Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -54.0x · EV/EBITDA 154.2x · ROE 40.7%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $207.2B | $154.0B | $115.9B | $101.9B | $108.3B | $91.6B | $73.6B | $83.0B | $81.8B | $94.5B | $97.2B |
| Enterprise Value | $224.6B | $171.4B | $132.6B | $120.8B | $128.2B | $113.0B | $99.0B | $95.9B | $91.2B | $120.4B | $115.4B |
| P/E Ratio → | -54.05 | 18.10 | 243.08 | 18.00 | 23.59 | 14.73 | 598.15 | 15.40 | 15.00 | 20.41 | 7.20 |
| P/S Ratio | 6.69 | 5.23 | 4.03 | 3.76 | 3.97 | 3.36 | 2.98 | 3.70 | 3.70 | 3.62 | 3.20 |
| P/B Ratio | 9.26 | 6.81 | 6.02 | 4.48 | 5.11 | 4.35 | 4.04 | 3.66 | 3.80 | 4.61 | 5.02 |
| P/FCF | 14.76 | 16.29 | 11.25 | 13.73 | 12.98 | 8.48 | 9.79 | 9.97 | 10.94 | 8.36 | 5.97 |
| P/OCF | 20.68 | 15.37 | 10.71 | 12.73 | 11.94 | 8.05 | 9.01 | 9.07 | 9.74 | 7.94 | 5.70 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 5.82 | 4.61 | 4.46 | 4.70 | 4.14 | 4.01 | 4.27 | 4.12 | 4.61 | 3.80 |
| EV / EBITDA | 154.24 | 11.85 | 29.95 | 11.73 | 13.59 | 9.44 | 17.83 | 16.86 | 9.47 | 7.82 | 6.14 |
| EV / EBIT | 19.19 | 15.84 | 79.57 | 15.48 | 18.99 | 12.18 | 37.31 | 15.59 | 10.27 | 8.22 | 6.39 |
| EV / FCF | — | 18.13 | 12.87 | 16.28 | 15.36 | 10.46 | 13.17 | 11.53 | 12.20 | 10.65 | 7.08 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 78.8% | 78.8% | 78.3% | 76.0% | 79.3% | 75.8% | 81.5% | 79.2% | 78.1% | 83.3% | 86.0% |
| Operating Margin | 39.7% | 39.7% | 5.8% | 28.0% | 26.9% | 36.3% | 16.5% | 19.1% | 37.1% | 54.1% | 58.0% |
| Net Profit Margin | 28.9% | 28.9% | 1.7% | 20.9% | 16.8% | 22.8% | 0.5% | 24.0% | 24.7% | 17.7% | 44.4% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 40.7% | 40.7% | 2.3% | 25.8% | 21.7% | 31.7% | 0.6% | 24.4% | 26.0% | 23.2% | 70.2% |
| ROA | 14.4% | 14.4% | 0.8% | 9.0% | 7.0% | 9.1% | 0.2% | 8.6% | 8.1% | 7.3% | 24.8% |
| ROIC | 23.1% | 23.1% | 3.2% | 13.8% | 13.2% | 17.3% | 7.7% | 9.7% | 15.9% | 25.2% | 40.2% |
| ROCE | 24.8% | 24.8% | 3.4% | 14.8% | 13.5% | 17.5% | 7.5% | 8.2% | 14.7% | 26.5% | 39.4% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 1.10 | 1.10 | 1.39 | 1.10 | 1.19 | 1.27 | 1.72 | 1.09 | 1.27 | 1.64 | 1.36 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 1.72 | 1.72 | 6.03 | 2.43 | 2.67 | 2.23 | 5.66 | 4.32 | 2.84 | 2.18 | 1.40 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.77 | 0.87 | 0.83 | 0.93 | 1.01 | 1.39 | 0.57 | 0.44 | 1.27 | 0.94 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.20 | 1.20 | 3.78 | 1.84 | 2.10 | 1.78 | 4.58 | 2.28 | 0.97 | 1.68 | 0.96 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 1.84 | 1.62 | 2.55 | 2.38 | 1.98 | 3.38 | 1.56 | 1.25 | 2.30 | 1.11 |
| Interest Coverage | 10.57 | 10.57 | 1.71 | 8.27 | 7.22 | 9.27 | 2.70 | 6.19 | 8.24 | 13.10 | 18.74 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.55 | 1.55 | 1.60 | 1.43 | 1.29 | 1.27 | 1.40 | 3.10 | 3.38 | 2.74 | 2.12 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.40 | 1.40 | 1.45 | 1.27 | 1.15 | 1.13 | 1.26 | 3.01 | 3.30 | 2.67 | 1.95 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.81 | 0.81 | 0.96 | 0.64 | 0.57 | 0.56 | 0.65 | 2.50 | 2.84 | 2.19 | 1.29 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.50 | 0.49 | 0.44 | 0.43 | 0.40 | 0.36 | 0.36 | 0.35 | 0.37 | 0.53 |
| Inventory Turnover | 3.51 | 3.51 | 3.66 | 3.64 | 3.75 | 4.08 | 2.72 | 5.07 | 5.96 | 5.46 | 2.68 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 60.91 | 56.11 | 62.73 | 63.91 | 60.06 | 72.32 | 58.24 | 54.88 | 53.84 | 54.22 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 1.9% | 2.6% | 3.4% | 3.7% | 3.4% | 3.9% | 4.7% | 3.9% | 3.6% | 2.9% | 2.5% |
| Payout Ratio | 47.0% | 47.0% | 816.3% | 67.2% | 80.8% | 57.9% | 2804.1% | 59.8% | 54.5% | 59.0% | 18.2% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | 5.5% | 0.4% | 5.6% | 4.2% | 6.8% | 0.2% | 6.5% | 6.7% | 4.9% | 13.9% |
| FCF Yield | 6.8% | 6.1% | 8.9% | 7.3% | 7.7% | 11.8% | 10.2% | 10.0% | 9.1% | 12.0% | 16.8% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.9% | 1.2% | 1.0% | 1.0% | 1.3% | 0.6% | 2.2% | 2.1% | 3.5% | 1.0% | 11.3% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 2.8% | 3.8% | 4.4% | 4.7% | 4.7% | 4.5% | 6.8% | 6.0% | 7.2% | 3.9% | 13.8% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $1.3B | $1.3B | $1.3B | $1.3B | $1.3B | $1.3B | $1.3B | $1.3B | $1.3B | $1.4B |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
Bull/bear thesis, analyst target revisions, and earnings execution.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying GILD stock.
Gilead Sciences, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -54.0x. The historical average is 28.4x.
Gilead Sciences, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 154.2x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 17.1x.
Gilead Sciences, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 40.7%. This is above the typical threshold of 15-20% considered good for most companies. The historical average is 23.7%.
Based on historical data, Gilead Sciences, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -54.0x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Gilead Sciences, Inc.'s current dividend yield is 1.91% with a payout ratio of 47.0%.
Gilead Sciences, Inc. has 78.8% gross margin and 39.7% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Gilead Sciences, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 1.7x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Q2 2026 impairment distortion and HIV concentration
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Modest P/E Masks Forward Multiple Uncertainty
Based on reported figures, GILD trades at a trailing P/E of 24.72 and a PEG of 0.18, a combination that suggests the market prices in limited growth, though the absent forward P/E leaves forward valuation difficult to assess directly.
The trailing P/E of 24.72 sits below the 32 to 35 range seen at AMGN and VRTX and well below ABBV's 121.62, which is distorted by depressed earnings. The PEG of 0.18 appears to imply that growth expectations are heavily discounted relative to the multiple, which may indicate investor skepticism about HIV durability rather than a clear mispricing. The forward EV/EBITDA of 81.12 against a trailing 15.59 likely reflects the Q2 2026 impairment depressing forward earnings estimates, so investors should monitor whether that distortion reverses.
Operating Margin Rebuilds After Impairment Shock
According to recent SEC filings, GILD's operating margin fell to negative 133.2% in Q2 2026 before recovering to 41.7% in Q3 2026, with gross margin steady near 79 to 81 percent throughout the ten-quarter window.
The stable gross margin of roughly 79 to 81 percent, sitting above the sector's typical range, suggests that cost of goods is not the source of earnings volatility. The swings in operating and net margin appear driven by non-recurring acquired in-process R&D charges rather than erosion in the core HIV business. Operating margin in Q3 2026 at 41.7% exceeds the 2024 to 2025 quarters averaging near 30 to 35 percent, which may indicate underlying earning power has improved, though one strong quarter warrants confirmation.
ROIC Recovery Lags Equity Base Contraction
Based on reported figures, GILD's ROIC of 7.7 percent in Q3 2026 remains well below the 23.9 percent reported by ABBV and 23.0 percent at VRTX, suggesting the company's acquisition-heavy capital base dilutes returns despite strong margins.
The ROIC trajectory from roughly 5 percent in 2025 to 7.7 percent in Q3 2026 indicates modest improvement, but the figure remains structurally low relative to margin levels. The gap between high gross margins and low ROIC appears attributable to large goodwill and intangible balances from past acquisitions, which inflate invested capital. Investors should monitor whether returns on the Immunomedics and Kite assets converge toward peer levels over time.
Debt Ratios Rise as Equity Contracts
As reported in financial statements, GILD's debt-to-equity ratio climbed from 0.95 in Q1 2026 to 2.02 in Q3 2026 while total debt held near $26.2 billion, indicating the increase stems from equity erosion rather than new borrowing.
Interest coverage of 12.39 in Q3 2026 appears comfortable on a stable earnings basis, and debt-to-EBITDA near 6.2 times is high but consistent with the prior year. The leverage increase appears driven by the impairment reducing book equity, which may overstate financial strain relative to cash generation. Refinancing and covenant exposure should be monitored, as the debt load is substantial relative to the reduced equity base.
Headline Ratios Understate Cash Generation
Based on reported figures, the Q2 2026 ROE of negative 59.7 percent and operating margin of negative 133.2 percent are largely non-cash distortions, since FCF margin remained at 47.3 percent in the same quarter.
Ratios such as ROE, ROIC, and net margin are sensitive to acquired in-process R&D charges and shrinking book equity, which can make the company look weaker than its cash generation implies. Using free cash flow margin or EBITDA-based leverage as the primary lens may better reflect underlying earning power. Investors should still monitor whether the impairment reflects a genuine decline in pipeline value rather than a one-time accounting event.