Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -0.0x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -376.3%. (2017–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $281019 | $400M | $2M | $2M | $6M | $122M | $50M | $34M | $59M | $44M |
| Enterprise Value | $-4149617 | $-7366915000 | $-2764663 | $617366 | $810595 | $116M | $51M | $38M | $59M | $44M |
| P/E Ratio → | -0.02 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 89.01 |
| P/S Ratio | — | 61.11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 0.03 | 0.00 | 0.18 | — | 0.57 | 3.11 | 1.64 | 0.89 | — | 8.82 |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | -1125.24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -3565.8% | -3565.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Profit Margin | -6881335.0% | -6881335.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -376.3% | -376.3% | -135.2% | -355.5% | -152.9% | -58.4% | -31.6% | -164.4% | — | 2.5% |
| ROA | -294.2% | -294.2% | -68.4% | -160.1% | -94.0% | -34.4% | -20.3% | -95.2% | -24.5% | 0.1% |
| ROIC | -0.1% | -0.1% | -91.8% | -148.5% | -49.7% | -31.1% | -11.1% | -90.0% | — | -5.2% |
| ROCE | -0.2% | -0.2% | -133.8% | -190.0% | -62.8% | -40.6% | -14.8% | -120.7% | -1.1% | -0.3% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.02 | — | 0.12 | 0.05 | 0.12 | 0.09 | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.03 | -0.48 | — | -0.50 | -0.16 | 0.06 | 0.09 | — | -0.09 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -0.08 | -0.08 | -128.65 | -496111.85 | -1406.95 | -108.27 | -9.03 | -136.21 | — | — |
Net cash position: cash ($8.0B) exceeds total debt ($251M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.33 | 0.33 | 1.47 | 0.72 | 1.58 | 0.57 | 0.19 | 0.08 | 0.11 | 2.26 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.33 | 0.33 | 1.47 | 0.72 | 1.58 | 0.57 | 0.19 | 0.08 | 0.11 | 2.26 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.20 | 0.20 | 1.31 | 0.39 | 1.23 | 0.42 | 0.10 | 0.01 | 0.06 | 2.06 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 100.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1.1% |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 100.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $82M | $91537 | $37909 | $10000 | $8251 | $4777 | $5808 | $4000 | $4000 |
Includes 30+ ratios · 9 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying ETHZ stock.
Ethzilla Corp.'s current P/E ratio is -0.0x. The historical average is 89.0x.
Ethzilla Corp.'s return on equity (ROE) is -376.3%. The historical average is -159.0%.
Based on historical data, Ethzilla Corp. is trading at a P/E of -0.0x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Ethzilla Corp.'s current dividend yield is 100.00%.
Ethzilla Corp. has -3565.8% operating margin.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Unsustainable capital consumption
Market Pricing Ignores Operational Deficits
Based on reported financial statements, Ethzilla Corp. trades at a P/B of 0.03, suggesting that the market heavily discounts the company's operational assets and legacy biotech holdings while struggling to reconcile the massive $8.018 billion cash treasury against the firm's persistent and deep net losses.
The extremely low P/B ratio indicates that investors are essentially valuing the company as a distressed asset or a liquidation play rather than a going concern. This valuation gap suggests the market remains skeptical of the company's ability to successfully pivot its massive cash reserves into a sustainable, yield-generating digital asset management business.
Margin Compression Reflects Strategic Transition
According to recent SEC filings, Ethzilla Corp. reported an operating margin of -3565.76%, a figure that highlights the extreme cost burden of the company's pivot from legacy biotechnology to a complex, DeFi-integrated treasury model that has yet to demonstrate any meaningful path toward operational profitability.
The lack of a stable gross margin suggests that the company is currently in a pre-commercial phase where core revenue streams are either non-existent or entirely offset by the high overhead of its new strategic initiatives. Investors should monitor whether the company can achieve scale in its gaming and asset management segments before the current cash burn rate necessitates further dilutive financing.
Capital Efficiency Remains Severely Impaired
As reported in financial statements, the company's ROIC has fluctuated significantly, reaching -34.9% in 2025Q3, which underscores the profound difficulty management faces in deploying its massive treasury to generate returns that exceed the company's high cost of operational and administrative overhead.
The persistent negative returns on capital suggest that the company is currently destroying shareholder value rather than compounding it through its new digital asset strategy. This trend warrants further investigation into whether the capital allocated to the DeFi Council and gaming projects is yielding any tangible economic benefit or merely serving as a sink for corporate resources.
Liquidity Buffer Masks Operational Fragility
Based on Ethzilla Corp.'s reported figures, the current ratio plummeted to 0.33 in 2025Q4, indicating that despite the headline $8 billion cash position, the company's ability to meet short-term obligations is increasingly constrained by the illiquid or restricted nature of its digital asset holdings.
The sharp decline in the current ratio from 10.07 in 2025Q3 suggests that the company's liquidity position is highly volatile and potentially dependent on the valuation of assets that cannot be easily converted to cash. This mismatch between reported cash and actual operational liquidity poses a significant risk if the company faces sudden capital requirements or regulatory hurdles.
Misapplication of Treasury-Based Valuation Metrics
Analysts frequently misapply traditional P/B and P/S ratios to Ethzilla Corp., failing to account for the fact that the company's reported $8 billion treasury may be composed of volatile, staked, or illiquid digital assets that do not function as traditional cash equivalents for operational purposes.
Using standard valuation multiples obscures the reality that this entity is a hybrid of a biotech shell and a crypto-treasury, where the 'book value' is highly sensitive to Ethereum price volatility. A more appropriate approach would involve a NAV-based analysis that adjusts for the liquidity and lock-up periods of the company's digital asset holdings rather than relying on static accounting book values.