 97.92 | 55.41 | 68.98 | 159.74 | 315.11 | 88.33 | 98.81 | 104.59 | 116.43 | 125.05 |
Net cash position: cash ($1.9B) exceeds total debt ($1.6B)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.34 | 2.34 | 2.09 | 2.25 | 2.17 | 2.08 | 1.94 | 2.55 | 3.12 | 3.21 | 3.56 |
| Quick Ratio | 2.34 | 2.34 | 2.09 | 2.25 | 2.17 | 2.08 | 1.94 | 2.55 | 3.12 | 3.21 | 3.56 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.52 | 0.52 | 0.63 | 0.79 | 0.75 | 0.77 | 0.77 | 1.15 | 1.62 | 1.78 | 2.14 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.02 | 0.99 | 1.05 | 1.09 | 1.04 | 0.98 | 1.04 | 1.01 | 0.97 | 0.95 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 76.76 | 75.07 | 72.59 | 71.32 | 70.15 | 67.66 | 70.81 | 72.21 | 79.41 | 78.62 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 2.0% | 1.5% | 1.6% | 1.5% | 1.9% | 1.1% | 1.1% | 1.3% | 1.3% | 0.6% | — |
| Payout Ratio | 27.4% | 27.4% | 26.8% | 27.8% | 24.6% | 23.8% | 34.5% | 24.6% | 22.3% | 17.6% | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 8.8% | 5.5% | 5.9% | 5.6% | 7.7% | 4.6% | 3.1% | 5.3% | 5.7% | 3.6% | 4.6% |
| FCF Yield | 8.1% | 6.5% | 4.8% | 5.3% | 7.5% | 4.7% | 6.5% | 6.1% | 6.0% | 5.0% | 3.9% |
| Buyback Yield | 4.7% | 3.4% | 1.6% | 2.8% | 4.8% | 1.6% | 3.7% | 6.5% | 3.4% | 4.5% | 1.5% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 6.7% | 5.0% | 3.2% | 4.3% | 6.7% | 2.7% | 4.7% | 7.8% | 4.7% | 5.1% | 1.5% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $482M | $497M | $505M | $519M | $528M | $541M | $560M | $584M | $595M | $610M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 28 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying CTSH stock.
Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation's current P/E ratio is 11.3x. The historical average is 31.8x.
Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation's current EV/EBITDA is 7.2x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 19.9x.
Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation's return on equity (ROE) is 15.2%. The historical average is 21.9%.
Based on historical data, Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation is trading at a P/E of 11.3x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation's current dividend yield is 1.96% with a payout ratio of 27.4%.
Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation has 33.7% gross margin and 16.7% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 0.4x, indicating low leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Margin compression from AI pricing deflation
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Discount Multiples Reflect Peer-Level Margin Concerns
Based on reported figures, CTSH trades at 14.62x trailing earnings and 7.27x EV/EBITDA, below Accenture at 21.82x and 12.55x, suggesting the market is pricing in slower growth and margin pressure rather than mispricing the business.
The 11.53x forward P/E sits below the trailing multiple, which implies consensus expects earnings to grow modestly rather than contract. A PEG of 1.21 is lower than most large-cap IT services peers, indicating the discount is more about growth durability than headline earnings power. Investors should monitor whether the discount narrows if operating margins hold near 15 percent through the next several quarters.
Flat Operating Margin Limits Earnings Power Gains
As reported in the financial statements, CTSH's operating margin has stayed between roughly 14.6% and 16.7% over ten quarters, with the latest reading at 15.4%, indicating little net operating leverage despite steady overhead.
The gross margin of 33.8% is competitive, but the gap between gross and operating margin is absorbing most of the benefit from scale. Net margin of 11.1% in the latest quarter is below the 12 percent range seen in several earlier periods, partly reflecting a volatile tax and non-operating line. Peer comparison shows Infosys and Wipro operating at materially higher margin levels, which suggests the gap is structural rather than purely cyclical.
Returns Stable but Well Below Peer Leaders
Based on CTSH's reported figures, ROIC has held in a tight 4.0% to 4.6% band across ten quarters, far below Accenture's 26.8% and Infosys's 34.4%, pointing to a capital base that is not generating peer-level incremental returns.
The stability of ROIC is a positive signal, since it shows the business is not decaying, but the absolute level is low for an asset-light services company. Goodwill representing roughly 38 percent of total assets is a material drag, because acquired capital dilutes the return on the invested base. The return profile suggests management has prioritized acquisition-driven scale over organic capital efficiency, which warrants further investigation into the returns on past deals.
Solid Current Ratio Masks Thinning Cash Cushion
According to the reported balance sheet, CTSH's current ratio has held near 2.2x while cash fell from $2.3B in 2025Q3 to $1.5B in 2026Q3, indicating liquidity coverage remains adequate even as the cash buffer narrows.
A current ratio above 2x provides ample coverage of short-term obligations, and the quick ratio matches it, meaning the position does not depend on inventory, which is immaterial for this business. The concern is the trajectory of cash rather than the ratio itself, since a sustained decline could constrain flexibility if receivables slow. Under a severe stress scenario, the balance sheet would likely hold given low debt, though the reduced cash headroom would leave less room for buybacks or acquisitions without new borrowing.
Leverage Ratios Overstate Financial Flexibility
Based on reported figures, the debt-to-equity ratio of 0.14 appears low, but the D/EBITDA swings from 1.14x to 2.36x over the period suggest that debt-based metrics can mask the true earnings base for an acquisition-heavy services firm.
A low debt-to-equity ratio is often read as conservative, yet for a company with $8.1B of goodwill, book equity is inflated by intangibles that do not support debt capacity in a downturn. Tangible equity is considerably smaller, so leverage measured against tangible capital would appear materially higher. Investors should monitor whether D/EBITDA stays within the 1 to 2.5 range, since that range better captures actual repayment capacity than book-equity leverage.