Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 55.9x · EV/EBITDA 40.0x · ROE 38.1%. (2019–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $7.5B | $8.5B | $15.3B | $10.6B | $2.8B | $4.1B | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $6.5B | $7.5B | $14.5B | $9.8B | $2.2B | $3.5B | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | 55.92 | 20.48 | 172.46 | 648.14 | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 6.32 | 8.17 | 20.42 | 19.87 | 7.60 | 16.19 | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 5.75 | 6.29 | 18.52 | 16.10 | 5.18 | 7.92 | — | — |
| P/FCF | 18.63 | 22.93 | 55.86 | 70.16 | 58.38 | 727.26 | — | — |
| P/OCF | 19.27 | 21.86 | 53.49 | 68.70 | 52.32 | 442.86 | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 7.26 | 19.44 | 18.51 | 6.03 | 14.11 | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 39.97 | 48.42 | 195.41 | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | 46.25 | 41.31 | 142.15 | 553.01 | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 20.38 | 53.19 | 65.36 | 46.32 | 633.88 | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 71.7% | 71.7% | 72.0% | 72.3% | 72.0% | 72.1% | 71.2% | 69.8% |
| Operating Margin | 13.6% | 13.6% | 8.5% | -2.4% | -17.5% | -22.4% | -9.7% | -18.2% |
| Net Profit Margin | 39.9% | 39.9% | 11.8% | 3.0% | -16.1% | -24.0% | -9.8% | -19.2% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 38.1% | 38.1% | 12.0% | 2.7% | -11.3% | -19.6% | -20.3% | -25.2% |
| ROA | 25.1% | 25.1% | 7.9% | 1.9% | -8.5% | -14.4% | -11.7% | -14.3% |
| ROIC | 42.3% | 42.3% | 329.7% | — | — | — | — | — |
| ROCE | 12.2% | 12.2% | 8.2% | -2.1% | -11.7% | -17.2% | -18.2% | -20.5% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.09 | 0.19 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 0.60 | 0.60 | 0.77 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.70 | -0.88 | -1.10 | -1.07 | -1.02 | -1.09 | -0.92 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -6.06 | -6.06 | -9.79 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | -2.55 | -2.66 | -4.80 | -12.06 | -93.39 | -7.76 | — |
| Interest Coverage | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Net cash position: cash ($1.0B) exceeds total debt ($94M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.61 | 2.61 | 2.61 | 3.24 | 3.84 | 5.20 | 2.41 | 2.46 |
| Quick Ratio | 2.61 | 2.61 | 2.61 | 3.24 | 3.84 | 5.20 | 2.41 | 2.46 |
| Cash Ratio | 2.07 | 2.07 | 2.08 | 2.70 | 3.35 | 4.65 | 1.83 | 1.86 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.52 | 0.57 | 0.56 | 0.49 | 0.38 | 0.92 | 0.74 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 62.23 | 62.92 | 98.21 | 80.77 | 83.52 | 76.83 | 87.37 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 1.8% | 4.9% | 0.6% | 0.2% | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 5.4% | 4.4% | 1.8% | 1.4% | 1.7% | 0.1% | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.2% | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.2% | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $48M | $47M | $47M | $39M | $38M | $36M | $36M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 7 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying DUOL stock.
Duolingo, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 55.9x. The historical average is 96.5x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Duolingo, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 40.0x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 48.4x.
Duolingo, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 38.1%. This is above the typical threshold of 15-20% considered good for most companies. The historical average is -3.4%.
Based on historical data, Duolingo, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 55.9x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Duolingo, Inc. has 71.7% gross margin and 13.6% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
Duolingo, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 0.6x, indicating low leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Margin compression from AI competition
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Premium Multiple Prices in Sustained Growth
DUOL trades at 57.18x forward earnings against 18.32x trailing and 7.05x sales, according to the supplied multiples, implying the market still underwrites a growth rebound that recent quarterly revenue deceleration has not yet demonstrated.
The gap between trailing P/E of 18.32 and forward P/E of 57.18 is unusual, suggesting the trailing figure is inflated by the non-recurring tax benefit visible in the net margin spike rather than reflecting core earnings power. Compared with Perdoceo at 10.97x and Strategic Education at 10.79x, DUOL carries a substantial premium, which the market appears to justify through engagement-driven growth durability rather than current earnings. Investors should monitor whether operating margin recovery from 7.8% toward prior peaks can close the gap before the premium compresses.
Operating Margin Reversal Obscures Earning Power
Operating margin fell from a 15.5% peak in 2025Q4 to 7.8% in 2026Q3, while gross margin held near 72.9%, based on the supplied quarterly ratio table, suggesting operating expense growth is absorbing gross profit gains.
Gross margin stability within a 70.5% to 72.9% band points to a fixed platform-fee ceiling rather than pricing power eroding, so the margin compression sits in operating costs. The 107.5% net margin in 2025Q3 is an outlier that signals non-operating or tax items dominate reported earnings and should not be used to judge profitability. Operating margin is the more reliable indicator of earning power here, and its recent reversal warrants further investigation into the drivers of rising expenses.
ROIC Volatile Against Low Capital Base
ROIC swung between roughly 5.7% and 41.7% over the ten quarters, with the most recent reading at 5.7% in 2026Q3, indicating returns have become unstable and currently sit well below the prior-year range.
The wide ROIC range reflects a small invested-capital denominator combined with lumpy net income, so the volatility is more a function of tax and non-operating items than of operating efficiency. ROE similarly moved from 25.6% in 2025Q3 to 1.9% in 2026Q3, which appears driven by the same one-time earnings effects rather than a structural shift. Based on the reported figures, the most recent quarters suggest returns are decaying toward operating-margin-consistent levels, and investors should monitor whether ROIC stabilizes once tax noise normalizes.
Negligible Debt Keeps Coverage Comfortable
With a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.06 and debt-to-EBITDA of 2.96 in 2026Q3, Duolingo carries minimal leverage relative to its roughly $1.5B equity base, based on the supplied balance sheet ratios.
The debt-to-equity ratio has held near 0.06 to 0.10 across the period, indicating leverage is structurally low rather than being actively managed. Debt-to-EBITDA rose to 2.96 in the latest quarter from 1.87 in 2026Q1, which may reflect falling EBITDA rather than new borrowing, a pattern that warrants monitoring. Interest coverage is not reported in the supplied data, so debt service capacity cannot be fully assessed and should be treated as data unavailable.
Cash Cushion Dwarfs Near-Term Obligations
A current ratio of 2.75 in 2026Q3, with cash near $1.2B against total liabilities of $684.6M, as reported in the balance sheet data, indicates a substantial operating buffer that would likely absorb a sustained revenue slowdown.
The current ratio and quick ratio are identical at 2.75, which indicates negligible inventory and that liquidity rests almost entirely on cash and receivables. A large share of liabilities is deferred revenue, which is cash already collected but unearned, so the liquidity cushion is partly tied to future service delivery rather than free capital. Under severe stress, the position would likely hold given the absence of debt maturities, though the conversion of deferred revenue into cash depends on continued subscriber retention.
Engagement Moat May Not Justify Premium
Based on the supplied peer data, DUOL's 57.18x forward P/E and 40.95x EV/EBITDA rest on a moat thesis that the reported ROIC decline and operating margin reversal have not yet confirmed, warranting caution on the multiple.
The most commonly misapplied metric here is trailing P/E, since the 18.32x figure is distorted by the 107.5% net margin quarter and non-operating tax items, understating how expensive the stock is on a normalized basis. EV/EBITDA or EV/operating income adjusted for stock-based compensation would more accurately reflect the cost of the equity dilution that the cash flow data suggests is being offset by buybacks. Investors should monitor whether the engagement advantage translates into operating margin recovery, since a failure to do so would leave the premium exposed without earnings support.