Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -2.3x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -25.8%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $910M | $230M | $2.7B | $13.7B | $35.9B | $80.2B | $13.3B | $394M | $2.1B | $3.3B | $3.0B |
| Enterprise Value | $776M | $96M | $2.7B | $13.6B | $35.5B | $79.9B | $13.4B | $496M | $2.1B | $3.3B | $3.0B |
| P/E Ratio → | -2.32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 5.75 | 1.46 | 24.10 | 111.24 | 274.84 | 1153.09 | 187.91 | 6.48 | 23.46 | 34.28 | 27.64 |
| P/B Ratio | 0.60 | 0.32 | 3.71 | 18.05 | 47.54 | 113.76 | 52.35 | 2.90 | 11.86 | 17.37 | 17.17 |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 128.57 | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.61 | 24.17 | 110.34 | 272.13 | 1148.28 | 188.38 | 8.17 | 24.02 | 34.73 | 27.66 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | -16.7% | -16.7% | -32.0% | -8.5% | -22.7% | -22.5% | -10.9% | -35.0% | 3.5% | 2.9% | -0.3% |
| Operating Margin | -76.6% | -76.6% | -139.1% | -110.3% | -110.1% | -93.3% | -55.3% | -110.2% | -49.9% | -47.0% | -42.8% |
| Net Profit Margin | -118.8% | -118.8% | -112.4% | -87.2% | -109.4% | -145.2% | -125.7% | -127.7% | -52.9% | -56.3% | -47.1% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -25.8% | -25.8% | -16.9% | -14.2% | -19.6% | -21.1% | -45.7% | -49.6% | -25.9% | -29.7% | -31.0% |
| ROA | -20.0% | -20.0% | -13.3% | -11.4% | -15.7% | -14.4% | -20.8% | -23.0% | -13.1% | -14.9% | -16.5% |
| ROIC | -13.6% | -13.6% | -16.9% | -19.4% | -27.9% | -14.8% | -11.2% | -21.6% | -14.6% | -16.5% | -23.8% |
| ROCE | -14.0% | -14.0% | -17.7% | -15.6% | -17.1% | -10.1% | -10.7% | -24.3% | -15.8% | -15.7% | -18.9% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.22 | 0.18 | 0.14 | 0.14 | 0.72 | 0.83 | 0.50 | 0.49 | 0.49 |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.18 | 0.01 | -0.15 | -0.47 | -0.47 | 0.13 | 0.76 | 0.28 | 0.23 | 0.01 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -17.43 | -17.43 | -15.18 | -13.83 | -21.90 | -12.72 | -4.82 | -6.35 | -4.56 | -4.97 | -9.30 |
Net cash position: cash ($278M) exceeds total debt ($144M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 6.63 | 6.63 | 6.01 | 7.23 | 6.76 | 10.30 | 3.97 | 1.34 | 2.17 | 2.07 | 3.87 |
| Quick Ratio | 5.36 | 5.36 | 4.48 | 5.95 | 5.70 | 9.03 | 3.11 | 0.48 | 1.28 | 1.32 | 2.46 |
| Cash Ratio | 4.10 | 4.10 | 3.48 | 5.37 | 5.34 | 8.19 | 2.54 | 0.15 | 0.65 | 0.50 | 1.61 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.17 | 0.12 | 0.13 | 0.14 | 0.08 | 0.14 | 0.18 | 0.26 | 0.25 | 0.32 |
| Inventory Turnover | 2.14 | 2.14 | 1.30 | 1.59 | 1.76 | 1.27 | 1.54 | 1.50 | 1.61 | 1.25 | 1.47 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 122.33 | 158.20 | 59.47 | 44.49 | 124.07 | 90.66 | 65.94 | 94.02 | 261.43 | 82.92 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.7% | 1.4% | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.5% | 0.2% | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.7% | 1.4% | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.5% | 0.2% | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $26M | $262M | $420M | $383M | $335M | $222M | $55M | $7M | $4M | $2M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying FCEL stock.
FuelCell Energy, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -2.3x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
FuelCell Energy, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -25.8%. The historical average is -40.9%.
Based on historical data, FuelCell Energy, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -2.3x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
FuelCell Energy, Inc.'s current dividend yield is 0.72%.
FuelCell Energy, Inc. has -16.7% gross margin and -76.6% operating margin.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Sustained negative gross margins
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Negative Margins Signal Structural Cost Issue
Based on FuelCell Energy's reported figures, gross margins have collapsed to negative 74.2% in 2026Q3, indicating that the cost of producing power systems and services is now nearly double the revenue generated, a severe deterioration from negative 22.1% in 2024Q4.
The accelerating decline in gross margin is the most critical fundamental issue, as it suggests the company is not only failing to cover its corporate overhead but is also losing money on every unit of core product or service delivered. This trend, coupled with operating margins consistently below negative 100% in recent quarters, implies that even significant revenue growth would not resolve the underlying profitability problem without a fundamental restructuring of its cost base.
Persistent Negative Returns on Invested Capital
According to the provided ratio data, FuelCell Energy's Return on Invested Capital has been negative in nine of the last ten quarters, with a recent low of negative 10.9% in 2025Q3, indicating the company is systematically destroying value on the capital deployed in its operations.
The consistently negative ROIC, which mirrors the negative ROE and ROA trends, confirms that the business model is currently incapable of generating a return above its cost of capital. This pattern suggests the company is in a phase of heavy investment and scaling where negative returns are expected, but the deepening losses raise questions about the path to future profitability and the ultimate viability of the capital allocation strategy.
Lengthy Cash Cycle Ties Up Capital
As reported in the financial statements, FuelCell Energy's cash conversion cycle stood at an extensive 250 days in 2026Q3, down from a peak of 619 days in 2025Q1 but still reflecting over eight months of cash tied up in working capital from procurement to collection.
The lengthy cycle is primarily driven by elevated days inventory outstanding (140 days) and days sales outstanding (137 days), suggesting potential challenges in project execution timelines and customer payment collections. While the improvement from the 2025Q1 peak is a positive sign, the cycle remains exceptionally long for an industrial company, exacerbating cash burn and increasing reliance on external financing to fund operations.
Fortress Liquidity Masks Operational Cash Drain
FuelCell Energy's current ratio of 8.67 in 2026Q3, based on the reported figures, provides an overwhelming short-term liquidity buffer, yet this strength is almost entirely a function of its large cash balance following recent equity raises, not operational cash generation.
The exceptionally high liquidity position, with quick ratio at 7.77, appears to be a strategic fortification against the ongoing negative free cash flow, which was negative 58.6% of revenue last quarter. This suggests management is prioritizing balance sheet strength to survive the extended period of operational losses, but investors should monitor the rate of cash consumption to assess the remaining runway.
P/E Ratio is Misleading for a Loss-Making Issuer
The price-to-earnings ratio, commonly applied to FuelCell Energy, is currently undefined or negative, making it a meaningless metric for valuation and analysis given the company's consistent and deep net losses over the past ten quarters.
For pre-profit industrial companies like FCEL, the P/E ratio is structurally misapplied as it either returns a nonsensical negative number or is not calculable. Analysts should instead focus on metrics like price-to-sales (5.32x) or enterprise value to future EBITDA, if available, to gauge market expectations for future growth and profitability, while also benchmarking these multiples against peers in the alternative energy space who share similar loss-making profiles.