Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 13.0x · EV/EBITDA 5.7x · ROE 18.9%. (2000–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $3.5B | $3.3B | $1.3B | $1.1B | $1.1B | $973M | $1.5B | $671M | $588M | $826M | $780M |
| Enterprise Value | $3.2B | $3.0B | $1.3B | $1.3B | $1.3B | $1.1B | $1.6B | $758M | $576M | $684M | $740M |
| P/E Ratio → | 12.96 | 10.90 | 10.46 | — | — | 16.96 | 68.67 | 27.20 | 17.33 | 12.43 | 43.46 |
| P/S Ratio | 3.68 | 3.42 | 1.26 | 1.35 | 1.60 | 1.62 | 5.50 | 2.61 | 2.23 | 3.08 | 3.71 |
| P/B Ratio | 2.25 | 1.90 | 0.91 | 0.88 | 0.85 | 0.68 | 2.11 | 1.06 | 0.98 | 1.47 | 1.84 |
| P/FCF | 12.00 | 11.16 | 8.23 | 14.05 | — | — | 4355.80 | — | — | 35.71 | 62.55 |
| P/OCF | 7.43 | 6.91 | 3.65 | 3.77 | 5.62 | 6.61 | 16.42 | 10.65 | 7.05 | 11.77 | 14.80 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 3.12 | 1.22 | 1.51 | 1.84 | 1.75 | 5.66 | 2.95 | 2.19 | 2.55 | 3.52 |
| EV / EBITDA | 5.73 | 5.29 | 2.78 | 5.81 | 21.13 | 4.06 | 15.39 | 9.41 | 5.49 | 4.41 | 9.05 |
| EV / EBIT | 8.78 | 6.94 | 5.48 | 114.86 | — | 8.79 | 25.80 | 16.70 | 8.32 | 6.38 | 15.21 |
| EV / FCF | — | 10.19 | 8.00 | 15.73 | — | — | 4487.09 | — | — | 29.56 | 59.36 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 48.7% | 48.7% | 32.4% | 22.6% | 21.5% | 34.3% | 39.5% | 32.9% | 36.7% | 40.9% | 38.3% |
| Operating Margin | 38.5% | 38.5% | 21.5% | -0.0% | -16.7% | 22.8% | 20.5% | 13.3% | 23.4% | 41.1% | 23.1% |
| Net Profit Margin | 31.5% | 31.5% | 12.1% | -6.0% | -18.8% | 9.6% | 7.7% | 9.3% | 12.9% | 24.7% | 8.5% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 18.9% | 18.9% | 9.3% | -3.9% | -9.4% | 5.4% | 3.2% | 3.8% | 5.8% | 13.4% | 5.2% |
| ROA | 13.3% | 13.3% | 6.3% | -2.6% | -6.6% | 3.8% | 2.2% | 2.8% | 4.6% | 10.4% | 3.8% |
| ROIC | 19.3% | 19.3% | 12.0% | -0.0% | -5.8% | 9.0% | 5.7% | 3.9% | 9.1% | 20.6% | 11.8% |
| ROCE | 18.4% | 18.4% | 12.7% | -0.0% | -6.3% | 9.7% | 6.3% | 4.4% | 9.0% | 19.2% | 11.4% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.13 | 0.21 | 0.19 | 0.13 | 0.25 | 0.27 | 0.13 | 0.07 | 0.10 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 0.47 | 0.47 | 0.42 | 1.21 | 4.06 | 0.72 | 1.74 | 2.12 | 0.74 | 0.26 | 0.52 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.17 | -0.03 | 0.11 | 0.12 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.14 | -0.02 | -0.25 | -0.09 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -0.51 | -0.51 | -0.08 | 0.62 | 2.70 | 0.31 | 0.45 | 1.08 | -0.12 | -0.92 | -0.48 |
| Debt / FCF | — | -0.97 | -0.23 | 1.68 | — | — | 131.29 | — | — | -6.15 | -3.18 |
| Interest Coverage | 17.25 | 17.25 | 9.71 | 0.50 | -10.26 | 11.71 | 30.94 | 34.89 | 36.04 | 61.86 | 22.67 |
Net cash position: cash ($553M) exceeds total debt ($266M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.98 | 2.98 | 1.90 | 1.37 | 1.87 | 1.69 | 2.57 | 1.70 | 3.57 | 4.50 | 2.87 |
| Quick Ratio | 2.50 | 2.50 | 1.37 | 0.89 | 1.19 | 1.17 | 2.21 | 1.53 | 3.34 | 4.20 | 2.64 |
| Cash Ratio | 2.19 | 2.19 | 0.90 | 0.53 | 0.60 | 0.64 | 1.38 | 0.93 | 2.66 | 3.52 | 2.15 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.40 | 0.50 | 0.43 | 0.36 | 0.30 | 0.26 | 0.27 | 0.33 | 0.38 | 0.37 |
| Inventory Turnover | 4.02 | 4.02 | 5.34 | 5.63 | 5.81 | 4.60 | 4.78 | 11.53 | 11.59 | 8.93 | 9.55 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 28.22 | 35.79 | 32.34 | 12.84 | 47.58 | 100.16 | 71.33 | 43.41 | 48.33 | 42.15 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 7.7% | 9.2% | 9.6% | — | — | 5.9% | 1.5% | 3.7% | 5.8% | 8.0% | 2.3% |
| FCF Yield | 8.3% | 9.0% | 12.1% | 7.1% | — | — | 0.0% | — | — | 2.8% | 1.6% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.3% | 0.3% | 2.6% | 0.0% | 0.5% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.3% | 0.3% | 2.6% | 0.0% | 0.5% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $335M | $311M | $295M | $291M | $249M | $186M | $165M | $162M | $158M | $138M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 25 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying FSM stock.
Fortuna Mining Corp.'s current P/E ratio is 13.0x. The historical average is 40.7x. This places it at the 23th percentile of its historical range.
Fortuna Mining Corp.'s current EV/EBITDA is 5.7x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 11.4x.
Fortuna Mining Corp.'s return on equity (ROE) is 18.9%. The historical average is 1.7%.
Based on historical data, Fortuna Mining Corp. is trading at a P/E of 13.0x. This is at the 23th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Fortuna Mining Corp. has 48.7% gross margin and 38.5% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Fortuna Mining Corp.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 0.5x, indicating low leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Geopolitical and revenue volatility
Margin Expansion Masks Revenue Decline
According to recent financial statements, FSM's gross margin surged to 57.6% in 2026Q2 from 45.6% a year earlier, while operating margin reached 51.3%, indicating strong cost efficiency despite a 9.6% revenue contraction.
The margin expansion is likely driven by the higher-margin Séguéla gold mine, which has structurally improved the cost profile. However, the sustainability of these margins is questionable given the revenue decline, which may reflect lower volumes or prices. Investors should monitor whether the margin gains can offset continued top-line pressure, as operating leverage could amplify downside if volumes fall further.
ROIC Recovery Signals Value Creation
Based on reported figures, FSM's ROIC improved to 8.6% in 2026Q2 from 1.6% in 2024Q2, reflecting a significant recovery in capital efficiency, though it remains below the 15%+ levels of peers like Coeur Mining.
The ROIC improvement is driven by margin expansion and efficient asset utilization, as the Séguéla ramp-up generates higher returns on invested capital. However, the absolute level still lags the best-in-class peers, suggesting room for further improvement. The trend indicates that management's capital allocation decisions, particularly the Roxgold acquisition, are beginning to pay off, but the sustainability depends on maintaining production volumes and cost control.
Working Capital Efficiency Improves
As reported in financial statements, FSM's cash conversion cycle shortened to 54 days in 2026Q2 from 73 days in 2024Q2, driven by a reduction in days sales outstanding to 20 days, indicating improved receivables collection.
The improvement in CCC is a positive sign of operational discipline, with DSO falling from 48 to 20 days over the period. However, days inventory outstanding remains elevated at 88 days, reflecting the lumpy nature of mining inventory. The stable DPO around 53 days suggests FSM is not stretching supplier payments, which is consistent with its conservative balance sheet. This efficiency gain supports cash generation, but the high inventory levels warrant monitoring for potential write-downs.
Minimal Leverage Provides Strategic Flexibility
According to recent SEC filings, FSM's debt-to-equity ratio stands at 0.13, with interest coverage of 26.7x in 2026Q2, indicating a conservative capital structure that insulates the company from rising interest rates.
The low leverage is a key strength, especially in a rising rate environment, as it minimizes interest expense and refinancing risk. The interest coverage ratio has improved significantly from 5.3x in 2024Q2, reflecting both higher operating income and stable debt levels. This financial flexibility allows FSM to pursue growth opportunities or weather operational disruptions without the burden of heavy debt service. However, the company's appetite for frontier market risk suggests that leverage could increase if it pursues acquisitions.
Liquidity Buffer Strengthens to Support Operations
Based on reported figures, FSM's current ratio improved to 3.00 in 2026Q2 from 1.27 in 2024Q1, with cash at $606.7M, representing 24% of total assets, indicating a robust liquidity position.
The strengthening liquidity is a direct result of strong cash generation and minimal debt, providing a cushion against operational disruptions in volatile jurisdictions. The quick ratio of 2.50 suggests that even without inventory, FSM can cover its short-term liabilities comfortably. This liquidity buffer is critical given the geopolitical risks in Burkina Faso and Mexico, as it allows the company to maintain operations during temporary shutdowns or invest in security measures. However, the accumulation of cash may also signal limited reinvestment opportunities, which could weigh on future returns.
Misapplied P/E Overlooks Earnings Volatility
The most commonly misapplied ratio for FSM is the P/E, which at 12.04 TTM appears cheap, but the company's volatile net income, swinging from $123.6M to $37.3M in recent quarters, makes this multiple unreliable.
The P/E is distorted by non-cash items and tax effects, as evidenced by the wide swings in net income despite stable operations. A more appropriate metric is EV/EBITDA, which at 5.29 better captures the underlying cash-generating ability of the business, or P/FCF at 11.15, which reflects actual cash returns. Investors should focus on EV/EBITDA and cash flow multiples to avoid being misled by earnings volatility, especially given the company's transition to gold production and the potential for one-time gains or losses.