Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 22.2x · EV/EBITDA 16.6x · ROE 17.7%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $92.9B | $92.2B | $73.1B | $71.6B | $69.0B | $58.8B | $42.8B | $51.3B | $47.0B | $62.0B | $53.6B |
| Enterprise Value | $100.4B | $99.7B | $82.1B | $80.8B | $79.9B | $70.4B | $54.8B | $63.8B | $58.5B | $63.0B | $55.1B |
| P/E Ratio → | 22.21 | 21.78 | 19.33 | 21.60 | 20.35 | 18.05 | 13.53 | 14.72 | 14.06 | 21.28 | 20.83 |
| P/S Ratio | 1.77 | 1.75 | 1.53 | 1.69 | 1.75 | 1.53 | 1.13 | 1.30 | 1.30 | 2.00 | 1.75 |
| P/B Ratio | 3.67 | 3.60 | 3.31 | 3.36 | 3.72 | 3.33 | 2.74 | 3.78 | 4.01 | 5.42 | 4.88 |
| P/FCF | 23.47 | 23.29 | 22.88 | 18.81 | 19.92 | 17.37 | 14.82 | 25.72 | 19.14 | 17.96 | 29.68 |
| P/OCF | 18.15 | 18.01 | 17.78 | 15.20 | 15.07 | 13.77 | 11.11 | 17.21 | 14.94 | 15.98 | 24.38 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.90 | 1.72 | 1.91 | 2.03 | 1.83 | 1.44 | 1.62 | 1.62 | 2.03 | 1.80 |
| EV / EBITDA | 16.63 | 16.51 | 14.45 | 15.81 | 15.68 | 13.93 | 10.93 | 11.82 | 11.34 | 13.46 | 13.14 |
| EV / EBIT | 18.74 | 18.40 | 16.64 | 18.43 | 18.05 | 16.35 | 12.95 | 13.65 | 13.12 | 15.01 | 14.69 |
| EV / FCF | — | 25.17 | 25.69 | 21.22 | 23.06 | 20.79 | 18.94 | 32.01 | 23.80 | 18.25 | 30.54 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 15.1% | 15.1% | 15.4% | 15.8% | 16.8% | 16.7% | 16.7% | 17.8% | 18.4% | 20.2% | 18.5% |
| Operating Margin | 10.2% | 10.2% | 10.1% | 10.0% | 10.7% | 10.8% | 10.9% | 11.6% | 12.1% | 13.7% | 12.3% |
| Net Profit Margin | 8.0% | 8.0% | 7.9% | 7.8% | 8.6% | 8.5% | 8.4% | 8.9% | 9.2% | 9.4% | 8.4% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 17.7% | 17.7% | 17.4% | 16.6% | 18.7% | 19.6% | 21.7% | 27.5% | 28.9% | 26.0% | 23.7% |
| ROA | 7.4% | 7.4% | 6.8% | 6.2% | 6.7% | 6.4% | 6.3% | 7.4% | 8.3% | 8.6% | 7.9% |
| ROIC | 12.5% | 12.5% | 11.7% | 10.6% | 10.8% | 11.0% | 11.5% | 13.9% | 18.5% | 25.5% | 23.5% |
| ROCE | 13.6% | 13.6% | 12.5% | 11.4% | 11.6% | 11.7% | 12.3% | 14.6% | 16.7% | 20.2% | 18.9% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.38 | 0.38 | 0.48 | 0.52 | 0.65 | 0.75 | 0.94 | 0.99 | 1.06 | 0.35 | 0.35 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 1.62 | 1.62 | 1.88 | 2.17 | 2.38 | 2.61 | 2.94 | 2.49 | 2.41 | 0.85 | 0.93 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.29 | 0.41 | 0.43 | 0.59 | 0.66 | 0.76 | 0.92 | 0.98 | 0.09 | 0.14 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.24 | 1.24 | 1.58 | 1.80 | 2.13 | 2.29 | 2.38 | 2.32 | 2.22 | 0.21 | 0.37 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 1.88 | 2.81 | 2.41 | 3.14 | 3.42 | 4.12 | 6.28 | 4.66 | 0.29 | 0.86 |
| Interest Coverage | 17.25 | 17.25 | 12.55 | 10.98 | 11.32 | 9.99 | 8.64 | 9.90 | 11.92 | 35.85 | 37.93 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.44 | 1.44 | 1.37 | 1.44 | 1.37 | 1.43 | 1.35 | 1.21 | 1.23 | 1.40 | 1.20 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.89 | 0.89 | 0.82 | 0.92 | 0.96 | 1.05 | 0.99 | 0.83 | 0.83 | 0.99 | 0.52 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.14 | 0.14 | 0.10 | 0.12 | 0.08 | 0.11 | 0.18 | 0.05 | 0.07 | 0.23 | 0.18 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.92 | 0.85 | 0.77 | 0.76 | 0.77 | 0.74 | 0.81 | 0.80 | 0.89 | 0.93 |
| Inventory Turnover | 4.83 | 4.83 | 4.15 | 4.15 | 5.19 | 6.00 | 5.50 | 5.13 | 4.94 | 4.66 | 2.83 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 74.92 | 85.86 | 94.99 | 109.32 | 109.48 | 107.65 | 105.75 | 104.23 | 104.37 | 90.90 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 1.7% | 1.7% | 2.1% | 2.0% | 2.0% | 2.2% | 2.9% | 2.2% | 2.3% | 1.6% | 1.7% |
| Payout Ratio | 37.8% | 37.8% | 40.4% | 43.1% | 40.4% | 40.4% | 39.2% | 33.1% | 32.1% | 33.9% | 35.4% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 4.5% | 4.6% | 5.2% | 4.6% | 4.9% | 5.5% | 7.4% | 6.8% | 7.1% | 4.7% | 4.8% |
| FCF Yield | 4.3% | 4.3% | 4.4% | 5.3% | 5.0% | 5.8% | 6.7% | 3.9% | 5.2% | 5.6% | 3.4% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.7% | 0.7% | 2.1% | 0.6% | 1.8% | 3.1% | 1.4% | 0.5% | 3.8% | 2.5% | 3.7% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 2.4% | 2.4% | 4.1% | 2.6% | 3.8% | 5.3% | 4.3% | 2.7% | 6.0% | 4.1% | 5.4% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $274M | $277M | $276M | $278M | $282M | $288M | $291M | $299M | $305M | $310M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying GD stock.
General Dynamics Corporation's current P/E ratio is 22.2x. The historical average is 16.4x. This places it at the 100th percentile of its historical range.
General Dynamics Corporation's current EV/EBITDA is 16.6x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 10.9x.
General Dynamics Corporation's return on equity (ROE) is 17.7%. The historical average is 21.1%.
Based on historical data, General Dynamics Corporation is trading at a P/E of 22.2x. This is at the 100th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
General Dynamics Corporation's current dividend yield is 1.69% with a payout ratio of 37.8%.
General Dynamics Corporation has 15.1% gross margin and 10.2% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
General Dynamics Corporation's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 1.6x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Margin compression from mix
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margins Stable Amid Growth
GD's gross margin held at 15.5% in 2026Q2, consistent with the 15-16% range over two years, per financial statements, indicating a stable cost structure despite revenue mix shifts.
Operating margin has remained tightly range-bound between 9.7% and 10.7% over the past ten quarters, suggesting that revenue growth has not translated into margin expansion. This stability may reflect a fixed-price contract environment where cost efficiencies are offset by program mix. Investors should monitor whether the recent operating income growth of 15.4% year-over-year, as reported in the income statement, can be sustained without margin deterioration.
ROIC Improving from Low Base
ROIC rose to 3.5% in 2026Q2 from 2.5% in 2024Q1, as per reported figures, indicating a gradual improvement in capital efficiency, though still modest relative to peers.
The improvement in ROIC is driven by both higher operating income and a reduction in invested capital, as debt has declined. However, the absolute level remains low compared to peers like Lockheed Martin (23.9%) and Northrop Grumman (10.2%), suggesting that GD's asset base, heavily weighted toward intangibles, may not be generating commensurate returns. The trend is positive but warrants monitoring to see if it can close the gap.
Working Capital Drag Persists
Cash conversion cycle extended to 122 days in 2026Q2, down from 156 days in 2024Q1, per quarterly data, but still elevated due to high DSO and DIO relative to DPO.
DSO has improved from 96 days to 74 days, and DIO from 91 to 70 days, indicating better receivables and inventory management. However, DPO remains low at 22 days, suggesting limited supplier leverage. The net effect is a CCC that, while improved, still ties up significant cash, explaining the working capital swings seen in cash flow. Further DPO extension could enhance free cash flow.
Deleveraging Improves Coverage
Debt-to-EBITDA fell to 5.61 in 2026Q2 from 8.87 in 2024Q1, while interest coverage rose to 29.7x, as per financial statements, indicating a strengthening balance sheet.
The reduction in debt from $11.1B to $9.5B, combined with growing EBITDA, has significantly improved leverage metrics. Interest coverage of nearly 30x suggests debt service is highly comfortable, and the trend of declining D/E from 0.52 to 0.35 indicates a deliberate deleveraging path. This provides financial flexibility for capital deployment or acquisitions.
Liquidity Buffer Strengthens
Current ratio improved to 1.44 in 2026Q2 from 1.33 in 2024Q2, with cash rising to $4.3B, per balance sheet data, indicating a stronger short-term liquidity position.
The quick ratio of 0.96 remains below 1, reflecting inventory dependence, but the overall liquidity trend is positive. Cash accumulation and improved current ratio suggest GD can weather short-term disruptions. However, the reliance on inventory and receivables means that a sudden contract cancellation could strain liquidity, though the current cash buffer mitigates this risk.
P/E Misleads on Defense Cycle
GD's P/E of 25.36 appears reasonable, but given the cyclicality of defense spending, a normalized earnings measure or EV/EBITDA may better reflect value, as per reported multiples.
The P/E ratio is often misapplied to defense contractors because earnings can be volatile due to contract timing and one-time charges. GD's EV/EBITDA of 18.81 is more comparable to peers and accounts for debt and cash. Additionally, the PEG of 3.60 suggests the market is pricing in limited growth, but given the accelerating revenue trend, a forward P/E of 23.17 may be more indicative. Investors should focus on EV/EBITDA and free cash flow yield to assess valuation.