VCP ScannerFree US Stock Screener & Financial AnalysisFree US Stock Screener
ScreenerThemes
DCF ValuationCalculate intrinsic value of US stocks
Market ValuationBuffett indicator, CAPE & macro gauges
Total ReturnSee dividends + price return history
DCA CalculatorSimulate recurring buys & compounding
Earnings
FAANG & Tech
AAPL vs MSFTNVDA vs AMDGOOGL vs META
Cloud & Cyber
CRM vs NOWCRWD vs PANWSNOW vs DDOG
Consumer & Auto
TSLA vs FAMZN vs WMTNFLX vs DIS
Finance & Crypto
JPM vs BACV vs MACOIN vs MSTR
Pharma & Energy
LLY vs NVOJNJ vs PFEXOM vs CVX
Compare Any Stocks...
WatchlistInsider
ScreenerThemes
Earnings
WatchlistInsider
FMSTForemost Clean Energy Ltd.
$1.54$19M
Overview & Verdict
Overview
Valuation & Forecasts
Valuation ModelsEstimatesDCF Model
Price & Analyst Data
Analyst TargetsPrice HistoryTechnical Analysis
Financial Statements
Income StatementBalance SheetCash FlowRatios & Margins
Performance
P/E HistoryRevenue HistoryEarnings HistoryDividend HistoryTotal Return
Ownership
Holders
← Back to Screener
VCP ScannerFree US Stock Screener & Financial Analysis

Find stocks. Verify deeply. Act with conviction.

Data updated daily

Product

  • Screener
  • Themes
  • Valuation
  • Total Return
  • DCA Calculator
  • News
  • Earnings

Resources

  • Market Valuation
  • Compare
  • Insider Activity
  • Methodology
  • How It Works
  • Glossary
  • Learn

Get Ideas

Get weekly stock ideas — free

© 2026 VCP Scanner
AboutPrivacyTerms
Not financial advice. Do your own research.
ScreenerNewsCompareWatchlist
  1. Home
  2. Financial Ratios

  1. Home
  2. Stocks
  3. FMST
  4. Financial Ratios

Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. (FMST) Financial Ratios

Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -4.6x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -19.2%. (2011–2025 historical series)

Income StatementBalance SheetCash FlowRatios
AnnualQuarterly

FMST Valuation Multiples

Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018FY 2017FY 2016
Market Cap$19M$6M$11M————————
Enterprise Value$16M$2M$11M————————
P/E Ratio →-4.55——————————
P/S Ratio———————————
P/B Ratio0.670.250.82————————
P/FCF———————————
P/OCF———————————

P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart

FMST EV Ratios

Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018FY 2017FY 2016
EV / Revenue———————————
EV / EBITDA———————————
EV / EBIT———————————
EV / FCF———————————

FMST Profitability

Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency

Margins

Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018FY 2017FY 2016
Gross Margin———————————
Operating Margin———————————
Net Profit Margin———————————

Return on Capital

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018FY 2017FY 2016
ROE-19.2%-19.2%-37.9%11.2%-66.5%-48.3%-29.5%-44.2%-274.6%-224.7%—
ROA-16.3%-16.3%-29.9%9.0%-55.9%-40.6%-25.8%-39.1%-234.6%-133.3%-62.2%
ROIC-26.2%-26.2%-27.6%-29.8%-48.7%-32.6%-15.3%-36.3%-341.3%-221.0%—
ROCE-30.2%-30.2%-37.1%-41.0%-62.4%-42.3%-20.3%-35.6%-254.8%-218.9%—

FMST Leverage & Debt

Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018FY 2017FY 2016
Debt / Equity0.020.020.090.120.020.030.040.000.020.01—
Debt / EBITDA———1.21———————
Net Debt / Equity—-0.180.010.07-0.01-0.030.04-0.02-0.47-0.26—
Net Debt / EBITDA———0.67———————
Debt / FCF———————————
Interest Coverage-11.44-11.44-34.3210.28-35.90-11.62-12.14-35.77-175.86——

Net cash position: cash ($5M) exceeds total debt ($521368)

FMST Liquidity & Efficiency

Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018FY 2017FY 2016
Current Ratio1.731.730.540.270.390.500.140.373.780.980.04
Quick Ratio1.731.730.540.270.390.500.140.373.780.980.04
Cash Ratio1.621.620.370.200.210.380.000.203.460.790.04
Asset Turnover———————————
Inventory Turnover———————————
Days Sales Outstanding———————————

FMST Shareholder Yields

Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders

Dividends

Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018FY 2017FY 2016
Dividend Yield———————————
Payout Ratio———————————

Total Shareholder Return Metrics

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018FY 2017FY 2016
Earnings Yield———————————
FCF Yield———————————
Buyback Yield0.0%0.0%0.0%————————
Total Shareholder Yield0.0%0.0%0.0%————————
Shares Outstanding—$8M$5M$4M$3M$3M$2M$2M$2M$964427$438443

Key Metrics

Growth RegimeMixed
ProfitabilityNegative
Balance SheetVulnerable
Cash FlowBurning
Top Statement Risk

Dilutive financing dependency

Speculative Optionality Drives Market Pricing

As reported in financial statements, FMST trades at a P/B of 0.67, which suggests that the market currently discounts the company's capitalized exploration assets, reflecting the inherent uncertainty of its pre-revenue status and the speculative nature of its dual-commodity mineral claims in the Canadian mining sector.

The negative P/E ratio is a standard characteristic for exploration-stage firms, indicating that valuation is driven by asset potential rather than current earnings. Investors should monitor whether this discount persists as the company attempts to de-risk its uranium and lithium projects, as the current valuation implies a significant lack of confidence in the immediate commercial viability of its portfolio.

Negative Returns Reflect Exploration Intensity

Based on reported figures, FMST has consistently generated negative ROIC, with a recent reading of -5.3% in 2026Q3, illustrating that the company is currently destroying capital as it funds exploration activities without the benefit of offsetting revenue or operational cash flow to support its asset base.

The persistent decay in return on capital metrics highlights the difficulty of compounding value in a pre-revenue environment where capital is consumed by drilling and administrative overhead. This trend warrants further investigation into whether the company's capital allocation strategy can eventually pivot toward positive returns, or if it will remain trapped in a cycle of value destruction until a major discovery is made.

Liquidity Buffer Faces Rapid Depletion

According to recent quarterly filings, the company's current ratio has fluctuated significantly, reaching 3.23 in 2026Q3, yet this metric masks the underlying reality that the firm's cash runway is rapidly depleting due to the high costs of maintaining exploration commitments across two distinct geological basins.

While the current ratio appears superficially healthy, it is heavily influenced by the composition of current assets, which may include non-liquid exploration-related items. Investors should be cautious, as the company's liquidity position remains highly vulnerable to the timing of future equity raises, which are essential to sustain operations given the lack of internal cash generation.

Minimal Debt Masks Financing Risks

As evidenced by the company's financial disclosures, FMST maintains a negligible D/E ratio of 0.00 as of 2026Q2, which suggests that while the firm avoids traditional debt-service burdens, it remains entirely dependent on equity markets to fund its ongoing exploration programs and corporate overhead requirements.

The absence of significant debt is a common feature for junior miners, yet it does not imply financial strength, as the company's reliance on equity financing creates a persistent risk of shareholder dilution. The negative interest coverage ratios observed in recent periods further confirm that the firm lacks the operational earnings necessary to support any meaningful debt-based capital structure.

Misapplied Metrics Obscure True Burn

The most commonly misapplied metric for FMST is the P/B ratio, which fails to account for the fact that capitalized exploration costs often overstate the true economic value of mineral claims, potentially misleading investors regarding the company's actual net asset value and its long-term financial health.

Instead of relying on book value, analysts should focus on the cash burn rate and the remaining exploration runway, as these metrics provide a more accurate picture of the company's survival prospects. The P/B ratio obscures the reality that these assets are only as valuable as the next successful drill result, making it a poor proxy for the firm's true intrinsic worth.

Download Financial Ratios Data

Includes 30+ ratios · 15 years · Updated daily

Consensus-Based Analysis Tools

Intrinsic Valuation

DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.

Check Valuation

Historical Returns

10-year return with dividends reinvested.

Calculate

DCA Calculator

See how regular investing compounds over time.

Run Numbers

Peer Comparison

Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.

Compare

FMST — Frequently Asked Questions

Quick answers to the most common questions about buying FMST stock.

What is Foremost Clean Energy Ltd.'s P/E ratio?

Foremost Clean Energy Ltd.'s current P/E ratio is -4.6x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.

What is Foremost Clean Energy Ltd.'s ROE?

Foremost Clean Energy Ltd.'s return on equity (ROE) is -19.2%. The historical average is -98.9%.

Is FMST stock overvalued?

Based on historical data, Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. is trading at a P/E of -4.6x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.