Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 110.4x · EV/EBITDA 10.7x · ROE N/A. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $455M | $488M | $449M | $757M | $1.0B | $1.3B | $941M | $1.4B | $1.2B | $900M | $1.4B |
| Enterprise Value | $1.9B | $2.0B | $1.9B | $2.2B | $2.5B | $2.7B | $2.6B | $3.2B | $2.5B | $2.2B | $2.7B |
| P/E Ratio → | 110.38 | 30.45 | 7.13 | 7.98 | 13.02 | 13.39 | — | 14.28 | 14.90 | — | 14.45 |
| P/S Ratio | 0.49 | 0.55 | 0.55 | 0.91 | 1.13 | 1.43 | 1.37 | 1.58 | 1.53 | 1.23 | 1.77 |
| P/B Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 5.52 |
| P/FCF | — | 9.13 | 4.78 | 8.05 | 19.02 | 7.15 | 11.00 | 10.61 | 9.50 | 17.19 | 12.41 |
| P/OCF | 5.11 | 5.48 | 4.16 | 5.77 | 11.50 | 6.54 | 9.75 | 9.28 | 8.54 | 13.69 | 11.82 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 2.23 | 2.30 | 2.64 | 2.75 | 3.01 | 3.76 | 3.49 | 3.20 | 2.98 | 3.38 |
| EV / EBITDA | 10.69 | 10.51 | 9.02 | 9.83 | 11.68 | 11.58 | 19.07 | 12.65 | 11.99 | 11.26 | 10.42 |
| EV / EBIT | 13.42 | 64.88 | 11.54 | 12.08 | 14.23 | 14.54 | — | 15.96 | 14.51 | — | 12.15 |
| EV / FCF | — | 36.69 | 19.83 | 23.37 | 46.28 | 15.05 | 30.28 | 23.37 | 19.83 | 41.65 | 23.70 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 39.9% | 39.9% | 46.2% | 47.7% | 41.5% | 41.9% | 36.1% | 42.1% | 45.2% | 46.3% | 48.8% |
| Operating Margin | 16.3% | 16.3% | 20.7% | 22.6% | 19.4% | 21.5% | 13.5% | 22.9% | 22.6% | 22.3% | 28.6% |
| Net Profit Margin | 1.9% | 1.9% | 8.0% | 11.7% | 8.9% | 10.9% | -15.1% | 11.5% | 10.3% | -46.8% | 12.8% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | -1841.2% | 38.8% |
| ROA | 1.0% | 1.0% | 3.7% | 5.4% | 4.2% | 4.8% | -5.0% | 5.5% | 4.6% | -17.1% | 4.4% |
| ROIC | 9.0% | 9.0% | 10.5% | 11.9% | 11.3% | 11.7% | 5.0% | 12.1% | 12.2% | 9.4% | 11.0% |
| ROCE | 10.6% | 10.6% | 12.8% | 14.0% | 11.7% | 11.6% | 5.4% | 13.2% | 12.2% | 9.5% | 11.2% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 5.58 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 8.58 | 8.58 | 7.75 | 7.10 | 8.14 | 7.63 | 14.96 | 7.37 | 6.90 | 7.22 | 5.51 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 5.02 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 7.89 | 7.89 | 6.84 | 6.45 | 6.88 | 6.08 | 12.14 | 6.91 | 6.25 | 6.61 | 4.96 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 27.56 | 15.05 | 15.32 | 27.26 | 7.90 | 19.28 | 12.76 | 10.33 | 24.47 | 11.29 |
| Interest Coverage | 6.04 | 6.04 | 2.24 | 2.59 | 2.88 | 2.93 | -0.62 | 3.29 | 2.79 | -5.91 | 3.57 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.87 | 0.78 | 1.02 | 1.40 | 1.68 | 0.97 | 1.21 | 1.26 | 1.28 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.87 | 0.78 | 1.02 | 1.40 | 1.68 | 0.97 | 1.21 | 1.26 | 1.28 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.35 | 0.35 | 0.42 | 0.32 | 0.57 | 0.88 | 1.10 | 0.32 | 0.43 | 0.38 | 0.49 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.51 | 0.45 | 0.48 | 0.48 | 0.45 | 0.33 | 0.44 | 0.44 | 0.42 | 0.35 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 49.40 | 51.76 | 56.19 | 48.16 | 48.86 | 64.55 | 54.89 | 64.27 | 69.93 | 65.53 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 6.0% | 6.4% | 7.0% | 4.2% | 3.0% | — | 2.5% | 3.3% | 4.3% | 7.8% | 4.8% |
| Payout Ratio | 181.3% | 181.3% | 48.2% | 32.6% | 37.9% | — | — | 44.9% | 63.6% | — | 66.8% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 0.9% | 3.3% | 14.0% | 12.5% | 7.7% | 7.5% | — | 7.0% | 6.7% | — | 6.9% |
| FCF Yield | — | 11.0% | 20.9% | 12.4% | 5.3% | 14.0% | 9.1% | 9.4% | 10.5% | 5.8% | 8.1% |
| Buyback Yield | 13.3% | 12.4% | 3.3% | 4.0% | 12.0% | 0.5% | 3.4% | 7.8% | 2.8% | 1.1% | 4.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 19.4% | 18.8% | 10.2% | 8.2% | 15.0% | 0.5% | 6.0% | 11.1% | 7.1% | 8.9% | 8.8% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $14M | $15M | $15M | $16M | $17M | $16M | $17M | $18M | $18M | $18M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying DIN stock.
Dine Brands Global, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 110.4x. The historical average is 19.4x. This places it at the 100th percentile of its historical range.
Dine Brands Global, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 10.7x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 12.4x.
Based on historical data, Dine Brands Global, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 110.4x. This is at the 100th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Dine Brands Global, Inc.'s current dividend yield is 6.05% with a payout ratio of 181.3%.
Dine Brands Global, Inc. has 39.9% gross margin and 16.3% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
Dine Brands Global, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 8.6x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Margin compression with heavy leverage
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Trailing Earnings Inflated, Forward Multiple Compelling
Based on DIN's reported figures, the trailing P/E of 32.01 sits far above the forward P/E of 8.37, suggesting the market is discounting recent earnings volatility rather than pricing sustained profitability into the stock today.
The gap between trailing and forward earnings multiples implies analysts expect earnings to recover from the depressed 2025Q4 loss period, though the data alone cannot confirm that recovery will materialize. The EV/EBITDA of 10.33 against a forward figure of 11.31 points in the opposite direction, which suggests EBITDA estimates may be softening even as earnings per share are expected to rebound. Investors should monitor whether this divergence resolves toward the forward P/E or whether trailing weakness persists.
Margin Compression Erodes Earnings Power
As reported in the quarterly statements, DIN's gross margin contracted from roughly 48% in 2024Q3 to 34.0% in 2026Q3, while net margin fell to 1.8%, indicating a substantial and persistent decline in earnings power.
A decline of about 14 percentage points in gross margin is far larger than what revenue movements alone would explain, suggesting structural cost or mix pressure rather than a purely cyclical dip. Operating margin of 11.6% in 2026Q3 versus 24.1% at the 2024Q2 peak indicates operating leverage is working against the company as revenue recovers. Net margin volatility, including a negative swing in 2025Q4, makes trailing profitability an unreliable guide to normalized earning power.
Interest Coverage Thin Against Heavy Debt
Based on DIN's reported figures, interest coverage swung from 2.75 times in 2024Q2 to negative 6.21 times in 2025Q4, with debt near $1.7B leaving limited room for earnings shortfalls.
Coverage has repeatedly approached or dropped below one times in several quarters, which suggests debt service has become sensitive to operating performance. With the reported current ratio below parity and negative equity, the balance sheet appears strained, warranting further investigation into refinancing terms and maturity profile. Investors should monitor whether operating income recovers enough to restore coverage to a comfortable range.
Sub-Parity Current Ratio Constrains Flexibility
According to recent filings, DIN's current ratio stayed between 0.81 and 1.05 across ten quarters, with the latest reading at 0.87 against cash of $91.1M and liabilities near $2.0B.
A current ratio persistently below one is typical of restaurant franchisors with deferred revenue, but the cash position relative to liabilities appears limited for severe stress scenarios. The seasonal deferred revenue swings suggest working capital metrics can shift materially within a year. Investors should monitor cash balances against near-term obligations rather than relying on the ratio alone.
Standard Current Ratio Misreads Franchisor Model
The current ratio is most commonly misapplied to DIN, since its sub-parity reading reflects deferred franchise revenue rather than distress, and it obscures the cash generation capacity of an asset-light franchise model.
Deferred revenue from franchise fees and the asset-light structure mean a current ratio below one can coexist with stable operations, so treating it as a solvency warning may overstate risk. A more informative lens is free cash flow relative to debt service and interest coverage over multiple years. Investors should monitor those alternative measures, since the reported figures here do not establish that the current ratio is signaling imminent liquidity stress.