Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -0.5x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -64.2%. (2020–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $8M | $21M | — | — | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $3M | $17M | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -0.47 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.58 | 1.57 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 0.31 | 1.27 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.23 | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 23.0% | 23.0% | 26.9% | 24.9% | 31.3% | 27.6% | 23.7% |
| Operating Margin | -74.7% | -74.7% | 5.4% | 7.2% | 12.4% | 17.4% | 8.6% |
| Net Profit Margin | -80.2% | -80.2% | 0.1% | 2.6% | 7.7% | 11.1% | 5.3% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -64.2% | -64.2% | 0.1% | 2.9% | 13.0% | 20.7% | 8.7% |
| ROA | -48.5% | -48.5% | 0.0% | 2.4% | 10.7% | 15.9% | 6.3% |
| ROIC | -62.4% | -62.4% | 5.6% | 7.5% | 19.4% | 32.5% | 13.9% |
| ROCE | -58.8% | -58.8% | 5.3% | 7.9% | 20.6% | 31.3% | 13.6% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.19 | 0.19 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.07 | 0.06 |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | 0.29 | 0.32 | 0.16 | 0.23 | 0.34 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.27 | -0.29 | -0.26 | -0.13 | -0.26 | -0.24 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | -3.24 | -2.22 | -0.60 | -0.91 | -1.41 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | -2.28 | -10.05 | — | -1.50 | -5.42 |
| Interest Coverage | -39.75 | -39.75 | — | — | — | — | — |
Net cash position: cash ($8M) exceeds total debt ($3M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.92 | 2.92 | 7.58 | 4.85 | 5.54 | 4.76 | 3.58 |
| Quick Ratio | 2.69 | 2.69 | 5.90 | 3.54 | 3.79 | 3.26 | 3.02 |
| Cash Ratio | 1.35 | 1.35 | 2.71 | 1.53 | 1.82 | 1.90 | 0.85 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.54 | 0.86 | 0.89 | 1.23 | 1.21 | 1.18 |
| Inventory Turnover | 5.76 | 5.76 | 3.11 | 2.80 | 3.12 | 3.35 | 6.31 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 236.03 | 150.16 | 138.71 | 84.16 | 65.45 | 81.27 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 2.3% | 0.8% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 2.3% | 0.8% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $1M | $1M | $1M | $1M | $1M | $6M |
Liquidity exhaustion and insolvency
Based on current market data, Eshallgo trades at a price-to-sales ratio of 0.58, which, according to recent financial filings, appears to reflect the market's skepticism regarding the company's ability to achieve profitability given the persistent negative earnings and the absence of a meaningful forward-looking growth trajectory.
The P/B ratio of 0.31 suggests that the market is pricing the company well below its book value, indicating a lack of confidence in the underlying asset quality or the firm's ability to generate future returns. This valuation level is typical for distressed micro-caps where the primary concern is not growth potential, but rather the preservation of remaining capital.
As reported in historical financial statements, Eshallgo's ROIC has deteriorated from a peak of 18.3% in 2021Q2 to a deeply negative -43.8% in 2026Q2, illustrating a fundamental failure to generate value from invested capital as the business model struggles with severe margin compression.
The collapse in return metrics suggests that the company's core operations are no longer capable of covering the cost of capital, let alone creating shareholder value. This trend indicates that the business is currently destroying capital with every dollar deployed, necessitating a radical restructuring of the cost base to reverse the decay.
According to the latest quarterly data, Eshallgo's cash conversion cycle has expanded to 141 days, which, based on reported figures, highlights significant inefficiencies in managing receivables and inventory compared to the more streamlined 43-day cycle observed during the company's more profitable periods in 2021.
The lengthening DSO, which reached 109 days in 2026Q2, suggests that the company is struggling to collect payments from its SME customer base, potentially indicating credit stress among its clients. This inefficiency ties up critical liquidity that the firm desperately needs to fund its ongoing operating losses.
Based on the company's reported balance sheet, the current ratio has declined from a high of 7.58 in 2024Q4 to 3.54 in 2026Q2, signaling that while the firm maintains a nominal liquidity buffer, the rapid cash burn rate threatens to exhaust available resources in the near term.
Although the quick ratio remains above 2.0, this metric is heavily influenced by inventory and receivables that may be difficult to liquidate at book value in a distressed scenario. Investors should monitor the cash burn rate closely, as the current liquidity position provides a limited cushion against further operational deterioration.
As evidenced by the company's financial statements, the P/B ratio is frequently misapplied to Eshallgo, as it obscures the reality that the firm's assets are largely comprised of aging inventory and receivables that may be subject to significant write-downs in a liquidation or restructuring event.
Relying on P/B for a business with negative margins and shrinking revenue is misleading, as it assumes the book value is a reliable floor for valuation. A more appropriate focus would be the cash burn rate and the net liquidation value of the remaining assets, which likely paint a more accurate picture of the firm's current risk profile.
Includes 30+ ratios · 6 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying EHGO stock.
Eshallgo Inc. Class A Ordinary Shares's current P/E ratio is -0.5x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Eshallgo Inc. Class A Ordinary Shares's return on equity (ROE) is -64.2%. The historical average is -3.1%.
Based on historical data, Eshallgo Inc. Class A Ordinary Shares is trading at a P/E of -0.5x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Eshallgo Inc. Class A Ordinary Shares has 23.0% gross margin and -74.7% operating margin.