Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 16.2x · EV/EBITDA 8.7x · ROE 13.6%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $3.7B | $5.6B | $6.9B | $7.1B | $5.7B | $5.4B | $4.2B | $4.2B | $2.6B | $1.7B | $1.9B |
| Enterprise Value | $4.0B | $6.0B | $6.4B | $7.1B | $5.8B | $5.5B | $4.3B | $4.3B | $2.5B | $1.9B | $2.0B |
| P/E Ratio → | 16.20 | 20.73 | 24.47 | 25.83 | 24.13 | 23.07 | 19.70 | 19.45 | 16.96 | 15.62 | 21.99 |
| P/S Ratio | 0.97 | 1.48 | 1.85 | 2.03 | 1.88 | 1.95 | 1.69 | 1.79 | 1.26 | 0.93 | 1.04 |
| P/B Ratio | 2.53 | 3.24 | 3.03 | 3.58 | 3.38 | 3.42 | 2.96 | 2.83 | 1.89 | 1.41 | 1.56 |
| P/FCF | 23.54 | 35.87 | 17.23 | 40.57 | 41.94 | 18.90 | 14.20 | 23.95 | 12.87 | 14.56 | 9.19 |
| P/OCF | 24.23 | 36.92 | 17.34 | 31.63 | 30.10 | 15.25 | 12.69 | 19.36 | 11.07 | 11.41 | 8.05 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.58 | 1.74 | 2.02 | 1.90 | 1.98 | 1.77 | 1.84 | 1.24 | 1.05 | 1.12 |
| EV / EBITDA | 8.73 | 12.90 | 16.27 | 16.60 | 16.48 | 15.37 | 13.34 | 12.61 | 9.44 | 12.56 | 10.62 |
| EV / EBIT | 9.77 | 15.24 | 17.98 | 18.93 | 18.71 | 17.25 | 15.40 | 14.09 | 10.67 | 16.81 | 13.30 |
| EV / FCF | — | 38.18 | 16.17 | 40.31 | 42.51 | 19.14 | 14.87 | 24.62 | 12.64 | 16.35 | 9.92 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 32.1% | 32.1% | 32.0% | 32.5% | 31.8% | 31.0% | 32.0% | 34.8% | 34.5% | 32.8% | 33.1% |
| Operating Margin | 10.9% | 10.9% | 9.4% | 10.8% | 10.0% | 11.2% | 11.5% | 13.0% | 11.1% | 6.0% | 7.9% |
| Net Profit Margin | 7.1% | 7.1% | 7.6% | 7.9% | 7.8% | 8.5% | 8.6% | 9.2% | 7.4% | 6.0% | 4.7% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 13.6% | 13.6% | 13.2% | 15.0% | 14.4% | 15.8% | 14.6% | 15.3% | 11.9% | 9.0% | 7.3% |
| ROA | 7.6% | 7.6% | 8.1% | 8.4% | 7.4% | 8.0% | 7.6% | 8.4% | 6.5% | 4.8% | 3.8% |
| ROIC | 15.8% | 15.8% | 13.8% | 15.3% | 13.4% | 14.4% | 13.2% | 15.8% | 12.6% | 5.9% | 7.5% |
| ROCE | 16.0% | 16.0% | 13.6% | 15.4% | 12.5% | 13.9% | 13.2% | 15.0% | 12.1% | 5.9% | 7.6% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.36 | 0.36 | 0.11 | 0.13 | 0.34 | 0.36 | 0.35 | 0.33 | 0.20 | 0.33 | 0.30 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 1.35 | 1.35 | 0.61 | 0.61 | 1.63 | 1.58 | 1.51 | 1.42 | 1.00 | 2.63 | 1.91 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.21 | -0.19 | -0.02 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.14 | 0.08 | -0.03 | 0.17 | 0.12 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.78 | 0.78 | -1.06 | -0.11 | 0.22 | 0.19 | 0.60 | 0.34 | -0.17 | 1.37 | 0.78 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 2.31 | -1.05 | -0.26 | 0.57 | 0.24 | 0.67 | 0.67 | -0.23 | 1.78 | 0.73 |
| Interest Coverage | 18.34 | 18.34 | 51.46 | 26.01 | 30.64 | 15.68 | 14.25 | 16.02 | 8.65 | 4.44 | 6.15 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.56 | 1.56 | 1.95 | 1.74 | 1.96 | 1.91 | 1.69 | 1.92 | 2.00 | 1.94 | 2.07 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.56 | 1.56 | 1.95 | 1.74 | 1.96 | 1.91 | 1.69 | 1.85 | 1.89 | 1.82 | 1.94 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.27 | 0.27 | 0.71 | 0.37 | 0.64 | 0.69 | 0.44 | 0.60 | 0.65 | 0.46 | 0.57 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.09 | 1.03 | 1.05 | 0.93 | 0.90 | 0.89 | 0.85 | 0.85 | 0.80 | 0.81 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 32.04 | 24.28 | 25.09 | 25.47 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 109.80 | 105.76 | 120.11 | 112.60 | 104.08 | 112.25 | 114.28 | 162.54 | 112.21 | 104.73 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 6.2% | 4.8% | 4.1% | 3.9% | 4.1% | 4.3% | 5.1% | 5.1% | 5.9% | 6.4% | 4.5% |
| FCF Yield | 4.2% | 2.8% | 5.8% | 2.5% | 2.4% | 5.3% | 7.0% | 4.2% | 7.8% | 6.9% | 10.9% |
| Buyback Yield | 23.3% | 15.3% | 0.1% | 0.3% | 1.5% | 0.9% | 8.5% | 2.5% | 2.2% | 10.0% | 1.1% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 23.3% | 15.3% | 0.1% | 0.3% | 1.5% | 0.9% | 8.5% | 2.5% | 2.2% | 10.0% | 1.1% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $33M | $36M | $36M | $36M | $35M | $37M | $38M | $38M | $39M | $42M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying FCN stock.
FTI Consulting, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 16.2x. The historical average is 20.9x. This places it at the 11th percentile of its historical range.
FTI Consulting, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 8.7x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 11.3x.
FTI Consulting, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 13.6%. The historical average is 11.2%.
Based on historical data, FTI Consulting, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 16.2x. This is at the 11th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
FTI Consulting, Inc. has 32.1% gross margin and 10.9% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
FTI Consulting, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 1.4x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Talent cost inflation and utilization risk
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Compression Signals Talent Cost Pressure
Operating margin fell to 8.6% in 2026Q2 from 10.5% a year earlier, per reported financials, while gross margin slipped to 31.8%, suggesting rising compensation costs are eroding profitability.
The sequential decline in operating margin from 12.3% in 2025Q3 to 8.6% in 2026Q2, despite relatively stable gross margins around 31-33%, indicates that SG&A and other operating expenses are growing faster than revenue. This trend aligns with the prior income statement analysis showing SG&A up 14.1% YoY versus revenue growth of only 5.3%. The net margin of 5.8% in 2026Q2 is the lowest in the reported period, down from 8.8% in 2024Q2, which may reflect a combination of higher talent costs and a shift in engagement mix toward lower-margin work. Investors should monitor whether management can pass on cost increases through higher billable rates, as a sustained compression would suggest a structural margin reset.
Return on Capital Decays as Leverage Rises
ROIC fell to 2.6% in 2026Q2 from 3.6% in 2024Q1, per reported figures, while D/E surged to 0.95 from 0.11, indicating that debt-funded buybacks are not generating commensurate returns.
ROIC has been on a downward trajectory, from 3.6% in 2024Q1 to 2.6% in 2026Q2, even as the company increased leverage significantly. The rise in debt to fund share repurchases has expanded the capital base without a corresponding increase in operating income, leading to a lower return on invested capital. ROE also declined from 4.0% in 2024Q1 to 3.9% in 2026Q2, but this masks the impact of a shrinking equity base due to buybacks. The combination of rising leverage and falling returns suggests that capital allocation decisions may be destroying value, as the cost of debt likely exceeds the incremental returns generated. This trend warrants close monitoring, as continued buybacks without operational improvement could further erode shareholder value.
Working Capital Swings Reflect Litigation Cycles
DSO rose to 114 days in 2026Q2 from 110 days in 2025Q4, per reported data, while the cash conversion cycle remains unavailable due to missing inventory data, highlighting the lumpy nature of collections.
Days sales outstanding have remained elevated in the 109-122 day range over the past ten quarters, reflecting the protracted nature of litigation and restructuring engagements where milestone payments are common. The slight increase in DSO to 114 days in 2026Q2, combined with the extreme quarterly swings in operating cash flow (from -$310M in 2026Q1 to +$152M in 2026Q2), suggests that cash collection timing is a significant source of volatility. The absence of inventory data is consistent with a services business, but the high DSO indicates that FCN extends substantial credit to clients, which may tie up cash and increase credit risk. Investors should monitor whether DSO trends upward further, as that could signal deteriorating collection efficiency or a shift toward clients with weaker payment profiles.
Leverage Creep Threatens Financial Flexibility
Debt-to-equity climbed to 0.95 in 2026Q2 from 0.11 a year earlier, per balance sheet data, while interest coverage fell to 7.36x from 84.24x, indicating a rapid increase in financial risk.
The company's debt levels have surged from $242.1M in 2024Q4 to $1.3B in 2026Q2, funded largely to support aggressive share repurchases. This has driven D/E from 0.11 to 0.95, and D/EBITDA from 2.46 to 14.81, a dramatic increase that suggests the balance sheet is now significantly more leveraged. Interest coverage has correspondingly fallen from 84.24x in 2025Q1 to 7.36x in 2026Q2, which, while still adequate, indicates a much thinner cushion for debt service. The rapid pace of leverage accumulation, combined with the recent EPS miss and margin pressure, raises concerns about the sustainability of the capital return program. If operating performance continues to deteriorate, the company may face refinancing risk or be forced to curtail buybacks, which could impact shareholder returns.
Liquidity Buffer Thins Despite Healthy Ratios
Current ratio remains above 2.0 at 2.03 in 2026Q2, per reported figures, but cash fell to $163.7M from $660.5M a year earlier, indicating a reduced cushion against shocks.
While the current ratio of 2.03 and quick ratio of 2.03 suggest adequate short-term liquidity, the absolute cash balance has declined sharply, from $660.5M in 2024Q4 to $163.7M in 2026Q2. This reduction in cash, combined with the increase in debt, means the company has less flexibility to absorb unexpected downturns or fund working capital needs. The high DSO and volatile cash flows from litigation and restructuring engagements further underscore the importance of maintaining a strong liquidity buffer. Although the current ratio remains above 2.0, the trend is concerning, and investors should monitor whether cash levels stabilize or continue to decline, as that could signal a need for additional debt or a reduction in capital returns.
P/E Misleads on Cyclical Earnings
The trailing P/E of 18.90 appears reasonable, but it fails to capture the cyclicality of restructuring revenue and the impact of debt-funded buybacks on EPS, per reported data.
The most commonly misapplied ratio for FCN is the P/E multiple, as it is based on trailing earnings that are heavily influenced by the timing of success fees and the lumpy nature of litigation and restructuring work. The current P/E of 18.90 may understate the true valuation if the recent EPS miss is a temporary dip, but it could also overstate value if the margin compression is structural. A more appropriate metric would be EV/EBITDA, which at 10.06 is lower than peers like HLI (12.48) and HURN (13.41), but this ratio also fails to account for the high DSO and working capital intensity. Investors should consider normalizing earnings over a full cycle and adjusting for the debt-funded buybacks that have artificially boosted EPS by reducing share count. Using a normalized earnings power approach or EV/EBITDAR may provide a clearer picture of FCN's intrinsic value.