Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -0.2x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -652.4%. (2013–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $26M | $6M | $196M | $205M | $319M | $515M | $312M | $128M | $196M | $2.9B | — |
| Enterprise Value | $26M | $7M | $198M | $205M | $317M | $511M | $312M | $129M | $194M | $2.9B | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -0.16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 4.35 | 0.98 | 104.88 | 71.55 | 70.89 | 252.26 | 3513.12 | 10.16 | 39.18 | 6888.59 | — |
| P/B Ratio | — | — | 9.37 | 9.93 | 9.98 | 6.99 | — | 38.88 | 25.82 | 1251.13 | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | 214.51 | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | 204.24 | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.10 | 105.89 | 71.67 | 70.33 | 249.97 | 3513.31 | 10.27 | 38.77 | 6887.89 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | 214.52 | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | -136.7% | -136.7% | 26.1% | 35.1% | 38.4% | 37.3% | 17.1% | 7.0% | 2.7% | 8.2% | 26.5% |
| Operating Margin | -425.6% | -425.6% | -423.5% | -444.1% | -973.4% | -378.1% | -463.1% | -41.5% | -219.3% | -5081.9% | -14020.6% |
| Net Profit Margin | -658.8% | -658.8% | -473.2% | -443.1% | -972.4% | -374.6% | -315.0% | -41.0% | -220.5% | -5153.6% | -15713.2% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -652.4% | -652.4% | -42.6% | -48.2% | -82.9% | -20.9% | -19.9% | -94.7% | -222.2% | -936.0% | — |
| ROA | -209.6% | -209.6% | -32.0% | -45.2% | -80.5% | -19.7% | -4.4% | -48.7% | -136.8% | -501.9% | -263.6% |
| ROIC | -260.2% | -260.2% | -27.1% | -37.8% | -66.7% | -16.9% | -14.6% | -76.5% | -217.2% | -777.3% | -798.9% |
| ROCE | -410.8% | -410.8% | -37.9% | -48.1% | -82.9% | -21.0% | -26.4% | -92.7% | -210.3% | -821.5% | -1275.5% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | — | — | 0.18 | 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.00 | — | 1.77 | 0.22 | 0.92 | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | — | 0.09 | 0.02 | -0.08 | -0.06 | — | 0.42 | -0.27 | -0.13 | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.01 | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | — | — | — | — | — | — | -141.05 | -122.69 | -58.46 | -67.01 | -8.31 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.26 | 0.26 | 1.50 | 6.80 | 12.46 | 14.85 | 0.71 | 1.40 | 3.38 | 1.65 | 0.45 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.26 | 0.26 | 0.96 | 1.09 | 8.61 | 12.37 | 0.71 | 1.33 | 3.38 | 1.57 | 0.40 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.17 | 0.26 | 3.47 | 8.29 | 0.05 | 1.05 | 2.56 | 0.91 | 0.15 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.27 | 0.06 | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 1.22 | 0.46 | 0.08 | 0.02 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | 0.22 | 0.18 | 0.49 | 0.33 | — | 23.63 | — | 1.73 | 0.16 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 73.52 | 392.31 | 88.24 | 168.03 | 255.15 | 37.02 | 19.21 | 94.47 | 858.82 | 2436.91 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.5% | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $16M | $16M | $15M | $15M | $11M | $4M | $4M | $4M | $3M | $3M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 12 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying EVTV stock.
Azio AI, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -0.2x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Azio AI, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -652.4%. The historical average is -75.9%.
Based on historical data, Azio AI, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -0.2x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Azio AI, Inc. has -136.7% gross margin and -425.6% operating margin.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Imminent liquidity and solvency
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Negative Margins Reflect Structural Inefficiency
As reported in financial statements, EVTV's gross margin profile has deteriorated significantly, with recent periods showing deep negative margins of -136.70% that suggest the cost of procuring and assembling vehicle components currently exceeds the realized sales price of the finished commercial units by a substantial margin.
The persistent negative gross margin indicates that the company's current assembly-based business model lacks the necessary scale to amortize fixed costs or achieve favorable unit economics. Investors should monitor whether management can transition toward positive gross margins, as the current trajectory suggests that every additional unit sold may be exacerbating the company's overall operating losses.
Working Capital Cycles Signal Instability
According to recent SEC filings, the company's cash conversion cycle has been highly erratic, with fluctuations reaching as high as 6,730 days in 2024Q3, suggesting that the firm's working capital management is heavily dependent on the timing of lumpy, non-recurring fleet deliveries rather than a repeatable process.
The extreme volatility in days sales outstanding and inventory turnover ratios reveals a lack of operational predictability in the supply chain and customer payment cycles. This inefficiency appears to be a primary driver of the company's cash burn, as capital remains trapped in inventory and receivables for extended periods.
Liquidity Position Nearing Critical Exhaustion
Based on recent financial disclosures, the company's cash position plummeted to just $358,966 by 2025Q4, while the current ratio simultaneously compressed to a precarious 0.26, indicating an acute inability to cover short-term obligations without immediate and substantial external capital injections or potential asset liquidation events.
The current ratio of 0.26 suggests that the company is effectively unable to meet its near-term liabilities using existing liquid assets. This liquidity profile warrants extreme caution, as it implies that the firm may be forced to seek dilutive financing or face a severe disruption to its ongoing assembly operations.
Revenue Multiples Obscure Fundamental Distress
As indicated by the P/S ratio of 4.01, the market appears to be valuing EVTV as a high-growth technology firm, which obscures the reality that the company is currently struggling with negative gross margins and a critical lack of liquidity that threatens its long-term operational viability.
Using revenue multiples for a company with negative gross margins is fundamentally misleading, as it ignores the fact that top-line growth is currently being purchased at the expense of shareholder equity. Analysts should instead focus on cash burn rates and the path to positive unit economics, as these metrics provide a more accurate assessment of the company's survival prospects than traditional valuation multiples.