Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 13.1x · EV/EBITDA 6.9x · ROE 16.8%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $14.6B | $20.1B | $26.6B | $23.4B | $18.3B | $21.5B | $18.0B | $22.0B | $18.6B | $15.7B | $14.9B |
| Enterprise Value | $17.1B | $23.7B | $28.5B | $25.6B | $21.3B | $23.9B | $20.1B | $24.1B | $20.2B | $17.4B | $16.2B |
| P/E Ratio → | 13.08 | 12.13 | 15.73 | 14.36 | 12.46 | 15.67 | 16.14 | 17.39 | 16.32 | 15.21 | 13.93 |
| P/S Ratio | 1.29 | 1.26 | 1.81 | 1.64 | 1.43 | 1.77 | 1.48 | 1.81 | 1.61 | 1.46 | 1.40 |
| P/B Ratio | 2.11 | 1.95 | 2.82 | 2.82 | 2.51 | 3.07 | 3.32 | 3.19 | 2.79 | 2.54 | 2.30 |
| P/FCF | 10.46 | 10.23 | 13.72 | 12.97 | 11.63 | 11.41 | 10.63 | 16.10 | 14.84 | 13.80 | 13.97 |
| P/OCF | 9.20 | 9.00 | 12.08 | 11.08 | 9.80 | 10.14 | 9.30 | 13.45 | 12.47 | 11.58 | 11.18 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.49 | 1.94 | 1.79 | 1.67 | 1.97 | 1.65 | 1.99 | 1.75 | 1.62 | 1.52 |
| EV / EBITDA | 6.92 | 6.79 | 9.95 | 9.26 | 8.45 | 9.69 | 9.17 | 10.91 | 9.66 | 9.04 | 8.34 |
| EV / EBIT | 7.37 | 10.27 | 11.99 | 11.19 | 10.43 | 12.33 | 12.35 | 13.72 | 12.93 | 11.79 | 10.63 |
| EV / FCF | — | 12.07 | 14.67 | 14.17 | 13.55 | 12.73 | 11.85 | 17.65 | 16.13 | 15.29 | 15.20 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 20.7% | 20.7% | 16.5% | 16.2% | 16.2% | 20.6% | 20.4% | 15.0% | 14.8% | 14.5% | 14.5% |
| Operating Margin | 20.6% | 20.6% | 16.5% | 16.2% | 16.2% | 16.1% | — | 15.0% | 14.8% | 14.5% | 14.5% |
| Net Profit Margin | 10.4% | 10.4% | 11.5% | 11.4% | 11.4% | 11.3% | 9.2% | 10.4% | 9.9% | 9.5% | 10.0% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 16.8% | 16.8% | 19.1% | 20.9% | 20.4% | 22.0% | 18.1% | 18.6% | 17.8% | 16.3% | 17.0% |
| ROA | 9.2% | 9.2% | 10.4% | 10.5% | 9.6% | 10.3% | 9.2% | 10.3% | 9.8% | 8.9% | 9.1% |
| ROIC | 19.5% | 19.5% | 16.7% | 16.7% | 15.7% | 17.3% | — | 15.8% | 15.8% | 15.0% | 14.8% |
| ROCE | 23.8% | 23.8% | 19.9% | 20.4% | 18.1% | 19.5% | — | 19.6% | 19.5% | 17.8% | 17.6% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.43 | 0.43 | 0.35 | 0.45 | 0.55 | 0.60 | 0.61 | 0.34 | 0.27 | 0.30 | 0.30 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 1.28 | 1.28 | 1.16 | 1.35 | 1.58 | 1.69 | 1.52 | 1.06 | 0.86 | 0.97 | 0.98 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.35 | 0.20 | 0.26 | 0.41 | 0.35 | 0.38 | 0.31 | 0.24 | 0.27 | 0.20 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.03 | 1.03 | 0.65 | 0.79 | 1.19 | 1.00 | 0.94 | 0.96 | 0.77 | 0.88 | 0.68 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 1.84 | 0.95 | 1.20 | 1.92 | 1.32 | 1.22 | 1.55 | 1.29 | 1.49 | 1.23 |
| Interest Coverage | 19.40 | 19.40 | 26.10 | 25.71 | 22.02 | 18.08 | 13.87 | 22.39 | 21.97 | 21.87 | 20.69 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.99 | 0.99 | 1.36 | 1.06 | 1.19 | 1.25 | 1.35 | 1.13 | 1.00 | 1.06 | 1.15 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.99 | 0.99 | 1.02 | 1.06 | 0.87 | 0.98 | 1.35 | 0.75 | 0.69 | 0.72 | 0.82 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.17 | 0.17 | 0.41 | 0.34 | 0.27 | 0.45 | 0.47 | 0.09 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.21 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.82 | 0.88 | 0.90 | 0.84 | 0.81 | 1.04 | 0.96 | 0.97 | 0.95 | 0.91 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | 10.15 | — | 8.96 | 9.21 | — | 9.40 | 10.42 | 10.00 | 9.76 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 69.15 | 35.36 | 36.54 | 39.20 | 37.21 | 52.20 | 41.16 | 47.01 | 43.72 | 37.93 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.6% | 0.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | 8.1% | 8.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 7.6% | 8.2% | 6.4% | 7.0% | 8.0% | 6.4% | 6.2% | 5.7% | 6.1% | 6.6% | 7.2% |
| FCF Yield | 9.6% | 9.8% | 7.3% | 7.7% | 8.6% | 8.8% | 9.4% | 6.2% | 6.7% | 7.2% | 7.2% |
| Buyback Yield | 6.3% | 6.4% | 3.8% | 3.7% | 5.4% | 7.2% | 6.2% | 5.3% | 4.4% | 7.9% | 3.7% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 6.9% | 7.1% | 3.8% | 3.7% | 5.4% | 7.2% | 6.2% | 5.3% | 4.4% | 7.9% | 3.7% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $225M | $232M | $238M | $243M | $253M | $266M | $278M | $289M | $303M | $313M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying GIB stock.
CGI Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 13.1x. The historical average is 17.8x. This places it at the 33th percentile of its historical range.
CGI Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 6.9x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 8.2x.
CGI Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 16.8%. The historical average is 14.3%.
Based on historical data, CGI Inc. is trading at a P/E of 13.1x. This is at the 33th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
CGI Inc.'s current dividend yield is 0.62% with a payout ratio of 8.1%.
CGI Inc. has 20.7% gross margin and 20.6% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
CGI Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 1.3x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Liquidity compression and goodwill concentration
Valuation Discount to IT Services Peers
CGI trades at a significant discount to peers with a forward P/E of 8.00 and EV/EBITDA of 5.85, suggesting the market is pricing in its lower-margin profile and acquisition-driven growth model.
The forward P/E of 8.00 is well below the peer median of approximately 14.0, indicating the market assigns a lower earnings multiple to CGI's business model. This discount appears justified given CGI's ~16% gross margin versus the 30%+ margins of peers like Accenture and Infosys, which command higher multiples. The PEG ratio of 1.18 suggests the stock is fairly priced relative to its growth, but the valuation gap highlights structural differences in profitability and capital efficiency.
Stable Margins Mask Structural Disadvantage
CGI's operating margin has remained stable near 16.3% for ten quarters, but this level is structurally lower than the 20-30% margins of its primary IT services peers, indicating a different cost structure or business mix.
The consistency of the operating margin, which tracks within 10 basis points of the gross margin, suggests minimal operating leverage and a cost structure where overheads scale directly with revenue. This stability is a double-edged sword: it provides predictability but also implies limited ability to expand profitability through operational efficiency. The net margin, averaging around 11%, is further compressed by non-operating items, making the gross margin the most reliable indicator of core earning power.
Declining Returns on Invested Capital
Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) has trended downward from 4.5% in Q2 2024 to 3.7% in Q3 2026, suggesting the company's acquisition-driven asset growth is not generating commensurate returns.
The decline in ROIC from 4.5% to 3.7% over ten quarters, while ROE has also fallen from 4.9% to 4.6%, indicates that the significant increase in assets—primarily goodwill—is diluting returns. This trend suggests that recent acquisitions may not be meeting the company's cost of capital, a critical concern given that goodwill now constitutes over 60% of total assets. The low ROIC relative to peers like Accenture (26.8%) and Infosys (34.4%) underscores a fundamental difference in capital efficiency.
Leverage Rising Amid Liquidity Tightening
The debt-to-equity ratio has increased from 0.34 to 0.43 over the past ten quarters, while the current ratio has fallen below 1.0 to 0.93, indicating a shift towards a more leveraged and less liquid balance sheet.
The increase in leverage, with total debt rising from $3.0B to $4.3B, has been accompanied by a decline in cash reserves, suggesting debt is being used to fund operations or shareholder returns rather than build a cash buffer. The interest coverage ratio, while still healthy at 19.77x, has declined from a peak of 32.24x, indicating that debt service is becoming slightly less comfortable. This trend warrants monitoring, especially as the current ratio has fallen below 1.0, which may signal tightening short-term liquidity.
Working Capital Volatility Impacts Cash Flow
The cash conversion cycle has been volatile, ranging from 35 to 60 days over the past ten quarters, driven primarily by swings in days sales outstanding (DSO) and days inventory outstanding (DIO).
The volatility in the cash conversion cycle, particularly the sharp increase to 60 days in Q3 2026 from 42 days in Q3 2025, suggests inconsistent working capital management. The DSO has fluctuated significantly, from 33 to 65 days, indicating variability in customer payment patterns or collection efficiency. This volatility directly impacts free cash flow generation, as seen in the wide range of FCF margins from 9.1% to 19.8%, and introduces uncertainty into the company's cash flow profile.
The Misleading Stability of Gross Margin
The most commonly misapplied ratio for CGI is its stable gross margin, which obscures the structural disadvantage of operating in a lower-margin segment of the IT services industry compared to peers.
Investors often focus on the stability of CGI's ~16% gross margin as a sign of operational consistency. However, this metric is misleading because it is significantly below the 30%+ margins of its primary competitors, indicating a fundamentally different business model—likely with a higher mix of lower-margin, labor-intensive projects. A more appropriate metric for comparison would be the operating margin relative to peers, which highlights the structural profitability gap. This gap suggests that CGI's growth may be volume-driven rather than value-driven, a critical distinction for long-term valuation.