Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 22.4x · EV/EBITDA 13.2x · ROE 7.4%. (1997–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $26.9B | $25.9B | $23.0B | $21.0B | $24.0B | $22.7B | $16.6B | $26.3B | $18.5B | $13.6B | $13.2B |
| Enterprise Value | $53.8B | $52.8B | $47.1B | $45.8B | $45.5B | $45.1B | $39.4B | $46.7B | $37.7B | $32.6B | $35.5B |
| P/E Ratio → | 22.40 | 25.44 | 23.40 | 19.09 | 59.07 | 17.70 | 15.38 | 28.93 | 18.87 | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 1.65 | 1.71 | 1.70 | 1.64 | 1.93 | 2.04 | 1.54 | 2.39 | 1.65 | 0.97 | 0.91 |
| P/B Ratio | 1.93 | 1.86 | 1.67 | 1.93 | 2.25 | 2.62 | 2.30 | 3.78 | 2.72 | 3.46 | 2.11 |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | 62.04 | — | — | — | 14.06 | 43.40 |
| P/OCF | 7.26 | 6.99 | 7.94 | 15.17 | 8.94 | 8.08 | 11.68 | 10.68 | 13.16 | 3.57 | 3.91 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 3.50 | 3.50 | 3.56 | 3.65 | 4.05 | 3.65 | 4.23 | 3.35 | 2.32 | 2.44 |
| EV / EBITDA | 13.24 | 11.90 | 11.89 | 12.92 | 14.10 | 13.30 | 11.71 | 12.53 | 9.70 | 7.89 | 8.82 |
| EV / EBIT | 19.00 | 19.58 | 18.73 | 18.39 | 19.00 | 17.19 | 18.18 | 22.47 | 14.70 | 13.68 | 17.81 |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | 123.22 | — | — | — | 33.66 | 116.93 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 54.8% | 54.8% | 67.5% | 63.9% | 63.1% | 69.1% | 71.5% | 69.0% | 67.6% | 53.5% | 46.8% |
| Operating Margin | 18.8% | 18.8% | 17.6% | 17.6% | 15.3% | 15.5% | 20.0% | 22.7% | 22.2% | 17.3% | 14.1% |
| Net Profit Margin | 6.8% | 6.8% | 7.3% | 8.6% | 3.3% | 11.5% | 10.0% | 8.3% | 12.0% | -12.3% | -42.4% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 7.4% | 7.4% | 7.9% | 10.2% | 4.2% | 16.1% | 15.2% | 13.2% | 25.1% | -33.9% | -66.2% |
| ROA | 1.9% | 1.9% | 1.9% | 2.3% | 0.9% | 2.9% | 2.5% | 2.2% | 3.3% | -4.0% | -13.0% |
| ROIC | 5.4% | 5.4% | 4.8% | 5.0% | 4.5% | 4.2% | 5.7% | 7.1% | 7.7% | 7.1% | 4.9% |
| ROCE | 5.8% | 5.8% | 5.3% | 5.3% | 4.6% | 4.3% | 5.6% | 6.9% | 6.8% | 6.5% | 5.0% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 1.94 | 1.94 | 1.77 | 2.28 | 2.04 | 2.75 | 3.38 | 3.01 | 2.86 | 4.98 | 3.61 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 6.10 | 6.10 | 6.12 | 7.02 | 6.71 | 7.04 | 7.28 | 5.63 | 5.02 | 4.73 | 5.60 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 1.94 | 1.76 | 2.27 | 2.02 | 2.58 | 3.14 | 2.92 | 2.81 | 4.83 | 3.58 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 6.07 | 6.07 | 6.10 | 6.99 | 6.66 | 6.61 | 6.77 | 5.47 | 4.92 | 4.59 | 5.55 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | 61.18 | — | — | — | 19.60 | 73.53 |
| Interest Coverage | 2.37 | 2.37 | 2.49 | 2.43 | 2.51 | 2.47 | 2.19 | 2.16 | 2.44 | 2.50 | 2.17 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.57 | 0.57 | 0.56 | 0.48 | 0.61 | 0.73 | 0.74 | 0.50 | 0.51 | 0.76 | 0.41 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.46 | 0.46 | 0.45 | 0.38 | 0.50 | 0.67 | 0.68 | 0.44 | 0.46 | 0.65 | 0.33 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.33 | 0.35 | 0.13 | 0.08 | 0.14 | 0.03 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.27 | 0.26 | 0.26 | 0.27 | 0.25 | 0.24 | 0.26 | 0.28 | 0.33 | 0.34 |
| Inventory Turnover | 11.83 | 11.83 | 7.97 | 9.07 | 10.91 | 13.25 | 9.68 | 12.19 | 14.47 | 7.39 | 6.88 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 3.8% | 3.9% | 4.2% | 4.3% | 3.7% | 3.7% | 5.1% | 3.1% | 3.8% | 4.7% | 4.6% |
| Payout Ratio | 99.6% | 99.6% | 99.2% | 82.2% | 219.5% | 66.2% | 78.3% | 89.3% | 52.7% | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 4.5% | 3.9% | 4.3% | 5.2% | 1.7% | 5.7% | 6.5% | 3.5% | 5.3% | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | 1.6% | — | — | — | 7.1% | 2.3% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 3.8% | 3.9% | 4.2% | 4.3% | 3.7% | 3.7% | 5.1% | 3.1% | 3.8% | 4.7% | 4.6% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $578M | $577M | $574M | $572M | $546M | $543M | $542M | $494M | $444M | $426M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 29 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying FE stock.
FirstEnergy Corp.'s current P/E ratio is 22.4x. The historical average is 21.5x. This places it at the 67th percentile of its historical range.
FirstEnergy Corp.'s current EV/EBITDA is 13.2x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 9.6x.
FirstEnergy Corp.'s return on equity (ROE) is 7.4%. The historical average is 6.0%.
Based on historical data, FirstEnergy Corp. is trading at a P/E of 22.4x. This is at the 67th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
FirstEnergy Corp.'s current dividend yield is 3.79% with a payout ratio of 99.6%.
FirstEnergy Corp. has 54.8% gross margin and 18.8% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
FirstEnergy Corp.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 6.1x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Ohio regulatory and leverage exposure
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Premium Trailing Multiple Against Regulatory Ceiling
Based on FE's reported figures, the trailing P/E of 26.76 sits well above the forward P/E of 17.19, implying that the market is discounting earnings recovery from the depressed 2025Q4 quarter rather than paying for current run-rate profitability.
A utility trading at a trailing multiple this elevated relative to its forward estimate suggests the market is looking through a volatile earnings base toward normalized regulated returns. The 3.7% dividend yield provides partial support, but the dividend is competing with a risk-free rate environment that makes the stock's income appeal less compelling if the forward earnings path fails to materialize. Investors should monitor whether the forward P/E compresses toward peer levels if Ohio authorized returns remain constrained.
Earned Returns Lag Regulatory Construct Materially
As reported in financial statements, FE's ROE has averaged roughly 2.5% across recent quarters, with the most recent 3.9% reading in 2026Q3 far below peer ROEs clustered near 9% and well short of any plausible authorized return level.
Quarterly ROE figures in the low single digits, even allowing for timing noise, suggest a substantial gap between earned returns and the regulatory compact that should underpin a regulated utility's earnings power. This pattern may indicate disallowances, regulatory lag on a rapidly growing rate base, or an earnings base depressed by one-time charges, though the supplied data does not isolate these causes. Until the gap closes, the rate base expansion visible in the balance sheet is not translating into proportional shareholder returns.
Operating Margin Recovery Remains Uneven
Based on FE's reported figures, operating margin rose from 12.9% in 2024Q2 to 20.5% in 2026Q3, yet the 15.9% reading in 2025Q4 demonstrates how quarterly cost recovery remains exposed to regulatory timing and expense volatility.
The upward trajectory in operating margin suggests that rate case outcomes and grid investment recovery are gradually improving the spread between revenue and operating costs. However, the sharp 2025Q4 compression indicates that recovery is not yet smooth, which may reflect O&M cost spikes or regulatory lag on newly placed assets. Sustained margins above 19% across recent quarters would strengthen the case for durable recovery, but investors should monitor whether the trend holds through a full rate cycle.
Reported Leverage Metrics Require Verification
According to reported figures, FE's debt-to-capital ratio of 0.67 and interest coverage between 1.43x and 3.32x, combined with a reported debt-to-equity of 1.94x, appear inconsistent with each other and with typical utility capital structures.
A debt-to-capital ratio of 0.67 implies roughly two dollars of debt for each dollar of equity capital, which is consistent with the reported 1.94x debt-to-equity but well above the leverage typically accepted by state commissions. Interest coverage in the lower range, particularly the 1.43x reading in 2025Q4, suggests limited cushion against earnings volatility. The lack of disclosed interest expense in the supplied data prevents a full assessment, and the figures warrant further investigation against the consolidated filings.
Dividend Coverage Uneven Against Capex Requirements
As reported in financial statements, the quarterly payout ratio ranged from 48% to 96% with reported operating cash flow covering dividends in most quarters, yet capex consistently exceeded operating cash flow, leaving the dividend dependent on external funding.
Operating cash flow coverage of the dividend appears adequate in most periods, but this coverage does not translate into internal funding of the capital program, since capex-to-operating-cash-flow ratios frequently exceeded 150%. The payout ratio spike to 95.9% in 2025Q2 and 93.1% in 2026Q2 suggests the dividend absorbs a large share of earnings during weaker quarters. Investors should monitor whether the dividend remains sustainable if capex stays elevated and external financing conditions tighten.
Standard Debt-to-Equity Misleads on Regulated Capital
The most commonly misapplied ratio for FE is standard debt-to-equity, which ignores regulated rate base structure and can overstate leverage risk, while failing to capture the regulatory allowed capital structure that commissions actually approve.
Applying a generic industrial debt-to-equity framework to a utility can mislead because commissions set allowed equity ratios and the rate base recovers debt and equity costs through authorized returns. A better approach would compare the company's actual capital structure against the commission-approved equity ratio and assess FFO-to-debt against agency thresholds. Given the reported 1.94x leverage figure, the data should be verified before drawing conclusions about regulatory-compliant leverage.