Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 93.4x · EV/EBITDA 15.7x · ROE 2.4%. (2019–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1.6B | $2.2B | $2.0B | $2.1B | $1.4B | $3.1B | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $2.0B | $2.6B | $2.4B | $2.5B | $1.9B | $3.5B | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | 93.42 | 126.54 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 2.69 | 3.78 | 2.91 | 3.09 | 2.33 | 6.28 | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 2.29 | 3.11 | 2.71 | 2.52 | 1.60 | 3.12 | — | — |
| P/FCF | 14.48 | 20.39 | 21.60 | 25.56 | 30.99 | 135.64 | — | — |
| P/OCF | 14.19 | 19.98 | 17.99 | 19.92 | 22.35 | 82.10 | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 4.47 | 3.47 | 3.74 | 3.05 | 7.20 | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 15.73 | 20.83 | 27.26 | 23.67 | 23.59 | 47.54 | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | 33.58 | 44.47 | 9634.47 | 1040.22 | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 24.12 | 25.76 | 30.95 | 40.49 | 155.57 | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 77.6% | 77.6% | 67.3% | 65.8% | 65.0% | 66.9% | 65.9% | 69.8% |
| Operating Margin | 10.1% | 10.1% | 0.0% | 0.4% | -4.9% | -5.5% | -6.5% | -22.4% |
| Net Profit Margin | 3.0% | 3.0% | -5.9% | -6.8% | -9.6% | -16.7% | -17.8% | -38.7% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 2.4% | 2.4% | -5.2% | -5.3% | -6.3% | -10.9% | -12.8% | -22.6% |
| ROA | 1.3% | 1.3% | -2.8% | -2.9% | -3.7% | -5.5% | -5.3% | -10.2% |
| ROIC | 3.9% | 3.9% | 0.0% | 0.1% | -1.6% | -1.6% | -1.7% | -5.1% |
| ROCE | 4.6% | 4.6% | 0.0% | 0.2% | -2.0% | -1.9% | -2.1% | -6.2% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.70 | 0.64 | 0.59 | 0.55 | 1.35 | 1.06 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 4.25 | 4.25 | 5.93 | 4.99 | 6.69 | 7.36 | 12.74 | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.57 | 0.52 | 0.53 | 0.49 | 0.46 | 1.16 | 0.92 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 3.22 | 3.22 | 4.40 | 4.12 | 5.53 | 6.09 | 10.99 | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | 3.73 | 4.16 | 5.39 | 9.50 | 19.93 | 13.55 | — |
| Interest Coverage | 1.56 | 1.56 | 0.01 | 0.05 | -0.90 | -1.55 | -0.53 | -1.74 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.11 | 2.11 | 1.97 | 1.53 | 1.72 | 1.66 | 1.66 | 1.94 |
| Quick Ratio | 2.11 | 2.11 | 1.97 | 1.53 | 1.72 | 1.66 | 1.66 | 1.94 |
| Cash Ratio | 1.29 | 1.29 | 1.23 | 0.79 | 0.88 | 0.91 | 1.11 | 1.10 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.43 | 0.49 | 0.44 | 0.39 | 0.29 | 0.25 | 0.26 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 30.16 | 27.93 | 33.26 | 35.87 | 38.39 | 37.64 | 38.99 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 1.1% | 0.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 6.9% | 4.9% | 4.6% | 3.9% | 3.2% | 0.7% | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 5.4% | 3.8% | 2.8% | 3.2% | 3.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 5.4% | 3.8% | 2.8% | 3.2% | 3.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $184M | $185M | $189M | $195M | $195M | $195M | $195M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 7 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying EVCM stock.
EverCommerce Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 93.4x. The historical average is 126.5x.
EverCommerce Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 15.7x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 28.6x.
EverCommerce Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 2.4%. The historical average is -8.7%.
Based on historical data, EverCommerce Inc. is trading at a P/E of 93.4x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
EverCommerce Inc. has 77.6% gross margin and 10.1% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
EverCommerce Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 4.2x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Revenue contraction persists
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Expansion Stalls Amid Revenue Decline
Gross margin improved to 78.6% in Q2 2026, but net margin remains thin at 6.4%, reflecting persistent operating inefficiencies. According to quarterly filings, operating margin of 11.5% still trails the 12.3% peak from Q1 2026.
The 77-78% gross margin underscores a high-fixed-cost software model, yet the spread to operating margin of roughly 67 percentage points indicates heavy SG&A and integration costs. Net margin of 6.4% in Q2 2026, while improved from negative levels a year earlier, remains far below the gross margin potential, suggesting that customer acquisition and support costs are absorbing most of the gross profit. The Q2 EPS miss of $0.05 versus $0.20 consensus, as reported in earnings releases, implies that margin recovery is not translating to bottom-line results, warranting close monitoring of cost discipline.
Capital Returns Remain Subdued
ROIC has hovered near 1% for the past year, with Q2 2026 at 1.2%, far below the cost of capital. Based on financial statements, ROE improved to 1.4% but remains minimal, indicating limited value creation from the asset base.
Despite a stable asset turnover of 0.11, the return on invested capital is negligible, reflecting that the company's large goodwill base—over 60% of total assets—does not generate proportional operating income. The slight uptick in ROIC from 0.9% in Q4 2025 to 1.2% in Q2 2026 is encouraging but still implies that the business is barely covering its capital costs. Investors should assess whether the multi-vertical strategy can eventually drive higher returns, or if the current capital allocation is value-destructive.
Working Capital Efficiency Improves
DSO improved to 30 days in Q2 2026 from 43 days in Q2 2024, while DPO rose to 32 days, indicating better cash collection and supplier leverage. As per quarterly data, the current ratio strengthened to 2.14, reflecting a solid liquidity buffer.
The reduction in days sales outstanding by 13 days over two years suggests improved billing and collection processes, which is positive for cash flow. However, the cash conversion cycle remains negative due to negative DIO, which is typical for a software company with minimal inventory. The rising DPO from 14 days in Q4 2024 to 32 days in Q2 2026 indicates the company is taking longer to pay suppliers, potentially improving cash retention, though this may strain supplier relationships if extended further.
Leverage Creeps Higher on Shrinking Equity
Debt-to-equity rose to 0.74 in Q2 2026 from 0.66 in Q1 2024, while interest coverage improved to 3.78 from 0.81 a year earlier. According to balance sheet data, total debt remains near $530M, but equity has declined to $715M.
The increase in leverage is driven more by equity erosion from losses and buybacks than by new borrowing, as debt levels have been stable. Interest coverage of 3.78 in Q2 2026 is a marked improvement from the negative readings in 2024, suggesting that operating income is now more than sufficient to service interest. However, with D/EBITDA at 16.18, the company remains highly leveraged relative to its EBITDA, which could constrain financial flexibility if revenue contraction persists.
Liquidity Buffer Strengthens
Current ratio improved to 2.14 in Q2 2026 from 1.68 in Q2 2024, with cash rising to $133.5M. As reported in quarterly filings, quick ratio matches current ratio at 2.14, indicating minimal inventory dependence.
The strengthening current ratio provides a comfortable cushion against operational shocks, especially given the revenue contraction. The absence of inventory means the quick ratio equals the current ratio, so liquidity is not distorted by slow-moving stock. However, the persistent negative working capital changes in eight of ten quarters suggest that cash generation from operations is being offset by other uses, such as buybacks, which could erode this buffer if not managed carefully.
Misapplied EV/EBITDA Multiple
EV/EBITDA of 17.48 appears reasonable, but it is distorted by heavy acquisition-related amortization and stock-based compensation. Based on reported figures, adjusted EBITDA would be materially higher, making the multiple misleading for cross-vertical comparisons.
The EV/EBITDA multiple is commonly used for SaaS companies, but for EverCommerce, EBITDA includes significant non-cash charges from acquisitions, which understate true cash earnings. A more appropriate metric would be EV/Operating Cash Flow or EV/Adjusted EBITDA, which would likely show a lower multiple, reflecting the company's strong cash conversion. Investors should adjust for these non-cash items to avoid overestimating the company's leverage and underestimating its earnings power.