Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -0.9x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -416.5%. (2023–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $566M | $1.2B | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $975M | $1.6B | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -0.94 | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 7.47 | 15.33 | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 1.01 | 2.15 | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 20.72 | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 111.7% | 111.7% | 8.2% | -43.4% |
| Operating Margin | -691.2% | -691.2% | -116.6% | -317.5% |
| Net Profit Margin | -768.5% | -768.5% | -111.5% | -325.7% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -416.5% | -416.5% | — | — |
| ROA | -34.3% | -34.3% | -11.3% | -26.4% |
| ROIC | -36.9% | -36.9% | -16.0% | -37.5% |
| ROCE | -130.0% | -130.0% | -113.1% | -649.1% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 1.22 | 1.22 | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.76 | — | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -7.37 | -7.37 | — | — |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.29 | 1.29 | 1.03 | 0.84 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.29 | 1.29 | 1.03 | 0.84 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.03 | 0.05 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.04 | 0.09 | 0.08 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $117M | $161M | $158M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 3 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying GEMI stock.
Gemini Space Station, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -0.9x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Gemini Space Station, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -416.5%. The historical average is -416.5%.
Based on historical data, Gemini Space Station, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -0.9x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Gemini Space Station, Inc. has 111.7% gross margin and -691.2% operating margin.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Chronic losses eroding capital base
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
P/B Premium Defies Negative Equity History
Gemini trades at a P/B of 1.05, a significant premium to its own history of negative book value, suggesting the market is pricing a recovery that is not yet supported by consistent profitability or a stable equity base.
The current P/B of 1.05 is a dramatic reversal from the deeply negative multiples seen in 2024 and early 2025, indicating the market is valuing the recently restored tangible book value of $2.80 per share. However, with ROE persistently negative and the equity base rebuilt from a deficit, this premium appears to be speculative rather than grounded in a demonstrated ability to generate returns on that capital.
Negative ROE Reflects Structural Profitability Deficit
Return on equity has been deeply negative for the past four quarters, with the most recent reading of -23.3% in 2026Q2, indicating the bank is destroying shareholder value rather than generating returns on its restored capital base.
The DuPont decomposition reveals a fundamental breakdown: negative ROA is the primary driver, as the bank's asset base is generating losses. The equity-to-assets ratio of 0.31 provides leverage, but it only magnifies the negative returns. The 100% fee income contribution in 2026Q2, while high, is insufficient to offset the core operating losses, suggesting the revenue model is not yet viable.
NIM Volatility and Catastrophic Efficiency Ratio
The net interest margin has been erratic, swinging from -1.0% to 2.8% in recent quarters, while the efficiency ratio has been catastrophically high, exceeding 100% for most periods, indicating operating costs vastly exceed revenue generation.
The NIM's instability, including a negative reading in 2025Q3, points to a core lending or funding franchise that is not yet stable or is being managed for liquidity rather than profitability. The efficiency ratio, which was 161.7% in 2025Q2 and 2025Q1, shows that for every dollar of revenue, the bank was spending over $1.60, a level that is unsustainable and indicative of severe operational diseconomies or high fixed costs relative to a shrinking asset base.
Thin Equity Buffer After Recapitalization
The equity-to-assets ratio has been rebuilt to 0.31 from a negative position, providing a regulatory buffer, but this thin cushion is being eroded by ongoing negative ROE, limiting capacity for capital return or growth.
While the restoration of positive equity is a critical step, the 31% equity-to-assets ratio is modest and provides limited room to absorb further losses. The bank's ability to grow or return capital is constrained by the need to preserve this buffer, especially given the history of severe capital erosion. The lack of reported CET1 or Tier 1 ratios prevents a precise regulatory assessment, but the fundamental equity position is the binding constraint.
P/B Ratio Misleads on Recovery Sustainability
The P/B ratio of 1.05 is the most commonly misapplied metric, as it implies the market values the bank at a premium to its tangible book value, obscuring the fact that the equity base was recently rebuilt from a deep deficit and is not yet generating positive returns.
Investors may focus on the P/B as a sign of recovery, but this metric is misleading without context. The tangible book value per share of $2.80 is a recent restoration, and the bank's negative ROE means it is actively eroding that value. A more appropriate metric would be the price-to-tangible-book-value relative to the bank's sustainable ROTCE, which is currently negative, indicating the premium is not justified by fundamentals.