Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -1.3x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -1.7%. (2017–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $5M | $192M | $5.2B | $5.2B | $200M | $150M | — | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $-166340769 | $20M | $5.1B | $5.1B | $154M | $100M | — | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -1.33 | — | — | — | — | 23.40 | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.11 | 3.89 | 103.32 | 78.96 | 3.14 | 2.01 | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 0.02 | 0.72 | 31.96 | 37.79 | 3.10 | 2.33 | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | 23.51 | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | 45.73 | 17.30 | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.41 | 101.38 | 77.99 | 2.41 | 1.35 | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | 20843.89 | 10.37 | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | 9.94 | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | 15.72 | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 22.4% | 22.4% | 24.9% | 27.8% | 30.4% | 35.2% | 34.8% | 37.9% | 41.0% | 40.8% |
| Operating Margin | -16.7% | -16.7% | -31.3% | -38.6% | -1.3% | 12.2% | 16.2% | 26.8% | 28.4% | 30.0% |
| Net Profit Margin | -7.6% | -7.6% | -38.4% | -53.1% | -8.5% | 8.6% | 12.2% | 20.0% | 21.1% | 22.6% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -1.7% | -1.7% | -12.9% | -34.6% | -8.4% | 13.2% | 18.6% | 43.7% | 72.4% | 100.2% |
| ROA | -1.6% | -1.6% | -11.5% | -29.3% | -7.0% | 11.1% | 14.4% | 32.0% | 50.4% | 68.9% |
| ROIC | -7.7% | -7.7% | -17.0% | -41.4% | -3.9% | 52.1% | 55.2% | 118.8% | 202.6% | 756.6% |
| ROCE | -3.8% | -3.8% | -10.1% | -23.4% | -1.2% | 17.6% | 21.9% | 50.5% | 84.9% | 133.1% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.05 | 0.13 | 0.04 | 0.12 | 0.14 | 0.21 | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | 1166.82 | 0.28 | 0.51 | 0.28 | 0.30 | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.64 | -0.60 | -0.46 | -0.72 | -0.77 | -0.65 | -0.69 | -0.54 | -0.87 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | -6267.38 | -5.13 | -2.83 | -1.41 | -0.77 | -0.65 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | -7.79 | -6.00 | -2.36 | -1.01 | -0.67 |
| Interest Coverage | — | — | -36.55 | -40.82 | -11.94 | 395.86 | 282.48 | 623.11 | 162.09 | — |
Net cash position: cash ($173M) exceeds total debt ($1M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 24.58 | 24.58 | 8.75 | 6.55 | 8.18 | 8.77 | 6.18 | 4.66 | 4.54 | 3.07 |
| Quick Ratio | 24.58 | 24.58 | 8.75 | 6.54 | 8.18 | 8.74 | 6.18 | 4.66 | 4.54 | 3.07 |
| Cash Ratio | 20.34 | 20.34 | 8.10 | 5.55 | 6.69 | 6.99 | 5.39 | 4.26 | 3.43 | 1.91 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.18 | 0.28 | 0.42 | 0.79 | 1.00 | 1.13 | 1.37 | 1.72 | 3.04 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | 3420.89 | 1387.91 | 4014.70 | 195.77 | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 254.86 | 11.51 | 37.13 | 5.03 | 4.05 | 14.02 | 9.68 | 16.31 | 17.89 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 48.7% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | 4.3% | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | 4.3% | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $3M | $405000 | $58925 | $200 | $150 | $168 | $168 | $168 | $168 |
Persistent negative operating margins
As reported in recent financial filings, EJH trades at a price-to-sales multiple of 0.11, a valuation level that suggests the market is heavily discounting the company's future growth prospects and questioning the underlying quality of its reported cash reserves relative to its current market capitalization.
The extremely low P/S ratio indicates that investors are assigning minimal value to the company's revenue stream, likely due to the persistent contraction in top-line growth. This valuation suggests that the market views the business as a distressed asset rather than a scalable service platform, warranting caution regarding potential value traps.
According to historical income statements, EJH's gross margin has compressed from 33.9% in 2021Q4 to 23.4% in 2026Q2, reflecting the structural difficulty of maintaining profitability in a labor-intensive service model where rising urban wage costs consistently outpace the company's ability to implement effective price increases.
The negative operating margin of -16.74% confirms that the company's current cost structure is not yet optimized for its scale, with administrative overheads significantly outweighing gross profits. Investors should monitor whether management can achieve operating leverage, as the current trend suggests a fundamental inability to convert service volume into sustainable earnings.
Based on reported figures, EJH's ROIC has remained largely negative over the last five years, dropping to -0.1% in 2026Q2, which indicates that the company is failing to generate adequate returns on its invested capital compared to the cost of maintaining its operational infrastructure.
The persistent decay in ROIC suggests that capital allocation has been value-destructive, as the company has not successfully deployed its resources into high-margin service segments. This trend warrants further investigation into whether the company's investments in digital platforms are actually yielding any tangible competitive advantage or operational efficiency.
As evidenced by the quarterly data, EJH's asset turnover has declined from 0.45 in 2021Q4 to 0.09 in 2026Q2, signaling a significant deterioration in the company's ability to utilize its asset base to generate revenue within its core Fujian province service footprint.
The erratic nature of the company's DSO and CCC metrics suggests that management struggles with consistent working capital management, potentially due to the hybrid nature of its one-off maintenance and recurring service contracts. This instability in efficiency metrics implies that the company's operational processes are not yet standardized or scalable.
The current ratio of 30.98, as reported in recent financial statements, is the most commonly misapplied metric for EJH, as it obscures the company's inability to generate positive operating cash flow and creates a false sense of security regarding the firm's long-term financial health.
While a high current ratio typically signals strong liquidity, in this context, it is primarily a function of large, unexplained cash balances that are not being deployed to improve operational performance. Analysts should instead focus on the cash burn rate and the quality of earnings, as the liquidity ratio fails to account for the company's structural inability to achieve self-sustaining profitability.
Includes 30+ ratios · 9 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying EJH stock.
E-Home Household Service Holdings Limited's current P/E ratio is -1.3x. The historical average is 23.4x.
E-Home Household Service Holdings Limited's return on equity (ROE) is -1.7%. The historical average is 21.2%.
Based on historical data, E-Home Household Service Holdings Limited is trading at a P/E of -1.3x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
E-Home Household Service Holdings Limited has 22.4% gross margin and -16.7% operating margin.