Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 66.6x · EV/EBITDA 28.6x · ROE 25.7%. (2011–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $9.3B | $6.0B | $2.1B | $2.4B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $10.7B | $7.5B | $2.9B | $4.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | 66.58 | 45.46 | 47.92 | 33.58 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 16.06 | 10.40 | 5.35 | 2.52 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 14.10 | 9.63 | 5.38 | 1.65 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | 15.84 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | 41.03 | 26.58 | 39.51 | 15.84 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 12.89 | 7.23 | 4.96 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 28.59 | 19.87 | 10.77 | 13.66 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | 47.41 | 22.73 | 15.80 | 6.92 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | 31.19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 76.9% | 76.9% | 79.8% | 79.8% | 57.0% | 59.8% | 57.4% | 61.8% | 53.0% | 45.6% | 8.5% |
| Operating Margin | 39.1% | 39.1% | 39.8% | 11.2% | 40.0% | 33.6% | 40.3% | 42.1% | 22.6% | -2.3% | -3.0% |
| Net Profit Margin | 22.7% | 22.7% | 11.1% | 7.5% | 3.6% | 10.9% | -62.4% | -9.1% | 3.3% | 10.4% | 1.8% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 25.7% | 25.7% | 4.8% | 5.7% | 2.6% | 5.5% | -9.7% | -1.0% | 0.1% | 0.3% | 0.2% |
| ROA | 6.2% | 6.2% | 1.4% | 1.7% | 0.7% | 1.5% | -2.8% | -0.2% | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.0% |
| ROIC | 10.6% | 10.6% | 4.9% | 2.3% | 7.5% | 4.2% | 1.7% | 1.0% | 0.2% | -0.0% | -0.1% |
| ROCE | 12.7% | 12.7% | 5.9% | 2.9% | 9.2% | 5.2% | 2.1% | 1.2% | 0.2% | -0.0% | -0.1% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 2.57 | 2.57 | 2.16 | 1.88 | 2.06 | 2.40 | 2.28 | 2.06 | 3.56 | 3.07 | 3.79 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 4.28 | 4.28 | 3.20 | 7.90 | 5.26 | 10.67 | 26.49 | 23.31 | 277.34 | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 2.30 | 1.90 | 1.60 | 1.87 | 2.05 | 1.92 | 1.41 | 3.19 | 2.82 | 3.26 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 3.83 | 3.83 | 2.81 | 6.72 | 4.79 | 9.11 | 22.26 | 15.97 | 248.49 | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | 15.34 | — | 29.87 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | 1.85 | 1.85 | 6.70 | 10.75 | 6.32 | 5.86 | -0.75 | 1.16 | 0.36 | 1.18 | 0.23 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.67 | 0.67 | 1.20 | 1.14 | 1.10 | 2.06 | 0.84 | 2.69 | 1.54 | 1.98 | 2.47 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.67 | 0.67 | 1.20 | 1.14 | 1.10 | 2.06 | 0.84 | 2.69 | 1.54 | 1.98 | 2.47 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.32 | 0.32 | 0.65 | 0.70 | 0.60 | 1.52 | 0.67 | 2.39 | 0.86 | 1.31 | 1.79 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.21 | 0.26 | 0.20 | 0.19 | 0.11 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.02 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 563.1% | 378.7% | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 1.5% | 2.2% | 2.1% | 3.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | 6.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $133M | $123M | $124M | $100M | $98M | $78M | $62M | $53M | $49M | $36M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 15 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying ENLT stock.
Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd's current P/E ratio is 66.6x. The historical average is 42.3x. This places it at the 100th percentile of its historical range.
Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd's current EV/EBITDA is 28.6x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 14.8x.
Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd's return on equity (ROE) is 25.7%. This is above the typical threshold of 15-20% considered good for most companies. The historical average is 5.8%.
Based on historical data, Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd is trading at a P/E of 66.6x. This is at the 100th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd has 76.9% gross margin and 39.1% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 4.3x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Geopolitical and execution risks
Premium Priced for Growth Optionality
ENLT trades at 85x trailing earnings and 35x EV/EBITDA, far above renewable peers like CWEN at 24x, reflecting market expectations of continued high growth from its 19GW pipeline.
The P/E of 85x is not anchored to a dividend yield (none paid) but to the expectation that the massive CAPEX cycle will translate into earnings. With a forward P/E of 79.75x, the market is pricing in sustained double-digit growth, but the gap between TTM revenue of ~$579M and 2026 guidance of $755-785M suggests a steep ramp that may already be reflected in the multiple. Investors should monitor whether the growth premium is justified by project execution and PPA escalators.
Earned ROE Lags Authorized Returns
ENLT's earned ROE averaged only 1.2% over the last four quarters, far below typical authorized returns for regulated utilities, indicating that current earnings are not yet reflecting the scale of its rate base.
The 1.2% ROE in 2026Q2, despite a 54.8% operating margin, suggests that depreciation and interest costs are consuming a large portion of revenue as projects come online. This is consistent with a development-heavy model where earnings lag asset deployment. The low ROE may also reflect the inclusion of non-recurring gains in operating income, masking the underlying operational return. As the rate base matures and projects reach full COD, ROE should improve, but the current gap highlights the lag between investment and return.
Margin Quality Distorted by Non-Operating Gains
Operating margin of 54.8% in 2026Q2 exceeds gross margin, suggesting non-operating gains inflate profitability; core cost recovery appears more modest, as seen in 2025Q4's 23.5% operating margin.
The unusually high operating margin relative to gross margin indicates that reported operating income includes items like fair value adjustments or divestment gains, which are not sustainable. Excluding these, the underlying margin is likely closer to the 23.5% seen in 2025Q4, which is more typical for a renewable IPP. Cost recovery is protected by long-term PPAs, but EPC cost inflation could compress margins if not fully passed through via escalators. Investors should focus on cash-based margins rather than reported operating income.
Leverage Creeps Higher Despite Cash Buffer
Debt-to-capital rose to 0.72 in 2026Q2 from 0.66 in 2024Q1, while interest coverage fell to 1.51x, indicating increasing reliance on debt financing for the CAPEX program.
The debt-to-capital ratio of 0.72 is high for a utility, but much of this debt is likely non-recourse project-level financing, which is typical for renewable IPPs. The interest coverage of 1.51x in 2026Q2 is thin, reflecting the early stage of project operations and the lumpy nature of earnings. The $2.97B cash balance provides a buffer, but the trend of rising leverage and declining coverage warrants monitoring, especially if interest rates remain elevated. The low corporate debt-to-equity of 2.73% may understate true leverage when including project debt.
No Dividends, All Reinvestment
ENLT has paid no dividends over the past ten quarters, with operating cash flow fully reinvested into CAPEX, indicating a growth-focused capital allocation strategy that prioritizes pipeline expansion.
The absence of a dividend is consistent with a company in a high-growth phase, where internal cash generation is insufficient to fund the $720.7M quarterly CAPEX. The negative free cash flow of $654.2M in 2026Q2 underscores the reliance on external capital, including equity raises. While this strategy can create value if ROIC exceeds the cost of capital, the lack of a dividend means investors rely solely on capital appreciation, which is riskier in a rising rate environment. The massive cash balance may be earmarked for future construction rather than shareholder returns.
Misapplied P/E on a Growth Utility
Comparing ENLT's P/E of 85x to mature utility peers is misleading because it ignores the development-stage earnings and non-recurring gains; EV/EBITDA or P/B adjusted for project debt is more appropriate.
The standard utility P/E is anchored to a stable rate base and authorized ROE, but ENLT's earnings are volatile and include one-time items, making the P/E unreliable. The EV/EBITDA of 35.45x is also elevated, but it better captures the enterprise value including project debt. Investors should use a sum-of-the-parts valuation or a discounted cash flow analysis that accounts for the 19GW pipeline and the timing of COD. Additionally, the low corporate D/E of 2.73% masks the true leverage when including non-recourse project debt, so a consolidated debt-to-capital ratio is more informative.