Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -3.7x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -2.9%. (2007–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $856M | $2.0B | $1.3B | $2.0B | $3.0B | $3.1B | $4.3B | $717M | $305M | $649M | $204M |
| Enterprise Value | $-124315367 | $1.0B | $286M | $-1044796969 | $-494558116 | $2.4B | $4.5B | $1.0B | $440M | $818M | $432M |
| P/E Ratio → | -3.72 | — | — | 4.63 | 1.64 | 4.14 | 33.74 | 24.38 | 7.80 | 6.99 | 4.82 |
| P/S Ratio | 1.69 | 2.99 | 1.25 | 0.86 | 0.65 | 1.84 | 6.37 | 2.05 | 1.01 | 1.84 | 0.89 |
| P/B Ratio | 0.14 | 0.34 | 0.22 | 0.31 | 0.45 | 1.16 | 5.39 | 1.26 | 0.58 | 1.64 | 0.75 |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | 4.65 | 2.45 | 23.67 | 47.06 | — | — | 8.67 | 6.55 |
| P/OCF | 15.25 | 35.50 | — | 1.23 | 1.21 | 4.84 | 20.52 | 6.97 | 3.19 | 4.55 | 2.07 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.52 | 0.28 | -0.45 | -0.11 | 1.41 | 6.61 | 2.99 | 1.46 | 2.32 | 1.89 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | -1.12 | -0.16 | 2.10 | 17.42 | 11.03 | 4.03 | 5.23 | 4.36 |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | -1.28 | -0.16 | 2.26 | 23.79 | 22.04 | 5.20 | 6.36 | 7.05 |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | -2.43 | -0.41 | 18.14 | 48.89 | — | — | 10.93 | 13.85 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | -20.7% | -20.7% | -20.7% | 39.9% | 74.0% | 65.4% | 34.6% | 22.9% | 32.5% | 40.7% | 35.1% |
| Operating Margin | -40.6% | -40.6% | -54.8% | 33.9% | 66.0% | 62.6% | 27.8% | 13.6% | 27.0% | 36.5% | 28.6% |
| Net Profit Margin | -25.6% | -25.6% | -33.5% | 18.6% | 39.5% | 44.6% | 19.1% | 8.4% | 12.6% | 26.3% | 19.0% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -2.9% | -2.9% | -5.6% | 6.6% | 39.3% | 43.3% | 18.9% | 5.4% | 8.3% | 27.9% | 16.9% |
| ROA | -2.7% | -2.7% | -5.0% | 5.7% | 33.3% | 32.7% | 10.6% | 2.9% | 4.8% | 13.2% | 6.6% |
| ROIC | -4.1% | -4.1% | -10.2% | 18.0% | 90.0% | 54.3% | 15.1% | 4.6% | 10.0% | 18.2% | 9.9% |
| ROCE | -4.6% | -4.6% | -9.0% | 11.7% | 63.0% | 56.1% | 22.0% | 6.5% | 13.2% | 27.4% | 16.5% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | — | — | 0.00 | — | 0.00 | — | 0.30 | 0.67 | 0.38 | 0.58 | 0.90 |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | 0.01 | — | 0.95 | 4.02 | 1.84 | 1.47 | 2.46 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.17 | -0.17 | -0.47 | -0.53 | -0.27 | 0.21 | 0.58 | 0.26 | 0.43 | 0.84 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | -3.26 | -1.11 | -0.64 | 0.65 | 3.47 | 1.24 | 1.08 | 2.30 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | -7.08 | -2.86 | -5.54 | 1.82 | — | — | 2.26 | 7.30 |
| Interest Coverage | — | — | — | — | — | 51.17 | 7.05 | 4.57 | 7.86 | 7.90 | 4.82 |
Net cash position: cash ($980M) exceeds total debt ($0)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 5.41 | 5.41 | 5.05 | 4.28 | 6.64 | 3.17 | 0.63 | 0.39 | 1.07 | 0.66 | 0.29 |
| Quick Ratio | 5.07 | 5.07 | 4.76 | 4.07 | 6.41 | 2.57 | 0.46 | 0.30 | 0.97 | 0.57 | 0.24 |
| Cash Ratio | 4.15 | 4.15 | 4.04 | 3.63 | 4.77 | 1.82 | 0.27 | 0.12 | 0.58 | 0.28 | 0.06 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.10 | 0.16 | 0.31 | 0.61 | 0.50 | 0.55 | 0.29 | 0.35 | 0.47 | 0.35 |
| Inventory Turnover | 4.75 | 4.75 | 8.28 | 8.01 | 7.08 | 1.77 | 8.97 | 6.87 | 13.17 | 10.68 | 12.11 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 74.34 | 19.57 | 18.41 | 89.63 | 79.56 | 0.15 | 5.92 | 12.23 | 22.22 | 30.89 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | 21.6% | 61.0% | 24.2% | 3.0% | 4.1% | 12.8% | 14.3% | 20.7% |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | 21.5% | 40.8% | 4.2% | 2.1% | — | — | 11.5% | 15.3% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.1% | 0.0% | 1.0% | 26.2% | 4.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.1% | 0.0% | 1.0% | 26.2% | 4.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $68M | $66M | $75M | $77M | $77M | $75M | $70M | $65M | $55M | $53M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 19 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying DQ stock.
Daqo New Energy Corp.'s current P/E ratio is -3.7x. The historical average is 9.7x.
Daqo New Energy Corp.'s return on equity (ROE) is -2.9%. The historical average is 12.9%.
Based on historical data, Daqo New Energy Corp. is trading at a P/E of -3.7x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Daqo New Energy Corp. has -20.7% gross margin and -40.6% operating margin.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Persistent polysilicon price collapse
Low Book Multiple Reflects Trough Pricing
Based on DQ's reported figures, the company trades at 0.14 times book value and 1.29 times sales against a negative trailing P/E of -4.96, pricing in continued losses rather than a recovery in earnings power.
The P/B of 0.14 sits far below the peer range, where Canadian Solar trades at 0.18 and JinkoSolar at 0.03 while First Solar commands 2.27, suggesting the market is valuing DQ's asset base at a steep discount to book. Price-to-sales of 1.29 appears more reasonable given revenue has contracted sharply, yet the absence of forward multiples and EBITDA-based metrics limits any reliable assessment of growth-implied value. Investors should treat the low book multiple as a signal of impairment risk on the roughly $3.4B fixed asset base rather than as a clear discount opportunity.
Gross Losses Overwhelm Operating Cost Discipline
As reported in financial statements, DQ's gross margin reached -31.2% in 2026Q3 and -132.0% in 2026Q2, indicating market prices have fallen below the company's full unit production cost.
Relative to its own trajectory, gross margin has oscillated sharply, from positive 7.0% in 2025Q4 to deeply negative readings in 2026, which points to pricing pressure rather than a one-time write-down effect. SG&A remains in a narrow band, so the operating margin deterioration is driven mainly by gross losses rather than overhead creep. The gross margin is the more reliable indicator of earning power here, because net margins are distorted by quarterly volatility and possible inventory adjustments that warrant further investigation.
Returns Decayed Below Cost of Capital
Based on reported figures, DQ's ROIC fell from -4.4% in 2024Q4 to -1.1% in 2026Q3, while ROE stayed near -0.9% to -1.5% in recent quarters, indicating returns remain negative on a multi-year basis.
The ROIC trend shows a narrower loss over time, but this partly reflects a shrinking denominator as equity and invested capital are absorbed by losses rather than genuine improvement in operating economics. Compared with First Solar's 17.6% ROIC, DQ's returns indicate capital is not compounding and is instead being eroded. Investors should monitor whether returns turn positive once pricing stabilizes, as continued negative returns on a largely fixed asset base may indicate structural overcapacity.
Headline Liquidity Masks Cash Erosion
As reported in financial statements, DQ's current ratio rose to 4.54 in 2026Q3 while cash fell from roughly $1.0B in 2024Q4 to about $546M, suggesting the headline ratio may overstate the true liquidity cushion.
The current ratio of 4.54 and quick ratio of 3.89 remain high in absolute terms, but their stability coexists with a roughly 45% cash drawdown, which indicates the composition of current assets may be shifting toward less liquid items. Inventory days have swung between 55 and 263 across recent quarters, adding uncertainty about the realizable value of current assets under further price declines. Under severe stress, the remaining cash balance would likely carry more analytical weight than the current ratio, and investors should monitor the pace of quarterly operating outflows against that balance.
Current Ratio Misleads for Commodity Producers
The current ratio is the metric most commonly misapplied to DQ, because a high ratio can coexist with rapidly eroding cash and inventory carried at values that may not reflect realizable market prices.
For a commodity polysilicon producer, the current ratio captures inventory and receivables at book value, which may be overstated when spot prices decline faster than inventory write-downs are recorded. A more appropriate lens is cash burn relative to the cash balance, along with cash cost per kilogram compared with realized prices, since these reveal the true operating runway. Analysts should therefore prioritize operating cash flow coverage and the cash-cost floor over the current ratio when assessing DQ's survival capacity.