Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 12.9x · EV/EBITDA 6.4x · ROE 15.2%. (1998–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $26.4B | $40.0B | $38.2B | $38.1B | $29.7B | $46.8B | $44.3B | $34.7B | $37.1B | $42.3B | $34.2B |
| Enterprise Value | $26.1B | $39.7B | $37.5B | $36.8B | $29.0B | $46.7B | $43.4B | $33.8B | $36.7B | $41.2B | $33.0B |
| P/E Ratio → | 12.90 | 18.24 | 17.05 | 17.94 | 12.97 | 21.91 | 31.89 | 18.85 | 17.63 | 28.07 | 21.97 |
| P/S Ratio | 1.25 | 1.90 | 1.94 | 1.97 | 1.53 | 2.53 | 2.66 | 2.07 | 2.30 | 2.85 | 2.53 |
| P/B Ratio | 1.88 | 2.66 | 2.65 | 2.88 | 2.41 | 3.91 | 4.09 | 3.15 | 3.25 | 3.96 | 3.19 |
| P/FCF | 10.19 | 15.42 | 20.92 | 18.95 | 13.27 | 21.14 | 15.28 | 16.48 | 16.74 | 19.90 | 25.87 |
| P/OCF | 9.17 | 13.88 | 17.99 | 16.37 | 11.56 | 18.78 | 13.44 | 13.90 | 14.30 | 17.56 | 21.08 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.88 | 1.90 | 1.90 | 1.49 | 2.52 | 2.61 | 2.01 | 2.27 | 2.78 | 2.45 |
| EV / EBITDA | 6.40 | 9.73 | 10.92 | 11.36 | 8.21 | 13.73 | 16.24 | 11.34 | 11.11 | 14.09 | 12.38 |
| EV / EBIT | 7.40 | 10.95 | 12.53 | 13.03 | 9.56 | 16.46 | 20.48 | 13.15 | 12.98 | 15.39 | 13.90 |
| EV / FCF | — | 15.29 | 20.52 | 18.30 | 12.98 | 21.07 | 14.96 | 16.03 | 16.55 | 19.41 | 25.00 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 33.7% | 33.7% | 34.3% | 34.6% | 35.9% | 37.3% | 35.9% | 36.6% | 39.0% | 38.2% | 39.9% |
| Operating Margin | 16.7% | 16.7% | 14.7% | 13.9% | 15.3% | 15.3% | 12.7% | 14.6% | 17.4% | 16.8% | 17.0% |
| Net Profit Margin | 10.6% | 10.6% | 11.3% | 11.0% | 11.8% | 11.5% | 8.4% | 11.0% | 13.0% | 10.2% | 11.5% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 15.2% | 15.2% | 16.2% | 16.7% | 18.8% | 18.7% | 12.7% | 16.4% | 19.0% | 14.1% | 15.5% |
| ROA | 11.0% | 11.0% | 11.7% | 11.7% | 12.8% | 12.3% | 8.4% | 11.5% | 13.5% | 10.2% | 11.4% |
| ROIC | 18.7% | 18.7% | 16.9% | 17.1% | 19.0% | 19.5% | 15.9% | 17.5% | 20.4% | 19.4% | 19.1% |
| ROCE | 21.1% | 21.1% | 18.3% | 18.1% | 20.6% | 20.4% | 15.9% | 18.6% | 22.0% | 20.5% | 20.6% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.12 | 0.14 | 0.16 | 0.15 | 0.07 | 0.08 | 0.08 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 0.39 | 0.39 | 0.44 | 0.41 | 0.43 | 0.48 | 0.66 | 0.57 | 0.23 | 0.30 | 0.33 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.02 | -0.05 | -0.10 | -0.05 | -0.01 | -0.09 | -0.09 | -0.04 | -0.10 | -0.11 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -0.08 | -0.08 | -0.21 | -0.40 | -0.19 | -0.04 | -0.34 | -0.32 | -0.13 | -0.36 | -0.43 |
| Debt / FCF | — | -0.13 | -0.40 | -0.65 | -0.29 | -0.07 | -0.32 | -0.46 | -0.19 | -0.50 | -0.88 |
| Interest Coverage | 97.92 | 97.92 | 55.41 | 68.98 | 159.74 | 315.11 | 88.33 | 98.81 | 104.59 | 116.43 | 125.05 |
Net cash position: cash ($1.9B) exceeds total debt ($1.6B)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.34 | 2.34 | 2.09 | 2.25 | 2.17 | 2.08 | 1.94 | 2.55 | 3.12 | 3.21 | 3.56 |
| Quick Ratio | 2.34 | 2.34 | 2.09 | 2.25 | 2.17 | 2.08 | 1.94 | 2.55 | 3.12 | 3.21 | 3.56 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.52 | 0.52 | 0.63 | 0.79 | 0.75 | 0.77 | 0.77 | 1.15 | 1.62 | 1.78 | 2.14 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.02 | 0.99 | 1.05 | 1.09 | 1.04 | 0.98 | 1.04 | 1.01 | 0.97 | 0.95 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 76.76 | 75.07 | 72.59 | 71.32 | 70.15 | 67.66 | 70.81 | 72.21 | 79.41 | 78.62 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 2.2% | 1.5% | 1.6% | 1.5% | 1.9% | 1.1% | 1.1% | 1.3% | 1.3% | 0.6% | — |
| Payout Ratio | 27.4% | 27.4% | 26.8% | 27.8% | 24.6% | 23.8% | 34.5% | 24.6% | 22.3% | 17.6% | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 7.8% | 5.5% | 5.9% | 5.6% | 7.7% | 4.6% | 3.1% | 5.3% | 5.7% | 3.6% | 4.6% |
| FCF Yield | 9.8% | 6.5% | 4.8% | 5.3% | 7.5% | 4.7% | 6.5% | 6.1% | 6.0% | 5.0% | 3.9% |
| Buyback Yield | 5.2% | 3.4% | 1.6% | 2.8% | 4.8% | 1.6% | 3.7% | 6.5% | 3.4% | 4.5% | 1.5% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 7.4% | 5.0% | 3.2% | 4.3% | 6.7% | 2.7% | 4.7% | 7.8% | 4.7% | 5.1% | 1.5% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $482M | $497M | $505M | $519M | $528M | $541M | $560M | $584M | $595M | $610M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 28 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying CTSH stock.
Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation's current P/E ratio is 12.9x. The historical average is 31.8x. This places it at the 4th percentile of its historical range.
Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation's current EV/EBITDA is 6.4x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 19.9x.
Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation's return on equity (ROE) is 15.2%. The historical average is 21.9%.
Based on historical data, Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation is trading at a P/E of 12.9x. This is at the 4th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation's current dividend yield is 2.16% with a payout ratio of 27.4%.
Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation has 33.7% gross margin and 16.7% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 0.4x, indicating low leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Goodwill impairment and acquisition risk
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Discounted Multiple, Modest Growth
CTSH trades at 12.8x trailing earnings and 6.4x EV/EBITDA, a discount to Accenture's 14.7x and 8.4x, per recent market data, suggesting the market prices in slower growth.
The forward P/E of 10.1x implies the market expects earnings growth, but the PEG of 1.06 suggests the growth is fairly valued relative to the multiple. Compared to peers like Infosys at 15.1x and Wipro at 15.1x, CTSH's discount may reflect its lower ROE (around 17% annualized) versus Infosys's 32.8%, indicating the market is pricing in a structural growth disadvantage. The EV/EBITDA of 6.4x is near EPAM's 6.1x, but CTSH's larger scale and diversified offerings may warrant a premium, which is not evident.
Margins Stable, Quality Questioned
Operating margin held near 15-16% over ten quarters, with Q2 2026 at 15.9%, per financial statements, but net margin dipped to 5.1% in Q3 2025 due to one-time charges, obscuring underlying earning power.
Gross margin fluctuated between 29.6% and 35.1%, with Q2 2026 at 33.4%, indicating cost variability likely from wage inflation and utilization. The operating margin expansion from 14.6% in early 2024 to 15.9% suggests cost discipline, but the net margin volatility—dropping to 5.1% in Q3 2025—highlights non-recurring items that distort true profitability. Adjusted for these items, the sustainable net margin appears closer to 11-12%, which is competitive but below Infosys's 16.4%, suggesting CTSH may have less pricing power or higher cost structure.
Returns Compress on Rising Capital
ROIC has hovered around 4-4.6% quarterly, translating to roughly 17% annualized, per reported figures, but this is below peers like Accenture's 26.8% and Infosys's 34.4%, indicating capital efficiency lags.
ROE and ROIC have been stable but unspectacular, with quarterly ROIC around 4.3% in Q2 2026. The stability suggests the company is not compounding returns, but rather maintaining a steady state. The gap to peers may stem from a higher asset base due to acquisitions, as goodwill now constitutes 39% of total assets, diluting returns on capital. If the company can integrate acquisitions effectively, returns could improve, but the current trend suggests a mature business with limited upside in capital efficiency.
Working Capital Cycles Remain Opaque
DSO has been stable at 73-78 days over ten quarters, per quarterly data, but DIO and DPO are not reported, leaving the cash conversion cycle incomplete and obscuring true working capital efficiency.
The stable DSO suggests consistent collection practices, but the absence of DIO and DPO data limits analysis of supplier leverage and inventory management. Given the asset-light model, inventory is likely minimal, but the lack of DPO data prevents assessment of how CTSH manages payables to optimize cash flow. The extreme swings in operating cash flow, as noted in prior analysis, may be partly due to working capital timing, but without full data, investors should monitor cash conversion trends as more information becomes available.
Debt Rising, Coverage Still Strong
Debt-to-equity rose from 0.09 to 0.14 over ten quarters, while interest coverage remains high at 68x in Q2 2026, per balance sheet data, indicating comfortable debt service but a clear upward leverage trend.
Total debt increased from $1.3B to $2.1B, but the absolute level is modest relative to equity and EBITDA. Interest coverage of 68x in Q2 2026 is robust, suggesting no near-term solvency risk. However, the rising D/E and D/EBITDA (from 1.14 to 2.36) indicate a deliberate shift toward debt financing, possibly for acquisitions or buybacks. If this trend continues, coverage could erode, but current levels are far from concerning. The company's cash position has declined to $1.0B, so the increased debt may be partly to fund capital returns.
Liquidity Cushion Thins
Current ratio fell from 2.35 to 2.18 over ten quarters, while cash dropped from $2.2B to $1.0B, per balance sheet data, indicating a shrinking but still adequate liquidity buffer.
The current ratio remains above 2.0, suggesting CTSH can cover short-term obligations comfortably. However, the decline in cash and the rise in debt indicate a tighter liquidity position. Under a severe stress scenario, such as a prolonged revenue downturn, the company might need to rely on credit lines or reduce capital returns. The quick ratio equals the current ratio, implying minimal inventory, which is typical for a services firm. Investors should monitor whether cash generation improves to rebuild the buffer, especially given the volatile FCF margins.
Misapplied ROE in Asset-Light Model
ROE is often used to compare CTSH with peers, but its asset-light model and large cash reserves distort the metric, per financial data, making ROIC a more accurate measure of operating efficiency.
CTSH's ROE of around 17% annualized appears lower than peers like Infosys's 32.8%, but this is partly due to a conservative balance sheet with low leverage and significant cash. ROE can be artificially depressed by holding excess cash that earns minimal returns. ROIC, which excludes cash and non-operating assets, provides a clearer picture of operating performance. CTSH's ROIC of around 17% annualized is still below peers, but the gap is narrower than ROE suggests. Investors should focus on ROIC and cash flow metrics rather than ROE when evaluating CTSH's capital efficiency.