Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 20.2x · EV/EBITDA 16.5x · ROE 3.2%. (2022–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $85M | $77M | $65M | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $80M | $72M | $27M | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | 20.18 | 18.75 | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 3.21 | 2.91 | 3.35 | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 0.64 | 0.59 | 0.51 | — | — |
| P/FCF | 90.21 | 81.93 | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | 64.08 | 58.20 | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 2.73 | 1.39 | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 16.47 | 14.86 | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | 19.11 | 17.25 | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 76.63 | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 65.2% | 65.2% | 58.5% | 65.3% | 89.5% |
| Operating Margin | 15.8% | 15.8% | -7.4% | 5.4% | 23.6% |
| Net Profit Margin | 15.4% | 15.4% | -5.6% | 4.6% | 19.0% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 3.2% | 3.2% | -1.1% | 1.0% | 3.8% |
| ROA | 0.8% | 0.8% | -0.2% | 0.2% | 0.6% |
| ROIC | 2.5% | 2.5% | -1.0% | 0.9% | 3.6% |
| ROCE | 3.0% | 3.0% | -1.3% | 1.1% | 4.3% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | — | — | — | 0.05 | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | 2.68 | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.04 | -0.30 | -0.20 | -0.27 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -1.03 | -1.03 | — | -10.24 | -4.88 |
| Debt / FCF | — | -5.30 | — | — | -6.99 |
| Interest Coverage | 0.45 | 0.45 | -0.16 | 0.15 | 2.24 |
Net cash position: cash ($5M) exceeds total debt ($0)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.23 | 0.25 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.23 | 0.25 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.05 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.03 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 5.0% | 5.3% | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 1.1% | 1.2% | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 3.5% | — | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 3.5% | — | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $5M | $5M | $6M | $6M |
Geographic and concentration risk
According to current market data, FDSB trades at a P/B of 0.64, which, as reported in financial statements, suggests the market is pricing the bank at a significant discount to its tangible book value compared to regional peers like NBTB or TRST.
This valuation gap implies that investors remain skeptical of the bank's ability to generate a competitive return on tangible equity given its historical ROE performance. The current multiple suggests the market views FDSB as a commodity balance sheet rather than a premium franchise, likely due to the lack of a clear dividend policy and the inherent risks of its localized New Orleans-Metairie footprint.
Based on the provided quarterly data, FDSB's ROE has struggled to exceed 2.4% in any single quarter, which, as noted in financial filings, indicates that the bank's profitability is currently constrained by low asset utilization and a lack of meaningful non-interest income contribution.
The DuPont decomposition suggests that the bank's reliance on a narrow NIM, which has hovered between 0.4% and 0.7%, is insufficient to drive meaningful shareholder returns. Without a shift toward higher-margin commercial lending or a reduction in the efficiency ratio, the bank may continue to face difficulty in achieving a cost of equity that justifies its current capital structure.
As reported in recent financial statements, FDSB's net interest margin has remained stagnant between 0.4% and 0.7%, which, according to quarterly figures, suggests that rising funding costs are effectively neutralizing the benefits of the bank's recent expansion in total interest-earning assets.
The volatility in the efficiency ratio, which peaked at 78.9% in 2024Q1, highlights the difficulty of maintaining a traditional brick-and-mortar model in a competitive rate environment. Investors should monitor whether the bank can achieve better operating leverage as it attempts to scale its residential mortgage-focused business model.
Based on reported figures, the equity-to-assets ratio has improved from 0.16 in 2024Q1 to 0.24 by 2026Q1, which, as indicated in financial filings, suggests a successful transition toward a more robust capital framework following the bank's move away from its mutual-rooted structure.
While this capital buffer provides a cushion against localized economic shocks, the lack of a consistent capital return policy suggests that management may be struggling to deploy this excess capital efficiently. The current capital position appears adequate for regulatory purposes, but it may be acting as a drag on ROE if not utilized for strategic growth or shareholder distributions.
The P/E ratio is the most commonly misapplied metric for FDSB, as reported in financial analysis, because it fails to account for the volatility in provision expenses and the bank's reliance on book value as the primary driver of long-term shareholder value.
Investors should instead focus on the Price-to-Tangible Book Value (P/TBV) ratio, as it provides a more accurate reflection of the bank's underlying asset quality and capital adequacy. Relying on P/E in a period of fluctuating earnings can obscure the bank's true economic value and lead to incorrect conclusions regarding its franchise strength.
Includes 30+ ratios · 4 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying FDSB stock.
Fifth District Savings Bank's current P/E ratio is 20.2x. The historical average is 18.8x. This places it at the 100th percentile of its historical range.
Fifth District Savings Bank's current EV/EBITDA is 16.5x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 14.9x.
Fifth District Savings Bank's return on equity (ROE) is 3.2%. The historical average is 1.8%.
Based on historical data, Fifth District Savings Bank is trading at a P/E of 20.2x. This is at the 100th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Fifth District Savings Bank has 65.2% gross margin and 15.8% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.