Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio N/A · EV/EBITDA 3.4x · ROE N/A. (2022–2024 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $2M | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $4M | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.21 | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 3.37 | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 66.9% | 66.9% | 57.7% | 56.4% |
| Operating Margin | -0.4% | -0.4% | 10.7% | -99.9% |
| Net Profit Margin | 8.7% | 8.7% | 4.4% | -97.5% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | — | — | 53.7% | -417.6% |
| ROA | 6.1% | 6.1% | 3.9% | -77.9% |
| ROIC | — | — | — | -1621.6% |
| ROCE | -0.7% | -0.7% | 21.3% | -427.7% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | — | — | 3.54 | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | 2.65 | 2.65 | 1.42 | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | — | -1.88 | -0.80 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.97 | 1.97 | -0.75 | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | -0.26 | — |
| Interest Coverage | -0.35 | -0.35 | 63.20 | -1085.76 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.28 | 0.28 | 1.00 | 1.06 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.19 | 0.19 | 0.90 | 0.79 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.51 | 0.18 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.82 | 0.52 | 0.80 |
| Inventory Turnover | 4.03 | 4.03 | 4.25 | 1.64 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 21.14 | 76.51 | 176.36 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Liquidity and operational insolvency
Based on reported figures, the company trades at a P/S multiple of 0.21 and an EV/EBITDA of 3.37, which suggests that the market is heavily discounting the firm's growth prospects due to the underlying operational losses and the lack of a clear path to sustainable profitability.
The low P/S ratio indicates that investors are assigning minimal value to the company's revenue stream, likely reflecting skepticism regarding the quality of earnings and the sustainability of the current business model. This valuation level appears to price in significant execution risk, as the market seems to be treating the firm as a distressed asset rather than a high-growth consumer brand.
According to recent financial disclosures, the company maintains a robust 66.92% gross margin, yet this figure is undermined by a -0.36% operating margin, suggesting that the firm's core business is currently unable to cover its administrative and marketing expenses without reliance on non-operating income.
The wide gap between gross and operating margins highlights a structural inability to achieve economies of scale, as the company appears to be spending its entire gross profit on growth initiatives that have yet to yield positive operating leverage. Investors should monitor whether this margin profile is a temporary byproduct of early-stage scaling or a permanent feature of a high-CAC business model.
As reported in financial statements, the company holds a cash position of only $748,099 against $7.3 million in TTM revenue, which indicates a precarious liquidity profile that leaves the firm with virtually no buffer to absorb unexpected operational shocks or sustain its current growth trajectory.
This minimal cash balance suggests that the company may face imminent pressure to seek external financing or dilute shareholders to maintain basic operations. The lack of liquidity significantly increases the risk of insolvency, particularly if the company fails to convert its revenue growth into positive, self-sustaining cash flow in the near term.
Based on an analysis of the income statement, the reported 8.75% net margin is a commonly misapplied metric for this business, as it obscures the fact that the company is actually operating at a loss, with the bottom line artificially inflated by non-recurring, non-operating items.
Relying on net margin in this context is dangerous because it masks the underlying operational reality of a business that is currently burning cash. Analysts should instead focus on the operating margin and free cash flow to assess the true earning power of the core business, as the net margin provides a distorted view of the firm's actual financial health.
Includes 30+ ratios · 3 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying DSYWW stock.
Big Tree Cloud Holdings Limited Warrants's current EV/EBITDA is 3.4x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA.
Based on historical data, Big Tree Cloud Holdings Limited Warrants is trading at valuation metrics that vary. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Big Tree Cloud Holdings Limited Warrants has 66.9% gross margin and -0.4% operating margin.
Big Tree Cloud Holdings Limited Warrants's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 2.6x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.